Skip to main content

Full text of "The ethics of medical homicide and mutilation"

See other formats









tl obstat 


Censor Librorum 



Archbishop of New York 

Copyright, 1919, by 

All Rights Reserved by 
The Devin-Adair Company 

Third Printing 






There is a Supreme Being who alone is master of life. The 
Natural Law. The nature and determinants of morality. 
Probabilism. Permissive suicide. Suicide is illicit. Con 
science. Homicide, direct and indirect. Self-defence. 
Formal and material aggressors. Legalized homicide. 
Bibliography 1-22 



Mutilation. Canonical irregularity. Self -mutilation. The dou 
ble effect in morality. Direct and indirect mutilation. 
The State and mutilation. The dominion of the State 23-32 



Ancient and modem opinions. The fetus is animated at the 
moment of conception. The single cell as the primal 
life-organ. Cell growth and division. Germ cells. The 
development of the embryo. Fetal viability. Theories 
of development. The Aristotelian and Thomistic opin 
ions. The formal principle. A soul exists. The pri 
mordial cell is a sufficient organ for the soul. Metabo 
lism in the cell. Cell motion. Animal heat and energy. 
Life in separated tissues. The soul in monsters . . 33-82 



The heart and life. Resuscitation after apparent death. The 
last sacraments in apparent death. Suspended anima 
tion. The living fetus in the womb of a dying or dead 
mother. Methods of resuscitation. Signs of death . 83-91 




Abortion and miscarriage. Causes of abortion, fetal, maternal 
and paternal. Surgical operations and abortion. The 
debitum in pregnancy. Premature labor. Threatened, 
inevitable, and incomplete abortions. Treatment. The 
use of the tampon. Precautions against abortion. Ther 
apeutic abortion. Methods of inducing abortion. Arti 
ficial abortion of an inviable fetus is never licit . De 
crees of the church concerning abortion. The civil law 
on abortion . 92-123 



Ectopic gestation or extrauterine pregnancy. Anatomy of the 
uterus and its adnexa. Place of fecundation. The ab 
normal uterus. Tubal rupture and tubal abortion. Diag 
nosis. Decrees of the church on ectopic gestation. Re 
moval of an inviable ectopic fetus except in present 
peril of life is illicit 124-132 



Indications for cesarean delivery. Abnormal pelves. Sym- 
physeotomy. Varieties of cesarean delivery. Morality. 
Amputation of the uterus after cesareau delivery. Pre 
cautionary sterilization of a cesarean case is illicit .133-142 



Nature and effects of placenta praevia. Treatment. Morality 
and methods of treatment. Abruptio placentae. Moral 
ity of fetal removal 143-146 



Tumors blocking parturition. Fibroids or myomata. Ovarian 

tumors. Cancer. Effects and morality of operation .147-152 





Occurrence. Time of operation. Diagnosis . . 9 JL53-154 



Causes. Varieties. Prognosis. Precautionary sterilization of 

puerperal psychopaths is illicit 155-157 



Frequency. Effects. Abortion as a treatment. Varieties of 

nephritis. Pyelitis. Catalepsy .... .158-161 



Definition. Symptoms. Prognosis. Causes. Precautions 
against eclampsia. Forced delivery. The expectant 
treatment. Relative mortality and morality of the 
methods. Cesarean delivery as a treatment. The ex 
pectant treatment is apparently the best . . .162-169 



Factors in abnormal gestation. The use of pituitrin. Weak 
pains and the diseased heart. The diseased heart in 
actual parturition. Operative risk in cardiopaths. Heart 
block and mitral regurgitation in labor. Prognosis .170-176 



Pernicious vomiting. Occurrence. Symptoms. Stages. Effects. 
Causes. Therapeutic abortion in pernicious vomiting. 
Treatment .177-181 





Varieties of chorea. Differentiation. Prognosis. Hysteria. 
Causes. Epidemics of hysteria. Symptoms. Progno 
sis 182-186 



Icterus gravis. Causes. Symptoms. Prognosis . . .187-188 


Effects on mother and fetus. Abortions in infectious diseases. 
Placental permeability. Typhoid. Smallpox. Pneu 
monia. Influenza. Scarlatina. Measles. Cholera. Tu 
berculosis. Artificial abortion in tuberculosis . .189-200 



Prognosis. Abortion. Infection of mother and fetus. Colles 
Law. Erroneous notions on the curability of syphilis. 
Once a syphilitic probably always a syphilitic. The pro 
fessional secret in syphilis. Nature of secrets. The 
physician may warn an innocent person . . .201-211 



The cause of gonorrhoea. Tests of cure. Effects on a woman. 
Chronicity. Prevalence. Surgical treatment in women. 
Morality of the surgical treatment. Conservative sur 
gery. Salpingotomy. Ovariotomy. Evil effects of 
ovariotomy. Internal secretion of the ovary. Results of 
various operations. Pregnancy after operation. Mor 
ality of infection. General effects of gonorrhoea. Oph 
thalmia neonatorum and gonorrhoea . . . .212-229 





Fatality of diabetes in pregnancy. Diagnosis. Sterility of dia 
betics. Prognosis. Heredity in diabetes. Therapeutic 
abortion in diabetes . . . .230-231 



Twilight sleep to avert pain in parturition. Stages of labor. 
Drugs used. Scopolamine and morphine. Danger in 
the use of these drugs in labor. Contradictory report 
of physicians on twilight sleep. Eminent authorities op 
posed to the methods. Baer s report on the evil ef 
fects. The methods are morally illicit and useless .232-244 



The States that have this law. Reasons for the law. Hered 
itary transmission of certain diseases. The operation. 
Its effects. Restoration of the function of the inter 
rupted vas deferens. Vasectomy and impotence. On- 
anism. Vasectomy effects impotence from the moral 
point of view. Other conditions in the male that effect 
moral impotence. Immorality of artificial impregna 
tion. Vasectomy a grave mutilation. Vasectomy as or 
dinarily practised is illicit. The State and vasectomy. 
The limitations of the State s dominion. The State sur 
geon and vasectomy. Bibliography . . . .245-268 



Index 281 


IN this book is discussed the morality involved in the ordi 
nary cases of medical homicide and mutilation. Craniotomy has 
been omitted because this operation on the living child is never 
morally licit, and when done on the dead fetus it has no moral 
quality that requires explanation. 

The articles may seem to be intended for Catholic physicians 
and spiritual directors alone, but the desire in writing them 
was to reach all practitioners, to the end that the Natural Law 
which binds every man may be observed. Morality is not 
made such in its fundamental principles by any religious creed, 
but by the requirements of Divine Order, which finally pre 
vails no matter what the opposition. Killing and maiming 
without sufficient extenuation did not become unlawful solely 
by the establishment of Christianity. Practically, however, 
physicians who have no religion, or a religion which is so 
illogical as to pay no attention to dogma, or even to rail at it 
as obtrusive, necessarily gravitates to the emotional in morality, 
and the principles of this book will not even interest them. 
Dogmas are abstract propositions, and all human society rests 
on abstract propositions. The most vital facts in morality, the 
basic distinction between crime and all that is virtuous or 
indifferent morally, is in abstract principle alone, but physicians 
and pastors who are not trained in philosophy and rational 
religion cannot appreciate an abstract principle they are in 
fluenced only by the concrete. 

Obstetrical text-books, unfortunately, are written by such 
emotional men; by men who lack all training in ethics other 
than that inculcated in childhood out of the mental vagaries 
of the women in the household; and these authors prescribe 
therapeutic homicide as if it were a drug in the American 
Pharmacopoeia. The reader is told that if the patient is a 
Catholic he is to respect her religious "prejudices"; if she is 
not a Catholic one need not bother about moral scruples when 
it is necessary to take a life to stop fits. Since the civil law 
does not prosecute a physician for therapeutic abortion on an 


inviable child, most physicians deem such an act not only per 
missible but scientific, and they hold that if a man s conscience 
will not let him kill a fetus to alleviate maternal distress he 
is guilty of malpractice. 

Decrees of the Catholic Church are cited in these pages, not 
because morality is an asset of the Catholic Church alone, but 
because it alone pronounces officially on these medical subjects 
after careful consideration by competent specialists. This 
Church has made decisions in comparatively few medico-moral 
cases, and the questions still undecided authoritatively are very 
numerous. They are quite difficult, too, because judgment 
supposes a knowledge of both medicine and ethics, a combina 
tion seldom found in one person. As physicians do not know 
ethics, and moralists do not know medicine, there is often 
trouble in getting at even a statement of the questions at issue 
between them. In the preface to Essays in Pastoral Medicine, 
in 1906, I mentioned a noted case of this kind, and in 1911 a 
similar incident occurred in a discussion of the morality in 
volved in the sterilization of criminals and the defective by 
the state. This dispute was taken up by the leading canonists 
and moral theologians in the United States, Belgium, Holland, 
Austria, Spain, Italy and France, and for nearly two years these 
men wrote article after article based upon utterly erroneous 
physical data. 

The books we have on medico-moral subjects are either ob 
solete at present, or insufficient; or, more commonly, they are 
the work of amateurs in medicine. These last are worthless 
when they are not harmful. If, however, I may judge from 
the questions sent to me for answer by clergymen and physicians 
from all parts of the country, our theological seminaries and 
medical schools are in grave need of courses on the morality of 
medical practice. In this book, to the preparation of which I 
have given years of anxious thought because of the extreme re 
sponsibility involved in its decisions, the data for the most im 
portant parts of such courses are presented. 






A DISCUSSION" of euthanasia through the use of nar 
cotics in cases of incurable diseases periodically recurs, 
and the opinions of those in favor of putting the patient 
out of his misery are expressions of mere sentimentality, as 
in Maeterlinck s essay, Our Eternity. They think either that 
the passing of a law by a legislature removes all moral dif 
ficulty, or that morality is a trifle which should never stand 
in the way of expediency. Those who oppose this method 
of euthanasia base their argument, first, on the fact that many 
patients supposed by even clever diagnosticians to be incur 
able recover health; and, secondly, on the fact that the giving 
power of life and death to physicians is liable to grave abuse. 
This side misses the central truth and argues from accidental 
and secondary premises. Whether it is expedient, humane, or 
impolitic to kill incurable patients are almost irrelevant con 
siderations: the fundamental question to be answered here is, 
Is there a Supreme Being who alone is master of life, to give 
it or to take it? 

By its very definition such a Being is necessary (as op 
posed to contingent), self-existent; its essence always has 
been and always will be actualized into existence, and that 
from itself alone; it is an individual substance of an intel 
ligent nature, and therefore a person. A contingent being 
is one that happens to be (coniingere) ; it is of necessity 
neither existent nor non-existent; it has no logical aversion 
to existence, but in itself it has no more than a possibility 



of actuality. A necessary Being, on the contrary, essentially 
must be ; it cannot not be ; it is absolutely and essentially its own 

There must be such a Necessary Being. Jf there were 
not, all things would be contingent, which is an absurdity. 
The absurdity arises from the fact that if all things were 
contingent nothing would be actual, nothing could ever come 
into existence, because there would be nothing to bring the 
primitive potentiality of the contingent beings into actual 
existence. The sufficient reason for the existence of contin 
gent beings is either in themselves or in something outside 
themselves. It cannot be in themselves, because as they do not 
yet exist they are nothing; therefore it is in a Being which 
is not contingent, but whatever is not contingent is necessary. 
Therefore the existence of contingent beings absolutely re 
quires the existence of a Necessary Being, which always was 
in existence. The ordinary name for this Necessary Being 
is God. Contingent beings are all creatures, all organic and 
inorganic beings without exception. There is, then, a God, 
the first cause or creator of all contingent beings, among 
whom is man; and since God created man wholly, this crea 
ture is wholly subservient to God, under the dominion of 
God, and his life is owned solely by God; God alone is the 
master of life and death, and he alone can delegate such mas 

From the relation between the Creator and the creatures 
arises the natural law. Violation of this law is the source 
of all moral evil in the world, and of much of the physical 
evil. Reason shows us this law, and the method of observing 
it; and reason and unreason, observance or disregard, of the 
order fixed by the natural law are the foundation of happi 
ness and unhappiness. Whatever a human being is or does, 
he must seek happiness; that is an essential quality of his 
being. Happiness is the satisfying of our desires; but as 
our desires are limitless, only infinite good can satisfy them. 
The sole sufficient good that sates all human longing is the 
infinite Necessary Being, and to be happy we must be united 
with that Being. Obviously the only possible method of pos- 


sessing this infinite God is through mental union, by undis- 
turbable contemplation of his infinite truth, goodness, being, 
beauty, and his other attributes. If perfect, everlasting hap 
piness is not in that, in what can it be ? Is it in human fame, 
honor, riches, science, art, man, woman, or child? None of 
these can give lasting happiness, and no other happiness is 
real happiness. 

Now, the only means we have to obtain union with infinite 
good is to follow out the condition inexorably placed by God, 
which is to act in life in keeping with right reason, to obey 
the law. Man s supreme honor is in freedom from the 
tyranny of unreason, and in a full obedience to external and 
immovable order, with the belief that his chief duty is to 
apprehend and to conform thereto. 

This is morality. From the beginning men have held 
that certain acts are wrong and to be avoided, and that others 
are to be done. What is wrong, moreover, is such of its own 
nature, not from our will: we deem the fulfillment of duty, 
obedience to law, the first, highest, and last necessity of life. 
Jf we deny this truth we let in chaos. What is right or 
wrong is one or the other on its own merits, prescinding from 
its pleasurableness or pain. 

We must seek good whether we will or not. Good is the 
sole object upon which the will operates, it is the raw mate 
rial of the will s business. The ultimate standard of this 
good is God himself as its exemplary cause, but proximately 
the standard of moral good is our rational nature. Through 
our reason we judge whether a thing is good or bad; that is, 
whether it perfects or injures us ; and as it is good or bad for 
us our will s tendency toward it is good or bad. Many acts 
are indifferent in themselves, but take on a good or bad quality 
from our intention ; others are good or bad in themselves apart 
from our volition: charity is good, lying is bad, whether they 
are willed by us or not. 

The morality of any action is determined (1) by the ob 
ject of the action; (2) by the circumstances that accompany 
the action; (3) by the end the agent had in view. 

1. The term object has various meanings, but here it 

means the deed performed in the action, the thing which 
the will chooses. That deed by its very nature may be good, 
or it may be bad, or it may be indifferent morally. To help 
the afflicted is in itself a good action, to blaspheme is a bad 
action, to walk is an indifferent action. Some bad actions 
are absolutely bad; they never can become good or indifferent 
blasphemy or adultery, for example; others, as stealing, are 
evil because of a lack of right in the agent: these may become 
indifferent or good by acquiring the missing right. Others 
are evil because of the danger necessarily connected with their 
performance, the danger of sin connected with them, or 
the unnecessary peril to life. An action, to have a moral 
quality, must bo voluntary, deliberate; and mere repugnance 
in doing an act does not in itself make the act involuntary. 

2. Circumstances sometimes, though not always, may 
add a new element of good or evil to an action. The circum 
stances of an action are the Agent, the Object, the Place in 
which the action is done, the Means used, the End in view, 
the Method observed in using the means, and the Time in 
which the deed is done. If a judge in his official capacity 
tells a sheriff to hang a criminal, and a private citizen gives 
the same command, the actions are very different morally 
because of the circumstance of the agent giving the command. 
The object it changes the morality of the deed whether one 
steals a cent or a thousand dollars. The place what might 
be an offensive action in a residence might be a sacrilege in 
a church. The means to support a family by labor or thiev 
ery. The end in view to give alms in obedience to divine 
command or to give them to buy votes. The method used in 
employing the means kindly, say, or cruelly. The time 
to do manual labor on Sunday or on Monday. Some circum 
stances aggravate the evil in a deed, others excuse or attenu 
ate it. Others may so color the deed that they specify it, make 
it some special virtue or vice. The circumstance that a 
murderer is the son of the man he kills specifies the deed 
as parricide. 

3. The end also determines the morality of an action. 
Since the end is the first thing in the intention of the agent, 


he passes from the object wished for in the end to choosing the 
means for obtaining it. Without the end the means cannot 
exist as such. There are occasions when an end is only a 
circumstance: for example, if it is a concomitant or extrinsic 
end. When this extrinsic end is in keeping with right 
reason or when it is discordant thereto, it may become a de 
terminant of morality. In every voluntary, or human, act 
there is an interior and exterior act of the will, and each of 
these acts has its own object. The end is the proper object 
of the interior act of the will; the exterior object acted upon 
is the object of the exterior act of the will; both specify the 
morality, but the interior object or end specifies more im 
portantly, as a rule, than the exterior object does. The will 
uses tho body as an instrument on the external object, and the 
action of the body is connected with morality only through 
the will. We judge the morality of a blow not by the phys 
ical stroke, but from the intention of the striker. The ex 
terior object of the will is, in a way, the matter of the moral 
ity, and the interior object of the will, or the end, is the form. 
Aristotle said : "He that steals to be able to commit adultery 
is more of an adulterer than a thief." l The thievery is a 
means to the principal end, and this principal end chiefly 
specifies or informs the action. 

The means used to obtain an end are very important in a 
consideration of the morality of an act. There are four classes 
of means the good, bad, indifferent, and excusable. Good 
means may be absolutely good, but commonly they are liable to 
become vitiated by circumstances, almsgiving is an example. 
Some means are bad always and inexcusable lying, for in 
stance. The excusable means are those which are bad, but 
justifiable through circumstances. To save a man s life by 
cutting off his leg is an excusable means. The end some 
times may vitiate or hallow indifferent means, but it does not 
in itself justify all means. Means, like other circumstances, 
are accidents of an action, but they are in the action just as 
much as color is in a man. Color is not of a man s essence, but 
we cannot have a man without color. 
1 Ethics, v, c. 2. 


The effect of an action, the result or product of an effec 
tive cause or agency, may in itself be an end or an object or a 
circumstance, and it has influence in the determination of 
morality. Sometimes an act has two immediate effects, one 
good and the other bad. For example, ligating the blood-ves 
sels going to the uterus to stop a hemorrhage and so save a 
woman s life, a good effect, has also in ectopic gestation while 
the fetus is living another immediate effect, namely, to shut 
off the blood supply from the fetus and so kill it, a bad 
effect. To make such a double-effect action licit there are four 
conditions which are explained in the chapter on Mutilation. 

The doctrine of Probabilism is very important in morality. 
Any law must be promulgated before it really becomes a law, 
and promulgation in a rational conscience is sufficient. Some 
times there is rational doubt of the existence, the interpreta 
tion, or the application of a law in a given case. Here prob 
ability is the only rule we can follow. A law which is doubtful 
after honest and capable investigation has not been sufficiently 
promulgated, and therefore it cannot impose a certain obliga 
tion because it lacks aii essential element of a law. When we 
have used such moral diligence as the gravity of the matter 
calls for, but still the applicability of the law is doubtful in 
the action in view, the law does not bind; and what a law 
does not forbid it leaves open. Probabilism is not permissible 
where there is question of the worth of an action as compared 
with another, or of issues like the physical consequences of an 
act. If a physician knows a remedy for a disease that is cer 
tainly efficacious and another that is doubtfully efficacious, he 
may not choose this probable cure. Probabilism has to do 
only with the existence, interpretation, or applicability of a 
law, not with the differentiation of actions. The term prob 
able means provable, not guessed at, not jumped at without 
reason. The doubt must be positive, founded on reason, not 
a matter of mere ignorance, suspicion, emotional bias. The 
opinion against a law to permit probabilism must be solid. It 
must rest upon an intrinsic reason from the nature of the case, 
or an extrinsic reason from authority, always supposing the 
authority is really an authority. The probability is to be com- 

parative also. What seems to be a very good reason when 
standing alone may be weak when compared with reasons on 
the other side. When we have weighed the arguments on both 
sides, and we still have a good reason for holding our opinion 
in a doubtful case, our opinion is probable. The probability is, 
moreover, to be practical. It must have considered all the cir 
cumstances of the case. 

There is, then, a Supreme Being whom we must obey, 
who created and owns human life primarily; there is also a 
moral law. On these facts rests the argument relating to the 
destruction of human life. How far, then, has a human being 
dominion over his own life, and, secondly, over the life of any 
one else? 

St. Thomas, 2 Lessius, 8 and others offer as one argument 
to prove suicide is not licit, that it is an injury to society 
or the state of which the suicide is part, and to which the use 
and profit of his service rightly belong. Lessius, while de 
veloping this proof, acknowledges its weakness. 

If there were only one man in the world, and no society or 
state, suicide would still be illicit, because its basic deordina- 
tion lies deeper than society or the state. If suicide were a 
moral evil solely because it deprives the state of the suicide s 
life, then for the same reason no one might become a citizen 
of another state, emigrate, nor might man abandon society and 
live as a recluse. Moreover, if a man were detrimental to the 
state rather than beneficial, in this point of view that fact alone 
would justify suicide, and the state would then be justified in 
permitting or even commanding suicide; and we shall show 
later that the state has not this power. 

It is true that the injury done the state or society by loss 
of use and profit, by scandal and similar evils, is a solid argu 
ment against suicide, as such injury aggravates the deordina- 
tion of suicide, but in itself the injury done to the state and 
society is not the fundamental reason against suicide. 

St. Thomas 4 argues against suicide because it is contrary 
to the charity a human being should have for himself. This 

2 Summa Theologica, 1, 2, q. 64, a. 5. 

3 De Justitia et Jure, lib. 2, cap. 9. 


is true ordinarily, and suicide takes on part of its guilt just 
because it is an offence against the rational regard a person 
should have for himself; yet this argument is not basic. We 
are told that if one sins against charity in killing his neighbor, 
a fortiori he sins in killing himself. Yet suppose just what 
the advocates of euthanasia suggest, viz., that a neighbor is in 
great agony and incurable: then the act of killing him takes on 
a quality of charity rather than of uncharity. And so for the 
suicide : if the patient is willing to be killed, there would be no 
uncharity; if he were unwilling, then homicide in any form 
would be uncharitable and unjust. The argument from char 
ity, therefore, is too narrow to fit the whole case ; and its very 
weakness is a source of error for the advocates of euthanasia. 

Still another argument is often advanced against suicide, 
viz., that a man is obliged to love his own life, since it is the 
foundation, or the necessary condition, to him, of all good 
and every virtue, and this circumstance makes the destruction 
of that life unlawful. That argument has solid truth, but if 
it held absolutely it would prevent us from desiring death in 
any case, and no one denies that there are conditions in which 
a desire for death is fully legitimate. No desire for death, 
however, can give the slightest justification for the destruction 
of life. 

Again, the argument that suicide is cowardice is not broad 
enough. Fortitude is a mean between fear and rashness, and 
this argument maintains that the suicide sins against fortitude 
by rashness. Jf we have good reason it is not rash to expose 
ourselves to death; the soldier may do so, the person strug 
gling to save a neighbor s life, and so on ; it may be the highest 
form of fortitude thus to expose oneself to death. If the 
suicide can persuade himself that by his act he is seeking 
greater good than the life he possesses he would have reason 
for his act, and at least be above cowardice. This argument 
is one that can be turned at times so as to cut the fingers of 
the man that uses it. The fundamental reason that suicide is 
not lawful is that man cannot be master of his own life, and 
therefore he may not dispose of it as he pleases. 

Suicide is the direct killing of oneself on one s own author- 


ity. A killing is direct when death is intended as an end, or 
chosen as a means to an end. Direct killing is positive by 
commission, or negative by omission. In such cases the will 
directly rests in the death as a voluntary and free act. A 
killing is indirect when the act of which death is the effect 
by its nature and the intent of the agent is directed toward 
another end, but concomitantly, or as a consequence, results 
in death. In such case death is an accidental effect, and comes 
indirectly from the activity of the will it is not necessarily 
voluntary. If one has a right to do that other deed, or if it 
is his duty to do it, and there is a proportion between it and 
his life, he may do the deed and permit the consequent death. 

A direct homicide may be done on one s own authority, or 
on that of another person. It is done on one s own authority if 
the agent assumes a natural individual dominion over life, and 
by virtue of such dominion directly kills himself or another; 
it is done on the authority of another when a man directly 
kills himself or another by the mandate of a positive divine or 
human law, and in the name and on the authority of a positive 
divine or human legislator. It is evident that God, as Creator, 
has supreme dominion over human life, and therefore by his 
positive authority he may command a man directly to kill 
himself. God, however, does not by the natural law confer on 
man the right thus to kill. The question here is of the natural 
duty or right which comes from the natural law alone. 

Direct suicide on one s own authority may happen in two 
ways: positively, that is, by doing an act which is directly 
homicidal ; or negatively, by omitting an act necessary for the 
preservation of life. That a negative homicide be direct, 
death must be intended as an end or means. If, however, one 
voluntarily intends an end or a means, but for the sake of 
antecedent good or evil omits some act necessary to preserve 
life, his suicide is indirect, per accidens, and not always illicit 
unless there is a precept against just such an omission. Man 
has no dominion over his own life, he has only the use of it; 
and the natural law obliges us while using a thing which is 
under the dominion of another not to omit ordinary means for 
its preservation. "We are not, however, held to extraordinary 


means. His own death is criminally imputable to him who 
negatively and indirectly kills himself by omitting the or 
dinary means for preserving his life, because the precept he 
is under to preserve his own life makes his act voluntary. If 
he omits extraordinary means, the death is not criminally im 
putable to him because there is no precept obliging such means. 
Certain circumstances may by accident oblige one to use ex 
traordinary means to preserve one s own life a dependent 
family, a public office in perilous times, or the like. The 
proposition, then, is: The natural law does not give a man 
absolute dominion over his own life. 

J. The natural law gives no rights except such as are 
finally founded in human nature itself ; but human nature can 
not give a title to dominion over one s own life; therefore the 
natural law does not give man such a right. 

Every natural right is either congenital or acquired. The 
title to a congenital right is human nature itself; the title 
to an acquired right is some act consequent to the exercise of 
human activity. The right to such exercise is, in turn, con 
genital and founded in human nature. 

If nature established the title to dominion over one s own 
life it would thereby establish the power of destroying that 
life, and thus of removing the fundamental title to all rights; 
but nature exists as the foundation for rights, not for the sub 
version of rights; therefore human nature cannot give a final 
title to dominion over our own life. 

Again, this minor of the first argument is confirmed by 
the fact that if nature even remotely established the power of 
self-destruction there should be in nature itself some natural 
tendency to such destruction, but the direct contrary is the 

II. The natural law cannot grant a right to man which 
is not a means to the common end of human life ; but absolute 
dominion over one s own life is not such a means, therefore 
the natural law cannot give one dominion over his own life. 

The natural law is only an ordination of man to that com 
mon end of human life and to the means toward that end. As 
regards the minor of this second argument, an absolute domin- 


ion over his own life would give man power to stop all his 
human activity, yet the common end of human life is attain 
able only hy man s activity. The stopping, or the power of 
stopping, all activity cannot he a means to that end. 

III. The natural law cannot give man a power which is 
opposed to the essential needs of human nature itself; hut that 
a man should have absolute dominion over his own life is 
opposed to an essential need of human nature itself, therefore 
the natural law cannot give such a power. 

Dominion over his own life implies the power in man of 
rebelling against the subjection which he owes to God; but 
human nature essentially demands that man be in subjection 
to God, since dominion over one s own life and subjection to 
God are contradictory. 

Again, if man had absolute dominion over his own life 
he could stand aloof from all influx of the natural law and 
avoid every duty arising from that law. A law, however, can 
not give a power which nullifies itself. 

The objection that suicide is licit because no injury can 
be done a man by an act if the man is willing to submit to 
the act, is irrelevant. The injury in suicide is not to man at 
all, but to God. 

There is also nothing in the objection that a gratuitous gift 
may be renounced. Life is not a gratuitous gift; it is an 
onerous gift with obligations inseparably affixed thereto which 
forbid the destruction of the gift. 

IV. Destruction is an act proper to a master alone. Man 
cannot be master of his own life; he can have dominion of 
things that are outside himself, distinguishable from himself, 
but not of the very existence of himself, which is not really 
distinguishable from himself. The definition of dominion sup 
poses relation. The offices of master, father, magistrate, are 
relative conditions which suppose superiority over another per 
son, not over oneself. Even Gbd is not a superior over himself, 
although he has all perfection. For this reason a man cannot 
sell himself ; he can sell only his labor. 

God, who should have absolute dominion over all creatures, 
and who has, wills to confine these creatures to certain lines of 


action in keeping with the creature s nature. This is the law 
underlying even the moral law when it touches humanity; it 
is the eternal law coeternal with God s decree of creation, but 
not necessary as God is. When this law exists in the mind 
of God it is the eternal law; when it exists in the minds of 
creatures it is the natural law, governing the free acts of intel 
lectual creatures. When the natural law becomes a motive to 
the human will, obliging but not forcing it, a law through 
knowledge within the consciousness of a man regulating his 
behavior, it is called the law of conscience. 

Conscience is an act, a practical judgment on one s own 
action in some particular case. ,It testifies, accuses, excuses, 
restrains, urges. It is a rational faculty, not an emotional, 
sentimental power. Emotion blinds its judgments. Yet mere 
emotion, and that foolish deordination of emotion called sen 
timentality, are promptings which the ignorant mistake for. 
conscience and obey. Conscience is the enlightened eye of the 
heart, not the vagary of any appetite that blunders into action. 
It must be educated ; left to itself, it is guilty of all the perver 
sions of the streets. 

The natural law is immutable, not subject to recall by 
every rascal under the goad of the flesh. In morality what 
was, is; what was once right because reasonable, always will 
be right and reasonable. Since opposition to the natural law 
as applied to man is repugnant to human nature, no power 
can make opposition to that law licit. For the same reason 
this law is not subject to evolution. Truth in morality is 
eternal. What is ugly now was ugly a millennium ago; what 
was immoral yesterday was immoral in the sixth century. If 
our ancestors thought permissible what we know to be illicit, 
our ancestors were ignorant ; the fact has not changed. It was 
as immoral to steal, lie, or murder in the day of Abraham as 
it is to-day. 

The ultimate tendency of man is toward happiness, and, 
of course, happiness, or any other perfection, is impossible 
without existence; hence the instinctive recoil from the de 
struction of our life, which is the requisite condition for hap 
piness. Even those that abnormally destroy their own life do 


so with horror for the destruction itself, and act thus unrea 
sonably to escape evil, not to escape life; or they seek what 
they think will be a better life. We can do no other injury 
to a man so great as the depriving him of his life, for that 
deprivation destroys every right and possession he has. He 
can recover from all other evil, or hold his soul above every 
other evil, but death is the absolute conqueror. No matter how 
debased or how diseased a man s body may be, no one may 
dissociate that body from its soul, except in defence of in 
dividual or social life under peculiarly abnormal conditions; 
but even such defence is permissible only while the defender 
respects other human life and the social life, while he is in 
nocent, has done no harm to society commensurate with the loss 
of his own life. 

"The weariest and most loathed worldly life 
That age, ache, penury, and imprisonment 
Can lay on nature is a paradise 
To what we fear of death." 

r..:istence, no matter how sordid, is immeasurably better 
tlian non-existence, for non-existence is nothing; and when we 
consider eternal life after separation from the body, even as 
a probability, that raises existence to infinite possibilities 
above the void of non-existence. A human life, even in an 
Australian Bushman, in a tuberculous pauper, in the vilest 
criminal, is in itself so stupendously noble a thing that the 
whole universe exists for its upholding toward betterment. 
The raising of human life toward a higher condition has been 
the sole tendency of all the magnificent charity, sacrifice, 
patriotism, and heroism the best men and women of the world 
since time began have striven in. The necessary first cause 
itself is life, and life is by far the most sacred thing possible 
for the first cause to effect. Eternal life is the greatest reward 
of the just. 

It is not permissible under any possible circumstance 
directly to kill an innocent human being. By killing directly 
is meant either (1) as an end desirable in itself, as when a 
man is killed for revenge; or (2) as a means to an end. By 
an innocent human being is meant a person who has not by 


any voluntary act of his own done harm commensurate with 
the loss of his own life. 

To kill a human being is to destroy human nature, by sep 
arating the vital principle from the body; to destroy anything 
is to subordinate and sacrifice that thing absolutely to the 
purposes of the slayer; but (1) no one has a right so to sub 
ordinate another human being, because man and his life are 
solely under the dominion of God. If a man may not kill 
himself, as we proved above, because he is not master of his 
own life, he surely may not kill another to whom he is no 
more closely related as master than he is to himself. (2) No 
man has a right to subordinate another human being as is 
done in slaying him, because this other human being is a per 
son, an intelligent nature, and consequently free, independent, 
referring its operations solely to itself as to their centre. This 
very freedom differentiates man from brutes and inanimate 
things. These are not independent; they are rightly possessed 
by man; but man may be possessed by no one except God. 
Even extrinsic human slavery is abhorrent to us as a corollary 
of the intrinsic freedom of man, which is absolute. This in 
trinsic freedom is such that we may not under any circum 
stances lawfully resign it to another s possession. This is one 
of the chief moral objections to oath-bound secret societies 
which exact blind obedience. All morality depends on that 
freedom, all peace in life, all civilization, and society itself. 

The end of our struggles, toil, fortitude, temperance, thrift, 
is freedom, freedom to do and to hold, freedom from the 
thraldom of vice and barbarity. The rational endeavor of 
every civilized nation is that it be free; and this means solely 
that every citizen thereof, from the highest to the lowest, is 
made secure in his rights as a human being. It intends that 
justice should prevail. Nearly all the unhappiness, crime, 
moral misery, and much of the physical misery in the world 
are due to a disregard for liberty, for the safeguarding of men 
in their inalienable rights. Give every man his bare rights as 
a man and all troubles of capital and labor, all race problems 
would cease, the prisons would be empty, war would be un 
known. Our struggle toward justice, toward the protection 


of the rights of man, toward liberty, must go on, or anarchy 
and social destruction will ensue. Now, as there is nothing 
greater and nobler than liberty, the freedom of the sons of 
God to do what they have a right to do, and as every human 
being has a right to that liberty, so there is nothing baser than 
its contrary, the destruction of that liberty; and no destruc 
tion is so final as that of killing the man, no usurpation so 
abhorrent to human nature and all liberty. Abhorrence for 
such a destruction is the primal instinct of all human beings; 
even the irrational reflexes of our bodies react quickest in pro 
tecting us from that destruction. 

Justice and order must prevail; that is a fundamental 
natural law to which all other laws are subordinate. Justice, 
moreover, is a moral equation, and whenever one right tran 
scends another it must be superior to the right it holds in 
abeyance. The right an innocent human being has to his life, 
however, is so great that no other human right can be superior 
to it while he remains innocent. Subversion of this right by 
creatures is intrinsically evil, as blasphemy and perjury are evil, 
although not in exactly the same degree. 

There are occasions upon which it is permissible to kill, in 
directly, innocent persons. An effect is brought about indi 
rectly when it is neither intended as an end for its own sake, 
nor chosen as means toward an end, but is attached as a cir 
cumstance to the end or the means. Means help to an end, 
circumstances often do not, although they may affect the mo 
rality of an act. 

Suppose two swimmers, Peter and Paul, are trying to save 
Thomas, who dies in the water ; as he dies Thomas grips Peter 
and Paul so tightly that they cannot shake the corpse off. Peter 
is weak, and he will soon sink and drown, owing to his weak 
ness and the weight of the corpse; Paul also will go down 
later, owing to the weight of Peter and Thomas. Peter, how 
ever, cuts his own clothing loose from the grip of the corpse 
and is saved; but Paul immediately is drowned, owing to the 
fact that the full weight of the corpse comes upon him. Js 
Peter justified in cutting himself loose? Certainly he is. 
This is an example of indirect killing, a case of double effect, 


one good, the saving of Peter s life, the other evil, the loss of 
Paul s life, both proceeding immediately and equally from 
the causal act, the cutting loose of the clothing. The good 
effect is intended, the bad effect is reluctantly permitted. 

Again, let us set the same condition for Peter, Paul, and 
Thomas; but Peter is not able to cut himself loose. John, a 
fourth person, can cut Peter loose and save him, but can do no 
more; he must let Paul go down with the corpse of Thomas. 
May John cut Peter loose ? Certainly he may, on the principle 
quod liceat per se licet per alium. This is another case of 
double effect, with the extenuating circumstances as above. 

Suppose, however, Peter represents a living infant in the 
womb of Ann, and that she is in labor; further, this infant 
cannot be delivered owing to the contraction of Ann s pelvis. 
May John, a physician, cut away Peter by craniotomy and so 
save Ann s life? Certainly he may not. John here directly 
brains Peter to save Ann, although Peter is not an unjust 
aggressor; he does a murder to get a good effect, and the end 
does not justify the means. There are two effects, but the good 
effect follows from the bad one, and not immediately from the 
causal act. 

Take another example: Peter is a swimmer disabled by 
cramps and about to drown ; Paul, going to save Peter, is seized 
by Peter, and both are now in danger of drowning; John goes 
to help Peter and Paul. He cannot get Peter s grip loose by 
ordinary means, and he sees he can save only one man, either 
Peter or Paul. May John knock Peter senseless to loosen his 
grip from Paul, bring in Paul, and thus leave Peter to drown ? 
Certainly he may. You have the double effect here also. 
Moreover, Peter is a materially unjust aggressor; he is like 
a maniac trying to kill Paul. In the craniotomy case the child 
is not a materially or formally unjust aggressor, it is not doing 
anything at all. It is where the mother put it, and it has a 
full right to its position and its life. 

John most probably might also knock Paul senseless and 
save Peter, if through affection or similar motive he preferred 
this course. He would then be justified by the double-effect 
principle alone, although Paul is in no sense an aggressor. The 

intention of the blow would have to be solely to loosen Paul s 

In a just war a commander may shell an enemy s works 
and indirectly thereby kill non-combatants. The gunners that 
cause the death of the non-combatants do not intend this death ; 
they permit it as the evil effect which comes immediately with 
the good effect (the capture of the works) from the causal act 
of firing the guns. 

If we keep within the bounds of a just defence we may 
protect ourselves against an unjust aggressor to the effusion of 
his blood, or even, if need be, to killing him. An aggressor is 
any one who does injury to us contrary to our rights and the 
ordination of right. A formally unjust aggressor is a sane 
intelligent person who intentionally attacks us; a materially 
unjust aggressor is one who is not intelligent, not responsible, 
as an insane person, a child, or a sane person who is injuring 
us unintentionally. This question is important in medicine 
because the fetus in utero is often erroneously called an unjust 

It is a primary law of nature that every human being 
should and will strive to resist injury and destruction. Justice 
requires a moral equation, and if one right prevails over an 
other it must be superior to the right it supersedes. At the 
outset both the aggressor and the intended victim have equal 
rights to life, but the fact that the aggressor uses his own 
life for the destruction of a fellow man sets the aggressor in 
a condition of juridic inferiority to the victim. The moral 
power of the aggressor here is equal to his inborn right to life, 
less the unrighteous use he makes of it; while the moral power 
of the intended victim remains in its integrity, and has there 
fore a higher juridic value. 

The right of self-defence is not annulled by the fact that 
the aggressor is irresponsible. The absence of knowledge saves 
him from moral guilt, but it does not alter the character of 
the act considered objectively; it is yet an unjust aggression, 
and in the conflict the life assailed has still a superior juridic 
value. In any case the right of wounding or of killing in self- 


defence is not based on the ill will of the aggressor, but on 
the illegitimate character of the aggression. 

The condition s of a blameless defence (moderamen incul- 
patae tutelae} are: (1) that the aggressor really threatens the 
defender s life, and there is no means of offsetting that vio 
lence except like violence; (2) that no more violence is used 
than is adequately required: if the aggression can be stopped 
by wounding the aggressor the defender is not to kill him; 
(3) that the violence in the defence is used with the inten 
tion of defence, not in revenge, hatred, anger, or the like 

We may do an act good in itself from which a double effect 
immediately follows, one good, to which the agent has a right, 
and the other bad, which the agent is not obliged to omit if 
permitted by him and not intended; but in the case of a 
necessary defence of life against an unjust aggressor, made 
even with the death of the aggressor, the defence is such an 
act, provided the moderation of a blameless defence is ob 

The evil effect here is not a means to the good effect, nor 
does it more immediately follow from the act done. The evil 
effect is an effect per accidens, and thus not directly voluntary, 
either in itself, because it is not intended, or in its cause. It 
lacks the condition necessary to make it voluntary in cause 
as regards the accidental effect since the act is not prohibited 
precisely because this accidental effect follows. 

The act in the case is good in itself; it is an application 
of physical force in defence of a proper right, and any right 
supposes a compulsive power. The two effects of this double- 
effect act are: (a) the preservation of the defender s life, and 
(6) the death of the aggressor. The first effect is good because 
the defender has a right to his own life ; the other effect is evil, 
not only physically for the one who dies, but morally inasmuch 
as the death conflicts with the dominion of God. This death, 
however, is an accidental effect of the act, because in general 
the defensive act is not directed by its nature to that death 
but to the preservation of the defender s life; nor does the 
death follow more immediately than the preservation. Thus it 

is not a means of the defence. Finally, the defensive act is 
not prohibited precisely lest that death follow: not in justice, 
for there is no justice in any right of the aggressor which re 
quires from the defender an omission of defence unto the loss 
of life; there is no obligation in charity, since charity does not 
oblige us to love another more than ourselves, or to exalt the 
good of another above our own. 

In an aggression which is merely material say, in an 
attack by an insane man the defender has a right to the in 
fliction of such damage as is necessary and proportionate to 
an efficacious defence. The right of the aggressor yields to 
the superior right of the defender, not through the fault of the 
aggressor but through his misfortune. There is a collision 
where both rights cannot be exercised at the same time, and 
there is no reason obliging the defendant to forego his own 

We may defend another against an unjust aggressor be 
cause we can assume that the attacked person communicates 
to us the use of his own coactive right. If the aggressor is our 
own father, mother, son, or daughter, or in general any one 
to whom charity obliges us more than to the person attacked, 
we are not permitted to kill our own kin because charity does 
not oblige us to prefer the good of an alien to the good of one 
of our blood. Ordinarily we are not obliged in justice or 
charity to defend another at the risk of our own life. 

We may kill an unjust aggressor, servatis servandis, in de 
fence of good equivalent in value to life: for example, to pre 
vent life imprisonment, the loss of reason, a mutilation which 
would render us useless, the loss of a woman s chastity. 

There are cases of accidental homicide, in medicine and 
elsewhere, which have an element of guilt in them. If a death 
follows accidentally upon an act which in itself is licit, and 
the agent uses all proper precautions, he is not morally guilty 
in case of an accidental death following, his act. This is true 
even if the agent foresaw a probable death but did not intend 
it. If, however, the agent s primary act is illicit in itself, 
and an accidental death follows from this act, the agent may 
be guilty of homicide, provided the first act in itself is natur- 


ally likely to cause homicide. Should the first act be always 
dangerous, such that death commonly follows from it, like 
rocking a row-boat, aiming a supposedly unloaded gun at a 
person and pulling the trigger, striking a pregnant woman, 
drinking whiskey and then overlying an infant in the bed, 
throwing building material from a roof to a street, racing an 
automobile through a crowded thoroughfare, sending a crew 
out in a rotten ship, and so on, the accidental homicide 
that follows is imputable to the agent no matter how much pre 
caution he may say he has used to avert such a death. 

Suppose, secondly, the original act of the agent is illicit 
but such that accidental death rarely follows from it; then if 
he takes due precaution he is not ordinarily guilty of homicide. 
He has, say, stolen an automobile, and is going along the street 
leisurely, when a careless child runs off the sidewalk under 
the machine and is killed. 

1. No person, then, may hasten his own death or permit 
any one else to hasten it. 

2. No physician may in any possible condition kill a pa 
tient merely to effect euthanasia. 

3. The state has no more right than the physician to per 
mit the killing of patients to bring about euthanasia. 

Were such permission given to physicians it would imme 
diately be abused by men with even the best intentions. In 
all countries and in the largest cities the medical profession 
is swarming with quacks. What is done in crass ignorance by 
licensed physicians and specialists every day in the name of 
medicine is appalling. Professor Orth of the Pathologic In 
stitute in Berlin makes the statement that of all the appendices 
that have been submitted to him for microscopic examination 
after removal by conservative and supposedly skilled physi 
cians, 17 per cent, showed no disease at all, and should not 
have been removed. In this country the percentage of normal 
appendices removed because of vague abdominal pains is much 

The Journal of the American Medical Association (June 
7, 1913) gave a list of post-mortem examinations where the 


diagnosis made by men with a reputation for fair work had 
been correct in only the following ratios: 

Diagnosis Diagnosis 

correct. incorrect. 

Per cent. Per cent. 

Diabetes Mellitus 95 5 

Typhoid Fever 92 8 

Aortic Kegurgitation 84 16 

Cancer of Colon 74 26 

Lobar Pneumonia 74 26 

Chronic Glomerular Nephritis 74 26 

Cerebral Tumor 72.8 27.2 

Tuberculous Meningitis 72 28 

Gastric Cancer 72 28 

Mitral Stenosis 69 31 

Brain Hemorrhage 67 33 

Septic Meningitis 64 36 

Aortic Stenosis 61 39 

Phthisis, Active 59 41 

Miliary Tuberculosis 52 48 

Chronic Interstitial Nephritis 50 50 

Thoracic Aneurism 50 50 

Hepatic Cirrhosis 39 61 

Acute Endocarditis 39 61 

Peptic Ulcer 36 64 

Suppurative Nephritis , 35 65 

Renal Tuberculosis 33.3 66.7 

Bronchopneumonia 33 66 

Vertebral Tuberculosis 23 77 

Chronic Myocarditis 22 78 

Hepatic Abscess 20 80 

Acute Pericarditis 20 80 

Acute Nephritis 16 84 

Pneumonia is a very common disease, extremely danger 
ous, and by skilful treatment it is very often cured, yet of 
these 100 cases 66 were not diagnosed. I recently saw a 
severe case of double pneumonia which a physician was treat 
ing as "indigestion," and he was giving pepsin tablets for 
the supposed indigestion. There is such a thing as extraor 
dinary scientific precision in medical work, but it is rare; 
the ordinary physician treats symptoms without knowing the 
cause of the symptoms ; that is, the symptom-treater is a quack, 
and if euthanasia were legalized thousands of such quacks 
would be permitted to murder with an overdose of morphine 
any querulous old man or woman who might fall into their 


hands. Osteopaths and chiropractors are masseurs, and they 
know very little of massage, but they are licensed by legisla 
tures to practise medicine, and some of them even try obstet 
rical malpractice. They, too, would be licensed to inflict 
euthanasia. Pure homeopathy is little more than a name at 
present; it is faith-healing without prayer. It attenuates its 
drugs 100 per cent, for thirty repetitions, to a degree expres 
sible by one with sixty ciphers. Consequently it gives sugar 
of milk or alcohol in minute quantities plus a label, and one 
cannot make much of an impression on any disease with a 
label. Such practitioners also would come under the euthan 
asia act. 


Cardinal John de Lugo. Disputationes Scholasticae et 

Morales, vol. vi; De Justitia et Jure, disputatio x. 
St. Augustine. I Contra Petilianum, cap. 24; Ad Marcel- 

lianum Comitem, cap. 21; De Civitate Dei, cap. 17 to 


Aristotle. IJI Ethicorum, cap. 7, and lib. v, cap. ii. 
Plato. Phaedo. 
Cicero. Quaestiones Tusculanae. I, lib. v; De Somno 


Lessius. De Justitia et Jure, lib. ii, c. 9, dub. 6, 7. 
Molina. De Justitia et Jure, vol. i, tr. 2, disp. 119 ; vol. iv, 

tr. 3, disp. 1 and 9. 
St. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica, 2, 2, q. 64, a. 

St. Alphonsus Liguori. Theologia Moralis, vol. iv, tr. 4. 

See this book for opposed opinions and a bibliography. 
Costa-Rossetti. Philosophia Moralis, thesis 120. 
Ferretti. Philosophia Moralis, theses xci, xciv. 
Macksey. De Ethica Naturali, theses xxxiv et seq. 



THE members of the human body may be injured (1) by 
a blow, which without bloodshed pauses pain or a bruise ; 

(2) by a wound, which breaks the continuity of the tissues; 

(3) by mutilation, which, without killing, removes some mem 
ber requisite for the integrity of the body. The term Mutila 
tion as applied to the human body has various meanings. In 
the civil law mutilation of a person is called Mayhem, an old 
form of the word Maim, and is defined by Blackstone * as 
"such hurt of any part of a man s body as renders him less able 
in fighting to defend himself or annoy his adversary." By 
statute in the United States and Great Britain the scope of 
the offence has been so extended as to include injuries to a 
person which merely disfigure or disable. Mutilation in the 
civil law now implies the taking away of some part of a legal 
instrument, as a will, contract, or the like, by any one who has 
no right to make this alteration. 

In canon law mutilation is like malicious or accidental 
mayhem in the civil law, and it has also a technical phase in 
relation to irregularity as affecting the reception of ecclesias 
tical orders. The mutilation requisite to irregularity as affect 
ing the reception of Holy Orders may differ from mutilation 
in its purely moral and accidental aspects. Broadly, an ir 
regularity is a canonical and permanent impediment to the 
reception and exercise of ecclesiastical orders. It does not 
exist unless it is actually promulgated in some canon, and it is 
not necessarily grounded on corporal deformity. Defects of 
the body that cause canonical irregularity are such as would 
render the public ministration of a clergyman either impos 
sible or indecent. 

1 Commentary, bk. iv, p. 205. 



Molina, treating of mutilation, says 2 it does not exist un 
less there is an amputation or shortening (detruncatio} of a 
member. When a foot or hand is so weakened without ampu 
tation that it cannot exercise its function the person is said to 
be maimed or lame, not mutilated. He holds that a finger, 
and a fortiori a phalanx of a finger, are not properly members. 
In defining mutilation as a cause of canonical irregularity 3 
he contends that the weakening of a member so that it cannot 
perform its function is not a true mutilation canonically. He 
does not agree 4 with Cajetan, de Soto, and others who hold 
that an important part of a whole member is equivalent to a 
member so far as technical canonical mutilation is concerned. 
Molina says that a part of the body as a member to fulfil the 
requirements of the law on mutilation as a cause of irregu 
larity must have a distinct, complete function of its own, not 
be a mere part conducing to the function. Ballerini 5 agrees 
with Molina, but he draws attention to a decretal of Jnnocent 
I. which makes an amputation by oneself of even a part of 
one s own finger a full canonical irregularity, because of the 
unnatural quality of the act. 

Suarez defines mutilation thus: "Mutilare significat 
proprie membrum aliquod abscindere" 6 to mutilate means, 
strictly speaking, to cut off any member. He holds with Caje 
tan that an important part of a member is in itself equivalent 
to a member. A reason he offers for his opinion is that a 
eunuch is enumerated among those who are canonically muti 
lated, but the eunuch, he tells us, "does not lack any member 
which in itself has a function in the body independent of all 
other organs." This is not true. The testicles, which the 
eunuch lacks, have two distinct functions, independent of 
other organs they make the spermatozoa and an important 
internal glandular secretion. These facts were not known in 
Suarez s time (1548-1617). Suarez adds this remark: "There 
can be a grave sin in a marring [diminutio] of any chief mem- 

1 De Justitia et Jure, disp. 19, tr. 3. 

1 Ibid., disp. 68, tr. 3. 

4 Ibid., n. 69. 

" Theol. Moral, vol. vii. 

* De Censuris, etc., disp. 44, sec. 2, 2. 


her, although there may be no grave mutilation; as, for ex 
ample, to cut off a part of a finger is undoubtedly a mortal 
sin, yet, in the opinion of all moralists, it is not enough to 
cause irregularity." 

St. Alphonsus Liguori defines mutilation thus: "Muti 
lation here signifies that some principal member be separated 
from the body; that is, a part of the body that has in itself a 
distinct function, as a foot, hand, eye, ear, etc." 7 He says 8 
canonical irregularity as a punishment is not incurred by a 
person who cuts off another man s finger, thumb, lips, nose, 
auricle, or who knocks out teeth, because these are supposed 
by canonists not to be properly members of the body, but parts 
of members. To blind a man in one eye is not enough to cause 
canonical irregularity; the eye must be taken out. 9 All these 
injuries are of course mutilations in the moral sense of the 
term. To blind a man without removing the eye, to cut out 
his spleen in the treatment of Banti s disease, to remove a 
woman s ovary or uterus, to cut off part of the point of a 
finger, to crop the top of an auricle, to knock out a tooth, and 
any other permanent marring of the body, even to cause an 
unsightly scar across the face, are all mutilations in the moral 
sense of the term. A physician, midwife, nurse, or parent 
who neglects an infant s eyes, and so permits ophthalmia 
neonatorum to blind the child, is guilty of grave mutilation. 
In the year 1914, in the Chicago schools, 45,176 children were 
found suffering from various defects, and 35,425 were advised 
by the examining physicians to seek treatment; in each of 
these cases the parents were informed of the nature of the 
disease and the necessity for treatment, but only 40 per cent, 
of the parents paid any attention to the notices. Of 5754 
cases of diseased tonsils, which are likely to affect the heart 
permanently, only 4 per cent, were treated; of 1254 cases of 
discharging ears only 10 per cent, were treated, although such 
a condition may go on to deafness if not attended to. These 

* Theol. Moral, lib. 7, cap. 5, disp. 4, n. 365. 
8 Ibid., n. 378. 
Ibid., n. 382. 


parents were criminally guilty of grave neglect in permitting 
the mutilation of the heart and ears. 

Any notable mutilation inflicted upon oneself is akin to 
the malice of suicide, and when perpetrated on another it is 
related to homicide. The dominion over the members of the 
body, as over the whole body, belongs to God alone. Man is 
constituted by his parts, members, taken together, and if he 
were master of his members he would be master of himself. 
Again, each member of the body is naturally united to that 
body and ordained for determined organic functions; so it is 
wrong to render these members unfit for their natural func 
tion or to separate them from the body, unless such actions 
are necessary for the preservation of life itself. Although 
man is not master of himself, he is the administrator of him 
self; and therefore when the amputation of any member is 
necessary for the preservation of the life of the whole body it 
is licit to subordinate this part to the good of the whole. 

A direct mutilation is one intended as an end, or as a 
means to an end; it is a voluntary and free act. An indirect 
mutilation is one in which the mutilation is the natural effect 
of the act, but the intention of the agent is directed toward 
another end. The mutilation follows indirectly from the ac 
tivity of the will, but there is a satisfying proportion between 
the accidental effect (the mutilation) and the end intended. 
In such an act there are two effects which follow the causal 
act deque immediate, or directly (not indirectly, that is, not 
all from the other effect, but each immediately from this 
cause) : one effect is good (to save life, avoid unbearable pain, 
or the like), and the other evil (the mutilation), but the good 
effect is the end intended, the evil effect is reluctantly per 
mitted. Such an act is licit provided the usual conditions of 
the double effect are present, that is: 

1. The action that is the cause of the good and bad ef 
fects must be itself good or indifferent morally. 

2. The good and the bad effects must each be an imme 
diate result of the causal act; the good effect may be not so 
subordinated to the evil effect as to be obtainable only through 
the evil effect. 


3. The had effect must not be intended, either imme 
diately or remotely; it may at most be tolerated as unavoid 

4. There must be a sufficiently grave reason for the 

Indirect mutilation may be licit when the evil to be 
avoided is proportional to the mutilation. Direct mutilation, 
where there is one direct effect of, say, the surgical operation, 
namely, to remove the somatic organ, is not licit, except for 
the good of the whole body; and that good to the whole body 
must be juridically equivalent to the damage done the body 
by the mutilation. There is to be a direct effect in such muti 
lation, which is the good of the whole body. It is not per 
mitted to kill directly to save the life of another, but it is per 
missible to mutilate directly to save the whole body. Direct 
mutilation, however, is never unavoidable because the agent 
can always correctly order his intention before the opera 

All direct mutilation, unless for the good of the whole 
body, implies deordination : it offends against the supreme 
dominion of God, who reserves to himself, as Creator, owner 
ship of human life and its organs. As we may not destroy life, 
which belongs to God, we may not amputate a member to sup 
press any vital function. The exception which permits us 
to mutilate a member or organ is, as has been said, the adequate 
good of the whole body. The reason for this is that man is 
the administrator of his members, to the good of the whole 
person. Each member is not for itself but for the whole 

The good of the body is the sole cause that renders direct 
mutilation licit. The members of the body by their nature 
are not immediately subordinate to anything except the con 
servation of the total natural good, or that of the body. There 
fore direct mutilation is not permissible to effect immediately 
spiritual good, or the good of the soul. We may not castrate 
a man, or do vasectomy on him, to preserve his continence, 
because there is no immediate subordination and connection 
between the members of the body and the salvation of the 


soul. Moreover, as St. Thomas says, 10 "Spiritual health can 
always be preserved by means other than amputation of bodily 
members," that is, through moderating by the will the use 
of these members. If a mutilation that immediately conduces 
to the good of the whole body, happens also to do good to the 
soul, this second effect is then legitimate. (The various muti 
lations of the body by surgical operations will bo considered 
separately hereafter. ) 

May the state, then, sterilize criminals, and persons af 
flicted with dangerous hereditary diseases, to prevent the prop 
agation of moral and physical defectives ? This question is 
considered specially in another chapter. 

There is an error gradually infecting all nations of late 
which is that the state, as such, is above morality; that what 
the civil authority permits or orders is by that fact alone made 
licit or obligatory. Hence the interference with individual lib 
erty, with the rights of man, shown by laws for the mutilation 
of the physically degenerate, laws conferring privileges on one 
part of the community to the detriment of another, meddling 
in parental rights, and so on. Political error has come to such 
a pass that the men on the street think any majority is jus 
tified, solely because it is a majority, in recalling a judge or 
a law, in overriding authority for the satisfaction of appetite. 
The sovereign people tries to be subject and sovereign at the 
same time, and it deems its rulers mere hired men who may 
be discharged at will like cooks. 

A law is a rule and standard of action; a just, perma 
nent, and rational ordination for the good of the community, 
promulgated by one who has charge of that community. 
Dominion is the power of claiming a thing as one s own, the 
right of ownership; and if this possessor has created the 
object, his dominion may be absolute. A governor, lawgiver, 
judge, has power or jurisdiction for the good of the governed. 
The business of government, of the state, is to protect each 
citizen in the pursuit of temporal happiness, to develop his 
natural faculties, establish and preserve social order, wherein 
each citizen is secured in his natural and legal rights, and is 

10 2, 2, q. Ixv, a. 1, ad 3. 


held up to the fulfilment of his own duties so far as they bear 
on the good of the community as such ; and also to put within 
the reach of all citizens, as far as possible, a fair allowance 
of means to acquire temporal happiness, or external peace and 
prosperity. This is the whole business of the state. The 
state is for the people, and it may not transgress an inch 
beyond its proper limits, which are as hard and fast as those 
that bind the individual citizen. The citizen is not to be 
treated solely as an industrial or military unit; nor are ma 
terial progress and military power, or even sheer intellectual 
civilization, to be the sole aim of the state. The state should 
develop a man s entire nature, physical, mental, and moral. 

We must obey civil authority, but we are not slaves or chat 
tels of that authority. The state s authority over us is not 
dominative; it is only a power for our good and utility. The 
civil authority has no more right to invade the rights of its 
meanest citizen than it has to lie or to blaspheme. God gives 
civil authority to the established community, and the com 
munity entrusts this to its ruler; authority is a divine insti 
tution, rulers are directly a human institution and only in 
directly divine. When the ruler has once been set up, has had 
authority entrusted to him, obedience must be given to him 
while he acts in keeping with his contract. Kant and his 
followers erroneously separate the juridic from the moral or 
der; they deny that beyond the state there are any rights pre 
eminent to the state s rights, yet they say there is an innate 
liberty which belongs to every human being equally and in 
alienably. The moral order comprehends all factors that are 
necessary to make the free activity of man in every respect 
well disposed, and among these factors is the juridic order it 
self. Man is naturally social, and whatever means are neces 
sary to preserve human society are also naturally befitting man. 
Such means are to preserve for each man what are his, and to 
abstain from injuring other men. Now, so to act, that is, to 
abstain from murder, theft, and the like, to fulfil contracts, are 
strictly juridic duties, and at the same time moral duties. 
Therefore the moral order comprehends the juridic order. 

The end of the state, then, is not the public good consid- 


ered as an end in itself. The individual citizen is not his own 
end in life, and so no mere multitude of men ever can become 
their own end. Jf the end of the state is the public good, 
then private good is subordinate to this, and the public good 
becomes man s final end, which is subversive of human dig 
nity and is despotism. 

A clear definition of the power of the state to interfere 
with the rights to life and limb of the individual citizen is 
very important, because, as has been said, of late there is an 
alarming tendency on the part of the civil authority to over 
ride the rights of private citizens, even in the most democratic 
forms of government. Encroachment on the liberty of the 
individual is characteristic of unchristian political societies, 
and all states are now receding from Christianity. A striking 
example of this tyranny is the laws recently passed in ten 
American states for the mutilation of degenerates. This defini 
tion is more readily made by considering concrete examples of 
public conduct 

Suppose an enemy demands from a city the surrender for 
execution of an innocent man on pain of the burning of the 
city and the destruction of its inhabitants. May the city cut 
off that member for the safety of the whole body politic, as a 
person may cut off his own hand to save his life? The state 
has not dominion over the life of a citizen, nevertheless it may 
kill a citizen in punishment of crime, because the punishment 
is useful to the whole people, is for the common good, is pre 
servative of the social life. Why, however, should the state be 
permitted to kill a criminal rather than an innocent man, since 
it has no dominion over the life of either, and we suppose the 
death of each is necessary for the public good? If you an 
swer by saying a man may cut off a diseased member but 
not a sound one to save his body, and the state in like manner 
may cut off a criminal, unsound member, but not an innocent 
one, this answer does not remove the difficulty: we may cut 
off even a sound member to save the body. Suppose, for 
example, a man caught by the arm and in danger of death from 
a flood; he might sever a sound arm to escape death if no 
other means presented. In like manner the state might cut 


off an innocent, sound member to save its life from the enemy, 
as described above. 

This reasoning, however, is open to objection. The state 
has no dominion over the life of its members, and there is a 
vast difference between the members of the human body and 
those of a body politic. A member of a human body has no 
right in itself against the other members; nor is it capable 
of natural injury, since it is not separable from the whole 
suppositum, or person. The suppositum, or person, has a right 
to the use of the members ; it alone is injured when a member 
is amputated; and the members are solely for the utility of the 
suppositum. Therefore we may licitly destroy a member to 
save the suppositum for which this member exists. 

The state, however, is not a suppositum in this sense; it 
may not wrest the life of its members to its own utility, be 
cause the citizens are not for the state; on the contrary, the 
state is for them and their utility. That a rational being 
should be for the utility of another person or a society makes 
him a slave and supposes dominion in the user. A slave is 
differentiated from a subject by the fact that the subject is 
only politically governed that is, governed for his own utility 
and good; the slave is governed despotically that is, for the 
utility and good of his master. The state may not, as a mas 
ter, use the life of a subject for its own utility alone. Al 
though the suppositum does not own its members, yet since the 
members are not separable from the man, are not self-centred 
as are the citizens in a state, the man may use them for his 
own utility. They are as slaves under a master, not as subjects 
in a body politic ; therefore they may be sacrificed for the good 
of the suppositum. 

This is the argument used by De Lugo ; Molina follows the 
same line of thought; but both authorities finally reach the 
conclusion, in the case of the enemy and the citizen whose life 
is required, that the state may at least drive this citizen out of 
the city to save its own existence. Molina also draws atten 
tion to the fact that there is a great difference between a mem 
ber of a body politic and a member of the human body; this 


identification, if pushed far enough, becomes an analogical 

Some hold that a judge or the civil authority in general 
may kill or maim a criminal by gubernatorial power alone, pre 
scinding from dominative power, and this not to the utility 
of the criminal but for the utility of society. The killing of 
a criminal, these objectors say, is not for the good of the 
criminal; it is a deterrent, a protective act, for the good of 
society. This is not true. The penal law which the criminal 
breaks was not made solely for society ; it was intended also for 
the utility of the person who becomes a criminal. The law 
was made and the punishment established that all subjects 
indiscriminately should be helped to live honestly and blame 
lessly, and to this end it was necessary to decree and inflict 
punishment as affecting all offenders. The obligation to re 
ceive punishment is in a manner essential to man. As he 
naturally requires direction and government unto virtue in his 
political and social life, he has a connatural obligation to en 
dure punishment when he violates the law made for his ad 
vantage one condition cannot exist without the other. Hence 
punishment really is to the utility of the criminal. 


BY the embryologists from the moment the spermatozoon 
joins the nucleus of the ovum until the end of the second 
week of gestation the product of conception is called the Ovum; 
from the end of the second week to the end of the fourth week 
it is the Embryo; from the end of the fourth week to birth it 
is the Fetus. At what moment during these three stages does 
the human soul, the substantial form of a man in the full 
comprehension of the term, enter the product of conception? 
When does the thing become a human being ? 

The question is evidently one of the greatest importance. 
If the rational soul does not enter until the ovum has developed 
into an embryo, or only after the embryo has passed on into 
the fetal condition, the destruction of this ovum, by artificial 
abortion or otherwise, would be a very different act morally 
from such destruction after the soul had turned the new 
growth into a living man. If the product of conception has 
first only a vegetative vital principle, and this is later replaced 
by a vital principle that is merely sensitive, and this again is 
finally superseded by a rational vital principle, the destruc 
tion by abortion or otherwise of the vegetative or sensitive life 
would not be a destruction of a rational life. In this hypo 
thesis the killing of the embryo would be a great crime, because 
the embryo would be in potency for the reception of human 
life, but the act would not be murder. 

The discussion concerning the moment the human soul 
enters the body is older than Christianity, and it was taken up 
by many of the early Greek and Latin Fathers of the Church, 
and revived again and again down to the present day. Plato 
thought the soul enters at birth ; Asclepias, Heraclites, and the 
Stoics held it is not infused until the time of puberty; Aris- 



totle * said the soul is infused in the male fetus about the for 
tieth day after conception, and into the female fetus about the 
eightieth day. 

Tertullian, 2 Apollinaris, and a few others advocated 
Traducianism, 3 or a transmission of the spiritual soul by the 
parents. He said souls are carried over by conception and by 
the parents, so that the soul of the father is the soul of the 
son, and from one man conies the whole overflow of souls. 
St. Augustine used the metaphor, one soul lit from another as 
flame from flame, without decay in either. Augustine was in 
doubt as to the origin of the soul, and inclined to traducianism, 
because it seemed to him better to explain the doctrine of the 
transmission of original sin. "Tell me," he wrote to St. 
Jerome in 41 5, 4 "if souls are created singly for each person 
born to-day, when do infants sin so that they need remission 
in the sacrament of Christ, sin in Adam from whom the flesh 
of sin is propagated? . . . Since we cannot say that God 
makes of souls sinners, or punishes the innocent, nor may we 
hold that souls even of infants which without baptism leave 
the body are saved, ,1 ask you how that opinion can be de 
fended which thinks that all souls are not made from the 
single soul of the first man, yet as that soul was one to one 
man, these are particular to particular individuals." 

Again, St. Augustine said : 5 "I do not know how the soul 
came into my body; he knows who gave it, whether he drew 
it [traxerit] from my father, or created it new as in the first 
man." In the Book of Retractions? speaking of the articles 
he had written against the Academicians before he was a 
bishop, he says : "As to the origin of the soul, how it is set in 
the body whether it is from that one man who first was 
created . . . or, as in his case, is made particularly for each 
particular individual, I did not then know, and I do not know 
now." St. Gregory the Great also said he could not tell 

*IX, De Animalibus. 

* De Anima, cap. 27. 

* From tradux, a planted vine-shoot made to take root. 

* Migne, vol. xxxiii, col. 720. 

* De Anima et ejus Origine, i, xv. 
"I, cap. i, n. 3. 


whether the human soul descends from Adam or is given par 
ticularly to each man. 

St. Gregory of Nyssa, however, who died about 385, thirty 
years before St. Augustine wrote the letter to St. Jerome, held 
that the soul is infused into the body at the moment of con 
ception, and ho argues with absolute precision for his opinion. 7 
St. Maximus the Theologian, who was martyred in 662, in 
veighs 8 against the notion that the soul is vegetative at first, 
then sensitive, and finally intellectual, and he thinks the asser 
tion of Aristotle that the fetus is not animated before the for 
tieth day is altogether untrue. 

St. Anselm, who died in 1109, very dogmatically denied 
that the fetus is animated at conception, 9 and after his time 
the doctrine of Aristotle, which is commonly called the Thom- 
istic opinion, became almost general. Vincent of Beauvais, 
however, a contemporary of St. Thomas, opposed the Thomis- 
tic doctrine. Albertus Magnus 10 had the same opinion as 
St. Thomas, and probably taught it to St. Thomas. In the 
middle ages all held that each soul is directly created by God, 
and is infused into the embryo, not at the instant of concep 
tion, but when the embryo is sufficiently formed to receive it, 
which, as Aristotle said, happens at about the fortieth day in 
males and the eightieth day in females. The Thomists main 
tained the succession of the three souls; many others opposed 
this particular opinion. 

Thomas Fienus, a physician and a professor in the Univer 
sity of Louvain, in 1620 published a book 11 in which he held 
that the soul is infused about the third day after conception, 
and his argument for the early advent of the soul is very sound. 
As a result of Fienus s revolutionary argument, Florentinus in 
1658 brought out a book at Lyons, called De Hominibus Dubiis 
Baptizandis, in which he held that no matter what the age 
of the aborted fetus, if it could be differentiated from a mole 
it should be baptized. This book was brought before the Con- 

I Migne, Patrologia Graeca, vols. xliv and xlvi. 

8 Migne, Ibid., vol. xci, col. 1335. 

9 De Conceptione Virginia, cap. xii. 

10 Summa, De Homine, q. xvi, art. 3. 

II De Vi Formatrice Foetus Liber. 


gregation of the Index. The congregation did not condemn 
the book, but the author was forbidden to teach that his doc 
trine holds sub gravi. The book went through many editions 
and was approved by the faculties of the principal universities 
and the theologians of the leading religious orders. 

Zacchias, chief physician to Innocent X., in 1661 published 
his Quest iones Medico-Legates, and in this he maintained that 
"the human fetus has not at any time any kind of soul other 
than a rational, and this is created by God at the first moment 
of conception, and is then infused." 12 By 1745 the opinion 
of Zacchias as to the moment life begins was virtually general 
among physicians, and has since remained the doctrine of 
physicists. Modern discoveries by biologists have confirmed 
the fact that human life exists in the impregnated ovum ex 
actly as it does in all stages of life, and no scientist holds any 
other opinion. There are, however, a few moralists at the 
present day who incline to the old Thomistic doctrine or to 
modifications of it. 

St. Alphonsus Liguori * 3 was a follower of the Thomistic 
opinion. He affirmed: "They are wrong that say the fetus is 
animated at the instant of conception, because the fetus cer 
tainly is not animated before it is formed, as is proved from 
Exod. xxi : 22, where in the Septuagint version we find : He 
that strikes a gravid woman and causes abortion, will give life 
for life if the child was formed ; if it was not formed, he will 
be fined. This argument by St. Alphonsus is invalid apart 
from any facts that may bear upon either the Thomistic or 
the modern opinion concerning the quickening of the fetus. 
The text from the Septuagint Exodus is (1) too doubtful in 
itself to be the basis of any argument; but (2) even if it were 
authentic just as it stands, the conclusion St. Alphonsus draws 
from it is not warranted by the premises. The Septuagint text 
differs from the Vulgate and the Hebrew texts. The Vulgate 
has it thus: "Si rixati fuerint viri et percusserit quis mulierem 
pracgnantem, et abortum quidem fercerit, sed ipsa vixerit, 
subjacebit damno quantum maritus mulieris expetierit et 

"Tom. ii, lib. ix, tr. 1. 

11 Thcologia Moralis, lib. iv, tr. 4, n. 594. 


arbitri judicaverint ; sin autem mors fuerit subsecuta, reddit 
animam pro anima, oculum pro oculo, dentem pro dente, 
manum pro mami, pedem pro pede, adustionem pro adustione, 
vulnus pro vulnere, livorem pro livore. 14 This version has 
nothing whatever to say about the foetus formatus or non for- 
matus; it is merely an application of the Semitic Lex Talionis, 
and the form of the law is clearly corrupt and inaccurate. 

The passage quoted by St. Alphonsus as that of the Sep- 
tuagint is not exact even as the Septuagint has it. The full 
text is : "If two men fight, and one strike a woman that hath 
[a child] in the womb, and her babe come forth not yet fully 
formed, 15 in a fine he shall be mulcted; whatsoever the hus 
band layeth upon him he shall give according to decision [i.e., 
of the judges]. But if it [the babe] be fully formed he will 
give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, 
foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe 
for stripe." 

This is (1) evidently nothing but an application of the 
Lex Talionis, with no thought whatever of the biological ani 
mation, as such, of the fetus. It means that if a fully formed 
fetus be aborted, either no real damage is done, as such a child 
is viable; or the formed child may be maimed, and then the 
Lex Talionis is to be applied. ,If the fetus is not fully formed 
it is not a fit subject of the Lex Talionis since it cannot lose 
an eye, a tooth, and so on, because it lacks these organs, and 
therefore the law of retaliation is not to be enforced. 

(2) Suppose, however, the writer of the text as the Sep 
tuagint has it did think with St. Alphonsus that the formed 
fetus is animated, and the unformed is not animated, even 
then the conclusion drawn by St. Alphonsus is not warranted 
by the text. The laws of Exodus do not teach embryology, 
physiology, or any other part of physical science; and no 

"If men quarrel, and one strike a woman with child, and she 
miscarry indeed, but live herself, he shall be answerable for so much 
damage as the woman s husband shall require and as arbiters shall 
award. But if her death ensue thereupon, he shall render life for 
life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burning 
for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe. 

5 KCU ee\0# Traidiov avrijs M 1 ? e^iKOVurufvov not moulded out into 
form; ltiKovi eiv,to mould out into fonn:euci , an icon, image, like 


authority worth a hearing holds that the Scriptures were in 
tended to be infallible treatises on obstetrics or astronomy. 
Like the other parts of the Bible, the laws of Exodus pre 
suppose the unscientific biological, astronomical, and other 
physical notions of the time in which they were written the 
moral truth is the matter the Scripture is dealing with; there 
no inaccuracy is to be found. St. John (1:13) speaks of those 
who believe in Christ s name, "Qui non ex sanguinibus, neque 
ex voluntate carnis, neque ex voluntate viri, sed ex Deo nati 
sunt." Here he expresses the contemporary notion, which is 
also the Thomistic opinion, that men are generated from the 
specialized blood of their parents. He was interested solely in 
conveying the truth that those who received Christ were re 
generated by him, not through heredity; and he does so, al 
though the biology is inexact. If St. Alphonsus s conclusion 
is valid as from the text of Exodus, then men are generated 
ex sanguinibus, and so on indefinitely. 

The Massoretic text of this passage seems to be the best 
preserved: "If men fight, and one hurt a woman who is 
with child, and her child come forth, yet there is no mischief, 
he [who struck her] shall be mulcted in a fine; whatsoever 
the husband of the woman layeth upon him he shall pay ac 
cording to the judges. But if there be mischief, then he shall 
give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, 
foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe 
for stripe." Here the Hebrew text follows the Lex Talionis 
exactly. If, in a brawl, a man s pregnant wife is struck and 
abortion results, the offender pays the penalty. If the abor 
tion does not kill or maim the child, the culprit is fined by 
the Sanhedrim; if the child is killed or maimed, then the 
penalty is according to the Lex Talionis. In the Hebrew text 
also there is no mention of a distinction between a foetus for- 
matus and non formatus. 

Whether the fetus is animated at conception or some time 
later, there is no foundation whatever for the notion that 
the female is quickened later than the male. As was said 
before, Aristotle held that the human male fetus is animated 
at the fortieth day, the female at the ninetieth day, and tho 


old moralists accepted his statement. At tlie fortieth day, 
however, no one can differentiate sex unless the microscope 
is used, and this particular use of the microscope is alto 
gether modern the knowledge requisite for such use was not 
in existence sixty years ago. At the twentieth day, with 
the microscope and a stained specimen, a biologist can rec 
ognize whether the primordial ova are present or absent 
and thus determine sex. Only at the eighty-fourth day can 
sex now be differentiated without the aid of the microscope, 
but then the embryo must be dissected: nothing can be told 
from its external appearance. Sex can first be distinguished 
by the external appearance only at about the one hundred 
and twelfth day, the end of the fourth month of gestation. 
Therefore when Aristotle said the male fetus is animated 
at the fortieth day, and the female at the eightieth or nine 
tieth day, he was romancing. 

The question, then, narrows to this: Is any human fetus 
animated immediately at conception, or from forty to eighty 
days after conception? The reason given by the followers 
of Aristotle for deferring animation is that the vital prin 
ciple requires organs in the receptive material, but the em 
bryo in the early stages, they say, lacks these organs. This 
notion, however, as to the lack of organs is altogether er 
roneous, and the rational soul enters the embryo in the oval 
stage, immediately after the pronuclei unite: there is organ 
ization in that stage of human life sufficient to receive the 
substantial form or soul. We do not know how long after 
insemination the pronuclei unite, but the proposition here is 
that as soon as they unite the human soul enters. Fecun 
dation usually occurs after a menstruation, but not necessarily 
so; the spermatozoon may live in the tube for seventeen days 
awaiting the ovum. 

The human body is made up of billions of microscopic liv 
ing cells, all of which are derived by fission and differentia 
tion from the two original single germ-cells, the ovum and the 
spermatozoon. Some nerve-cells have long processes running 
along the white fibres through the entire length of the body, 
but they cannot be differentiated except by the microscope. 


In the body are also various liquids which are not cellular, 
as water, saliva, tears, urine, blood and lymph plasma, and 
the gastric, intestinal, and glandular juices, and these are 
secreted or excreted by the somatic cells. The cells assimi 
late nutritive material carried to them by the blood, excrete 
refuse substances, secrete glandular products, and are the 
media for all human operations below certain acts of the in 

A typical animal cell is commonly spherical in shape, 
but it may take a great variety of forms through compression. 
It has a cell-body or protoplasm, which is called also cyto 
plasm, especially when contrasted with the nuclear karyoplasm, 
and a nucleus. A few cells, like fat-cells and the human ovum, 
have an external covering membrane, or cell-wall. There is 
a part called the Centrosome observable in many cells, 
and this is made up of one or two minute dots surrounded by 
a radiating aster called the Attraction-Sphere. The centro- 
some is concerned in the process of cell-division and in the 
fertilization of the ovum ; it is an important organ in the 
production of cell from cell, though its full nature and func 
tion are not yet known. The Plastid, or Protoplast, is an 
other less important part found in certain cells; and in this 
by enlargement and differentiation are formed starch, pig 
ment, and in some cases chlorophyl. \ r acuoles are seen in 
cells ; and there is an opinion that these may be a special kind 
of plastid: some vacuoles pulsate. 

The Nucleus is the most important part of a cell, the cen 
tre of its activity. The specific qualities of organism in origin 
and development are based upon nuclei, so far as the material 
element of the living cells is concerned. Vital stimuli pass 
through the nucleus into the surrounding protoplasm, and 
these stimuli control metabolism. The nutritive cytoplasm 
assimilates, but the vital principle energizes this assimilation 
through the nucleus, for a part of a cell deprived of the nucleus 
may live for a time, but it cannot repair itself. Constructive 
metabolism ceases when the nucleus is lost. A toxic disease 
like diphtheria kills by disintegrating cellular nuclei. 

In the nucleus are several elements, the chief among which 


is Chromatin. Chromatin takes various forms, but commonly 
it is an irregular network. From the chromatin are derived 
the Chromosomes in the prophases of indirect cell-division 
which is the process of cell-division in the human body, ex 
cept in lymph-cells and white blood-corpuscles, which split 
directly, or by Amitosis. Indirect cell-division is called 
Mitosis or Karyokinesis. In the male and female chromo 
somes, according to a common opinion of biologists, all the 

Fig. I 

fWo Ceotro6<xnes in an attraction-sphere 

Nueteolus or 




si ve bodies t 

suspended in the moh, 
<X the Cytoplaanx 


Throughout the Cytoplasm is a mesh containing numerous minute granules 
called Microsomes. 

elements of parental and phyletic physical heredity are trans 
mitted to the embryo. 

The production of cell from cell is accomplished either 
by direct splitting of the nucleus and cytoplasm into two 
new cells, or by indirect division through a series of stages. 
In a typical direct, or amitotic, division the nucleus is con 
stricted in the middle and divides into two daughter-nuclei. 
These by amoeboid movements withdraw to the poles of the 
cell; the cell finally divides between them, and thus two cells 
are formed. These, again, split into four, the four into 
eight, and so on. An amoeba by direct division can separate 
into two distinct new animals in ten minutes. 


Heredity here is simple. In unicellular organisms, such 
as Rhizopoda and Infusoria, each individual grows to a cer 
tain stage, and then divides into two parts, which are exactly 
alike in size and structure, so that it is not possible to decide 
whether one is older or younger than the other. These or 
ganisms reduce the size of their overgrown bodies by division. 
Each individual of any such unicellular species is a part split 
off serially from an organism which started into life ages ago. 
Some of them have come down in uninterrupted life from geo 
logical epochs that passed away euns before the first man was 
created. Many of these unicellular plants and animals have 
immeasurably the most ancient form of life on earth. Hered 
ity with them depends upon the fact that each offspring is 
merely half of its parent. In some cases the division has a 
sexual quality: two cells in Paramecium, and, like Infuso- 
soria, fuse and then divide if they come into contact; they 
can, however, split without this sexual process. 

Multicellular plants and animals do not reproduce by sim 
ple division, and the half of the parental body does not pass 
over into the progeny. Sexual reproduction is the chief means 
of multiplication in multicellular organisms, and in no case 
is it completely wanting; in most it is the only method of re 
production. In multicellular animals the power of reproduc 
tion is in the germ-cells, which differ from the somatic cells. 
Germ-cells do not maintain individual life as the body-cells 
do, but the germ-cells alone preserve the species. From two 
of these germ-cells under certain conditions is developed a 
complete bodily organism of the same species as the parents. 
These two cells are in a sense the undying cells; the somatic 
cells die. 

Multicellular animals Man, for example grow embryo- 
logically by Mitosis or Indirect Division. As in Direct Divi 
sion, typically, the nucleus in mitosis splits first and the cyto 
plasm secondly; but before the nucleus divides its content un 
dergoes a series of changes. The chromatin loses its reticular 
arrangement and gives rise to a definite number of separate 
bodies, usually rod-shaped, known as Chromosomes. In this 
process the chromatin becomes a convoluted thread, called the 


Skein or Spireme. The thread thickens and opens out some 
what, and finally breaks transversely to form the chromo 
somes, which may be rods, straight, curved, ovoid, and some 
times annular. Commonly the nuclear material fades away 
and leaves the chromosomes in the cell-plasm. (Fig. II, 2 

and 3.) 

Fig. II 


1. Cell with resting Nucleus. 2. Prophase: Chromatin in thickened con 
voluted threads, beginning of Spindle. 3. Prophase: Chromosomes. 4. Pro- 
phase: Spindle in long axis of the Nucleus, Chromosomes dividing. 5. Ana- 
phase: Chromosomes moving toward the Centrosomes. 6. Chromosomes at 
the poles forming the Diaster, beginning splitting of the Cell-body. 7. Telo- 
phase, Daughter-Nuclei returning to resting state. 8. Daughter- Nuclei show 
ing Monaster below. 9. The two new Cells. 

It is almost an established fact that each species of animal 
and plant has a fixed and characteristic number of chromo 
somes, which regularly recurs in the division of all its cells. 
In forms arising by sexual production the number is even. 
The number of chromosomes in the human cell is said to be 


forty-eight. There are, according to some observers, forty- 
seven chromosomes in man and forty-eight in woman. There 
seem to be twice as many chromosomes in white men as 
in negroes. Wilson gives the number 18 of specific chromo 
somes for seventy-four animals and plants. Germ-cells as 
differentiated from the somatic cells have in the perfected cell 
always half the number of chromosomes found in a somatic 

While these changes are going on in the chromatin the 
Amphiaster forms. This consists of a fibrous spindle-shaped 
body, the Spindle, at either pole of which is an Aster made 
up of rays. In the centre of each aster is a Centrosome, and 
this may have a Centrosphere about it. As the amphiaster 
grows the centrosomes are grouped in a plane at the equator 
of the spindle, forming the Equatorial Plate. (Fig. ,11, No. 
4.) The process so far makes up the Prophases of the Mi 

In the Metaphases of the Karyokinesis begins the actual 
division of the cell. Each chromosome splits lengthwise into 
exactly similar halves, and these, in the Anaphases of the 
mitosis, drift out to the opposite poles of the spindle to form 
the daughter-nuclei of the new cells. The daughter-nuclei 
receive precisely equivalent portions of chromatin from the 
mother-nucleus, and this is an important fact in mitosis. As 
the chromosomes go toward the poles the cell-body begins to 
constrict at the equator. 

In the final phases, the Telophases, the cell divides in a 
plane passing through the equator of the spindle, and each 
daughter-cell receives half the chromosomes, half the spindle, 
and one of the asters with its centrosome. A daughter-nucleus 
is reconstructed in each cell from the chromosomes. The as 
ter commonly disappears and the centrosome persists, usually 
outside the new nucleus, but sometimes within it. Every 
phase of mitosis is subject to variation in different kinds of 
cells, but the outline of the division given here is the funda 
mental method. 

The germ-cells differ from the body-cells in general by 

18 The Cell in Development and Inheritance, p. 207. 


containing half the number of chromosomes characteristic of 
a given animal or plant. If the body-cell has, say, twenty- 
four chromosomes, the spermatozoon of the animal or plant 
from which the cells are taken will have twelve chromosomes 
and the ovum will have twelve. When the nuclei of these two 
cells unite in fertilization the resulting primordial cell will 
have the twenty-four chromosomes restored, the specific num 
ber for this plant or animal. In oogenesis and spermatogen- 
esis the phases of "Reduction," wherein the ovum and sper 
matozoon get rid of half the chromosomes during the stages 
of maturation of these germ-cells, are somewhat similar for 
both sexes. The process is very complicated, but it is of im 
portance in the theories of inheritance. All the physical 
characteristics in a human being that come to him from his 
parents and remoter ancestors are supposed, by the biologists, 
to reach him through the chromosomes in the nuclei of the 
single parental germ-cells. The maternal physical heredity 
is handed on through the chromosomes in the ovum. The fe 
tus in the womb is a parasite, autocentric, feeding at the start 
from the deutoplasm, or yolk, in the ovum, and later from 
the supplies brought to it by the maternal blood. The physi 
cal material it gets directly from the mother is very probably 
all in the chromosomes of the fecundated ovum. Some weeks 
elapse, and the embryo is quite advanced before it begins to 
draw food from the mother at all. So far as the father is 
concerned, there is no doubt whatever that every physical and 
pathological characteristic that can be handed down and 
there are many such qualities must come through the chro 
mosomes of the paternal spermatozoon. Certain physical 
characteristics are passed on for centuries in a family the 
Norseman s body in northeastern Ireland, the skin-pigment in 
the American negro, and so on indefinitely and these qual 
ities cannot come down except through the chromosomes. 
The germ-plasm has come to us from the first man, and it 
will be passed on to the last person of the race we are all 
literally uterine brothers. 

In the reduction of the germ-cells, if the primordial cell 
that finally produces the ovum has, say, four chromosomes, 


these four chromosomes first split longitudinally and reduce 
into two tetrads, or two groups of four chromosomes. Out 
side the nucleus is a spindle toward which the two tetrads 
move; they pass out of the nucleus and become the equatorial 
plane of the spindle; each tetrad divides into dyads (pairs of 
chromosomes), and one pair of these dyads remains in the 
ovum, while the other pair leaves the ovum entirely and be 
comes the nucleus of an abortive cell, called the First Polar 
Body. Later a second polar body forms and carries another 
dyad (two chromosomes) out of the ovum, leaving only one 
dyad, or two chromosomes, in the germ-cells; that is, half the 
number of chromosomes that were in the primordial cell. 

The reduction-division in spermatozoa is similar, but the 
end process leaves four active spermatozoa, whereas in the 
ovum the final result is one ovum and three practically inert 
and cast-off polar bodies. The reduction-division in both 
ovum and spermatozoon is in reality far more complicated 
than the broad summary given here. In parthenogenetic in 
sects and animals a polar body takes the place of the 
spermatozoon, and fuses with the egg-nucleus to start 

In general, the new nuclei in the cells formed by division 
are not made de novo, but arise from the splitting of the 
nucleus in the mother-cell. The new nucleus assimilates ma 
terial, grows to maturity, and divides again into two daughter- 
nuclei. Whatever be the number of chromosomes that enter 
a new nucleus as it forms, the same number issues from it in 
mitosis. Boveri said, 17 "We may identify every chromatic 
element arising from a resting nucleus with a definite element 
that enters into the formation of that nucleus, from which the 
remarkable conclusion follows that in all cells derived in the 
regular course of division from the fertilized egg, one half 
of the chromosomes are of strictly paternal origin, the other 
half of maternal." It is not strictly true to say that the 
germ-nuclei fuse: they send in two sets of chromosomes that 
lie side by side, as has been frequently demonstrated since 
" Jenaische Zeitschrift, 1891, p. 410. 


1892 18 in many of the lower forms of life, and this law al 
most certainly extends also io man. 

The primordial germ-cells appear in the human fetus 
about the twentieth day and finally mature at puberty. Then 
an ovum at menstruation breaks out through the surface of 
the ovary, and is taken by the fimbriae of the Fallopian tube 
into the lumen of this tube. Fecundation happens near the 
outer or ovarian end of the Fallopian tube, and the fecundated 
ovum finally is passed on to fasten on the wall of the uterus. 
The spermatozoon is a ciliated cell with the power of locomo 
tion, through the movement of the tail of the cell. It can 
move 0.05 to 0.06 mm., or its own length, in a second. It 
thus passes up through the uterus and out through the Fal 
lopian tube, against the ciHary motion of the tubal cells, until 
it meets the ovum. 

A human ovum is a typical cell, but it has a covering mem 
brane, and a minute quantity of deutoplasm or yolk, which is 
not alive, and is food for the growing embryo before the 
embryo begins to draw sustenance through the placenta. The 
eggs of birds have a large quantity of food stored in the 
yolk, since their embryos live in the ovum and draw food 
therefrom during the entire period which corresponds to the 
time of gestation in mammals. The "white" and the cal 
careous shell of a hen s egg are adventitious parts, added in 
the oviduct after the egg leaves the ovary. 

The spermatozoon is a complicated organism. The head 
is partly covered with a thin protoplasmic cap, and it con 
tains the nucleus with the chromatin. fn the neck are two 
centrosomes. The tail is in three parts with an axial filament 
throughout, which is a bundle of extremely minute fibrils. In 
the middle part the axial filament is surrounded by an inner 
sheath ; outside this sheath is a spiral filament lying in a clear 
substance; and outside the spiral filament is a finely granular 
layer of protoplasm, called the Mitochondria. This organ 
ism is a living animal cell, and it can live in an incubator, or 
in the Fallopian tube for two or three weeks, altogether re 
moved from the living male body that produced it. Sir 

u See Wilson, op. cit., p. 299. 


John Lubbock 19 says be kept a queen ant alive for thirteen 
years. This ant, which died in 1888, had been fertilized in 
1874, and never afterward. She laid fertile eggs for thirteen 
years; that is, the spermatozoa in her oviduct retained their 
vitality for thirteen years. 

The human spermatozoon is a living cell: it has (1) the 
requisite structure; (2) the chemical composition of an or 
ganic being; (3) a figure in keeping with its species; (4) an 
origin from a living progenitor; (5) the explicatio naturae; 
(6) the power of assimilation; (7) the duratio viventium; 
(8) the power of reproduction; (9) motion and locomotion. 
As soon as the ovum breaks through the surface of the ovary 
it has all the qualities of the spermatozoon except locomotion. 
These two cells are animal cells, not vegetable; just as single- 
celled protozoa, like Actinophrys, Actinosphaerium, Closte- 
rium, Stentor, and the Amoebas are animals, not plants. It 
is not possible in our present knowledge sharply to differen 
tiate ultimate forms of plants from animals. To say that ani 
mals have the qualities of plants plus a sentient vital prin 
ciple is not enough. It is very doubtful that even the so-called 
sensitive plants feel, and it is practically certain that many 
low forms of animal life do not feel they have no sentient 
mechanism. Plants have the qualities enumerated above plus 
the power of drawing nutriment directly from inorganic ma 
terial, while animals can draw nutriment directly only from 
organic material ; yet some fungi, bacteria for example, will 
grow and thrive only on organic material, and animals will 
take up mineral drugs. It is questionable, however, that min 
erals which thus find a way into animal cells are really as 
similated. They excite or irritate these cells into intenser ac 
tion, and thus cause growth, rather than affect development 
by direction. The so-called mineral tonics used in medicine 
act by irritation. 

This irritation or stimulation by drugs can in certain very 

low forms of animal life start mitosis in the unfertilized ovum, 

and thus build up part, at the least, of a specific embryo par- 

thenogenetically : here probably a polar body takes the place 

"Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. xx, p. 133. 


of the spermatozoon. Loeb, by treating the unfertilized egg 
of Arbacia (a sea-urchin) with magnesum chloride, started 
mitosis that resulted, it is said, in a perfect Pluteus larva. 20 
The human ovum is about half the size of a period in the 
type of this page, and two hundred and fifty spermatozoa will 
fit side by side along the horizontal diameter of the lower 
case letter o here. The nuclei of these cells are extremely 
minute: they must be stained and be observed with a high- 
power objective on the microscope before they become visible. 
This small nucleus of the spermatozoon penetrates the cover 
ing membrane of the ovum, enlarges, and becomes the male 
pronucleus. The pronucleus unites permanently with the 
pronucleus of the ovum, and together they form the Cleavage 
or Segmentation Nucleus of the fertilized ovum. This new 
nucleus gives rise by division to the innumerable myriads of 
nuclei in the growing body. Hence every nucleus of the child 
apparently contains nuclear material derived from both par 
ents, as has been said. 

The two perfected germ-cells before fecundation are in a 
state of nuclear rest after the numerous mitotic changes that 
have taken place in the maturation of these cells. When 
these nuclei unite in the ovum an intense activity at once is 
set up. Biologists offer very many theories to explain this 
awakening force. Herbert Spencer, Herting, and others held 
that protoplasm when perfected tends to pass into a state of 
stable equilibrium and consequent lessened activity, but fer 
tilization restores it to a labile state. This and similar 
theories are verbose amplifications of the obvious fact that the 
cells start to divide and the biologists do not know the cause. 
The soul, of course, cannot have anything to do with the 
matter, because you cannot smell a soul. "Senescence and re 
juvenescence" is another sonorous explanation that does not 
explain, used by Minot, Engelmann, and Hansen. Weismann 
rejects these theories for his own "Fertilization as a Source 
of Variation." Anyhow, the fertilized cell starts to divide 
regardless of the biologists. Adult cells may be stimulated 
to divide by chemical irritation, by mechanical pressure as in 
"American Journal cf Physiology, 1899, iii, 3. 


the formation of calluses, traumatism, by any agency that 
brings about an abnormal condition of the body, but this fact 
does not explain the normal fission of the fecundated ovum. 

In about fifteen days from the date of fertilization the 
ovum passes through the following stages : 

1. The ovum, with a full series of mitotic changes of the 
ordinary somatic type described above, divides, subdivides, 
and grows within the cell-wall until a rounded mass of cells 
is formed, which is called the Morula or Blastula the original 
cell-wall, of course, stretches to hold these new cells. They 
are of unequal size, and they divide at unequal rates. 

2. An albuminous fluid collects within the morula, and 
thus the Vesicle or Blastocyst is formed. The blastocyst is 
called more commonly the Cleavage Cavity or the Segmenta 
tion Cavity. As this cavity widens the cells are seen to be 
arranged in two groups (a-) an enveloping layer, the epi- 
blast, from the outermost plate of which develops later the 
Trophoblast, or the nourishing and protecting covering of the 
embryo; (5) an Inner Cell Mass, made up of granular cells, 
attached to the epiblastic layer at the Embryonic Pole of the 
Vesicle. These two stages probably take place in the Fallo 
pian tube, and thereafter the embryo is in the cavity of the 

3. In the third stage the Inner Cell-Mass separates into 
two layers derived from the inner cell-plate of the blastula. 
The mass flattens and spreads peripherally, until finally it is 
divided into two layers. The outer is the Ectoderm and the 
inner is the Endoderm or Hypoblast. The three steps just 
described have not yet been seen in the human species by any 
one, but they are inferred very confidently from what is well 
known of the development in mammals most closely resembling 
man in physical formation. 

4. By the conversion of the one-layered blastula into two 
layers of cells, the Gastrula stage of the embryo is attained. 
The Gastrula consists of two layers of cells surrounding a 
central cavity, which is the Archenteron, or the body-cavity 
that will hold the intestines. During the past twelve years 
many specimens of human gastrulas have been observed. The 


earliest form was that seen in 1908 by Teacher and Boyce. 21 
This embryo was 1.95 mm. in length by 0.95 mm. in width, 
about twice the size of a pin-head. It showed on section the 
endoderm, the ectoderm, and the beginning mesoderm, en 
closed in a spherical mass of trophoblastic cells. The mes 
oderm is a plate of cells lying between the endodermic and 
ectodermic plates. When the mesoderm develops into two 
plates, a cavity, called the Primitive Coelom, appears between 
the plates. The Coelom becomes the space between the vis 
cera and the body-walls in later development. 

From the primary embryonic layers of cells, the ecto 
derm, the endoderm, and mesoderm, all the parts of the body 
are built up. From the ectoderm are produced the skin, 
nails, hair, the epithelium of the sebaceous, sweat, and mam 
mary glands, the epithelium of the mouth and salivary glands, 
the teeth-enamel, the epithelium of the nasal tract, of the ear, 
of the front of the eye, and the whole spinal cord and the 
brain, with their outgrowths. 

From the endoderm come the epithelium of the respiratory 
tract, of most of the digestive tract with the liver and pan 
creas, the epithelium of the thyroid body, the bladder, and 
other minor parts. 

From the mesoderm are developed bone, dentine, cartilage, 
lymph, blood, fibrous and alveolar tissues, muscles, all en- 
dothelial cells, as of joint-cavities, blood-vessels, the pleura and 
peritoneum, the spleen, kidneys and ureters, and the reproduc 
tive bodies. 

The epiblast now with its mesoblastic lining begins to form 
the Chorion, an embryonic intrauterine appendage; and the 
endoderm encloses the Archenteron or primitive gut. Before 
the end of the second week of gestation the heart is indicated 
as two tubes in the mesoderm, and the blood-vessels begin to 
be produced in the yolk-sac. About the twelfth day the 
mouth-pit shows, and the gut-tract is partly separated from 
the yolk-sac. The medullary plate of the nervous system is 
laid down about the fourteenth day, and the nasal area is 

" Contributions to the Study of the Early Development and Em 
bedding of the Human Embryo. Glasgow, 1911. 


observable. The maternal blood escapes into spaces about the 
embryo enclosed by masses of embryonic cells, which have 
not separated from one another, but which are known collec 
tively as Syncytium. 

5. With the third week the stage of the embryo, techni 
cally so called, begins. During this week the body of the 
embryo is indicated. There are three layers of cells, already 
mentioned, the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm, and these 
lie on the floor of the enveloping Amnion. The amnion is 
a loose fluid-filled sac (the caul) enveloping the fetus to pro 
tect it from jarring. The fluid in it is the "waters" that es 
cape in parturition when the infant breaks through the caul. 
The archenteron in the third week shows the beginning of a 
division into two parts: the part that will go to the body 
proper of the embryo, and the part outside the body of the 
embryo which will form the yolk-sac, or umbilical vesicle, 
from which the embryo will draw sustenance until the placen- 
tal vessels have been formed. The part of the archenteron 
that remains within the embryo proper begins in this third 
week to be moulded into the head-cavity. The forepart of 
the archenteron will later make the alimentary tract from the 
mouth to the middle of the duodenum, or small intestine be 
yond the stomach. The other part of the archenteron will 
make the Allantois, the hind gut and the bladder. The allan- 
tois becomes a part of the fetal umbilical cord after the for 
mation of the placenta. 

During this third week the dorsal outline of the embryo is 
concave; the heart has a single cavity, which will begin to 
divide during the fourth week; the vitelline blood circula 
tion begins, and the blood-vessels of the visceral arch are laid 
down. The digestive system is advanced to a gut-tract, which 
is a straight tube connected with the yolk-sac. The liver 
evagination is present and the oral pit is a five-sided fossa. 
The respiratory system is represented by the anlage of the 
lungs, a longitudinal protrusion of the ventral wall of the esoph 
agus. The genitourinary system begins as the Wolffian 
bodies. The mesoderm starts to segment to form the skin, 
and the neural canal (from which develop the spinal cord 


and brain) for the nervous system forms. The fourth ven 
tricle of the brain is indicated, and the vesicles of the fore 
brain, mid brain, and hind brain are recognizable. The ears, 
nose, and eyes, muscular system, skeleton, and limbs are also 
beginning to be recognizable. At about the sixteenth or eight 
eenth day of gestation the various parts of the embryo rap 
idly differentiate. 

In the fourth week all these parts advance. The atrium 
cavity of the heart begins to divide ; the alimentary tract shows 
the pharynx and esophagus, stomach, and gut; the pancreas 
starts, the liver diverticulum divides, and the bile-ducts ap 
pear. The lung anlage bifurcates and the primitive trachea 
is seen. The ventral roots of the spinal nerves appear, the 
interior ear is indicated, and the eye is deeper. The buds of 
the legs and arms appear about the twenty-first day by the 
thirty-second day even the fingers are present. The four 
heart-cavities are formed, the intestinal canal is nearly closed, 
the first indications of the liver and kidneys appear. The 
child now has reached the fetal stage, and its living body is 
made up of myriads of cells all derived from the original 
fertilized ovum. The fetus is then one centimetre, or two- 
fifths of an inch, in length about the length of the word 
"fetus" here. 

At the end of the second month the fetus is two and a 
half centimetres long. The ears appear, and the tail-like proc 
ess at the lower end of the spine disappears. The arms show 
the three parts, arm, forearm, and hand; and a little later 
the thigh, leg, and foot are differentiated. The navel begins 
to close, the liver develops, the abdomen is yet partly open. 

At the end of the third lunar month the fetus is seven to 
nine centimetres long. The intestinal canal is formed and 
contains bile. The body resembles that of a human being, but 
the head is proportionately very large. Bony tissue begins to 

At the end of the fourth lunar month the fetus is ten to 
seventeen centimetres long. Some muscles are movable. 
The heart-beat is strong. Sex is distinguishable externally. 



The skin is bright red, and so transparent that the blood-vessels 
are visible through it. 

Toward the close of the fifth lunar month the head is about 
the size of a hen s egg. The skin is somewhat less transparent. 
There are indications of hair and nails. The eyelids are 
closed. Parts of the brain and spinal cord are formed. Such 
a fetus may live for five or ten minutes if removed from the 
womb, and it may make attempts at respiration. 

At the end of the sixth lunar month the fetus, if born, may 
live for several hours under favorable circumstances. Its res 
piratory, digestive, and related organs are not developed, and 
no artificial feeding will keep such a child alive. The brain 
cortex, the organ of consciousness, begins to laminate into 
three strata of nerve-cells at the beginning of the sixth month. 

Here the time of fetal viability outside the womb may be 
considered. Langstein, of the. Augusta Victoria Hospital in 
Berlin, reported 22 a study of the growth and nutrition of 250 
prematurely born infants, and he found that a weight of 1000 
grammes (2 pounds) and a full body length of 34 centi 
metres (13f inches) are the lowest limits for viability under 
proper circumstances. A fetus 1000 grammes in weight and 
34 centimetres in length has completed the sixth solar month, 
or the sixth and a half lunar month; that is, it is viable at the 
beginning of its seventh month, servatis servandis. 

The child at term, as a rough average, is from 48 to 52 
centimetres (19 to 20 inches) in length, and it weighs from 
about 6 to 7^ pounds. It is impossible, however, to ob 
tain the sizes and weights of infants in utero with scientific 
accuracy, because the date of conception cannot be determined 
with absolute certainty, and individual fetuses vary as do in 
fants after birth. A full-term infant sometimes may weigh 
only 3^ pounds when the mother is diseased, and again an 
eight-month fetus will weigh as much as 8 pounds. Large 
muscular and fat women have large babies; women of the 
well-to-do classes have larger babies than do the poor; women 
who work during gestation bear smaller babies than do those 
women that rest. Mothers who work in tobacco, lead, or phos- 

M Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, June 14, 1915. 


phorus have puny babies; white children are larger at birth 
than negro children; boys at term are 3 to 5 ounces heavier 
than girls. 

Langstein says that prematurely born infants weighing 
from 900 grammes (31| ounces) to 1500 grammes (3 oounds) 
that is, all born before the seventh solar month must be kept 
in hot-water incubators in a room with ordinary ventilation. 
Babies weighing 2000 grammes (4| pounds) or more get along 
in an ordinary crib if they are kept surrounded with hot- 
water bags. Such children are to be fed with human milk 
through a catheter passed into the mouth or they die of inani 
tion. Only a few of them are strong enough to suck from a 
bottle, and these give up the effort after a few days and die. 
They cannot utilize fat, even from milk; and all artificial 
food is dangerous. 

Most of the prematurely born become rachitic, and even hu 
man milk is not preventive of this condition. Rachitis is a con 
stitutional disease, characterized by impaired nutrition of the 
bones and changes in their shape. In the third or fourth 
month craniotabes is frequent that is, an atrophy of the 
skull bones with the formation of small conical pits. These 
infants show also a morbid tendency to convulsions spas- 
mophilia. Such diseases are caused by a lack of mineral salts, 
which normally are carried to the fetus by the placental blood 
during the last two months of gestation. Because of this lack 
premature infants require the administration of lime salts 
in their food ; they also need iron because they are anemic. 

A fetus, then, of six calendar, or solar, months (not lunar) 
is viable if treated in a hospital by competent physicians. 
Otherwise it is not viable, except in a strictly technical sense; 
it will not live more than a few days or weeks. Reports of in 
fants younger than six months as having been successfully 
reared are not credible it is easy to make an error in the 

A full seven-months infant may be reared with proper 
feeding and skilled care; a six-months infant may be reared 
(with difficulty) in a hospital with skilled care. If it is cer 
tain that the removal of a six-months fetus will here and now 


save the life of a mother (a very difficult matter to judge by 
the best diagnosticians), this removal may be done, provided 
the infant is delivered in circumstances where skilled care, 
incubator, and proper food are obtainable; otherwise the re 
moval is not justifiable. That the ordinary physician says 
it is necessary to empty the uterus is not a sufficient reason, 
as he is likely to act from ill-digested information set forth 
by professorial pagans, who place no value whatever on human 
life in an infant. 

A most important and essential circumstance in the matter 
of inducing abortion at the end of the sixth month of gesta 
tion to save a mother s life is that in practically every case 
requiring such interference the diseased condition of the 
mother has checked the growth of the fetus, and the fetus 
therefore is really not a six-months child in development. 
Such an undeveloped fetus is not viable. Eclamptic women, 
and those who have nephritis, are most likely to have undevel 
oped fetuses. In cases of this kind the seventh month should 
be completed before interference. 

How is this human body in all its complexity developed 
from the microscopic germ-cells ? There has been a vast deal 
of ink spilled in striving to solve this mystery, but we come 
out empty by the same door wherein we went. The early 
Preformationists guessed that the ovum contains an embryo 
fully formed in miniature, and development is a mere un 
folding of what had already existed. The biologists of to-day 
mention the Preformationists with superior scorn, and then 
present Preformationism under other names. Weismann s 
theory is the most fashionable at present. 

In a paper read at the Darwinian Memorial Congress in 
1909, Weismann said: "With others I regard the minimal 
amount of substance which is contained within the nucleus of 
the germ-cells in the form of rods, bands, or granules, as the 
germ-substance, or germ-plasm, and I call the individual gran 
ules 23 ids. There is always a multiplicity of such ids pres 
ent in the nucleus, either occurring individually or united in 

* Id is a word derived from Nageli s term idioplasm, which meana 
the chromosome granule. 


the forms of rods and bands (chromosomes). Each id con 
tains the primary constituents of the whole individual, so that 
several ids are concerned in the development of a new indi 
vidual." Actually there are such things as chromosomes, and 
when these are stained and are under the highest power of the 
microscope they appear to be granular. These granules 
Weismann calls ids. Beyond the fact that there are such 
granules, all else is sheer guessing. 

He says further: "In every complex structure thousands 
of primary constituents must go to make up a single id; these 
I call determinants, and I mean by this name very small in 
dividual particles, far beyond the limit of microscopic visibil 
ity, vital units, which feed, grow, and multiply by division. 
These determinants control the parts of the developing em 
bryo, in what manner need not here concern us." 

There is some truth here. The id is made up of molecules 
and atoms, ions and electrons, and in some manner, of course, 
these have to do with the development of the embryo; but 
as to the manner we have not the slightest knowledge, and 
just this knowledge is what we need to make the theory any 
thing more dignified than a child s game at guessing. There 
is a structural differentiation in the unsegmented ovum, with 
all the embryonal axes foreshadowed in it. but this tells us 
nothing more than that the egg contains the man in germ. 

He goes on: "The determinants differ among themselves; 
those of a muscle are differently constituted from those of a 
nerve-cell or a glandular cell, etc., and each determinant is in its 
turn made up of minute vital units, which I call biophors, or 
the bearers of life." 

That these so-called determinants differ among themselves 
may be true, if they exist at all, which is just the point to be 
proved. Giving Greek names to inventions does not turn 
invention into fact. These supposed determinants, he says, 
"may vary quantitatively if the elements of which they are 
composed vary; they . . . and their variations may give 
rise to corresponding variations of the organ, cell, or cell- 
group which they determine." Professor Dwight said: 24 
" Thoughts of a Catholic Anatomist, p. 48. 


"This is what is palmed off on us for science!" Weismann 
assures us we must admit this farrago of clumsy fiction, other 
wise we should be forced "to assume the help of a principle 
of design." 25 In the name of common sense, then, admit a 
principle of design, and be done with it! 

Darwin s Gemmule Theory is the same guessing; and 
Weismann rejects it because he did not think of it first. As 
a theory the gemmule plot is just as good and just as bad 
scientifically as Weismann s. The chief objection to such 
imagining is that after its authors have put it into print a 
few times they lose all sense of humor, and mistake phan 
tasms for facts. 

Up to the present time we have discovered no living or 
ganism lower in grade than the cell. If life ever originated 
from inorganic matter, it appeared in an organized cell. The 
Weismann ids, biophors, and the rest, supposing they existed 
outside his own imagination, are not more capable of inde 
pendent life than is a chromatin granule. In any event, 
these biophors could not have originated spontaneously in the 
first living being; and if they could not so have come into 
existence, life could never have begun. However primitive 
any organism is, it must be able to nourish itself and to de 
velop into a higher specific form; but such a variety of func 
tions supposes differentiated structure, composed of unstable 
chemical substances, a correlation of parts, a purposeful an 
ticipation of ends. Inorganic substances, crystals, and the 
like are characteristically stable, not unstable; and these 
could not have been brought into the organic state on an earth 
burnt to a cinder and devoid of chlorophyl, which itself pre 
supposes organic cells. Whence came also the absolutely es 
sential form of energy, directive of vegetative life ? The only 
possible explanation is that life was created, not evolved by a 
stranger miracle from a lump of lava. 

We know the successive steps in the growth of the embryo 

from the time of fertilization to the end of gestation, but how 

this vital process is effected is not so evident. What we are 

certain of is that there is a vital principle of some kind from 

* Contemporary Review, September, 1893. 


the beginning, and this is the matter of real importance in 
the present discussion. The old moralists held that this prin 
ciple in the human being is at first vegetative; after a while 
that vegetative vital principle is expelled by a sensitive prin 
ciple ; and finally this sensitive soul is expelled by the rational 
vital principle, or human soul. St. Thomas 2G says : "Some 
tell us the vital acts that appear in the embyro are not from 
its soul, but from the soul of the mother, or from the primi 
tive force in the semen. Both these statements are false. 
Vital operations, as sensation, nutrition, growth, cannot come 
from an extrinsic principle; therefore it must be admitted 
that a soul preexisted in the embryo, nutritive at first, then 
sensitive, and finally intellectual." After showing that an 
intellectual soul cannot be evolved from lower forms, he con 
cludes: "Therefore we say that since the generation of one 
thing is always the corruption of another, in man as in other 
animals, when a more perfect form comes in this supposes the 
corruption of any precedent form; so, however, that the se 
quent form has all perfection that was in the destroyed forms, 
and something in addition : and thus through many generations 
and corruptions the final substantial form is attained in man 
and other animals. This is apparent to the senses in animals 
generated from putrefaction. Therefore the intellectual soul 
is created by God at the end of human generation, and this 
soul is both sensitive and nutritive, all precedent forms having 
been destroyed." 

There is no such thing as the generation of any animal 
or other living being from putrefaction ; but that is irrelevant. 
St. Thomas s argument proves conclusively that if man has 
first a merely vegetative soul, and secondly a merely sensitive 
soul, which includes the power of the vegetative soul, and 
thirdly an intellectual soul, which does the work of all three, 
that this final intellectual soul is not an evolution of the first 
two, but a new form that replaces these after they have served 
their purpose and have been annihilated. It does not even 
attempt to prove that man really has first a merely vegetative 
soul, and secondly a sensitive, and lastly an intellectual soul; 
"I, q. 118, a. 2, ad 2. 


it supposes all this. It starts out with the erroneous Aristote 
lian theory and takes it for granted. The reason for this 
statement is that the rational substantial form requires dis 
posed matter to work upon, and the Thomists suppose (again 
erroneously) that in the human embryo during the period im 
mediately after conception there is not enough matter to be a 
receptacle for the rational soul. 

The soul according to the Thomists, who use the Aristote 
lian definition, is the first entelechy of a natural organic body 
that has life in potency. 27 It is the determination that gives 
the body its specific and substantial being; the primal actua 
tion of a body or matter, since only in matter is there a dis 
tinction between potency for substantial being and substantial 
actuality. An entelechy is a realization, actuality, full perfec 
tion; sight, for example, is the entelechy of the eye. This 
body is natural, not merely instrumental; it is energized by 
an immanent principle, not moved by an external force like a 
tool. The body is also organic ; it must have organs, faculties, 
parts destined to perform definite functions. To say the en 
telechy has life in potency means that since life, or the op 
eration of the soul, is an immanent act, there must be a re 
ceptacle within which it can be immanent, and the soul is the 
primal actualization of that organic body, which is in potency 
to produce those immanent actions in which life consists. A 
body might be in potency while it still has no principle of 
operation, or, secondly, while it has such a principle but is not 
using it. In the second condition the human body is in po 
tency for life at the moment of actualization. 

A form fixes a thing in its proper species, and the ra 
tional soul is such a form for the human body. This sub 
stantial form is the completion, perfection, in operability and 
existence, of the matter that receives it. It is the formal 
cause of man, not the efficient cause, although it is the efficient 
cause of subsequent vital operations. An efficient cause makes 
something numerically different from itself by its own real 
and physical action; a formal cause and a material cause do 

27 ^ ^X 1 ^ tffriv tvTtKkxtia. $ irp&Tij aco/iaros 4>vffiKov bpyavtKov 
(De Anima, ii, 1). 


not make anything different from themselves numerically, but 
they intrinsically constitute the effect they are intrinsic 

The human soul as^ the substantial form virtually contains 
vegetative and sensory faculties, and through these lower or 
ganic capacities it informs and animates the body. That form, 
together with the matter, the body, does the vital acts of the 
composite human nature. The rational soul enters the body 
at the beginning, and first uses its vegetative faculty until the 
fetus is far enough advanced to be a subject for the action 
of the sensory faculty of the soul. Later, some time after the 
birth of the child, when the body is sufficiently formed, the 
intellectual faculty comes into use. 

The nature of a vital principle is that in which it normally 
issues. If it issues as a rational substantial form, as in man, 
it was rational from the beginning. If it was not rational 
from the beginning, a rational principle replaced a sensory 
vital principle, and that sensory vital principle replaced a 
vegetative vital principle. The only reason for these replace 
ments would be that the early human embryo, as has been said, 
lacks organization sufficient to sustain a form higher than a 
vegetative principle. If this were sufficient reason for defer 
ring the advent of the rational soul, then a baby six months 
after birth would have no rational soul because it certainly 
lacks the supposedly requisite organs. However, as the ra 
tional soul is whole in each part of the adult body in the to 
tality of its essence and perfection, but not in the totality of 
its virtue, because certain organs are lacking in particular 
parts of the body, it is in the embryo whole in the totality of 
its essence and perfection, but not in its virtue because certain 
organs are not yet formed, and it is thus from the moment of 

As to the soul itself, Kant held that the soul is not a real, 
but only a logical substance. The Pantheists, Transcenden- 
talists, and ISTeo-Hegelians try to identify the soul with the 
divine consciousness. The Associationists (Hume, Davis, 
Hoffding, Sully) say that the soul is a mere group of sensa 
tions. The Agnostics and Positivists (Locke, Herbert Spen- 


cer, James, Comte) write volume after volume on the soul 
to prove that they know nothing about it. Then the Material 
ists assert that there is no soul of any kind; that we secrete 
thought as a mule secretes sweat. Yet the vital operations of 
man are inexplicable as resultants of the physical and chem 
ical properties of matter. There is an intrinsic energy that 
unifies the actions of man, directs processes, controls the tend 
ency of organic matter to pass into the fixity of the inorganic, 
and effects metabolism. This intrinsic energy is the entel- 
echy, substantial form, or what is popularly called the soul. 

In any organic body there is a formal principle. We 
know that there are activities that proceed from organic bodies, 
and a formal principle of such activity is a substantial entity 
whence the organism derives basically its own kind of action, 
which determines and orders the activity. There are acts of 
perception in animals such that an external object becomes 
so internal to the organism of these animals that it is known 
by one expressed and immanent image, not only as something 
objectively existing but as good or hurtful to the perceiving 
animal. The innate and elicited appetites by which the animal 
tends toward or away from the object are recognized, as are 
the spontaneous motions which are directed by that knowledge. 
There must be a principle whence these actions proceed, and 
this is either an accident of matter or something substantial. 
It is not an accident of matter, because action can never arise 
from an accident; it must proceed from a substance. If you 
say this principle whence these actions arise is not an accident 
of matter, but matter itself, you would have an extended, com 
posite, inert mass acting; but even if such thing could act, it 
could never effect a simple immanent image of an object or 
group of objects external to itself. 

No mere machine can build up itself, can make any re 
mote approach to metabolism as an organized body can; and 
the principle of this immanent action is not matter itself, be 
cause it uses, makes, subordinates matter to (itself. That 
principle is positively one, not one by continuity as matter 
is. Matter as in a crystal grows by mere aggregation, an or- 


ganism grows by assimilation ; a crystal loses force in forma 
tion and growth, an organism accumulates force. 

The theory that denies the existence of this formal princi 
ple does not explain the phenomena of life in organic beings. 
Uniformity of tendency toward an end is not a characteristic 
of mere matter; neither is a harmonious interaction of parts, 
nor the dependence of parts on the unit, nor motion, nor the 
reproduction of the species. 

Moreover, most of the greatest physical scientists strongly 
maintain that there must be a formal substantial principle in 
all living things. Among these are Wallace, Niigeli, Asken- 
asy, Preyer, Fechner, Agassiz, von Baer, E. de Beaumont, 
Blanchard, A. Braun, Brongniart, Bronn, Burmeister, Delff, 
Milne-Edwardes, Flourens, Goeppert, Griesbach, Heer, Koel- 
liker, Mivart, Quatrefages, Quenstedt, Spiers, Volger, R. Wag 
ner, Liebig, and Joseph Hyrtl. 

The formal principle which coexists with matter in the or 
ganic body is really though not perfectly distinguished from 
matter. A formal principle which is necessary for sensation 
should be either perfectly simple, or at the least so one that its 
parts together make up one essence: matter, however, cannot 
have such unity, and as a consequence the formal principle 
must be distinct from matter. Anything is like its operation, 
and the parts of any sensitive activity always result in an ac 
tivity that is essentially one. If we touch a table, by that sin 
gle touch we at once know that the object is one, wooden, hard, 
angular, smooth, extended, and so on, and we also know that 
one subject perceives all these varied qualities. One eye can 
convey knowledge at once of a thousand objects miles apart, 
and these objects can be brought into one perception only by 
a simple subject. An extended complex subject like matter 
would get one impression (if it could perceive any impression) 
on one side, one on another, and so on, but it could not unite 

The formal principle which is in organic bodies is a true 
substantial form, actuating the body both as to its nature and 
substance. Together with the body, this principle makes a 
being one in itself, such that the matter and the form sep- 


arably are incomplete as regards operation and being. 
Now, a form is that principle through which anything is es 
tablished in its own species; light, for example, is the form 
of a luminous body, heat of a hot substance. A body, how 
ever, is established in the human species by receiving a ra 
tional soul, and this soul, then, is its form. It is also a sub 
stantial form because the soul itself is a substance, not an ac 
cident dependent upon another subject. Moreover, from its 
union with the body another substance man arises, and not 
a thing added to a substance. Man s body is alive, therefore 
it is a living substance; but life in its secondary actuality is 
an operation; in its primary actuality it is an essence. The 
body is made a living substance, not from itself, but from the 
soul which is added to it. When the soul departs the body 
is no longer alive. Now, a principle which by a communica 
tion of itself determines the body in its essence and differen 
tiates it as a living substance from everything else, is a sub 
stantial form. A substantial form, then, or a soul, exists. 

The soul, however, must have disposed matter for most 
of its operations; it cannot exist as a substantial form bom- 
binans in vacuo; but it does not need a human organism com 
plete in all its parts as a necessary condition for its indwell 
ing. There is organized matter enough in the first cell that 
comes into existence after the fusion of the germ-nuclei to 
hold this rational form, or soul, as perfectly as it needs to be 
held in this first stage of human life. 

To inform the embryo any principle, whether it is the ra 
tional soul or a force derived from the parental organism, 
must have organs; and if organs are present, then the embryo 
is fit to receive the human soul, as the only objection to its 
presence is a supposed lack of organs. To use other prin 
ciples when the human soul itself could be present would be a 
multiplicatio entium sine necessitate, which is a condition re 
pugnant to the universal method of the Creator. 

It has been said that the vital activity in the fertilized 
ovum does not proceed from the rational soul because, "in the 
first place, it results from the fusion of two vital activities, 
neither of which is rational; secondly, it results in the for- 


mation, by fission, and differentiation, of two distinct and sep 
arate living cells, each containing within itself a principle of 
vital activity. Now this principle of vital activity cannot 
be a rational soul, for each cell has its own principle of ac 
tivity, and in man there is but one soul." 

In the first place, that vital activity does not result from 
the fusion of two vital activities neither of which is rational. 
,It results after the nuclei come together, by particular crea 
tion, and replaces their activity the generation of the last 
vital force is the corruption of the first that existed in the sep 
arate nuclei, not a derivative of that first force. Again, when 
the embryo is in the two, four, eight cell stage, and so on, 
there are not two, four, eight vital principles present, but 
one. Substantial unity is essential to life of any kind, no 
matter how low its grade; and if each cell had an independ 
ent vital principle, any form of resultant life in the mass 
would be impossible. An aggregation has no unity of sub 
stance; there would be as many substances or natures as there 
are individual beings in the aggregate, no matter whether or 
dered or in a mob, consequently no life at all as a life. 

The embryo in the two-cell stage is not made up of two 
independent organisms, any more than the right and left 
halves of an adult man are two independent organisms. Ths 
cells in the two-cell stage of the embryo are the right and left 
halves of the body, not two individuals, as has been proved 
repeatedly by biologists. Roux 28 punctured with a hot 
needle one of the cells in the two-cell stage of a frog embryo 
without killing the embryo, and it grew into a half-frog larva. 
Analogous results were obtained by operating in the four-cell 
stage. Later, Pfliiger, Schultze, Enders, and Morgan corrobo 
rated the work of Roux. Newport 29 discovered this fact sixty 
years ago. 

In analyzing the structure and functions of the individ 
ual cell we regard it as an independent elementary organic 
unit, but this view is solely a matter of convenience, almost 
a convention. All the billions of cell s in an adult man are 

n Virchow s Archiv (1888), 114. 
"Phil Trans., 1854. 


inseparable parts of the single living person. No cell exists 
as an independent organism in multicellular animals, except the 
germ-cells, and these only after separation from the gland of ori 
gin. Indeed, the biological theory of heredity, already men 
tioned here, wherein the germ-cell is supposed to carry forward 
the entire heredity, is now changing toward the view which 
makes all the somatic cells influence the germ-cells; that is, the 
body-mass of cells sends on heredity through the germ-cell as 
the instrument. Adult organisms do not make cells de novo. 
New cells are formed by division from preexisting cells, but 
some biologists think the body-cells so affect the new germ-cells 
as to influence heredity. 

The cells are organs, nodal points, of a single formative 
power which pervades the mass of cells as a whole. The 
protoplasm of each cell is not only in direct apposition with its 
neighbors, but nearly all biologists are now inclining to the 
opinion, which Heitzmann proposed in 1873, that division 
of cell from cell is incomplete in nearly all forms of tissue; 
and that even where cell-walls are present (an exceptional 
condition in mammals) they are traversed by strands of proto 
plasm, by means of which the cells are in organic continuity. 
The whole body, he contended, is thus a syncytium (a mass of 
continuous protoplasm Stippled with nuclei), with the cells 
as mere nodal points in an almost homogeneous protoplasmic 
mass. There are cell-bridges between the sieve-tubes of 
plants. In 1879 Tangl discovered such connection between 
the endosperm cells of plants, and later Gardiner, Kienitz- 
Gerloff, A. Meyer, and many others demonstrated that in 
nearly all plant tissues the cell-walls are connected by intra- 
cellular bridges. Kanvier, Bizzozero, Eetzius, Fleming, Pfitz- 
ner, and many other observers have found these protoplasmic 
bridges in animal epithelium. In the skin of a larval sala 
mander they are quite conspicuous. They are known to oc 
cur also in smooth muscle-fibre, in cartilage cells, in connec 
tive-tissue cells, and in some nerve-cells. Harrison found, in 
1908, that in frogs the nerve-fibres develop out of these intra- 
cellular bridges. Dendy in 1888, Ketzius in 1889, and Pal- 
ladino in 1890 have shown that the follicle cells of the ovary 


are connected by protoplasmic bridges, not only with one an 
other, but also with the ovum; and similar connection between 
somatic cells and germ-cells has been found in a number of 
plant s. Thus even the germ-cell is not independent until it 
has actually broken away from the gland. A. Meyer holds 
that both the plant and animal individual are continuous 
masses of protoplasm, in which the cytoplasmic substance forms 
a morphological unit, no matter what the cell is. That opinion 
is not finally settled as regards the animal after the fetal stage, 
but it is much stronger as regards embryos. In the early stages 
of many arthropods it is certain that the whole embryo is at 
first an unmistakable syncytium. This is almost established 
also for Amphioxus, the Echinoderm Volvox, and other ani 
mals. Adam Sedgwick holds that it is true for vertebrates up 
to a late embryonic stage. Mitosis, then, is a form of growth 
of a mass, not a generation of new individuals. 

Whether chromatin or any other element in the germ-cell 
be the idioplasm in which heredity inheres, differentiation is 
a progressive transformation, through physical and chemical 
changes, of the substance of the ovum, and this transforma 
tion occurs in a definite order and a definite distribution in the 
ovum. The changes result in a cleavage of the egg into cells, 
the boundaries of which sharply mark the areas of differen 
tiation. These cells take on specific characters. In the four- 
celled stage of an annelid egg these four cells contribute 
equally to the formation of the alimentary canal and the ce 
phalic nervous system, but only one of them, the left-hand 
posterior cell, gives rise to the nervous system of the trunk 
and to the muscles, connective tissues, and germ-cells. The 
relation between the four original cells, or blastomeres, and 
the adult parts arising from them, is not fixed, because in 
some eggs these relations may be artificially changed. A por 
tion of the egg which normally would develop into a fragment 
of the body will, if split off from the others, give rise to an 
entire body of a diminished size. 

Conklin says 30 that in the ascidian Styela "there are four 
or five substances in the egg which differ in color, so that their 

" Heredity and Environment, p. 123, Oxford Press. 


distribution to different regions of the egg and to different 
cleavage cells may be easily followed, and even photographed, 
while in the living condition. The peripheral layer of proto 
plasm is yellow and it gathers at the lower pole of the egg, 
where the sperm enters, forming a yellow cap. This yellow 
substance then moves, following the sperm nucleus, up to the 
equator of the egg on the posterior side, and there forms a yel 
low crescent extending around the posterior side of the egg. 
On the anterior side of the egg a gray crescent is formed in 
a somewhat similar manner, and at the lower pole between 
these two crescents is a slate-blue substance, while at the up 
per pole is an area of colorless protoplasm. The yellow cres 
cent goes into cleavage cells which become muscle and meso- 
derm, the gray crescent into cells which become nervous sys 
tem and notochord, the slate-blue substance into endoderm 
cells, and the colorless substance into ectoderm cells. Thus 
within a few minutes after the fertilization of the egg, and be 
fore or immediately after the first cleavage, the anterior and 
posterior, dorsal and ventral, right and left poles are clearly 
distinguishable, and the substances which will give rise to ec 
toderm, endoderm, mesoderm, muscles, notochord, and nervous 
system are plainly visible in their characteristic positions." 
Conklin followed these cells in every division until the em 
bryo was developed, making a complete genealogy up to the 
ovum proper. 

De Vries 31 assumed that the character of each cell is de 
termined by "Pangens" that migrate from the nucleus into 
the protoplasm. Driesch and Oscar Hertwig held that the 
peculiar development of a given blastomere is a result of its 
relation to the remainder of the cell-mass, an outcome of the 
action upon it by the whole sytem of cells of which it is a 
part. Hertwig said : 32 "Each of the first two blastomeres con 
tains the formative and differentiating forces not simply for 
the production of a half -body, but for the entire organism; 
the left blastomere develops into the left half of the body 
only because it is placed in relation to a right blastomere." 

* Iniracelluldre Pangenesis. Jena, 1889. 
"Jenaische Zeitschrift, 1892, 1. 


Wilson 33 and Driesch 34 came to the same conclusion about 
the time Hertwig wrote. Driesch said : 85 "The relative po 
sition of a blastomere in the whole determines in general what 
develops from it; if its position be changed it gives rise to 
something different; in other words, its prospective value is 
a function of its position." 

A discussion of this matter will be found in Wilson, 86 but 
the many experiments made in the study of this subject show 
conclusively that the cells, singly, grouped, and in mass, are 
a morphological unit, not an aggregation of distinct individ 
uals. They are not, of course, absolutely homogeneous, be 
cause such a body could not have organs. The substantial 
form, therefore, is not confined to the first cell. 

The cell-mass, then, has a unity sufficient to be the recep 
tacle of a human vital principle ; again, the basic vital operation 
of the human body at any age is metabolism, and this is ac 
tually carried on in the first somatic cell of the embryo as in 
the cells of the adult man. In the development of the human 
body in the embryonal stage the energy of cell-division is 
most intense in the early cleavage stage, and this diminishes as 
the limit of growth approaches because further division is not 
needed. When that limit is attained a more or less definite 
equilibrium is established. Some of the cells in the fully 
formed body cease to divide, the nerve-cells, for example; 
others divide under special conditions, as the blood-cells, the 
connective-tissue cells, gland-cells, epithelial and muscle cells; 
others continue to divide throughout life and thus replace 
worn-out cells of the same tissue, as the Malpighian layer of 
the skin. Cells grow, divide, function, reproduce themselves, 
and so on, all through their vital activity, sustained by the 
material brought to them by the blood. Weismann 37 and 
other biologists think that the vital processes of the higher 
animals are accompanied by a renewal of the morphological 

"Journal of Morphology, 1893, 1894. 

* Studien, iv, p. 25. 
K IUd., p. 39. 

* The Cell in Development and Inheritance, pp. 413 et seq. New 
York, 1906. 

17 The Duration of Life. 


elements in most tissues. The material is carried to the fetus 
in the womb by various agents, but mostly by the maternal 
blood after the embryo uses up the yolk; and when the fetal 
circulation has been established the nutritive material is taken 
from the maternal blood into the fetal circulation through the 
placenta, and then carried to the cells by the fetal circula 
tion itself. After the child has been born the stomach and in 
testines take in the food. The stomach does very little with it 
except in a preparatory manner; the intestines further pre 
pare it, pass it into the body, where it is again modified by 
other organs, and finally it is carried by the blood to the cells. 
The cells really use it; the other organs are the farmers, gro 
cers, railways, and the like; the cells are the consumers. So 
far as the essential processes are concerned, the embryological 
cells act as do the adult cells. 

The first cell has contractility, protoplasmic motion; it 
can absorb perfectly all food-stuffs necessary for it from the 
deutoplasm of the ovum, and the water that passes in from 
without to the ovum. In a few days the embryonic cells have 
used up the deutoplasm and are taking up food from the ma 
ternal blood as perfectly as any adult cell does, and are exer 
cising their function of building up and sustaining whatever 
part of the body they are destined for; and this with all the 
complicated metabolism of the adult cell. Cell metabolism 
is the fundamental, chief, organic act of any human body at 
any age. That the embryo does this impelled by the virtus 
formativa transmitted from the parents is a mere gratuitous 
assumption to fit the theory that the embryonic cell lacks or 
ganic power. The fundamental organ that conserves the body 
in its very existence under the government of the soul is the 
apparatus which effects metabolism. Incessant chemico-vital 
change is a characteristic of all living substances, from the 
single cell up to the adult man; and in all cases this activity 
has to do with a transformation of the complex molecules 
which build up the protoplasm or are associated with its op 
erations. The totality of the chemical changes, or exchanges, 
in living cells, the transformation of unorganized food ma 
terials so that these may be assimilated, and the chemical proc- 


esses in the tissues themselves, all are metabolism. Growth 
and repair (anabolism) occur side by side with the destruction 
of elementary tissue substance (katabolism), and the dura 
tion of life rests on these processes; and all are mere cell ac 
tivities. Food-stuffs (water, inorganic salts, proteids, albumi 
noids, carbohydrates, and fats) undergo more or less combus 
tion or oxidation. Oxygen unites with carbon to form carbon 
dioxide, and with hydrogen to form water; the nitrogen of 
the highly complex proteid substances reappears in combina 
tion with carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen as urea, uric acid, and 
other compounds; and other ingesta are thus transformed 
through oxidation. All maintain the temperature of the body, 
replace outworn parts, and accomplish the body s work. Oxi 
dation occurs to a slight extent in the blood, but the specific 
reactions are intracellular. Even when nothing exists but the 
cells and the blood, as in the beginning embryo, the cells really 
do the work, and they do the work as they do in the adult. 

The cells also from the very beginning are the organs 
that make the animal heat necessary for life. Rubner 38 proved 
that the source of at least 90 per cent, of the animal heat in 
the body is a result of the chemical changes oxidation in 
the food ingested: the other 10 per cent, is caused by muscular 
contractions, the flow of blood, the friction of joints, and like 
motions. This oxidation is more active in young animals 
than in adults, and in each it is, of course, a cellular process. 

Living matter contains hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur, chlo 
rine, iodine, fluorine, nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, silicon, po 
tassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, and iron. The removal 
of one of these elements causes the death of the body. They 
must be arranged in a definite, prescribed order to constitute 
cellular protoplasm, and any disarrangement of this order 
causes intoxication, disease, or death. Hydrogen is a constant 
product in the putrefaction of animal matter, of animal food, 
and is present in the intestinal tract. Oxygen is found dis 
solved in water and loosely combined in blood as pxyhemoglobin. 
All the elements, except fluorine, combine with oxygen, form 
ing oxides, and the process is called oxidation. The produc- 
" Zeitschrift f. Biologic, 1893, bd. 30, p. 73. 


tion of heat and all vital motion depend on oxidation, decom 
position of matter. In the nuclei of cells there is a so-called 
"oxygen-carrier," a micleo-proteid, which contains iron, and 
this appears to be the chief oxidizing agent in the body. 
Chlorine, which in hydrochloric acid is essential to digestion, 
is ingested as chloride, and leaves the body chiefly through 
the urine and sweat. Iodine is a necessary part of the thyroid 
gland, an indispensable vital organ. Fluorine is found in all 
cells. Nitrogen goes into the body combined in proteids; and 
phosphorus, combined in the alkalies and alkaline earths of 
the foods. Carbon occurs in all cells and leaves them through 
the lungs as carbon dioxide. 

The amount of energy set in action in the body in the de 
composition of any food is equal to the energy that had been 
expended in the synthesis of that food from its organic ele 
ments, and the liberated energy set free in the body appears 
as heat, work, and nervous impulse. In a plant the chloro- 
phyl and the sun s rays combine water and the carbon dioxide 
of the air into sugar and free oxygen. This sugar is changed 
in a plant into starch, cellulose, and fat, and also, when com 
bined with some nitrogen, into proteid. An animal eats this 
plant, which contains starch, cellulose, fat, and proteid, and it 
either adds these ingredients to its own substance or oxidizes 
them so as to prevent the destruction of its own substance. 
These are the ends of all food. Broadly speaking, plants 
synthesize elements; animals analyze them, reduce them into 
simpler bodies. 

Such processes, and those of the other elements of the body, 
which have to do with the changing constituents of the human 
organism, are all cellular processes metabolism. Hence the 
chief organic act of the body is metabolic; the basic organ of 
man is the cell. Arms, legs, heart, brain, stomach, and simi 
lar organs are secondary, though some of the latter are essen 
tial for certain operations. Now, one cell is an organ amply 
sufficient for metabolism, for the chief organic act of the body ; 
hence it is a fitting receptacle for a substantial form, a soul. 
Therefore there is no reason why the soul may not be present 
in the one-cell stage of the embryo ; and since there is no reason 


why it should not he present, hut many why it should, it is 

Conklin says : 39 "The fertilized egg of a star-fish, or frog, 
or man is not a different individual from the adult form into 
which it develops, rather it is a star-fish, a frog, or a human 
being in the one-celled stage. This fertilized egg fuses with 
no other cells, it takes into itself no living substance, but man 
ufactures its own protoplasm from food substances; it receives 
food and oxygen from without and it gives out carbonic acid 
and other waste products; it is sensitive to certain alterations 
in the environment, such as thermal, chemical, and electrical 
changes it is, in short, a distinct living thing, an individual 
ity. Under proper environmental conditions this fertilized 
egg-cell develops, step by step, without the addition of any 
thing from the outside except food, water, oxygen, and such 
other raw materials as are necessary to the life of any adult 
animal, into the immensely complex body of a star-fish, a frog, 
or a man. At the same time, from the relatively simple re 
actions and activities of the fertilized egg there develop, step 
by step, without the addition of anything from without except 
raw materials and environmental stimuli, the multifarious ac 
tivities, reactions, instincts, habits, and intelligence of the 
mature animal." 

An objection to the opinion that the soul is in the embryo 
from the beginning is made from a consideration of the facts 
that there appears to be an aptitude for life in certain animal 
cells and tissues after removal from the original host, or after 
the death of the host; and, secondly, that in other separated 
tissues life is undoubtedly made evident under proper condi 
tions. Some parts of the human body can be grafted upon 
another human body, and human sarcomatous cells have been 
made to grow in vitro. Hair often lengthens after the death 
of a person, if no embalming fluid has been injected. Dr. 
Alexis Carrel 40 substituted a piece of a popliteal artery, taken 
from an amputated human leg and kept in cold storage for 

"Heredity and Environment. 

"Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. lix, n. 7, 
p. 523. 


twenty-four days, for a part of the aorta of a small bitch, and 
the dog lived for four years afterward and died in parturition. 
Magitot of Paris, in 1911, took a piece of the cornea from an 
extirpated human eye, and with it replaced a part of an opaque 
cornea on another man, and this second man could see through 
the new cornea. Surgeons now remove skin, bone, and other 
tissues from still-born infants and accident cases, preserve 
these, for weeks if necessary, in petrolate and Ringer s solu 
tion in cold storage, and then graft them on patients to repair 
lesions in skin, bone, cartilage, or other parts of the body. 

If these separated tissues are alive, what is the origin and 
nature of the life? Again, if there is a low form of life in 
these separated tissues, remaining after the departure of the 
human soul, why could not such a low form of life precede 
in the embryo the advent of the human soul ? 

What is the nature of the "life" in the parasitic sarcoma- 
tous tissue which has been seen to proliferate for a short time 
in vitro? We do not know, nor is it relevant to the question. 
That there is life of any kind in the cold-storage graft of bone 
and skin is certainly not evident; rather every evidence points 
to the absence of all life. When taken out of cold storage, 
and the ordinary forces which corrupt a dead body are per 
mitted to work, these grafts corrupt exactly as any part of 
a corpse does. That there is life of any kind in these grafts 
is a gratuitous assumption. In cold storage they are kept 
ready for assimilation into the body as food may be kept. 
Bone and skin grafting is merely a peculiar form of assimi 
lation. Food taken into the body through the stomach and 
entrails is prepared in the body and assimilated into the sub 
stance of the bones or skin or other tissues ; the graft is ready 
for assimilation without this preparation because it is already 
bone or skin. 

The vital principle in a man, or in anything else, is at the 
end, when it normally issues, of the same nature as it was in 
the beginning. If it is at perfection a substantial primary 
form, it always was such a substantial form cannot issue 
from an accidental form. If the substantial form is the form 
of the cells in the completed organism, it was such before that 


organism was perfected, unless it replaced a lower substantial 
form; but there is, we repeat, absolutely no need for such a 
secondary form at the beginning. If the cells of the embryo 
(not the infused germ-cells, which are not the embryo) had 
a forma corporeitaiis, or cellular is, or whatever you wish to 
call it, the human soul when it did come would not confer pri 
mal existence, would not be a forma subsianiialis, but an 
accidental form. "In proof of which," says St. Thomas, 41 
"we must consider that a substantial form differs from an ac 
cidental form in this, that an accidental form does not give 
being simply, but such or such being; as heat does not give 
being simply, but heated being. So when an accidental form 
comes in, a thing is not said to come into existence or to be 
generated, simply, but to become such or such an object, or 
to find itself in such or such a condition. So, also, when an ac 
cidental form disappears, a thing is not said to be destroyed 
simply, but only to a certain degree. A substantial form, 
however, gives being simply; and therefore by its advent a 
thing is said to be generated simply, and by its recession to be 
destroyed simply. Jf, therefore, it happened that any sub 
stantial form other than the intellectual soul preexisted in 
matter, by which the subject of that soul would come into ac 
tual being, it would follow that the soul would not confer be 
ing simply, and therefore would not be a substantial form; 
also that the coming of the soul would not be a generation 
simply, but only secundum quid all of which is evidently 
false." Again, St. Thomas says: 42 "Some tell us the vital 
acts that appear in the embryo are not from the soul, but from 
the soul of the mother, or from the primitive force in the 
semen. Both these statements are false." 

An application of the opinion offered here that is, that 
the human soul is infused at the instant of conception to mul 
tiple and monstrous embryos offers no real difficulty. There 
are two kinds of human twins those from two distinct ova 
and those from one ovum. Two ova may come from one or 
different ovaries, or even from one Graafian follicle, be ferti- 

41 1, q. 76, corp. 

tt la, q. 118, a. 2, ad 2. 


lized at the same time and develop synchronously. If the 
ova are placed at some distance apart in the uterus, two pla 
centas appear ; if the ova are near each other the placentas may 
fuse, but their circulations do not. Each child will have its 
own fetal envelope. 

In twins from two distincl ova there is no difficulty in see 
ing that the souls are placed in these in the same manner as 
the soul is put in the normal single embryo. When the twins 
come from one ovum the condition is not so simple. The oval 
nucleus is the essential part that goes from the maternal side, 
and human ova at times contain two nuclei, as occasionally hens 
eggs do ; a double-yoked hen s egg has two nuclei, and two nuclei 
have been found in a single yolk. Kolliker, Stockel, and von 
Franque have observed double germinal vesicles in single 
human ova. In such a condition two spermatozoa could fe 
cundate the two nuclei and the development go on as in the 
case of twins from distinct ova. 

There is a theory which holds that homologous twins (uni- 
oval) can develop from a single germinal vesicle which splits 
into two primitive streaks and two gastrulas. According to 
this opinion, if the germinal vesicle divide entirely, two fe 
tuses develop which are always of the same sex, and which re 
semble each other so closely in appearance that it is very diffi 
cult to differentiate them. This theory holds also that should 
the germinal vesicle not split fully, the lack of fission causes 
the various kinds of double monsters. The germinal vesicle 
that supposedly splits into two is not fecundated by two sper 
matozoa, they say, because where there is only one nucleus in 
the beginning, the entrance of a second spermatozoon com 
monly kills the ovum. This last assertion has been disproved 
of late. 

Some followers of the splitting theory hold that double 
monsters arise from the union of two originally separate prim 
itive traces (Verwachsungstheorie}. Others say that a single 
primitive trace of blastoderm cleaves more or less thoroughly 
and makes the double monster (Spaltungstheorie ). The earli 
est human double monster (Ahlfeld s case) was in -the fourth 
week of gestation; therefore whatever is held in these theories 


as regards human monsters is only through analogy with lower 

Gerlach 43 saw bifurcation at the cephalic end of a chicken 
embryo sixteen hours old. In this case the first change was a 
broadening of the anterior end of the primitive streak; next a 
forked divergence appeared, and by the twenty-sixth hour the 
bifurcation was half as long as the undivided posterior part. 
Whether this was a case of two nuclei or not is not known. 

What seems to make for the fission theory is that in 
non-parasitic double terata, no matter how unequally nour 
ished or how variable in extent, the union between the halves of 
double monsters is symmetric, and the same part of each twin 
is joined. This fact is used as a reason to exclude a fortui 
tous growing together of dissimilar areas of cell-masses, at 
least in non-parasitic cases. Born, 44 in a study of fish ova, 
found that eggs which produce double monsters begin with a 
segmentation like that of the simple normal ovum. Composite 
spermatozoa have been observed with two and three heads and 
one body and tail-piece, but the significance of these abnormal 
cells is not known. 

Embryos of sea-urchins in the two-cell and four-cell stages 
can be separated by shaking into isolated blastomeres, and the 
segments will grow into full though dwarfed larvae. The same 
division with the growth of dwarfed larvae has been made 
in Amphioxus, in the teleost Fundulus, in Triton, in a number 
of Hydromedusae and several other low forms of life. When 
the division is not made completely double monsters result. 

Up to a certain stage of development the blastomeres of 
the Medusa embryo are totipotent, or capable of developing 
into any part of the body. The limitation of development 
in a particular case lies in the cytoplasm rather than in the 
nuclei of the cells. If frogs eggs are fastened in abnormal 
positions, inverted or on the side, a rearrangement of the egg 
material results, wherein the nucleus and cytoplasm rise and 
the deutoplasm sinks. This change of axis shifts the embryo. 

" U. d. Entstehungsweise der vordern Verdoppelung. Deutsch. 
Archiv. f. Uin. Ned., 1887. 

44 U. d. Furchung des Eies "bei Doppelbildungen. Breslauer Aertz- 
liche Zeitschrift, 1887. 


If an egg is turned upside down in the two-cell stage, a whole 
embryo, or half a double embryo, may arise from each of the 
two blastomeres, instead of a normal half-embryo. A half- 
embryo or a whole dwarf may arise according to the artificial 
position of the blastomere. Each of the two blastomeres con 
tains all the materials potentially for the formation of the 
whole body, and these materials build up a whole body or a 
half body according to the grouping they take on. Primarily 
the egg cytoplasm, in low forms of animal life, is totipotent; 
it has no fixed relation with the parts to which it gives rise, 
and may be artificially modified or differentiated. These ef 
fects, from position and traumatic dislocation, suggest expla 
nations for teratic forms in higher animals. 

Human terata are now commonly classified in four groups : 
(1) Hemiteratic ; (2) Heterotaxic; (3) Hermaphroditic; and 
(4) Monstrous. Hemiterata are giants, dwarfs, persons 
showing anomalies in shape, color, closure of embryonal clefts, 
in absence or excess of digits, or like defects. The Hetero 
taxic group are persons whose left or right organs are reversed 
in position. A true Hermaphrodite would have the complete 
reproductive organs of both sexes, but such an individual has 
not been observed. There is never any question of double per 
sonality in hermaphrodites. 

Terata more properly so called may be single, double, or 
triple; and single monsters may be autositic or independent 
of another fetus, or they may be omphalositic, dependent upon 
another which is commonly well developed and which supplies 
blood for both through the umbilical vessels. There are four 
genera of autositic single monsters, with eight species and 
thirty-four varieties. Of the monstra per defectum the com 
monest are caused by a failure of closure in the embryonal 
medullary canal, which leaves part of the brain and spinal 
<x>rd or their bony covering lacking. Some terata, as the Ace- 
phalia, have no brain or spinal cord, but they die in the fetal 
stage. The Anencephalia may have a spinal cord, a medulla 
oblongata, and parts of the basal ganglia, but the cerebral hem 
ispheres are wanting. Such monsters are sometimes born at 


term and live for several days : they cry, suckle, show some re 
flexes and a sense of pain, and move the arms and legs. 

I described the various kinds of terata in Essays in Pas 
toral Medicine,** and of these the most important in the mat 
ter under discussion here are the double and triple monsters. 
Many of the double monsters evidently were two persons. 
There is only one well authenticated case of a triple human 
monster, and this happened in Italy in 1831. It had a single 
broad body with three distinct heads and two necks, and was 
killed in delivery. There is no proof as to whether it was 
one or more persons. The standard of judgment in such cases 
as regards the presence of one or two souls in the monster is 
the evidence of one or more distinct consciousnesses. A monster 
double from the navel or breast downward (terata anadidyma) 
is, I think, one person. There was an example of a monster 
in this group which was divided from the foreheads down 
ward; or better, the distinct twins were united by their fore 
heads only; but such a form is very exceptional. In my arti 
cle on "Human Terata and the Sacraments," in Essays in Pas 
toral Medicine, in 1906, I expressed the opinion that a mon 
ster which is single to the navel and double below is composed 
of two persons, but I now am of the opinion that such a mon 
ster is only one person, because there is apparently only one con 
sciousness. There are about eight cases of two-headed mon 
sters known which were evidently two persons in each case, 
and several terata kata-anadidyma, divided above and below 
but joined at the sternum, abdomen, or sacrum. Several is- 
chiopagic twins, joined at the pelvis with the heads at the op 
posite ends of the double body, are grouped with either the 
katadidyma or kata-anadidyma. It is commonly not difficult 
to recognize individuality or duality of personality in mon 
sters, but it is not easy to explain the origin of life, to point 
out the moment the second soul enters these fused or undivided 

We can artificially obtain double embryos of frogs by in 
verting the blast omeres in the two-cell stage. 46 We thus get 

49 Chap, vi, p. 69. New York, 1906. 
* See Wilson, op. cit., p. 421. 


united twins with heads turned in opposite directions, twins 
united back to back like the Blazek Sisters, twins united by 
their ventral sides, and double-headed tadpoles, but we have 
no knowledge of how similar doubling in human monsters 
takes place; we must guess vaguely from analogy. There was 
one soul, at least, present from the one-cell stage of the human 
monster; when the second soul is created and infused we do 
not know, but the moment of the creation of this second soul 
has no practical significance in this discussion. 

The presence of certain kinds of monsters in the uterus 
can be diagnosed before labor, but double monsters are mis 
taken for ordinary twins. A woman who has given birth to 
a monster is likely to have subsequent monstrous fetuses. 
Where the intrauterine existence of a single monster is sus 
pected the X-ray will at times clear up the diagnosis. Women 
gravid with monsters commonly abort early in pregnancy, but 
even united twins may go on to term. Those monsters that 
offer an obstacle to delivery by the abnormal bulk of one or the 
other end are mostly twins joined above or below the navel; 
those joined at the middle are easier of delivery. Monsters 
that are joined at the pelves are commonly in a straight line, 
and may not be difficult to deliver. Most double monsters 
cannot be delivered alive except by cesarean section, and the 
fact that the content of the uterus is monstrous is, as a rule, 
not diagnosed until it is impossible to attempt cesarean sec 
tion without killing the mother through infection. In such 
a condition the double monster would, in the ordinary medical 
practice, be delivered by craniotomy, exenteration, cleidotomy, 
or the like operation. 

The Rituale Romanum Pauli V 47 gives the following di 
rections for the baptizing of human terata: 

"18. In monstris vero baptizandis, si casus eveniat, magna 
cautio, adhibenda est, de quo si opus fuerit, ordinarius loci, 
vel alii periti consulantur, nisi mortis periculum immineat. 

"19. Monstrum, quod humanam speciem non praeseferat 
baptizari non debet; de quo si dubium fuerit, baptizatur sub 
hac conditione ; Si tu es homo ego te baptizo, etc. 

4T Tit. ii, cap. 1, nn. 18, 19, 20, 21. 


"20. Illud vero, de quo dubium est, una ne, aut plures sint 
personae non baptizetur, donee id discernatur: discern! autem 
potest si habeat unum vel plura capita, unum vel plura pectora ; 
tune enim totidem erunt corda et anirnae, bominesque distincti, 
et eo casu singuli seorsim sunt baptizandi, unicuique dicendo: 
Ego te baptizo, etc. Si vero periculum mortis immineat, tem- 
pusque non suppetat, ut singuli separatim baptizentur, poterit 
minister singulorum capitibus aquam infundens omnes simul 
baptizari, dicendo: Ego vos baptizo in nomine Patris, et Filii, 
et Spiritus Sancti. Quam tamen formam in iis solum, et in 
aliis similibus mortis periculis, ad plures simul baptizandos, 
et ubi tempus non patitur, ut singuli separatim baptizentur, 
aliis nunquam, licet adhibere. 

"21. Quando vero non est certum in monstro duas esse 
personas, ut quia duo capita et duo pectora non babet distinc- 
ta; tune debet primus unus absolute baptizari, et postea alter 
sub conditione, boc modo : Si non es baptizatus, ego te baptizo 
in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti." 

Any kind of monster coming from tbe human womb, if 
it is only a head and lacks a body (Acardiacus Acormus), or 
is a body and lacks a head and heart (Acardiacus Acephalus), 
or is a Foetus Anideus, which is a shapeless mass of flesh cov 
ered with skin, should be baptized, provided it shows signs of 
life. Number 19 in the Ritual would be liable to an interpre 
tation which is too narrow if it were not that very monstrous 
fetuses, which appear to a lay observer to be not human, are 
as a rule delivered dead. Here it may be worth while to men 
tion that a hybrid between a human being and a lower animal 
is impossible. As to number 20, the rule for differentiating 
unity or duality of personality is not the number of heads, 
but the number of evident consciousnesses, and this differentia 
tion commonly cannot be made at birth. There have been ex 
amples of two-headed monsters delivered alive, which were 
single as to soul because the consciousness evidently was one, 



THE moment human life begins in the human fetus is a 
subject of dispute, but the moment human life ends is 
a mystery we have no method of determining exactly just 
when the soul leaves the body. Daily throughout the world 
the priest reaches a patient who has just died. Conditional 
absolution, extreme unction, baptism might have been adminis 
tered if there were signs of life, but the heart and lungs are 
still, "the patient is dead," and the priest leaves without doing 
anything. Yet it is always probable that the patient does not 
die at once even in a case of decapitation. 

Bichat, at the beginning of the last century, called the 
brain, lungs, and heart "the tripod of life," and from time 
immemorial we have based our judgment of the presence of 
somatic death on the lack of consciousness, respiration, and 
circulation in the patient. The heart, however, beats after 
consciousness and respiration cease (and sometimes respira 
tion continues after the pulse cannot be felt), and this cardiac 
activity may go on for more than a half hour after all the 
normal clinical signs of death have appeared after respira 
tion has quit, when no heart-sounds can be heard by the stetho 
scope and muscular relaxation indicates death. 

The stimulus of the heart-beat probably starts at the junc 
ture of the superior vena cava with the right auricle of the 
heart. Some biologists think that in this spot life takes its 
last stand before the final retreat, but that fact is disputed of 
late. In the hospital of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical 
Research in New York, Dr. G. Canby Robinson l made records 

1 A Study with the Electrocardiograph of the Mode of Death of 
the Human Heart. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1912, xvi, 



from about eight patients before and during the actual stop 
ping of the heart, using the electrocardiograph, which can be 
employed without disturbing the patient. He thus found 
only in one case, however that the heart may beat for a half 
hour after all vascular and circulatory sounds have ceased to 
be audible. In a letter to me Dr. Robinson said : "Undoubt 
edly the heart continues to show activity sufficient to be re 
corded by the string galvanometer very frequently after res 
piration has ceased, both in man and the lower animals; but 
this does not necessarily mean that it continues to be an effi 
cient pump, maintaining the circulation. Undoubtedly also 
in other instances the cardiac activity ceases before the respira 
tion, but I have never obtained electrocardiographic records of 
such cases." 

Crilo s experiments upon dogs show that it is possible to 
resuscitate these animals after they have been apparently dead 
for periods of time up to seven and a half minutes. The ces 
sation of the blood circulation causes degenerations in the nerve 
cells and fibres, and these lesions may last even if the animal 
has been resuscitated. Crile thinks the human respiratory 
centre may survive anemia from thirty to fifty minutes; the 
vasomotor and cardiac centres, about twenty to thirty minutes ; 
the spinal cord, eight to ten minutes; the motor cortex, eight 
to ten minutes; the portion of the brain used in conscious ac 
tivity as such, six to seven minutes. The higher neurons have 
been stimulated into reflex activity twenty-five minutes after 
complete clinical cardiac cessation of activity. 

In any attempt to resuscitate a person apparently dead the 
maintenance of the blood circulation is the chief end. If, 
however, the blood is not oxygenated the circulation will not 
go on automatically. Artificial respiration is used, and the 
active principle of the adrenal gland is injected to stimulate 
the heart. If the heart has stopped in diastole, that is, when 
distended with blood, this distention must be relieved by car 
diac massage, commonly through an opening in the thoracic 
wall. Intratracheal insufflation of oxygen is also to be em 
ployed, as a rule. 


In Essays in Pastoral Medicine 2 I mentioned several cases 
of resuscitation after what had appeared to be certain death. 
Two of these had been "dead" for forty-five minutes before 
they were revived temporarily. Wayne Babcock 3 reported 
a number of new cases of his own. One was a resuscitation 
which lasted for forty-three hours, and which was begun twenty- 
five minutes after respiration had ceased. The patient was 
a very fat negress who had collapsed after the use of scopo- 
lamine. A man whose arm had been torn off died from shock 
in the operating-room. After fifteen minutes of artificial res 
piration the circulation started again, and he was kept alive 
for six hours in this manner, but he died as soon as the artifi 
cial respiration was discontinued. An exactly similar case 
was kept alive for seven hours by artificial respiration. One 
of Babcock s cases was a woman of eighty-seven years of age, 
who apparently died on the table during an operation for 
strangulated hernia. After ten minutes of cardiac and respir 
atory cessation she was revived. She died four days later of 
peritonitis. A man fifty-six years of age undergoing the same 
operation ceased breathing and his heart stopped. He was 
completely revived and cured. 

Father Juan Ferreres 4 holds that aborted and newly born 
children should be baptized, although they give no sign of life, 
if they show no clear evidence of putrefaction. This opinion 
is mine also, but the word maceration should be substituted as 
more exact. Eschbach 5 says : "Infantes recenter natos et in 
vitae discrimine positos, aut foetus abortivos plane formates, 
cum vel levissimus in eis motus apprehenditur, absolute 
baptizari oportet: cum autem sine motu et sensu iidem videan- 
tur neque tamen adhuc corrupti aut putrefacti sint, sine mora 
baptizentur conditionate : Si vivis, ego te baptizo, etc." These 
quotations give the common opinion of moralists at present, and 
this opinion is fully safe Eschbach, however, would have 
the fetus "plane formatus," which is erroneous and an echo 
of the old Aristotelian notion. If the fetus is visible at all, 

1 New York, 1906, p. 164. 

Proceedings of the American Therapeutic Society, 1912. 
La Muerte Real y Apparente, 4th ed., p. 21. Madrid, 1911. 
Quaestiones Physiologicae-Theologicae, disp. 3, p. 2, c. 3, a. 3. 


open the membranes and baptize it conditionally, even if it is 
not as big as a pea. 

An infant born apparently dead may be resuscitated after 
a delay very much longer than would be possible in an older 
person, provided always the infant has not begun to breathe. 

Ferreres mistakes cases of catalepsy which have recovered 
consciousness for cases of apparent somatic death. In these 
cataleptic conditions the blood circulation does not completely 
cease if it did the nervous centres would be disintegrated. 
The case he reports on p. 2G, 6 of the woman resuscitated by 
Rigaudeaux in 1748, was one of catalepsy, if it ever happened. 
The same is true of the case from Gaspar de los Reyes, 7 which 
probably had some foundation in a condition of catalepsy, but 
which more probably is a sheer invention by Reyes. It looks 
like an anecdote from a medieval Florentine novella. 

Old writers speak of cessation of the pulse for long periods. 
Ballonius 8 mentions a person in whom there was no pulse for 
fourteen days before death ; Ramazzini 9 describes a cessation 
of the pulse for four days before dissolution ; Schenck 10 tells 
of a disappearance of the pulse for three days, with recovery. 
These all were apparently cataleptic cases, where the circula 
tion was very feeble and the radial pulse was not palpable. 
Cheyne gives an account of a Colonel Townsend who had the 
power of apparently dying at will. He could so suspend the 
heart action that no pulse could be felt, and after a short while 
the circulation would become normal again. The longest period 
in which he remained in this condition was about thirty min 
utes. St. Augustine mentions a priest named Rutilutus who 
had a power like that of Colonel Townsend, and Caille n re 
ported a similar case. 

The fakirs of India carry this power to great lengths. 
Braid, 12 on the authority of a Sir Claude Wade, says a fakir 
was buried unconscious at Lahore in 1837, and the grave was 

* P. 30 in the English translation. 
T P. 35; p. 39, English translation. 

* Opera Medico, Omnia. Geneva, 1762. 
8 Epistolae, 1692. 

10 Observationum Medicarum, etc. Frankfort, 1600. 
u New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal, xvi. 
" Treatise on Human Hibernation, 1850. 


guarded day and night by sentinels from an English regiment. 
Six weeks after the burial the man was dug up and he pre 
sented all the appearance of a corpse. The legs and arms were 
shrunken and stiff, and the head reclined on the shoulder, as 
happens in corpses. There was no perceptible circulation any 
where, yet he revived. 

Honigberger, a German physician in the service of Run- 
jeet Singh, described 13 a fakir of the Punjaub who was put 
into a sealed vault for forty days, and the seal of Runjeet 
Singh was on the coffin. Grain was sown above the vault and 
it was well above the ground when the man was taken out of 
the vault and resuscitated. Sir Henry Lawrence testified to 
the truth of this story. The fakir s chin was shaved, Honig 
berger says, before the burial, and the beard did not grow 
while he was in the vault. 

In keeping with these stories are many curious accounts 
of recovery after hanging. These are frequent in writings of 
the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when hanging was 
almost an every-day occurrence. These narratives are much 
more authentic than the anecdotes told of recovery after pre 
mature burial, which are as old as literature. Paul Zacchias 14 
tells of a young man who died of the plague and was set out 
with the corpses for burial. He revived and was taken back 
to the pest-house. He "died" again and was again prepared 
for the grave, but he came to a second time. The stock story 
in these premature burial cases is that of the woman who is 
revived by a thief who cuts her finger in an effort to steal the 
rings buried with her. 

The important fact, however, is that in any case of death 
the exact moment in which the soul leaves the body is not know- 
able by any means we have at present, and where there is 
question of giving the sacraments the person apparently dead 
should have the benefit of the doubt. He is to receive condi 
tional baptism, absolution, or extreme unction (preferably by 
the short method), in case these sacraments are required. For 
a whole hour after apparent death the probability that the 

a Medical Times and Gazette, vol. i. London, 1870. 
" Quaestiones Medico-Legales, 1701. 


soul has not departed is so strong that, in my opinion, a priest 
who does not give the necessary sacraments is virtually as 
guilty as if he neglected to administer them to a person evi 
dently alive. Crile, one of the best medical authorities on 
this matter of somatic death, holds that the human respiratory 
system may survive anemia for from thirty to fifty minutes. 
How long after the hour a priest may administer the sacra 
ments is not known, but a second hour, or even a third, are not 
unreasonable periods of time during which the sacraments may 
be administered conditionally. The sacraments are for man, 
and there is no irreverence if they are administered condition 
ally and the priest explains to the bystanders the reason he has 
for his action. 

If a pregnant woman dies slowly, the fetus in her womb 
is likely to die owing to lack of oxygen; if she dies suddenly, 
the child may live for variable periods in various cases. 
Brotherton reported a case where a living child was taken from 
a woman twenty-three minutes after the death of the mother. 
Tarnier, the noted French obstetrician, told of a remarkable 
incident which happened in Paris during the rioting by the 
Commune after the war of 1870. The rioters fired on a ma 
ternity hospital, and a pregnant woman sitting on a bed in a 
ward was instantly killed by a bullet through her head. After 
a while she was discovered dead, and Tarnier was sent for to 
save the fetus, as its heart-sounds could be heard through the 
abdominal wall. When he began the operation the hospital 
was fired upon again, and it was necessary to carry the corpse 
to the cellar of the building. There Tarnier, an hour and 
three quarters at least after the death of the women, extracted 
a living child from the corpse. Hirst 15 tells of another case 
which was narrated to him by an American naval surgeon who 
saw it in the harbor of Rio Janeiro during the revolution at 
the beginning of the present republic of Brazil. A woman 
near term was killed instantly by a piece of shell. As soon 
as she fell to the ground a Brazilian surgeon, who was standing 
near by, cut open her abdomen with a penknife and drew out 
the child, but it was already dead. 

" A Textbook of Obstetrics, 7th ed., p. 643. Philadelphia, 1912. 


Mack 18 was called to a pregnant woman, and he found 
she had died suddenly about five minutes before he arrived. 
He at once opened the uterus with a small lancet and extracted 
a child which was beyond the livid stage and had no heart- 
sound. He worked on the child for forty minutes, using the 
ordinary methods for reviving asphyxiated children, but got no 
sign of life. Then he injected a hypodermic syringeful of a 
1 :1000 epinephrin solution through the umbilical cord into the 
abdomen and continued the reviving motions. In ten min 
utes the child was crying vigorously, and it was a healthy 
baby afterward. 

Gunn and Martin, 17 in experiments on rabbits poisoned 
by chloroform and apparently dead, found they could resusci 
tate about 70 per cent of the animals if treatment was begun 
within ten minutes after the heart ceased beating. They 
started artificial respiration through a tube in the trachea, 
then injected epinephrin into the pericardium, and afterward 
massaged the heart through an opening in the abdomen. The 
rate of compression of the heart in this massage must be some 
what less than half that of the normal beat, and at short in 
tervals the massage is to be stopped to allow the spontaneous 
beats to develop. Compression should be gradual and the 
relaxation abrupt. The massage is applied by one of these 
four methods, and they are arranged here in the order of their 
efficiency: (1) by direct compression of the heart through an 
opening in the thorax; (2) by compression above the dia 
phragm through an opening in the belly-wall; (3) by simple 
compression of the abdomen; (4) by simple compression of the 
thorax. Epinephrin, or pituitary extract, is used as an ad 
juvant intravenously to increase the cardiac movement after it 
has been started. The same methods will probably be effective 
in man, and have been used successfully. 

When a woman is in articulo mortis with a living fetus in 
her womb, one should not wait for her death. If one waits, he 

"Journal of the American Medical Association, August 28, 1915. 
" Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. Bal 
timore, July, 1915. 


will nearly always lose the child. The cervix should be dilated 
forcibly, the child turned and delivered. Even if this forcible 
delivery should happen to hasten somewhat the mother s death, 
the action would be morally licit. jit would be a double-effect 
action; the two effects would proceed immediately and equally 
from the act, which is indifferent morally; one effect, the 
good one, is to save the child for baptism at least, and pos 
sibly permanently; the second, evil but reluctantly permitted, 
is the possible hastening of the maternal death. I should be 
willing even to slit the cervix, if necessary, provided the diag 
nosis were certain, with the possibility of tearing the uterus, 
in a case where the dilatation of the cervix would be too slow 
a method; but this supposition is scarcely practical. 

Zsako * 8 gives a method for determining the interval since 
death by muscular phenomena. Tapping with a percussion 
hammer on certain muscles of the body excites a reflex contrac 
tion up to from an hour and a half to two hours after death. 
The contraction may be elicited in the same manner on the 
living, but it is more evident on a cadaver owing to the ab 
sence of antagonistic tonus in the muscles. Some muscles 
may move for four hours after death. Tapping along the 
radius from the elbow downward, he says, a point is found 
where the stroke causes extension of the hand; tapping along 
the radius above the wrist makes the thumb bend; tapping on 
the spaces between the bones of the hand closes up the corre 
sponding fingers; tapping on the back of the foot extends the 
toes, on the leg adducts the foot, on the tibia along the middle 
third extends the leg. "When the lower third of the thigh is 
tapped across the muscles move, and if the back is struck be 
tween the scapula and the spine the shoulder blades move to 
ward each other. If there is no response the person must be 
dead from two to four hours. I have had no experience with 
this method. 

Satre 19 reported that many soldiers brought into the dress 
ing-stations apparently dead from shock, head or spinal 
wounds, or gas asphyxiation, were revived after artificial res- 

"Miinchener medizinische Wochcnschrift, January 18, 1916. 
" Presse Medicale, Paris, xxiv, 66. 


piration had been applied, sometimes for even six hours before 
results were obtained. Two tests were used to find out whether 
the patient was alive or not. In such cases ten c.c. of a 20 per 
cent, alkaline solution of fluorescine is injected subcutaneously, 
and if there is any circulation this dye will be carried to the 
eye and turn the conjunctiva green. The second test is to push 
a fine puncture-needle into the spleen or liver and thus re 
move a particle of the pulp. This pulp is put on blue litmus- 
paper and drawn free from blood. If the litmus-paper turns 
red the man is dead; if it remains blue he is alive. The re 
action of the living pulp is alkaline, blue; this becomes acid, 
red, a half -hour after death; an hour after death the acid 
reaction is quite marked. 


A3ORTIOX, as the term is used by physicians, in its 
widest sense is the ejection or extraction of a fetus from 
the womb at any time before term. The word is popularly 
contrasted with miscarriage, where the fetus is ejected through 
disease or accident; abortion in the lay sense supposes arti 
ficial, and commonly criminal, extraction of the fetus. Abor 
tion (from dboriri, to perish) etymologically has an associa 
tion with destruction of life, but the name is given by physi 
cians to a removal of any premature fetus, even if it is viable. 
Strictly, however, abortion is an interruption of pregnancy 
before the fetus is viable, and premature labor is such an in 
terruption after the fetus is viable. Throughout this chapter 
the words are used in this sense. 

Abortion as a medical and moral consideration may be con 
sidered from several points of view. 

First, involuntary pathologic and accidental interruptions 
of pregnancy are to be averted, if it is possible to do so, to 
save the life of the child; and when the abortion is inevitable 
the treatment has moral qualities which involve the physician 
and the mother. 

Secondly, voluntary and therapeutic abortion has peculiar 
moral and medical qualities arising (a) from the period of 
gestation or the viability of the child; (&) from the truth or 
error in the diagnosis as regards the necessity for interference, 
and the advantage or damage resulting from the interference. 

Thirdly, the technical skill or ignorance of the physician, 
and the methods he employs may in themselves in any case 
avert or cause the death of the mother or grave injury to her, 
and in the forced delivery of premature infants may save, kill, 
or maim the child. 



Fourthly, voluntary criminal abortion has a special malice 
of its own, which makes it somewhat more criminal than the 
therapeutic removal of an inviable infant. 

Fifthly, there are positive canonical and civil penalties 
against abortion as it affects the inviable infant. 

Pathologic abortions, and those arising from accident or 
carelessness, are extremely common. Hegar estimated that 
there is one of these abortions to every eight normal parturi 
tions, and specialists in obstetrics find as many as one abortion 
to four deliveries at term. These abortions are most frequent 
from the eighth to the twelfth week of gestation, because the 
ovum is then not firmly attached to the uterus, and it readily 
succumbs to external influence. Moreover, the woman is not 
certain she is pregnant and neglects precautions. Many wom 
en, again, are under the error that there is no moral evil in 
getting rid of the ovum before quickening, and they think 
quickening occurs only when they feel the fetal movements. 
Others, erroneously again, fancy that abortion in the early 
months is not dangerous or injurious to themselves. 

The causes of pathologic and accidental abortion are very 
numerous and often interactive. They may arise from the 
fetus, the mother, the father, or from violence. The death of 
the fetus, or diseases of the fetus itself or of its appendages, 
cause abortion. Weakness of the fetus from alcoholism in 
the parents, anemia, carbon monoxide and lead poisoning, to 
bacco poisoning in women who are cigar-makers, and similar 
conditions in one or both parents, will bring on abortion. 
Monsters rarely go on to term. Acute or chronic affections 
in the mother, as typhoid, malaria, smallpox, cholera, scar 
latina, measles, tuberculosis, and the like, and syphilis in the 
mother or father, effect abortion. Other abnormal states that 
bring on abortion are low blood-pressure in maternal anemia, 
shock, syncope; hemorrhages into the placenta in maternal 
nephritis; hemorrhages between the placenta and uterus from 
diseases of the placenta and decidua, or from traumatism, 
which detach the placenta; sun or heat stroke; sudden high 
temperature in fever; toxemias, as in some forms of hyper- 


emesis gravidarum, eclampsia, chorea, hepatic autolysis, and 
impetigo herpetiformis. 

Chronic endometritis, or inflammation of the lining mem 
brane of the uterine cavity, is the commonest maternal cause 
of abortion, especially of habitual abortion. In this condi 
tion hemorrhages in the decidua, or uterine fold that holds the 
fetus, kill the fetus, or force the ovum off the uterine wall, 
or excite expulsive uterine contractions. Without hemorrhage 
endometritis prevents a firm fixation of the ovum, or it may 
bring about a malposition of the placenta, called placenta prae- 
via. Endometritis at the decidua may cause hydrorrhoea 
gravidarum, and the accumulated serous secretions from this 
source are likely to start uterine contraction. Chronic me- 
tritis, or inflammation of the deeper tissues of the uterus, is 
commonly found with endometritis, and it prevents the ex 
pansion of the uterine muscle. This condition is more likely 
to cause abortion than endometritis alone. 

Acute gonorrhea, inflammations of the Fallopian tubes, and 
appendicitis sometimes interrupt pregnancy. Other causes are 
malformations and diseases of the uterus, infantilism, fibroids, 
polyps, uterine horns, lacerations and amputation of the cer 
vix, and retroversions and retroflexions of the uterus. At 
times a replacement of the uterus will avert an abortion. 

When the mother has an infectious disease like typhoid, 
smallpox, cholera, or typhus, the infection may reach the fetus 
and kill it, or may cause an endometritis with a hemorrhagic 
tendency. Maternal sepsis may kill the fetus directly or sec 
ondarily, and this is true also of maternal syphilis. A sudden 
rise in temperature may excite expulsive uterine contraction. 
In pneumonia the excess of carbon dioxide in the blood may 
bring on abortion. Like pneumonia, anesthesia may kill the 
fetus if kept up for a long time, or if marked by cyanosis. 
Prolonged nitrous-oxide anesthesia is especially dangerous to 
a fetus, but a brief nitrous-oxide anesthesia for the extraction 
of a tooth may not bring on abortion. The worst tooth stump 
can be extracted painlessly after local injection of novocain, 
with no danger to the fetus. The gums remain somewhat 
sore for a day or two after novocain infiltration, but this in- 


convenience is a much less evil than total anesthesia, even when 
there is no pregnancy. It is probable that total anesthesia is 
morally unjustifiable for the extraction of a single tooth if the 
tooth is not wedged in. 

Violence, accidental or intentional, is a frequent primary 
or secondary cause of abortion. Sometimes a slight jar, a 
misstep on a stairway, a nervous shock, a jump from a carriage- 
step, lifting weights, running sewing-machines, sea-bathing, a 
rough automobile ride, will bring on an abortion where there 
is a predisposition. Often in healthy women, on the other 
hand, extreme violence does not interrupt pregnancy. Sur 
gical operations are classed here with violence. In a neurotic 
woman a slight operation on an organ not directly connected 
with the uterus will start expulsive contractions. Again, 66 
per cent, of operations on ovarian tumors during pregnancy 
have left the uterus undisturbed. De Lee says he has removed 
fibroids from the pregnant uterus, once even exposing the 
chorion, and has amputated the cervix of a gravid uterus, with 
out interrupting pregnancy. Several cases have occurred 
where both ovaries have been removed during pregnancy with 
out abortion. The breast has been amputated and a kidney 
removed from a pregnant woman * without disturbing the preg 
nancy. Wiener 2 did eleven operations for ovarian tumors dur 
ing pregnancy with only two abortions. Von Hoist 3 removed 
a myoma weighing two and a half pounds from the uterus at 
the seventh month of gestation without abortion. Davis of 
Birmingham, Alabama, reported 4 that a woman three and a 
half months pregnant was shot in the abdomen. The rifle 
bullet made twenty-five perforations in her intestines. She 
was taken eighty-five miles, and then Davis cut out five feet 
of the intestine. She recovered and gave birth to a living 
child at term. 

Double ovariotomy brings on abortion in the early months 
of pregnancy oftener than in the later, probably from the loss 
of the corpus luteum, which, it appears, is necessary for the 

1 Cronk, Oklahoma State Med. Assoc. Jour., July, 1816. 
1 Amer. Jour. Obstet., August, 1915. 

3 Upsala Ldkareforenings Forhandlingar, xxi, 8. 

4 Journal Amer. Med. Assoc., October 28, 1916. 


growth of the uterus. Appendicitis and appendectomy are 
especially likely to interrupt gestation, apparently as a 
result of infection and because pregnant women are prone 
to defer operation. The traumatism of criminal abortion, 
punctures and lacerations from bougies and curettes, and the 
exhibition of drugs like ergot and cantharides, are sources and 
results of abortion. Drugs will not empty the uterus unless 
they are given in poisonous doses which endanger the woman s 

In the father, syphilis, tuberculosis, general paresis, gen 
eral debility from alcoholism, unchastity, and senility, and 
septic conditions of the generative tract, may cause abortion. 
Many men who work with lead, phosphorus, mercury, or X-rays 
are sterile, and before they become totally sterile their con 
dition appears to cause debility in the fetus which leads to 
abortion. In paternal lead poisoning there is a reduction of 
about 20 per cent, in the weight of the infants at birth, and 
a general weakness and retardation of the child. The children 
of lead-poisoned fathers are frequently permanently under 

Coition during gestation is a cause of abortion, and the 
fault here, as a rule, lies with the husband. St. Thomas 5 
said: "St. Jerome protests against the sexual approach of the 
husband to his gravid wife, not that in this condition such an 
act is always a mortal sin, unless there is probable danger of 
abortion." St. Alphonsus 6 says if there is danger of abor 
tion the use of the debitum is a grave sin. In n. 924 he again 
teaches that while it is true that if by the use of the debitum 
the life or formation of the fetus is endangered or checked the 
right to the use of the debitum is, in such circumstances, lost, 
yet he thinks that in pregnancy there is little danger of abor 
tion from this cause, especially near term. 

Sabetti-Barrett 7 says the wife is excused from the debitum 
conjugale if the husband is drunk, or if there is a rational 
dread of grave injury, or grave danger to health. Genicot 8 

In. 4, dist. 81. 

* Theologia Moralis, n. 943. 
f Theologia Moralis, n. 936. 

* Theologiae Moralis Institutiones, vol. ii, n. 544. 


thinks that in pregnancy it "can scarcely be shown that there 
is a notable danger of abortion." Lehmkuhl 9 holds that a 
married person is not obliged to grant the debitum if there is 
great danger of abortion; but, he adds, "Even then, if there 
is a grave danger of incontinence I do not think it certain that 
there is an absolute obligation to abstain." 

Unlike Lehmkuhl, moralists agree that if there is real dan 
ger of abortion from marital congress, such an act is illicit, 
but they are inclined to think that there is little or no danger 
of abortion, especially at the end of gestation. Authorities 
on obstetrics, on the contrary, say that one of the causes of abor 
tion in the early months of pregnancy is marital congress ; and 
one of the sources of sepsis in women, which may result in the 
death of both mother and child, is certainly congress at the 
end of gestation. This causation of abortion is found espe 
cially in neurotic irritable women, in such as have diseases of 
the generative tract, or a tendency to habitual abortion. When 
ever a woman shows any tendency to bleeding during gestation 
the use of the debitum is undoubtedly contraindicated, because 
of the proximate danger of both abortion and septic infection. 
Toward the end of pregnancy the danger from sexual com 
merce is the risk of infecting the woman s vagina with bac 
teria which may bring on sepsis through the abrasions incident 
to parturition. The staphylococcus pyogenes albus, a danger 
ous septic microorganism, exists as a saprophyte in 50 per 
cent, of male urethras, and the bacillus coli communis is an 
other source of infection from the father during pregnancy. 
De Lee saw two cases of sepsis that killed both mother and 
child from such an infection shortly before term. If a phy 
sician now examines a woman before delivery without using all 
the precautions known to prevent sepsis, such as wearing a 
sterile rubber glove, he is guilty of malpractice; yet certain 
moralists are inclined to let a husband do what he likes. Mor 
alists talk about the fetus as protected in the membranes. 
That is nonsense, because it has no relevancy to the question. 
It can have the slight relevancy of untruth when the woman 

* Compendium Theologiae Moralis, n. 1114. 


is rendered septic, because then the membranes are no protec 
tion at all. 

The mortality statistics of the United States Census Bu 
reau show that a little more than 42 per cent, of the infants 
who died in the registration area in 1911 did not last through 
out the first month of extrauterine life, and of these babies 
almost seven-tenths died of prenatal and delivery abnormali 
ties. In 1912, in the registration area, which then took in 
63.2 per cent, of our population, the total death-rate of infants 
under a year old was 9035, and of these 3905 died of puer 
peral infection. In the entire country a very conservative 
estimate of the annual number of deaths of infants from puer 
peral sepsis is 5000; and about 15,000 women die here yearly 
from this etiology alone. Of course most of these deaths are 
caused by unclean niidwives and quacks, but a large number of 
them are brought about by incontinent husbands. Invalidism 
from puerperal sepsis happens many times 15,000. Moreover, 
one-third of all the blindness in the world is caused by septic 
infection of the eyes at birth and virtually all this septic infec 
tion of the eyes is carried in by diseased husbands, although not 
necessarily by coitus during gestation. 

Coition during pregnancy is unnatural because it neces 
sarily fails of the end of coition, which is procreation. Cu 
riously, too, all the lower animals instinctively appear to avoid 
this act during pregnancy. Men should be told that marriage 
has restraints as well as celibacy. Women are reminded of 
the law of the debitum, but not of the occasions when they are 
even obliged to deny it. If a man cannot keep continent in 
the presence of his pregnant wife, let him live in another part 
of the house. Regard for the woman is lacking in many ways. 
Young girls often marry without having the faintest notion of 
sexual life, and they are panic-stricken when assaulted. I 
have known two who were frightened into insanity. Priests 
should tell young married men that they are human beings, 
not animals; that they should act like rational beings when 
they are first married; and that after the wife has become 
pregnant the husband should not be the cause of abortion in 
the first three months, nor of puerperal sepsis in the last three 


months. Priestley, 10 in 2325 pregnancies, found one abortion 
in every four pregnancies ; Guillemot and Devilliers in France, 
Hirst in Philadelphia, and others report the same propor 
tion. These are natural, not criminal, abortions. If, then, in 
normal pregnancies about one child in five is lost before birth, 
husbands should be taught a continence which would to some 
degree avert this calamity. Superfetation has occurred by 
coition during pregnancy, and this results commonly in abor 
tion and the death of both fetuses. 

Premature labor in cases where the child is viable is pro 
duced by the same agencies that interrupt gestation in the early 
months. Obstetricians think that syphilis is the commonest 
cause of premature labor, and they estimate that from 50 to 
80 per cent, of these premature births are due to syphilis. In 
a series of 705 fetal deaths in Johns Hopkins Hospital, 26.4 
per cent, were due to syphilis. After syphilis the cause of 
premature labor next in frequency is nephritis with placental 
hemorrhages and infarcts. Twins are not seldom delivered 
prematurely because of lack of room in the uterus. For the 
same reason any tumor of the uterus or abdomen may cause 
an abortion. 

When successive pregnancies are interrupted prematurely 
the abortion is said to be habitual, and again the commonest 
cause is syphilis. In this disease, as the virulence of the in 
fection decreases, the gestation is prolonged until a child is born 
infected with congenital syphilis. This child commonly dies, 
and later a child strong enough to live appears. Correct treat 
ment of the parents will avert this slaughter of the innocents. 
Sometimes the syphilis is latent so far as clinical symptoms 
are concerned, but we may find a positive Wassermann reaction. 
Hubert reported n that 8.8 per cent, of 8652 patients in a clinic 
at Munich where all were subjected to the Wassermann test 
had latent syphilis, and in 52 per cent, of these cases in men, 
and 75 per cent, in women, the infection was altogether un 
known to the patients. 

Chronic endometritis, where there is no syphilis, will per- 

10 Pathology of Intrauterine Death. London, 1887. 
u Munchener medizinische Wochenschrift, Ixii, 39. 


mit habitual abortion, and each abortion makes the condition 
worse. Nephritis, diabetes, and other constitutional diseases 
cause habitual abortion. 

In the first two months of gestation the decidual fold which 
holds the ovum against the uterine wall is thick, vascular, and 
friable. The contracting uterus in abortion expels the decidua 
with considerable difficulty, but the ovum containing the fetus 
may slip out easily and be lost. A fetus two months old is 
about three-fourths of an inch in length. Jf a physician, 
nurse, or other person finds the ovum, no matter how small it 
is, they should open it at once with a scalpel or scissors and 
baptize the fetus conditionally, even if no sign of life is per 
ceptible. If the fetus is unmistakably dead a diagnosis not 
easily made there is no use in attempting baptism; but al 
ways give the fetus the benefit of the doubt. In the first six 
or eight weeks the whole ovum is usually born developed in 
decidual tissue; sometimes the ovum will slip out of the de 
cidua and be covered only with shaggy villi, suggestive of a 
chestnut burr. 

During the third and fourth months there may be (1) an 
abortion of the whole ovum; or (2) the membranes may rup 
ture, the fetus be expelled, and the secundines remain in the 
uterus, and these may have to be removed by instrument or 
finger; or (3) the decidua reflexa and the chorion may split 
and let out the fetus into the amniotic sac: here again the re 
maining secundines, if they do not come away spontaneously, 
must be removed. Abortion after the fifth month is like a 
regular labor at term, but not so energetic. 

An abortion may be threatened, inevitable, or incomplete. 
In each of these conditions there is uterine pain and hem 
orrhage. In inevitable and incomplete abortions we find soft 
ening and dilatation of the cervix, and a presentation or ex 
pulsion of part or all of the ovum. 

In pregnancy uterine hemorrhage and uterine pain are 
symptoms of a threatened abortion, but not certain symptoms. 
Fromme found that 17.9 per cent, of 157 women who had these 
signs in the early months went on to term. If the fact of 
pregnancy is not known it is not always easy to differentiate 


a threatened abortion from other uterine conditions, like chronic 
metritis, ectopic gestation, a fibroid or other tumor, hemorrhage 
from cervical erosions or varices, or malposition of the uterus. 
If the abortion is inevitable the diagnosis is made more read 
ily. The cervix is then more or less dilated and the ovum is 
palpable. There is rather profuse hemorrhage, flooding, and 
painful uterine contractions are evident. The rupture of the 
bag of waters may be simulated by the escape of secretions in 
hydrorrhoea gravidarum, or the escape of waters may be a 
primary symptom of graviditas exochorialis. Hydrorrhoea 
gravidarum is an intermittent discharge of clear or bloody 
fluid from a catarrhal endometritis under the decidua. It 
occurs in anemic, weak women, especially multiparae. In 
graviditas exochorialis the fetus is left within the womb but 
outside the ruptured chorion, and it may remain there for some 

When an abortion is incomplete it is absolutely necessary 
to learn whether the entire ovum and decidual tissue have been 
expelled or not. When a part or all of the dead ovum is re 
tained the consequences are so grave that they may result in 
the death of the woman or cause chronic invalidism. Sepsis 
may result, a placental polyp may form, and even syncytioma 
malignum may start this fatal tumor, however, is not so 
common after incomplete abortion as after hydatid mole for 

The prognosis as regards health is worse after abortion than 
after normal pregnancy. The involution of the uterus is 
slower than in full-term cases, and if infection has occurred 
there is great likelihood of a chronic endometritis and me 
tritis. The woman may bo rendered sterile, or she may be 
come a chronic invalid to be cured only by capital operations. 

In threatened abortion examination is to be avoided unless 
it is absolutely necessary for diagnosis, and then great gentle 
ness is required so as not to excite uterine contractions. The 
woman is to rest in bed, not so much as raising her head to take 
a drink of water (which is given to her through a tube), and 
she is morally obliged to submit to this inconvenience. If she 
refuses she is accountable for the death of the fetus. If there 


is bleeding the foot of the bed should be elevated as in hem 
orrhage in typhoid fever. The routine practice is to quiet 
the woman and the uterine irritability with morphine and other 
opium derivatives. Children are readily overwhelmed by opium 
because their circulation is not sufficient to neutralize the de 
oxidizing effects of the drug up to safety. While the embryo 
is connected with the maternal circulation through the placenta 
the mother s circulation often safeguards the fetus from the 
effects of the opium. The danger to the child in such cases 
begins from the opium remaining in its circulation after the 
child has been separated from the mother. Often, however, 
fetuses in cases where scopolamine and morphine have been 
used on the mother during labor are born badly, and even 
fatally narcotized, despite the connection with the maternal 
circulation. Nevertheless, even if there is some real danger 
to the fetus from the use of morphine in a threatened abor 
tion, the cautious use of this drug would be morally justifiable. 
Should the threatened abortion go on to actual abortion, the 
fetus will certainly be killed, but the use of morphine on the 
woman is the best and virtually the only means we have to avert 
a threatened abortion and so save the fetal life. The imme 
diate double effect from the morally indifferent act of giving 
a dose of morphine is, on the good side, the saving of the fetal 
life, and on the other, the evil side, the danger of fetal nar 
cosis, which is not at all certain to follow. Evidently, the good 
intended effect far overbalances the evil and somewhat hypo 
thetical effect. 

After about five days, if the bleeding ceases, the woman 
may be permitted to go back to her ordinary routine of life, 
but with extreme caution, and she must return to bed at the 
slightest show of blood. Morphine is used at the beginning 
to quiet the patient and the irritable uterus. If the cervix 
is eroded, applications of a 10 per cent, nitrate of silver solu 
tion are made. The bowels are kept locked for three days and 
a softening enema of olive-oil is used before emptying the 

If the bleeding starts again every time the woman goes 
about her duties, the abortion may be inevitable. When the 


cervix is shortened and dilated so that the ovum is palpable 
and pieces of the decidua or ovum are expelled, the hemorrhage 
is more or less profuse, and especially if the bag of waters has 
ruptured and uterine contractions show, the abortion is deemed 
inevitable. In such a case the fetus may be alive, or it may 
be dead; and, again, conditions which show all the classic 
symptoms of inevitable abortion sometimes, though rarely, do 
not go on to abortion. It is extremely difficult, and often im 
possible, to tell whether an early fetus is dead or alive. A high, 
lasting fever sometimes kills the child; so do low blood-pres 
sure, profuse hemorrhages, deoxidation of the blood in pneu 
monia, separation of the placenta, fatty degeneration of the 
placenta, and the severe infections in such cases there is al 
ways strong probability that the child is dead when the abor 
tion shows its symptoms. If the fetal tissues that appear in 
dicate maceration, or if the discharge is fetid or purulent, the 
fetus is dead. Should the fetus be alive, tamponing the va 
gina to check the hemorrhage often separates the fetus from 
the uterus by the dissecting force of the blood dammed back, 
or in any case tamponing is almost certain to excite uterine 
contractions ; thus there is an indirect killing of the fetus. 

The treatment of inevitable abortion after the fifth month 
differs very much from the methods used in the early months. 
The prime principle is, never interfere until forced to do so. 
When the hemorrhage is dangerously profuse, so that the 
woman s life is endangered (an exceptional condition), the 
uterine cervix and the vagina must be tamponed with sterile 
gauze and cotton to check the bleeding, but this is a last resort. 
If the fetus is alive, or probably alive, nothing short of a ne 
cessity to save the woman s life by this means justifies the 
use of the tampon. De Lee advises the routine use of the 
tampon in threatened abortion, but this doctrine is erroneous 
medically and altogether false morally. If the physician 
knows the fetus is dead, he should, of course, tampon at once 
to get rid of the fetus. The tampon excites uterine contrac 
tions and causes destruction of a living fetus by dissecting it 
loose from the uterine wall through the dammed blood. Ele- 

ration of the foot of the bed and the use of morphine will, as 
a rule, check the bleeding. 

When the woman is bleeding to the risk of her life, the 
tampon is put in to check the bleeding and so save her life. 
The double effect immediately following this indifferent act is 
on one side good, the saving of her life ; on the other side evil, 
the killing of the fetus. The good effect is intended, the evil 
effect is reluctantly permitted. Such a procedure is morally 

Where a tampon must be put in, it is left in from sixteen 
to twenty-four hours, even if the temperature goes up. Dur 
ing this time there are painful contractions of the uterus, as 
a rule, and these are expulsive. Xo drug is to be given to allay 
these pains if the intention is to have a dead or viable fetus 
expelled. If the pains cease suddenly, this is usually a sign 
that the fetus has been expelled above the tampon. When 
the tampon is removed and the entire ovum is found, it is best 
for the ordinary physician not to meddle with the uterus in 
any manner. Some advise that the physician should go over 
the uterine lining with a half-sharp curette to make certain 
that nothing has been left behind, but this is dangerous advice 
to any one who is not an expert obstetrician. Should the tem 
perature remain above 100 degrees, the uterus must be cleaned 
out, and flushing with uterine catheters is not enough: if the 
gloved finger cannot remove the secundines, the curette is 

If, when the tampon has been removed, no ovum is found 
and the cervix is still closed, another tampon is to be put in 
for another twenty-four hours, supposing the removal of the 
ovum is licit. Forcible dilatation of the cervix is always a 
dangerous operation, and should never be employed when 
avoidable. Steel dilators have ruptured the uterus and killed 
the patients again and again even when used by experts. Lam- 
inaria tents are not to be recommended; the tamponade is 

When the retained ovum cannot be removed by the finger 
or squeezed out, the free portion of the ovum is to be grasped 
by an ovum forceps and gently drawn out. The operator 


should bo sure he has a part of the ovum in the forceps and not 
a part of the uterine wall. If he bites into the uterine wall 
(a common catastrophe), he may pull a hole in that wall, and 
then the woman will probably die unless the rent can be closed 
immediately after opening the belly. "When the abdominal 
cavity has been opened in such an event, the uterus is also to 
be opened, cleansed, and sutured. This method is safer than 
curetting where there is a rent. If one is certain the gut has 
not been injured and it is extremely difficult to be certain 
vaginal anterior hysterotomy may be substituted. Sometimes 
perforations, when the uterus is not septic and the instruments 
are clean, are not dangerous. Rest in bed, ice-bags, ergot, 
and opium cure without operation. 

Physicians who are called into an abortion case should al 
ways be certain that no one has attempted to pass sounds, 
curettes, or similar instruments, because a perforation may have 
been made by the meddler which will be charged to the second 
man himself. 

If a uterus is flexed it is easy to poke a curette or like in 
strument through it at the bend, especially if the uterus is 
thin or friable from sepsis. Again, the placental site is raised, 
it feels rough, and the furrows in it lead one to think part of 
the placenta is still adherent, whereas all has been removed. 
Repeated scraping, due to this error, may dig a hole through 
the uterine wall. Perforation in a septic case is practically 
always fatal to the woman. The use of the curette supposes 
a special technic, and no physician should presume to try its 
use unless he has been carefully and practically instructed. 

In inevitable abortion after the third month it may be very 
difficult to get the embryo out. The cervix, in primiparae es 
pecially, may be long, thick, and hard. If the fetus is dead, 
it may then be removed by morcellement L e., by cutting and 
breaking it into pieces, and then taking out these pieces with 
an ovum or stone forceps. Sometimes, though rarely, the op 
erator may find it impossible to get the entire fetus away. 
Then the uterus is packed with weak iodine gauze, and after 
twenty-four hours the fetal remains are expelled. 

In every abortion the presence or absence of extrauterine 


pregnancy is to be made out If there is an extrauterine preg 
nancy, curettage will cause rupture of the sac. 

When the interior of the aborting uterus has become septic 
the old treatment was to empty the uterus at once, but now the 
treatment is expectant, because the traumatism of the curetting 
makes the sepsis worse. The commonest and worst infections 
are of the streptococcus putridus, a pus staphylococcus, and the 
bacterium coli communis. Curettage lets these microorganisms 
enter the circulation. The cause of this condition is often un 
skilful attempts at artificial abortion. When the womb con 
tains decomposing material bleeding usually obliges tampon 
ing, and thus often the uterine contents come away in twenty- 
four hours with the gauze. If there is no hemorrhage there 
should be no tamponing: it is then better to get dilatation by 
packing and drain the uterus with gauze. The curette should 
not be used at all. 

Where there is habitual abortion the cause must be found. 
During gestation syphilis and displacements of the uterus, as 
causes, may be treated. Endometritis can be cured only when 
the uterus is empty. Rest in bed at the time when these abor 
tions usually occur, and at the time when menstruation cus 
tomarily appears, is required. Treatment of the husband is 
often necessary, as he is virtually always the source of luetic 

Attention or inattention to the mother s own hygiene dur 
ing pregnancy has great effect on the fetus, and care of hy 
giene may avert abortion. The woman s dress should be sim 
ple and warm enough to prevent congestion from changes in 
temperature. Congestions are likely to affect the kidneys, and 
care of the renal function is always one of the most important 
facts connected with pregnancy. No circular constrictions of 
the trunk by lacing or stiff corsets should be attempted. The 
corset forces the uterus and child downward into the pelvis 
and against the lower abdominal wall, causing congestion of 
the pelvic veins and strain on the abdominal muscles. Tight 
corsets, preventing the expansion of the uterus and the growth 
of the fetus, may cause mutilations like club-foot and wry 
neck, or even kill the child. The woman who would "preserve 


her figure" by corsets, to the mutilation, weakening, or killing 
of her unborn infant, and this is an every-day evil, is either 
a criminal fool or an unmitigated scoundrel. Tight lacing to 
conceal pregnancy is a method of murder. High-heeled shoes 
are somewhat injurious because of the constrained position into 
which they throw the woman. X-ray photographing of preg 
nant women is very likely to cause abortion. 

The woman s diet should be simple. She must abstain 
from all alcoholic liquors even if she has been accustomed to 
their use at meals. She should not overeat on the supposition 
that she has to feed two persons. Some popular books advise 
a special diet to reduce the bone-salts and thus get a smaller 
baby and one more easily delivered. Such advice is criminal. 
The constipation of pregnancy is not to be treated by strong 
cathartics like Epsom salt. The kidneys are to be watched; 
therefore the urine should be examined every three weeks up 
to the seventh month, then oftener. If there is any suspicion 
of toxemia or nephritis, the urine should be examined daily. 
Obstetricians who have any regard for their own conscience 
and reputation will have nothing to do with a woman who re 
fuses to take this precaution. 

Physical exercise should be gentle say, walking, up to two 
miles in the daytime. The vast majority of women are too 
lazy to take physical exercise as a hygienic duty at any time, 
and during pregnancy their aversion to all effort to overcome 
indolence is so great they make even themselves believe 
they cannot. Just as most professional men think they think, 
most women think they work. There are thousands of women 
who have servants, yet make not only their families and friends 
but themselves believe they are worked to death, and their 
work is the spreading of four or five beds, and the ordering of 
groceries over the telephone. When these women are preg 
nant they quit even the bed-making. 

Cold and hot baths, Turkish and Russian baths, hot sitz- 
baths and ocean bathing are not permissible during gestation. 
Tepid baths and spongings are to be substituted. Near term 
the bath-tub is not safe because of danger of uterine infection 
from unclean water. Then shower-baths are better, but these 


are dangerous if the woman must step over an enameled bath 
tub side to take them, because she may slip and fall. Vaginal 
douches are not to be used in pregnancy except in certain dis 
eased conditions, under the direction of a competent physician. 

Therapeutic abortion and therapeutic induction of prema 
ture labor are employed in five chief groups of conditions: 
(1) contracted pelvis; (2) diseases caused by pregnancy; (3) 
diseases coincident with pregnancy; (4) habitual death of 
the child after viability but before term; (5) prolonged preg 
nancy. There is no such act as therapeutic abortion of an 
inviable child; all abortions of inviable children, when di 
rect, are criminal, and nothing criminal is therapeutic. The 
consideration of narrow pelvis, and the diseases caused by 
pregnancy and coincident therewith, will be treated in detail. 

When the child dies after viability but before term the cause 
is most commonly syphilis. In such cases a Wassermann re 
action should be made from both parents; and even if it is 
negative, and no other definite cause for the fetal death can be 
found, syphilitic treatment should be tried on the father and 
mother. Bright s disease, even when scarcely diagnosable, 
anemia, diabetes, adiposity, and hypothyroidism are other le 
thal causes of habitually still-born infants. Not seldom the 
cause is in the husband. If he is an alcoholic (and two or 
three drinks of whiskey a day make any man an alcoholic), if 
he is especially susceptible to the toxin of tobacco (and tobacco 
alone may render some men not only sterile but impotent), if 
he is a worker in poisonous metals, an X-ray operator, a user 
of narcotics, exhausted with overwork and worry, affected with 
weakening systemic disease, his germ-cells are unfit for their 
function. Such men are not technically sterile, but they are 
practically sterile. 

Some women carry the child beyond term, with the effect 
that the baby is overgrown for normal delivery. The head is 
harder and more angular than it should be, the long bones 
stiffer and less pliable, the muscles tenser. All these changes 
make the delivery so difficult that the overgrown child may 
be fatally injured at birth. Physicians must be cautious in 
believing histories of enormous children at previous births at 


which they were not present. Mothers and nurses are likely 
to exaggerate the size of infants. 

In cases where the children die at a particular time before 
term, premature labor should be induced to save the child, and 
when the child has been carried over term it may be necessary 
to induce labor. In the first condition labor is not to be in 
duced a week earlier than is necessary. We talk so much of 
a seven months child as viable that we forget that any child 
born before the thirtieth week of gestation has very small 
chance for survival. From 30 to 60 per cent, of all prema 
turely delivered infants die. The maternal passages do not 
dilate normally and the child is unformed; its bones fracture 
readily; it cannot sustain pressures and strains. All induced 
labors are dangerous to the mother by shock and possible in 
fection, and only very grave necessity justifies any such pro 

In inducing necessary premature labor the technical meth 
od may take on a moral quality. There are over a score of 
methods, and many of these, although used, are dangerous and 
should be obsolete. A very common method, begun in 1855, is 
to insert one or two elastic solid bougies into the uterus between 
the membranes and the uterine wall. This is a dangerous 
method and should be obsolete. Other dangerous and obsolete 
methods are the puncture of the membranes with a trocar high 
up in the uterus; intrauterine injections of hot or cold water, 
glycerine, milk, and other liquids; vaginal tamponade alone; 
irrigation of the vagina with carbon-dioxide water; a stream 
of hot water directed against the cervix, electricity, X-ray, di 
latation of the vagina with a rubber bag, irritation of the nip 
ples, the use of drugs like quinine, cimicifuga, ergot, or can- 

If haste is not necessary, packing the cervical canal and the 
lower uterine segment antiseptically with a strip of gauze three 
to five yards long and three inches wide and leaving it in for 
about twenty-four hours is one of the best methods. Where 
rapid delivery is required, cesarcan section must be employed. 
In cases of somewhat less urgency the membranes are first 
punctured and balloon dilators are used. In any case puncture 


of the membranes is the most certain method to start labor, 
but it has many bad disadvantages. A dry labor in a primi- 
para with an undilated cervix is a grave condition. If the fe 
tal head is not engaged in the pelvis, puncture must not be at 
tempted. When the head is not engaged in the pelvis like a 
ball-valve, the cord will prolapse, be pinched, and thus the 
blood supply will be cut off from the child and the loss will 
kill it. For the same reason, the waters must not be run off 
too quickly. Many operators insert a bag, dilate, and so start 
the labor, without puncturing the membranes, where there is 
no reason for haste. 

Therapeutic abortion, as has been said, is never permissi 
ble, under any circumstances, if the child is not viable. In 
certain conditions, say, when a uterine tumor clearly threatens 
the life of the pregnant woman, or if in extrauterine gestation 
there is a rupture of the tube, an operation may be permissible, 
or even obligatory, which has for its direct end the removal 
of the tumor or the stopping of the hemorrhage. If such a 
removal or ligation, under these conditions, indirectly causes 
the abortion of the inviable fetus, or its death from a lack of 
blood, these indirect effects may be reluctantly permitted. 
They are cases of an equally immediate double effect, one good 
and one evil, where all the requirements are fulfilled. A di 
rect abortion of an inviable fetus, however, is never licit even 
to save the mother s life, and in abortion the killing is direct 
because it is used as a means to an end. In a ruptured ectopic 
gestation the primary effect of the physical operation is to li- 
gate the torn arteries to save the woman s life here and now; 
the secondary effect is the permitted death of the fetus from 
the shutting off of the blood supply. In the abortion of a pre 
mature fetus the primary effect of the operation is to separate 
the placenta from the uterus, to cut off the child s blood supply, 
and as a direct consequence of this act, which is essentially 
evil, the woman s life is saved. The original act in this abor 
tion is evil, and evil may not be done even if good follows. 
Even in self-defence against an unjust aggressor Cne may not 
kill a man to save his own life he tries to save his own life 
and reluctantly permits the death of the aggressor. In a kill- 

AJ30KTION" 111 

ing in self-defence there are two distinct effects; in abortion 
there is only one effect, and the killing is a means to this one 
effect. That you may kill an irresponsible insane man who 
is attacking your life, or the life of one entrusted to your 
care, is no reason that you may attack a fetus in the womb. 
There is no parity. The insane man is a materially unjust 
aggressor; the fetus is not an aggressor at all. The mother 
placed it where it is; and if any one is an aggressor, she is. 
In the abortion you directly kill the fetus and indirectly save 
the woman s life, and this indirection uses the death of the 
fetus as a means to the end of saving the woman s life. In 
killing the insane aggressor you directly save the life of your 
self or your ward, and reluctantly permit the death of the 
aggressor. The proofs of the essential immorality of direct 
homicide have already been established in the general chapter 
on Homicide. 

The assertion that an undeveloped fetus in the womb is not 
as valuable as the mother of a family is beside the question, 
and in certain vital distinctions it is untrue. Any human life, 
as such, whether in a fetus or an adult, is as valuable as an 
other, inasmuch as no one but God has any authority to de 
stroy it, except when it has lost its right to existence through 
culpable action. Secondly, the quality of motherhood is an 
accidental addition to a mother s life, not substantial as is the 
life itself. This quality of motherhood does not create any 
juridic imbalance of values which justifies the destruction of 
the rights inherent in the fetus. That the fetus may not be 
able to enjoy these rights if the mother dies is, again, an 
irrelevant consideration. There is no question of a com 
parison of values. A life is a life, whether in mother or fetus, 
and the destruction of an innocent life by any one except its 
creator, God, is essentially an evil thing, like blasphemy. An 
innocent fetus an hour old may not be directly killed to save 
the lives of all the mothers in the world. Insisting on such 
comparisons supposes ignorance and sentimental opposition to 
truth. It is a good deed to save a mother s life ; but such sav 
ing by killing an innocent human being ceases to be good 
and becomes indescribably evil, an enormous subversion of 


the order of the natural law, as it is a usurpation of the 
dominion over life possessed by God alone. If I owe a man 
a vast sum of money and the payment of this debt will ruin 
me and my children, it would be a good thing for me and 
them to have this creditor put out of the way by death, but 
that fact is no justification whatever for me to kill the man. 
The fetus in the womb in a case where there is question of 
therapeutic abortion is like this creditor: it would be w r ell for 
the mother to have this fetus out of the way, but that is no 
justification whatever for her to kill the fetus, or to let it be 
killed by a physician. The physician who kills such a fetus 
is exactly like a hired bravo who assassinates a troublesome 
creditor for a fee, except that the physician does the nasty 
job for less money. 

To hasten even an inevitable death is homicide, and that 
quality of merely hastening adds nothing for extenuation : 
every murder is merely a hastening of inevitable death. To 
give a dying man a fatal dose of morphine "to put him out 
of misery" is as criminal a murder as to blow out his brains 
while he is walking the streets in health; to ease pain is not 
commensurate with the horrible deordination of taking a 
human life. This subversion of the moral law in the interest 
of mawkish sentimentality is one of the gravest evils of modern 
social ignorance. Physicians are constantly mistaking inclina 
tion, or the mental vagaries of the nurses who influenced their 
childhood, for rules of moral conduct. A physician is not a 
public executioner, nor a judge with the power of life and 
death: his business is solely to save human life, never to 
destroy it. 

If there were anything in the objection that refusal to do 
abortion opposes the life of a useless fetus to that of a useful 
mother of a family, where would such false logic stop ? If it 
held for the taking of life in an unpleasant condition, it 
would hold a fortiori in every other less unpleasant condition 
where a life would not be at stake. When a note that you had 
given falls due and it would bankrupt you to pay it, does this 
inconvenience let you out of the difficulty in honor, in the 
moral law, or in the civil law? It certainly does not; but it 


should if the doctrine of the sentimentalists on abortion were 
true. An eclamptic woman, or one with hyperemesis gravida- 
rum, conceived the child, got into the difficulty, and she and 
her physician have no right to tear up the note they have 
given to the Creator, especially when such tearing implies 
murder. Suppose, again, a woman has done a deed for which 
she has in due process of just law been condemned to death; 
suppose, also, there is only one man available to put her to 
death, and if this man were killed she could escape. Would 
her physician be permitted to shoot that executioner to let 
her out of the difficulty ? Certainly not. That, however, is 
just what the physician does who empties an eclamptic uterus 
of an unviable fetus. You may not do essential evil that any 
thing under the sun, good, bad, or indifferent, may come of 

If I may kill a so-called "useless fetus" to save a useful 
mother, do gross evil to effect great good, why should I stop 
there? Why, then, may I not rob a church to make my chil 
dren rich, murder a useless miser to employ his money in 
founding orphanages, shoot any oppressor of the poor, kick 
out of doors my senile and bothersome father, reject all my 
most sacred promises whenever their observance makes me 
suffer? Where will the sentimental moralist draw the line? 
That the civil law permits therapeutic abortion is no excuse at 
all; it is merely a disgrace of the civil law. The American 
civil law permits many things that are contrary to morality 
and the law of God: it absolves bankrupts even if they after 
ward become solvent ; it permits the marriage of divorced per 
sons; it levies unjust school taxes; it gives unjust privileges; 
it squanders the money of the citizens ; and so on. 

If a woman marries in good faith a man she deemed a gen 
tleman, but who turns out to be a syphilitic sot who disgraces 
her and makes her life a perpetual misery, immeasurably 
worse than the condition of any eclamptic woman, no greater 
blessing could come to her and her children than his death. 
Would she therefore be justified before any tribunal of God 
or man in murdering him to get rid of her trouble? No; 


she must bear with her evil for the sake of social order and of 
eternal right. So must the eclamptic woman. 

If it is murder to kill a child outside the womb, and mere 
therapeutics to kill it inside the womb, then it is murder to 
shoot a man on the street, and mere good marksmanship to 
shoot him to death inside his house, especially if he is an 
undesirable citizen. All reputable physicians deem a fetus in 
a normal pregnancy so good that they will not dream of de 
stroying this fetus. They absolutely refuse to effect an abor 
tion to get rid of a fetus which may disgrace an unmarried 
woman and her family, and they are perfectly right in this 
refusal. They talk and write with genuine indignation of 
race suicide. The only reason they have for the refusal to 
do what they call criminal abortion is that the disgrace or 
inconvenience of the woman is not commensurate with the de 
struction of a human life. They observe the natural human 
instinctive repugnance to murder in this special speech and 
writing, and then go home and get their obstetrical bags and 
complacently murder the first baby they find in the womb of a 
married matron who has a disturbed stomach or kidneys. 
They show here the fine intellectual acumen and reasoning 
ability of a chronic lunatic. The first fact in the social order 
is that justice, law, order, should prevail, no matter what the 
cost. It might be better that the fetus should die than that the 
mother should die, though that is not always true. It is not 
better that an unbaptized fetus should die than that a mother 
in the state of grace should die. T^ut these are irrelevant con 
siderations. It is never better that the fetus should be killed 
than that the mother should die. That is a very different 

The Mignonette case in 1884, tried in England by Lord 
Coleridge, is a good example of evaluation of lives as in 
therapeutic abortion, which came to grief. A ship called the 
Mignonette foundered 1600 miles from the Cape of Good 
Hope, and three of its crew, with a boy, were for a long time 
at sea in an open boat without provisions. When they were 
almosi starved the boy lay on the bottom of the boat, asleep 
or half conscious from weakness. Two of the men plotted to 


kill the boy for therapeutic purposes; they needed his flesh 
to save their own lives. They killed the poor lad just as the 
therapeutic abortionist kills a fetus. They got his uncooked 
flesh for four days. Later Lord Coleridge got them and he 
sentenced both of them to death. Another Lord will get the 
therapeutic abortionists. 

What, then, is the physician to do who meets a case that 
imperatively calls for therapeutic abortion according to the 
common medical practice ? He can do nothing. The law may 
seem hard in certain circumstances to those who cannot see 
beyond the physical; yet that fact does not abrogate the law, 
which is one of essential morality. 

May the physician call in a physician who, he knows, will 
not scruple to perform the therapeutic abortion on an unviable 
fetus ? If he does, he is as much a murderer as if he did the 
deed himself. He may not so much as suggest the name of 
some one who will do the deed. He simply tells the family 
he can do nothing. If they insist on the abortion he with 
draws from the case. 

In this connection it is necessary to mention again the ques 
tion of viability. Langstein reported 12 a study of the growth and 
nutrition of 250 prematurely born infants, and he found a con 
firmation of what was already known, that a weight of 1000 
grammes (2 pounds) and a full body length of 34 centi 
metres (13f inches) are the lowest limits for viability under 
proper circumstances. A fetus 1000 grammes in weight and 
34 centimetres in length has completed the sixth solar or 
calendar month, or the sixth and a half lunar month it is 
beginning its seventh month, not ending it, yet it is viable un 
der proper conditions. 

The child at term, on a rough average, is from 48 to 52 
centimetres (19 to 20 inches) in length, and it weighs 
from about 6f to T pounds. It is impossible, however, 
to obtain the sizes and weights of infants in utero with scien 
tific accuracy, because the date of conception cannot be deter 
mined with absolute certainty, and infants in utero vary as 
they do after birth. A full-term infant sometimes may weigh 

u Berliner klinische Wochenschrift, June 14, 1915. 


only 3 pounds when the mother is diseased, and at times an 
eight-months fetus will weigh as much as 8 pounds. 

As was said in Chapter III, a fetus of six completed cal 
endar or solar months (not lunar the duration of gestation is 
often reckoned in lunar months by obstetricians) is viable pro 
vided it is cared for by competent physicians in a hospital. 
Otherwise it is not viable, except in a strictly technical sense ; 
it will not live more than a few days or weeks. 

A full seven-months infant may be reared with proper feed 
ing and skilled care; a six-months infant may be reared (with 
difficulty) in a hospital with skilled care. Jf it is certain that 
the removal of a six-months fetus will here and now save tlio 
life of a mother (a very difficult matter to judge by the best 
diagnosticians), this removal may be done, provided the in 
fant is delivered in circumstances where skilled care, incubator, 
and proper food are obtainable; otherwise the removal is not 

The Council of Lerida, in Catalonia, in the year 524, de 
creed that abortionists of any kind must do penance all their 
lives, and if they are clerics they are to be suspended per 
petually from all ecclesiastical ministration. 

The Council of Worms, under Hadrian II., in the year 
868, 15 also judged women who procure abortion as certainly 
guilty of murder. 

In the Corpus Juris, among the decretals of Gregory, 
there is the following law: "If any one, through lust or 
hatred, does anything to a man or woman, or gives them any 
drug, so that they cannot either generate or conceive, or bear 
children, he is to be treated as a murderer." 

Sixtus V., in the Constitution Effraenatam, October 29, 
1588, mentions a decree of the Sixth Synod of Constantinople, 
in session in 680 and 681, which subjects those who perform 
abortion, or kill a fetus, to the punishment inflicted on mur 
derers. Sixtus then decreed that any one who effects the 
abortion, directly or indirectly, of an immature fetus, whether 
the fetus is animated, formed, or not, either by blows, poison, 

"Cap. 35. 

18 Lib. v, tit. xii, c. 5. 


drugs, or potions, or tasks of hard labor imposed on pregnant 
women, or any other method, however subtle or obscure it be, 
is guilty of murder, and is to be punished accordingly. He 
recalls all ecclesiastical privileges from clerics who cause 
abortion, and says that they are to be reckoned as murderers 
according to the decree of the Council of Trent, 17 and he makes 
a law that abortionists may never be promoted to orders. 

In the fifth paragraph he says : "Moreover, we decree that 
the same penalties are incurred (1) by those who give potions 
and poisons to women to induce sterility or prevent concep 
tion, or who cause these drugs to be administered, and (2) by 
the women themselves who freely and consciously take these 

In paragraph seventh he decrees that any one, man or 
woman, cleric or lay, who procures abortion by counsel, favor, 
drinks, letters of advice, signs, or in any way whatever, are 
ipso facto excommunicated, and the excommunication is re 
served to the Pope himself. 

Gregory XIV., in the constitution Sedes Apostolica, May 
31, 1591, gave to priests who have special faculties for the 
purpose from the bishop, permission to absolve from this ex 
communication, but only in foro conscientiae. Sixtus V. and 
Gregory XIV. used the term foetus animatus, in keeping with 
the old Aristotelian notion of animation. 

Pius IX., in the constitution Apostolicae Sedis Moderar 
tioni, deleted the epithet animaius, and extended the excom 
munication to all abortions, no matter at what time of the 
gestation they occur. He ordered that only the actual physical 
abortionist is to be excommunicated, not those who counsel 
the crime. Some moralists hold that those who order abor 
tion are direct abortionists and fall under this excommunica- 
tion; other moralists oppose this opinion. Pius IX. 18 excom 
municates procurators of abortion if actual abortion is effected, 
and this excommunication is reserved to the bishops, not to 
the Pope. 

In this decree occur the words "Procuranies abortum, ef- 

1T Session xiv, De Reformatione, cap. 7. 
18 Sect, iii, cap. ii. 


fedu secuto," and there has been considerable discussion of the 
question who are the procurantes, the agents who fall under the 
excommunication? Again, are craniotomy, cephalotrypsis, de 
capitation, embryotomy, and exenteration, when performed on 
the living child, abortions in the sense of the decree, and thus 
matter of the excommunication? 

Those who do abortion are the principal agents who 
physically, immediately, of themselves, in their own name, or 
who morally, through others, perform an abortion. The com 
mon opinion of moralists is that all those who of themselves or 
through others bring on an abortion are excommunicated, but 
that assistants, although guilty of crime, are not excommuni 

Many eminent moralists are of the opinion that the mother 
herself who seeks an abortion does not fall under the excom 
munication because Sixtus V. does not explicitly mention her 
in this penal law, and a penal law is to be interpreted liter 
ally. If a pregnant woman goes to an abortionist and per 
suades him by speech and pay to do an abortion, she is the 
direct moral cause of that abortion. If it were not for her, 
the abortion would not take place. Virtually all abortions 
done on married women are effected morally by the woman 
herself. In my opinion, and the new canon law states this ex 
plicitly, the woman who procures an abortion on herself or on 
another woman is excommunicated. 

Sabetti-Barrett 10 holds that craniotomy on a living child 
and the removal of an inviable extrauterine fetus are not 
abortion in the scope of this excommunication, because as a 
penal law these operations are not specifically mentioned. All 
mutilating operations, like craniotomy and the others enumer 
ated above, first kill the fetus, then extract its body from the 
womb; abortion first extracts the fetus and then lets its die. 
The result is the same, but the operations differ technically, 
and a penal law is ad literam. A cleric who procures abor 
tion of an inviable fetus at any time of gestation falls under 
the excommunication and suspension a sacris perpetually, al 
though he probably is not technically irregular canonically if 

" Compendium Theologiae Moralis, 1915, n. 1009. 


he procures the abortion before the Aristotelian date of anima 
tion. The bull Effraenatam makes the canonical irregularity 
at the Aristotelian date obsolete practically. 

In the church the Holy Office (that is, the Inquisitors-Gen 
eral in matters of faith and morals) is the official authority 
which interprets, under the approval of the Pope, the morality 
of acts like abortion and related operations. In 1895 the fol 
lowing difficulty was proposed to the Holy Office for solu 

A physician is treating a woman with a disease which 
will certainly be fatal to her unless cured medically, and the 
disease is due to the presence of a fetus in her womb. To save 
her it is necessary to empty the uterus, but the fetus is not 
yet viable. The question is, May the physician perform 
therapeutic abortion in such circumstances? 

On July 24, 1895, the Holy Office answered: "The In 
quisitors-General in matters of faith and morals, with the vote 
of their Consultors, decree: Negatively, in accord with the 
other decrees of May 28, 1884, and August 19, 1888." 

Jn May, 1898, the following questions were proposed to 
the Holy Office : 

I. Is the induction of premature labor licit when a con 
tracted maternal pelvis prevents the birth of a child at term ? 

II. If the maternal pelvis is so narrow that premature 
delivery is impossible, is it licit to perform abortion, or to 
effect cesarean delivery at the proper time? 

III. Is laparotomy in extrauterine gestation licit ? 

May 4, 1898, the Holy Office answered, with the assent of 
Leo Xm. : 

I. Premature labor in itself is not illicit, provided it is 
done for sufficient reason, and at the time and by such methods 
as will under ordinary circumstances preserve the life of the 
mother and the fetus. 

II. As to the first part, the answer is negative, according 
to the decree of July 24, 1895, on the unlawfulness of abor 
tion. As to the second part, there is no objection to the 
cesarean delivery at the proper time. 

III. In a case of necessity, a laparotomy to remove an 


ectopic fetus from the mother is licit, provided the lives of 
both mother and fetus are, so far as is possible, carefully and 
opportunely preserved. 20 

March 5, 1902, this question was asked the Holy Office: 
"Is it ever licit to remove an ectopic fetus from the mother 
while the fetus is under six months of age from the time of 
conception ?" 

The answer was: "Negatively, in accord with the decree 
of May 4, 1898, by which the lives of the fetus and mother, 
as far as possible, are carefully and opportunely preserved. 
As to the time, the questioner is reminded by the same decree 
that no premature delivery is licit unless effected at the time 
and by the methods which, under ordinary circumstances, will 
preserve the lives of mother and fetus." 

The English civil law concerning abortion 21 is: 

"Whoever shall unlawfully supply or procure any poison 
or other noxious thing, or any instrument or thing whatsoever, 
knowing that the same is intended to be unlawfully used or 
employed with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, 
whether she be or be not with child, shall be guilty of a mis 
demeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the 
discretion of the court, to be kept in penal servitude for the 
term of three years, or to be imprisoned for any term not 
exceeding two years, with or without hard labor." 

Alfred Susaine Taylor, 22 commenting on this law, said: 
"Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as justifiable abor 
tion; the law recognizes no such possibility. A medical man 
must always remember this when he contemplates emptying a 
pregnant uterus. 

"It is obvious that the only reasons that can be thought of 
by an honorable man as justifying the induction of labor are 
(1) to save the life of the mother; (2) to save the life of 
the child. (Some religions will not contemplate the first rea 
son, but that we are not now concerned with.) It cannot be 

" "Dummodo et foetus et matris vitae serio et opportune pro- 

" Statutes 24 and 25, Victoria, cap. 100, sec. 59. 

M Principles and Practice of Medical Jurisprudence. London, 


done for the sake of family honor nor for any similar ethical 
reason. . . . 

"The golden rule is never to empty a uterus without first 
having a second professional opinion as to its necessity; if 
this opinion be adverse, do not do it; if it be favorable, it is 
well to get it in writing, and it is well also to get the written 
or attested consent of the woman and her husband, and then 
proceed to do it with all the skill and care possible. The 
death of the fetus is at any time the most certain means of 
causing the womb to empty itself, but after the sixth month 
the operation is performed necessarily with a view to preserv 
ing this life, and steps must be taken accordingly." Coke, 
about 1615, judged that to kill a child in the womb is not 
murder, but if it is expelled by violence and dies after it leaves 
the womb, that is murder. 

The law in Pennsylvania 23 is : "If any person, with in 
tent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, shall unlaw 
fully administer to her any poison, drug, or substance whatso 
ever, or shall unlawfully use any instrument, or other means 
whatsoever, with the like intent, such person shall be guilty 
of felony, and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to 
pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an 
imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, 
not exceeding three years." It makes no difference in Penn 
sylvania law whether the child is quickened or not. 

The New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Wisconsin laws are 
like the Pennsylvania law. The law in Iowa 24 is : "If any 
person, with intent to procure the miscarriage of any pregnant 
woman, wilfully administer to her any drug or substance what 
ever, or, with such intent, use any instrument or other means 
whatever, unless such miscarriage shall be necessary to save 
her life, he shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a term 
not exceeding five years, and be fined in a sum not exceeding 
one thousand dollars." To the same effect are the laws in 
Connecticut, Maine, New York, Ohio, Michigan, Minnesota, 
Colorado, Texas, and Maryland. 

" Laws of Pennsylvania, Act of March 31, 1860, sec. 88. p. 404. 
* Laws of 1897, Iowa Code, 4759. 


Frank Winthrop Draper, professor of legal medicine in 
Harvard University, 25 commenting on the Massachusetts law 
of October, 1903, cap. 212, sees. 15, 16, says: "It is impor 
tant to recognize the fact that the law does not make any excep 
tion or formal recognition in favor of justifiable operations to 
procure premature labor. The statute is general in its applica 
tion. It is, of course, obvious that the best sentiment of the 
medical profession and of obstetric teachers is favorable to 
interference of pregnancy, (1) whenever there is such anatom 
ical deviation or mechanical obstruction in the mother s pelvis 
that the birth of a child is impossible; or (2) whenever the 
mother is suffering from such grave disease that her life is in 
imminent peril and can be saved only by the arrest of gesta 
tion. Under such conditions the physician is not only war 
ranted in inducing premature labor, but is required to do so 
by a sense of duty to his patient, with a view thereby to 
save one life at least, and, if possible, the lives of both mother 
and offspring. 

"Nevertheless, as the law now stands, a prudent prac 
titioner will not expose himself to any risk, if a few precau 
tions will save him. In the event of the death of the mother 
and child in such an emergency, the attending physician might 
find himself in jeopardy, with the imputation of gross care 
lessness and criminal neglect hanging over him, an imputation 
which requires years to remove. So the attending physician 
should never undertake to do an instrumental operation with 
out these precautions: 1. The consent of the patient, with 
that of her husband or family. 2. Especially, a consultation 
with some other physician or physicians in whom there is full 
confidence. Attention to these simple and sensible safeguards, 
by making the conduct appear by its candor and openness in 
the strongest possible contrast with the secret methods of the 
abortionist, may save great embarrassment." 

The ethics of this doctrine is, of course, absurd, as has 
been shown, and it is cited here only to show how the civil 
law considers abortion. Wharton and Stille 26 give the same 

" Legal Medicine, 1905. 

" Medical Jurisprudence, vol. iii, sec. 526. 


information in a more technical manner. "It is a general 
rule," they say, "independent of statute, that the act of a 
physician in aiding a miscarriage is not unlawful, where the 
miscarriage was the inevitable result of other causes. And the 
act is justified where the circumstances were such as to induce 
in the mind of a competent person the belief that a miscarriage 
was necessary to preserve the life of the mother. And the 
statutes of many of the States penalize the causing, or at 
tempting to cause, an abortion, unless necessary to preserve the 
life of the woman, or unless advised by a designated number of 
physicians to be necessary for such purpose, the absence of 
both the necessity and the advice being an essential ingredient 
in the crime. The physician by whom the deed is done, how 
ever, cannot act as his own adviser in the matter. And an 
indictment under the statute must not only allege that the 
act was not necessary to preserve the woman s life, but must 
also negative the advice of physicians; and such averments 
cannot be inserted as an amendment after demurrer. 

"The burden of proof rests with the state to show that the 
means used were not necessary to preserve the life of the 
woman in question; and the absence of necessity may be de 
termined from circumstantial evidence. But the burden of 
proof as to the advice of physicians would not fall within the 
rule controlling the production of proof as to negative matters 
in general, and would rest with the accused ; though it may be 
proved by a preponderance of the evidence and need not be 
established beyond a reasonable doubt. But either that the 
act was necessary to preserve the life of another, or that it 
was advised by physicians to be necessary for that purpose, is 
of equally good defence; and the destruction of the child need 
not have been both necessary and advised by physicians. And 
statutes of this class apply only in cases in which the death of 
the mother could reasonably be expected to result from natural 
cause, unless the child was destroyed, and do not apply to a 
case in which the mother threatened suicide unless she was 
relieved from her trouble." 


ECTQPIC Gestation, called also extrauterine pregnancy, 
is gestation outside the uterus in the adnexa or the peri 
toneal cavity. Pregnancy in the horn of an abnormal or rudi 
mentary uterus is classed with ectopic gestation because the 
effects are similar, although pregnancy at times in a rudimen 
tary uterus goes on to term normally. The uterus is in the 
pelvic cavity, between the bladder and the rectum, and above 
the vagina, into which it opens. It is a hollow, pear-shaped, 
muscular organ, somewhat flattened, and about three inches 
long, two inches broad, and an inch thick. The fundus or base 
is upward, and the neck is downward. Passing horizontally 
out from the corners or horns of the uterus, which are at the 
fundus, are the two Fallopian tubes, one on either side. These 
are about five inches in length and somewhat convoluted. They 
are true tubes, opening into the uterus, and they are about 
one-sixteenth of an inch in diameter throughout the greater 
part of their extent. The ends farthest from the uterus are 
fringed and funnel-shaped; and this funnel end, called the 
Infundibulum or Fimbriated Extremity, opens into the ab 
dominal or peritoneal cavity. Near the Fimbriated Extremity 
of each tube is an Ovary, an oval body about one and a half 
inches long by three-quarters of an inch in width. For con 
venience in description, each tube is divided into four parts: 
(1) the Uterine Portion, which is that part included in the 
wall of the uterus itself: it extends from the outer end of the 
horn into the upper angle of the uterine cavity, and its lumen 
is so small that it will admit only a very fine probe; (2) the 
Isthmus, or the narrow part of the tube which lies nearest the 
uterus: it gradually widens into the broader part called (3) the 
Ampulla; (4) the Infundibulum, or the funnel-shaped end of 



the Ampulla. One of the fimbriae, the Fimbria Ovarica, is 
longer than the others, and it forms a shallow gutter which 
extends to the ovary. 

The uterus, tubes, and ovaries lie in a septum which 
reaches across the pelvis from hip to hip. This septum is 
called the Broad Ligament. If a man s soft hat, of the style 
called "Fedora," is inverted, the fold along the crown coming 
up into the cavity of the hat is like the broad ligament. As 
the crown is held downward the uterus would be in the middle, 
its fundus upward, and outside the hat, representing the pelvic 
cavity, but in the crown fold. The tubes and ovaries would 
also be in the crown fold, or broad ligament, and the fim- 
briated extremities would open into the interior of the pelvic 
cavity through holes. The ovum breaks through the surface 
of the ovary into the pelvic cavity, passes, probably on a 
capillary layer of fluid, into the fimbria ovarica and thence into 
the infundibulum, whence it moves along slowly into the 

Ovulation and menstruation occur about the same time 
ordinarily, and if the ovum produced is not fecundated it 
gradually shrivels and passes off through the uterus and 
vagina. Fecundation of the ovum rarely occurs in the uterus, 
but ordinarily in the Fallopian tube. After fecundation the 
ovum is pushed on through the Fallopian tube into the uterus 
in from five to seven days, where it fastens to the wall and 
develops normally. Hyrtl described an ovum which appeared 
to reach the uterus in three days. If from some abnormal 
condition of the Fallopian tube the fecundated ovum is blocked 
and held in the tube, the embryo grows where the ovum 
stopped, and we have a case of Ectopic Gestation. In normal 
pregnancy in the uterus, the uterus grows with the embryo, 
but a tube does not. In the latter condition, when the ovum 
is big enough it bursts the tube or slips out through the am 
pulla, causing hemorrhage or other pathological symptoms. 

There are certain rare abnormalities of the uterus through 
imperfect embryological development, and pregnancy in such 
a uterus may result in symptoms like those of ectopic gesta 
tion. Normally the uterus and vagina are formed by the 


fusion of the two Miillerian ducts. When these ducts do not 
fuse perfectly, or when one develops partly, the various kinds 
of abnormal wombs and vaginas are the results. There may 
be a double uterus with a single or double vagina, a uterus with 
a complete or partial septum down the middle, a uterus with 
one horn, a uterus with a developed horn and a rudimentary 
horn, and the rudimentary horn may be open or shut, and so 
on. In many of these conditions the ovum becomes blocked 
and rupture follows as in ectopic gestation. 

When the ectopic ovum begins to develop in the Fallopian 
tube the placental villi erode the tubal wall and the blood 
vessels. At length the ovum slips out of the ampulla the 
common result or the tube bursts. The break may be trau 
matic in origin, from jarring or a like accident, or it may be 
spontaneous. If the rupture is through the tube there is 
hemorrhage into the pelvic cavity ; if the ovum slips out of the 
ampulla the tubal abortion causes hemorrhage as in uterine 
abortion. In either case the blood with peritoneal fibrin forms 
a hematocele, and this, with the ovum, may be finally absorbed J 
or the woman may bleed to death unless the hemorrhage is 
checked surgically; or the child may live for varying periods 
up to term. The tube rarely ruptures into the fold of the 
broad ligament. 

The fetus usually dies after rupture or tubal abortion, and 
if it has not advanced beyond the eighth week it is absorbed. 
Sometimes it lives. When the rupture or abortion does not 
tear the placental site the fetus may develop in the abdominal 
cavity. Between 1889 and 1896 Haines J found 40 operations 
for ectopic gestation done after the seventh month of pregnancy 
with 10 maternal deaths. Of the children, 27 survived the 
operation from a few moments to fifteen years. Sittner, in 
1903, compiled from the medical reports 142 cases of viable 
ectopic fetuses, and Essen found 25 additional cases. Since 
Essen s article more have been reported, about 173 to my 
knowledge, but the number is considerably larger. , 

Hirst says an experienced obstetrical specialist sees from 
12 to 24 cases of ectopic pregnancy annually. Kiistner him- 
1 Kelly s Operative Gynaecology. New York, 1898. 


self operated on 105 cases in five years. About 78 per cent, 
of all ectopic gestations result in tubal abortion and 22 per 
cent, in rupture. 

Many specialists now are of the opinion that the diagnosis 
of ectopic gestation ordinarily is not difficult, but most physi 
cians find it very difficult. Before rupture of the tube or a 
hemorrhage diagnosis is hardly ever made by any one, and no 
pelvic condition gives rise to more diagnostic errors. When 
there is rupture or tubal abortion the symptoms may lead the 
physician to mistake the condition for uterine abortion. In 
uterine abortion the onset of the symptoms is quiet, with grad 
ually intensifying and regular pains, resembling labor, in the 
lower abdomen. In ectopic pregnancy the symptoms of a rup 
ture or tubal abortion arise quickly, with irregular and colicky 
or very violent pains, localized on one side. In uterine abor 
tion the external hemorrhage is more or less profuse, with clots ; 
in ectopic gestation the external hemorrhage is slight or absent ; 
the shock in the latter case is out of proportion to the visible 
blood loss. Parts of the ovum, or the presence of the whole 
ovum, as uterine, are found in ordinary abortion, but in the 
ectopic condition the ovum proper does not appear. An intrau- 
terine angular pregnancy, or pregnancy in a uterine horn, 
causing the upper corner of the womb to bulge sidewise, may be 
mistaken for ectopic gestation. Pregnancy in a retroflexed 
uterus, tumors of the adnexa, the twisted pedicle of an ovarian 
tumor, a burst pyosalpinx, an appendicitis in pregnancy, or a 
combined intrauterine and ectopic gestation, also may confuse 
the diagnosis. When there is a dangerous hemorrhage from 
rupture or tubal abortion the diagnosis is usually made with 
out difficulty from the collapse and other signs. 

The diagnosis as to whether the fetus in the pelvis is dead 
or alive may be made (1) from the absence or presence of 
symptoms of tubal rupture during the second and third months, 
or of mild symptoms indicating only slight bleeding; (2) from 
the continuation and progress of the evidences of pregnancy, 
as nausea, mammary changes, fetal movements, or audibility 
of the fetal heart; (3) from the presence of a loud uterine 
blood souffle; (4) from the absence of toxemia or suppura- 


tion; (5) from a growth of the uterus and a softening of 
the cervix; (6) from a gradual increase in the size of the 
suspected ectopic fetal tumor. In making the diagnosis great 
caution must be observed, as roughness in manipulation may 
start hemorrhage or rupture a thinned tube. 

The diagnosis may be made: (1) that ectopic gestation 
exists without symptoms of maternal hemorrhage, and the fetus 
is not viable; (2) that the same maternal condition may be 
present, but the fetus is viable; (3) that there may be symp 
toms of slight bleeding, and the fetus is inviable; (4) that 
there may be symptoms of grave maternal hemorrhage at any 
stage of the gestation. 

The ordinary medical doctrine in the text-books is that as 
soon as a diagnosis of ectopic gestation is made laparotomy 
should be done and the sac with the ectopic fetus removed. If 
the fetus is alive and inviable this procedure will, of course, 
kill it. Only a few obstetricians of authority advise an ex 
pectant treatment. Schauta found 75 recoveries and 166 ma 
ternal deaths in 241 cases treated expectantly a mortality of 
69 per cent. 

If there are no symptoms of maternal hemorrhage but the 
fetus is evidently dead, the fetus is to be removed. If it is 
evidently alive, or doubtfully alive, the treatment must be 
expectant. The woman is to be removed to a hospital and 
kept under constant watch, day and night, with everything 
prepared for immediate operation. Any woman while bear 
ing an ectopic fetus is in constant grave danger of death, but 
the moralists hold that her danger is not so imminent before 
actual rupture as to justify the death of the fetus by precau 
tionary removal. 

In 1886 the Archbishop of Cambrai proposed the following 
list of questions to the Holy Office for decision: 

1. May a pregnant woman in danger of death from 
eclampsia or hemorrhage be prematurely delivered of a viable 

2. May a woman in the same condition be delivered in 
urgency by means which will kill the infant? 

3. May a woman in articulo mortis be delivered of a 1 


viable child if the delivery will somewhat hasten her death ? 

4. May the woman in question 1 be delivered of an in- 
viable fetus ? 

5. May the woman in question 3 be delivered of an in- 
viable fetus? 

6. May a woman who is about to become blind, paralytic, 
or insane from her pregnancy be prematurely delivered of a 
viable child ? 

7. May the woman in question 6 be delivered by means 
which will kill the fetus ? 

8. May the woman in question 6 be delivered of an in- 
viable child? 

9. May the woman in question 6 be delivered of an in- 
viable child, supposing the child to be in articulo mortis? 

10. May an ectopic fetus be killed by operation, electric 
ity, or poison, to avert possible danger of death from the 
mother ? 

11. May a surgeon who has opened the abdomen for 
some condition not uterine incidentally remove a viable ectopic 
fetus ? 

12. With conditions like those in question 11, except 
that the fetus is not viable, may the surgeon remove the in- 
viable ectopic fetus? 

Three years later, August 19, 1889, the Holy Office an 
swered these questions comprehensively: "In Catholic schools 
it may not be safely taught that craniotomy is licit, as was 
decided May 28, 1884, or any other surgical operation which 
directly kills the fetus or the pregnant mother." Safely taught 
here is a somewhat technical expression which has been inter 
preted by the Holy Office in another connection as meaning 
that the act is illicit morally. 

The Holy Office, May 4, 1898, again decreed: "Necessi 
tate cogente, licitam esse laparotomiam ad extrahendos e sinu 
matris ectopicos conceptus, dummodo et foetus et matris vitae, 
quantum fieri potest, serio et opportune provideatur." 2 This 

1 "In a case of necessity, it is licit to do a laparotomy for the re 
moval of an ectopic gestation sac from the maternal pelvis, provided 
the life of both fetus and mother be carefully safeguarded." 

decision was not clearly understood, and on March 5, 1902, the 
same congregation reported the following question : "Is it ever 
licit to remove from the maternal pelvis an ectopic fetus which 
is still immature ; that is, which has not yet completed the sixth 
month after conception?" The answer was, "No; according 
to the decree of May 4, 1898, which prescribes that the life 
of the fetus and the mother must as far as possible be care 
fully safeguarded. As to the time, according to the same de 
cree, the questioner will remember that no premature delivery 
is permissible unless it is effected at such a time and by those 
methods which in ordinary circumstances safeguard the life 
of the mother and fetus." 3 

If the fetus is removed and so killed to avert a threatened 
danger to the maternal life, but not an actually operative 
destruction of her life, this removal or homicide is an evil 
means used to avert the danger. There is no question of a 
double effect, that is, of two effects, one good and the other 
evil, coming with equal directness from the cause, which is the 
removal or killing of the fetus ; but of a good effect, the avert 
ing of the danger to the mother, issuing from an evil cause, 
the removal and death of the fetus. A good effect does not 
justify the use of evil means; it is not permitted morally 
directly to kill the fetus, as in this case, to save the mother 
from a threatened grave danger. 

The case is not like that of the woman who has an operable 
cervical cancer while she is bearing an inviable fetus. If 
the cancerous uterus is not removed the woman will surely 
die; if it is removed she has a reasonable chance of cure; but 
if the inviable ectopic fetus is not removed it is by no means 
certain that the woman will die. In the cancer the uterus is 
directly removed, the fetus is indirectly killed; in the ectopic 
case the fetus is directly killed, and the danger to the woman s 
life is removed as a direct effect of the killing. 

Again, the killing of the inviable ectopic fetus cannot be 

1 "Negative, juxta decretum 4 Maii, 1898, vi cujus, foetus et matris 
vitae, quantum fieri potest serio et opportune providendum est : quod 
vero tempus, juxta idem decretum, orator meminerit, nullam pa.rtus 
accelerationem licitam esse, nisi perficiatur tempore et modis, quibus 
ex ordinarie contingentibus, matris ac foetus vitae consulatur." 


justified by maintaining that the fetus is an unjust aggressor 
against the life of the mother. An aggressor against life may 
be such formally or materially. A formally unjust aggressor 
consciously and voluntarily attacks the life of the victim un 
justly. This perversion, or evil, in the aggressor s consciously 
actuated will sets his own right to life in juridic inferiority to 
that of the victim s right to life, and the victim may defend 
his own life, even unto the indirect death of the aggressor in 

The materially unjust aggressor attacks the victim s life 
unjustly, but whether the aggressor is sane or insane, the attack 
is not voluntary. When an insane aggressor appears to use 
his will, such use lacks all moral quality because of the ab 
sence of intellect and reason; he wills improperly, as a brute 
is said to will. In either case, nevertheless, there is active 
aggression directed against the victim s life, which also sets 
the aggressor in juridic inferiority to the victim, and permits 
the victim to defend his own life to extremes. As great an 
authority as De Lugo holds that in such defence, whether the 
aggressor is formally or only materially such, the victim may 
directly kill, but direct killing is never necessary, as it is all 
a matter of intention. 

The ectopic fetus cannot, of course, be a formal aggressor 
because it cannot exercise either intelligence or will. It is not 
a materially unjust aggressor, because the only action it is 
capable of is to increase in size in obedience to the natural law 
of growth. It is not trying in any manner to tear the maternal 
blood-vessels. It has a right to its own. life and a right to 
grow. Its growth may finally bring about a maternal hemor 
rhage, but just now it is not causing that hemorrhage. An ag 
gressor is such only while there is an actual attack going on 
here and now, directed against the victim s life. The fetus 
is necessarily passive always, never aggressive in any sense 
of the term, until the actual rupture occurs. If it may be 
deemed materially aggressive when the actual rupture is tak 
ing place, the question becomes irrelevant, because at that time 
the fetus may be removed for other reasons altogether. If an 
insane man is in a room with a loaded revolver which he may 

not use against me, but which he probably will, I may not 
kill him in self-defence until he actually begins the aggres 
sion. The opinion expressed here is the contrary of the 
opinion I expressed, in 1906, in Essays in Pastoral Medi~ 

The second condition proposed is that the ectopic gestation 
exists without symptoms of maternal hemorrhage, but the child 
is viable. In such a case it is probably better to remove the 
fetus at once, but only a skilled abdominal surgeon should at 
tempt the operation because it is likely to be difficult from 
adhesions. A viable ectopic fetus is usually deformed. 
Winckel found 50 per cent, of them deformed the head in 75 
per cent., the pelvic end in 50 per cent., the arms in 40 per 
cent. Compression, infraction, hydrocephalus, and meningo- 
cele are common. The longer the fetus is left in, the worse 
for the mother so far as peritoneal adhesions and danger and 
difficulty in removing the fetus are concerned. 

The third case supposed that the fetus is not viable but 
the symptoms of maternal hemorrhage are slight. The danger 
to the mother in waiting is greater here than in case one, and 
the decision must be made in keeping with evidences in the 
particular case. The surgeon who assumes responsibility is 
obliged to remain ready for instant operation. 

Where there are symptoms of grave hemorrhage in the 
mother at any stage of ectopic gestation the surgeon must 
operate at once, and ligate the bleeding vessels to save the 
woman s life. The ligation will shut off the blood supply to 
the fetus, and thus indirectly, permissively, the fetus must 
be unavoidably allowed to die. This is a clear case of double 
effect immediately issuing from the same cause, and the opera 
tion is morally licit. No matter how young the fetus is, the 
surgeon or an assistant is to baptize it; if it is very young it 
may be necessary to split the envelopes to get at the fetus. 


IN the cesarean delivery (partus cesareus, celiohysterotomy) 
the infant is brought out through an opening made in the 
abdominal and uterine walls. The chief indications for this 
operation may be a contracted maternal pelvis, an abnormally 
large fetal head or body, death of the pregnant mother before 
delivery, certain forms of rigidity of the cervix uteri, some 
cases of stenosis of the vagina, relative vaginal narrowness, 
blocking tumors, or a ventrofixed uterus. Sometimes abruptio 
placentae, eclampsia, placenta praevia, and other accidents of 
pregnancy are taken as indications for cesarean delivery. 

An abnormal bony pelvic girdle is the most frequent ob 
struction to delivery of the fetus. The lower part of the pelvis, 
called the pelvis minor or true pelvis, supports the muscles of 
the pelvic floor, and gives shape and trend to the parturient 
canal. The inlet and outlet of the true pelvis are narrower 
than its middle portion and are called the superior and in 
ferior straits. The inlet is somewhat cordate in outline, and 
normally from front to back, at its so-called conjugate vera, 
it averages 11 centimetres (4-& inches) in depth ; from 
side to side it measures 13 centimetres (5-J inches) ; obliquely 
from the right posteriorly to the left anteriorly it is 12| centi 
metres (nearly 5 inches), and the other oblique conjugate is 
12 centimetres (4f inches) long. The transverse diameter 
of the outlet, from right to left, is 11 centimetres ; the diameter 
from front to back, because the coccyx can be pushed back in 
labor, is from 9^ (3f inches) to 12 cm. Normal fetal head 
measurements average from side to side at the widest part, 9 
cm. (3f inches) ; from the root of the nose to the occiput, 11 
cm. ; from the chin to the occiput, 13 cm. ; from the vertex to 



the neck behind, 9^ cm. The size of the fetal head is the 
most important factor in delivery, so far as the child is con 
cerned, because, as a rule, when the head is delivered the com 
pressible trunk follows readily. Normally the child presents 
in delivery with the vertex of the head first; other presenta 
tions are transitional, abnormal or pathologic. In 48,499 cases 
Karl Braun found vertex presentations in 95.9 per cent., and 
Schroeder in 250,000 cases found an average of 95 per cent. 
The child s head is "engaged" when its largest diameter has 
passed the plane of the inlet. 

An abnormal pelvis may be generally contracted, dwarfed, 
in all its diameters; it may be flat or narrow from front to 
back; it may be contracted from side to side; it may be gen 
erally contracted and flat at the same time ; it may be obliquely 
contracted (Niigeli s pelvis) ; or it may be crowded together 
irregularly. Kachitis, osteomalacia, curvature of the spine, 
habit scoliosis, hip dislocation, and similar pathologic states 
cause these distortions and contractions. 

Contraction of the pelvis affects the mother and child in 
parturition in proportion to the degree of the narrowing. Be 
sides this, the prognosis depends on the size of the child, its 
presentation, position, and attitude, the strength of the pains, 
the skill and surgical cleanliness of the operator, and the pres 
ence or absence of complications. Obstruction may bring about 
rupture of the uterus, septicemia, exhaustion and shock, pres 
sure narcosis, or tears of the cervix or vagina. If the child s 
head becomes impacted the vagina and vulva may become even 
gangrenous. Pressure may cause areas of necrosis resulting in 
fistulas into the bladder, rectum, or between the uterus and the 
vagina. When the contracture is sufficient to let the fetus just 
engage, pressure may interfere with the placental circulation 
and kill the child. Compression of the vagus nerve may slow 
the child s pulse and asphyxiate it through lack of oxygen in 
the blood. The cord may prolapse. The pressure on the child s 
head may cause fatal intracranial hemorrhage, or effect per 
manent injury to the brain. 

Often it is extremely difficult to find out the best plan 
for delivering a woman who has a contracted pelvis. Where 


the conjugata vera is 9.5 cm. (3f inches) or above, Ludwig 
and Savor found that 75 per cent, were delivered without in 
strumental help. At 9 cm. (3^ inches), 58 per cent, so end; 
at 8 cm. (3 T \ inches), 25 per cent. Should the conjugata 
vera be less than 5 cm. (2 T \ inches) in a flat pelvis, or 
6 cm. (2| inches) in a generally contracted pelvis, this is an 
absolutely contracted pelvis according to the old standard, and 
the delivery must be by cesarean section, whether the child is 
living or dead. The minimal requirements have been grad 
ually extended. In 1901 Williams of Johns Hopkins Univer 
sity advocated that the absolute indication for cesarean sec 
tion be changed to 7 cm. in the generally contracted pelvis, 
and to 7.5 cm. in the simple flat pelvis. His opinion was 
accepted by Webster, Jewett, Edgar, and others. Now some 
obstetricians of authority extend the measurements to 8 cm. 
If the woman is seen before labor, or early in labor, cesarean 
delivery alone is done. When the uterus is infected it is 
usually necessary to remove it after taking away the child, 
because an infected uterus left in place causes death by sepsis, 
as a rule. 

Text-books on obstetrics have a series of rules, based on 
pelvic measurements, concerning the indications for cesarean 
or other methods of delivery in cases of contracted pelvis, but 
the problems are not so simple and uniform as to be always 
accurately solved by the data derived from measurements. One 
woman with a contracted pelvis may require cesarean delivery ; 
another woman with the same measurements may have a nor 
mal parturition because the child happens to be small or its 
skull compressible. The best pelvic measurement is made with 
the fetal head. A difficult decision as to whether a cesarean 
delivery is necessary or not comes up in the majority of cases 
in primiparae; in multiparae the physician has the experience 
from former births to guide him. In over 90 per cent, of 
primiparae the fetal head normally is found engaged in the 
pelvis in the last week of gestation, and can be felt by a 
vaginal examination. In multiparae the head usually is not 
engaged until labor begins. If the fetal head does not engage 
in a primipara, this fact at once suggests an absolutely or rela- 


tively narrow pelvis. When labor has begun, if the fetal head 
cannot be pushed into the true pelvis of a primipara, especially 
after anesthesia, the necessity for cesarean delivery may be 
clearly evident. 

In the cases where there is doubt that the child can get 
through the pelvis, but good reason to think that it can, many 
obstetrical experts try the effect of labor for two hours or a 
little more, and if there is no real progress they deliver through 
laparotomy. There is considerable objection now to version 
or the application of high forceps, but many skilful men pre 
fer these methods at times. When version has been done and 
it fails there is no chance to save the child s life. In the trial 
of labor, the expectant treatment, extraordinary watchfulness 
is required and a full knowledge of the special procedure that 
may be necessary. 

In minor degrees of pelvic contraction the obstetrical prac 
tice is either to induce premature labor at the thirty-second 
week, or to deliver by a cesarean operation, or to delay and 
try labor. In the last event there may be one of the follow 
ing issues: spontaneous delivery, version and delivery, extrac 
tion by high forceps, cesarean delivery, symphyseotomy, hebos- 
teotomy, or craniotomy. Craniotomy on a living child is never 
to be considered under any circumstances. Symphyseotomy is 
a cutting of the maternal pelvic girdle through the symphysis 
pubis, the rigid joint at the front middle part of the pelvis, 
and thus letting the bony girdle dilate. Hebosteotomy or 
pubiotomy is a sawing through the pelvis near that joint to 
get the dilatation. Symphyseotomy has been replaced by 
hebosteotomy because the maternal mortality and morbidity 
are somewhat lessened by the latter method. Schlafli in 1908 
reported 700 hebosteotomies with a maternal mortality of 4.96 
per cent, and a fetal of 9.18 per cent. Other operators have 
a better average; still others a worse. This operation is done 
very seldom of late except in a case where the fetal head is 
caught low in the pelvis, or there is a chin-posterior or brow 
or face presentation, and the cesarean operation would not de 
liver the child. 

The varieties of the cesarean delivery as practised at pres- 


ent are the classic cesarean, called also celiohysterotomy, the 
Porro cesarean, or celiohysterectomy, where the uterus is re 
moved after the extraction of the child, and the two sections 
in the cervical end of the uterus, viz., the extraperitoneal 
cesarean and the transperitoneal cervical cesarean. Before 
the days of antiseptic surgery cesarean delivery was prac 
tically always fatal to the mother. Tarnier could not find one 
successful outcome for the mother in Paris during the nine 
teenth century up to his own time, and Spaeth said the same 
for Vienna up to 1877. In 1877 Porro of Pavia advised the 
supravaginal amputation of the uterus after the child was de 
livered to avoid hemorrhage and peritoneal infection. This 
operation replaced the classic cesarean until 1882, when 
Siinger invented a suture which would keep the uterine in 
cision shut, and applied antisepsis. Sanger s operation has 
been improved so much that cesarean delivery, when per 
formed by skilled obstetricians, has an extremely low mortal 
ity in cases which have not been infected. Routh, in 1910, 
collected the statistics of Great Britain, comprising 1282 cases, 
which may be taken as a standard for all civilized countries, 
and he found a steady decrease in the mortality until now it 
is near 2 per cent, in uninfected cases. The dangers in the 
operation increase with every hour the woman is in labor, but 
even then the general mortality is now down to about 8.1 
per cent. This, it must be remembered, is the rate when com 
petent men operate. 

When the ordinary practitioner in small cities, towns, and 
country places operates the mortality is very high. Newell * 
said that in four cities of from 25,000 to 40,000 inhabitants 
within forty miles of Boston he collected the following data: 
in A no patient on whom cesarean section had been done is 
known to have recovered a mortality of 100 per cent. In 
B the mortality is from 60 to 70 per cent. In C the operation 
is invariably fatal when done by the local surgeons. In D the 
fatality is from 10 to 20 per cent, in average cases, but since 
cesarean section has become popular as a method of treatment 
for eclampsia the mortality is over 50 per cent. 

l Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., February 24, 1917. 


In spite of perfect technic by the best obstetricians, the 
operation has a high morbidity: fever, peritonitis, pneumonia, 
dilatation of the stomach, and other bad results are common. 

Before antiseptic surgery began, opening the abdominal 
cavity was almost always fatal, and some obstetricians tried to, 
get the child out of the uterus in cases where cesarean de 
livery is indicated by going in above the pelvis without open 
ing the peritoneum. The uterus was incised near its cervical 
end. This method, called extraperitoneal cesarean delivery, 
has been restored for use in cases where there is some infection 
of the uterus and the operator wishes to save the child with 
out removing the womb. The technic is more difficult than in 
the classic cesarean, and the operation was not kindly re 
ceived, but of late some men are having so much success with 
it that it is reviving, and rightly so. Baisch 2 says that the 
first eleven women he delivered by extraperitoneal cesarean 
section recovered more readily than they would from an or 
dinary laparotomy. In nineteen cases of transperitoneal but 
cervical section he had no trouble, and six of these were in 
fected cases. The technic of this low incision protects the 
peritoneal cavity better than the classic incision, apparently. 
Two of the nineteen women were in slight fever and the uterine 
fluids were fetid. Two primiparae forty years of age had been 
in labor seventy hours. Eight of the women were able to 
leave the clinic on the tenth day. Only one child was lost, and 
that was a delayed case. Hofmeier 3 compiled 194 cases of 
transperitoneal cervical cesarean section with three deaths. 
Kiistner did 110 extraperitoneal cesarean sections with no mor 
tality. This makes 304 cases of cesarean cervical section, not 
the classic operation, with only three deaths, less than 1 per 
cent, mortality ; and fully 50 per cent, of these cases were not 
surgically clean. From these statistics it is evident that the 
cervical operation in the hands of competent surgeons should 
be the operation of choice. 

The ordinary practitioner, however, is utterly unfitted to 
do a cesarean section of any kind. In large cities it is easy 

Zentralblatt f. Gynakologie. Leipsic, October 30, 1915. 
1 Munch ener medizinische Wochenschrift, January 4, 1916. 


to find a trained surgeon to do the operation, but in small 
towns and in country places there is seldom any one available. 
The physician who chooses to practise medicine in an isolated 
place knows that he will almost certainly be called upon to do 
a cesarean section some day, and he should not take up the 
responsibility of the general practitioner in such a place until 
he is competent to do that operation when life depends upon 
him. This is as things should be; but unfortunately a man 
who is trained well enough to do major surgery will not live 
in a small town if he can get into a large city. The physician 
in any case should be able at least to make the diagnosis in 
time, before labor sets in, and have the woman sent to the near 
est city, if possible. Dr. Bull 4 reported that he had traveled 
seventy-five miles to see a woman who was having severe 
hemorrhages at term. He found her in a log cabin, with a 
centrally implanted placenta (i.e., right across the opening of 
the cervix uteri), and she had had three hemorrhages before his 
arrival. He narcotized her, took her in a train to a hospital, 
delivered her by cesarean section, and saved her and the child. 
If he had delivered her by version in the log cabin, he would 
almost certainly have lost both the mother and the child. 

The question of removing the uterus comes up when the 
uterus is infected, or as a method of sterilizing the woman 
to avoid the danger of a subsequent gestation. Whenever a 
uterus is gravely infected and a cesarean delivery is finally 
necessary, the infection is commonly due to ignorance or care 
lessness, and the physician or midwife is guilty. There should 
be no such business as that of the midwife who actually delivers 
the patient. The state should provide physicians for the poor. 
Even the midwife who calls herself "a practical nurse," but 
who is not a licensed trained nurse, is commonly a public 
danger, although some so-called practical nurses are better than 
the ordinary trained nurses. 

Suppose, however, that the uterus is infected unavoidably. 

If this infection has been done by a competent obstetrician 

working in a hospital with sterile instruments, it may be safe 

to deliver the woman by an extraperitoneal or cervical trans- 

* Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., September 30, 1916. 


peritoneal cesarean section. If the practitioner has tried to 
deliver the woman at her home with forceps and has failed, 
especially if repeated attempts have been made by the physi 
cian and an assistant or consultant, the uterus should be am 
putated. It will not do to deliver by a low cesarean and 
await developments, because if the infection is serious no 
subsequent removal of the uterus will save the woman s life. 
The grave mutilation of removing the uterus is, of course, licit, 
as it is the only means of saving the woman s life. Some mor 
alists hold that a woman from whom the uterus has been re 
moved is impotent, but this question has never been decided 
authoritatively, as we shall show in the chapter on Vasectomy; 
and until it has been so decided the woman must be given the 
benefit of the doubt. 

The question of removing the uterus solely to prevent the 
danger of subsequent deliveries differs from the condition just 
considered. If the woman has had a cesarean delivery for an 
absolutely narrow pelvis, her subsequent deliveries must be by 
the same method. After a cesarean section there is more or 
less danger of rupture at the scar in other labors. Some think 
the danger is greater if the placenta becomes implanted on the 
scar; others think this implantation does not weaken a good 
scar. If the convalescence after the cesarean section already 
done has been abnormal, the prognosis for rupture is not good. 
Where there has been an abnormal convalescence, each new 
pregnancy must be watched closely, and often an early subse 
quent cesarean is indicated to prevent rupture. No matter 
how well the section has been done, latent gonorrhea may pre 
vent perfect healing of the wound. Twins, hydramnios, and 
overtime gestation are other causes of rupture. The tendency 
with obstetricians in the future will probably be to do the sec 
tion toward the cervical end of the uterus ; and as the uterus is 
thinnest there, it might be thought that it will be more likely 
to break, but Spalding 5 found the contrary true the ruptur 
ing was usually in the thick part of the uterus. Version, high 
forceps, uterine tampons, hydrostatic bags, and pituitary ex 
tract should be avoided where an old cesarean scar exists, but 
Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., December 1, 1917. 


Vogt and Kroback have done version a few times without rup 
ture. Vogt had one patient with a true conjugate of 6| cm. 
(2 A inches) to 7 cm. (2 inches). She was delivered in 
the first three labors by craniotomy; in the fourth by version; 
in the fifth and sixth by cesarean section; in the seventh she 
had twins one of which was born spontaneously; in the eighth 
by version and perforation of the after-coming head; in the 
ninth she refused operation and was delivered spontane 
ously. Skilful operators have the fewest ruptures after ce 
sarean delivery. Olshausen had one in 120 cases, Leopold 
none in 232 cases, Schauta none in 177 cases, Kiistner none in 
100 cases. Olshausen, in a series of 29 cases, operated on 
two patients twice and upon three patients three times. As 
early as 1875, Nancrede of Philadelphia had operated the 
sixth time on the same woman. In such cases the uterus is 
commonly so broadly attached by adhesions to the belly-wall 
that it is opened without getting into the peritoneal cavity. 
In 150 cases of repeated section collected by Polak in 1909 the 
mortality was only 5 per cent. 

A woman may not be sterilized by having the uterus re 
moved, by fallectomy, or otherwise, solely to obviate danger or 
morbidity from subsequent pregnancies and cesarean deliver 
ies. Such a sterilization would be a grave mutilation with 
out a present excusing danger, and it would render the primary 
end of marriage always impossible. Such sterilization of a 
woman is in contravention to the decretal of Gregory 6 as given 
in the chapter on Vasectomy. It is also against the bull Ef- 
fraenatam of Sixtus V., who extended all penalties prescribed 
for abortionists to those who give women drugs which cause 
sterility, and to those who purposely prevent the development 
of the fetus or in any manner abet the deed ; and the penalties 
are to be applied to the women themselves who willingly use 
these means. These penalties are enumerated in the chapter 
on Abortion. The Congregation of the Holy Office, May 22, 
1895, answered negatively the following question: "Si sia 
lecita la practice sia attiva sia passiva di un procedimento il 

Corpus Juris, lib. v, tit. xii, c. 5. 


quale si propone intenzionalmente come fine espresso la ster- 
ilizatione della donne ?" 7 

The reason for these laws is that any act which deprives 
one of the power to generate, and which prevents conception 
and makes the semen fail of its end, is against the chief intrin 
sic end of marriage and any benefit that arises therefrom, 
which is the good of offspring. The act is also against the 
intrinsic end of the semen, which is to generate ; and since the 
semen cannot possibly effect its end, the conjugal act degener 
ates into an equivalent of onanism. This act of sterilization, 
done not to save the whole body from immediate danger, is in 
trinsically evil, and therefore unjustifiable. 

To say that marriage is also a licit remedy of concupiscence 
is no excuse. Marriage is such only in a secondary sense, and 
this secondary end is necessarily subordinate to the primary 
end, and coexistent with that primary end, which is the 
generation of children. Even when a surgeon is doing a Porro 
operation, his main intention may not be to sterilize the woman. 
He must directly intend to save her life by removing the in 
fected uterus, and reluctantly permit the sterilization as an 
evil part of the double effect coming from the causal amputa 

7 Is any active or passive procedure licit which is undertaken with 
the express end of sterilizing a woman? 



CESAEEA1ST delivery is used frequently of late in pla 
centa praevia. It may be necessary also in abruptio 
placentae, gunshot wounds of the abdomen during pregnancy, 
sometimes in appendicitis complicating gestation, rarely in pro 
lapse of the cord to save the child, and when twins become in 
terlocked in delivery. Placenta praevia is a development of 
the placenta in that part of the uterus which dilates at the 
end of gestation or during delivery. This dilatation, with the 
mechanical pressure of the child, detaches the placenta enough 
to cause a hemorrhage which may be fatal to the woman if 
not checked. The hemorrhages begin sometimes as early as 
the sixth month of gestation, but most frequently in the eighth 
month. Premature labor is a common effect. The position 
of the placenta may cause malposition of the fetus, prolapse of 
the cord, weak pains, air embolism into the blood, rupture of the 
uterus, sepsis, profound anemia, and other evils. The child 
may be premature, puny, have collapsed lungs, hemorrhages, and 
it is very likely to be killed in delivery. The mortality of the 
women varies, but it averages about 7 per cent ; that of the chil 
dren averages 61 per cent. 

The tendency with obstetricians is to deliver the child as 
soon as the diagnosis has been made. When the bleeding is 
slight, and the child is viable, one may delay delivery provided 
the woman will remain in bed in a good maternity hospital with 
out moving. At home the woman may "flood" and bleed to 
death before a physician can reach her. If the woman refuses 
to go to a hospital, and to permit the induction of labor, any 
physician who has regard for his own reputation will drop the 
case and leave the woman to her own devices. 



There are various methods of treatment, and much depends 
on the position of the abnormally placed placenta. The treat 
ments all consist in stopping the hemorrhage for the instant, 
emptying the uterus, insuring permanent hemostasis, and meet 
ing the anemia. The Braxton-IIicks version is one method. 
The child is quickly turned so that the head is upward in the 
uterus, and a leg is pulled down to plug the cervix uteri until 
there is enough dilatation to extract the child. Very many 
children are lost by this method. When the placenta praevia 
is marginal to the cervix or lateral in the uterus the child has 
a better chance when a colpeurynter, or inflatable rubber bag, 
is inserted in the cervix as a plug. Much skill and discrimi 
nation is required in the management of this bag until the 
child is delivered. The obstetrician may be obliged to sit by 
the bed and hold on to the bag for from three to twelve hours. 
Hasty extraction through a poorly dilated cervix is a very dan 
gerous process, as a tear cannot be repaired quickly enough, as 
a rule, to check the hemorrhage, which will be fatal. When 
version has been done haste may compress the head in the tight 
cervix and asphyxiate the child. 

When the child is viable a cesarean section is by far the 
best method for the child, as it lowers the fetal mortality from 
61 to about 5 per cent. The mother, too, has a better chance 
by the cesarean section, provided it is done by a competent 
man, early in labor before infection has set in, and in a hos 

If the child is not viable the hemorrhage must be stopped 
to save the woman s life. As a rule, the hemorrhages are not 
dangerous before the seventh month. In the 128 deaths of 
Miiller s statistics there was not one before the seventh month 
of gestation. Hirst, however, says he has been obliged to 
empty the uterus at the fifth month for placenta praevia. The 
woman must be kept in bed, the foot of the bed elevated, seda 
tives used, and so on, as in threatened abortion, and the va 
gina tamponed securely with cotton. If it is evident that the 
fetus is dead, it must be extracted as in the case of a viable 
fetus. If it is probable that the fetus is alive, it is to be 
treated as in a case of inevitable abortion as described in the 


chapter on Abortion. The tamponing of the vagina to stop the 
hemorrhage will cause the abortion of the fetus indirectly. 
This is another double-effect case, and the tamponing is mor 
ally permissible provided the intention is correct. 

Abruptio placentae is a tearing loose of a placenta which is 
situated in the normal position, not abnormally as in placenta 
praevia. The cause may be a disease of the placenta or de- 
cidua ; for example, syphilis, chronic metritis, traumatism from 
a blow or fall, jumping from a carriage-step, and so on. Ne 
phritis is often found where there is abruptio placentae. In 
labor the placenta may be torn loose by a version, by the de 
livery of the first of a pair of twins, or because the cord is 
too short. 

There is always profuse hemorrhage, which is usually con 
cealed at first, but finally external. Jt is possible at times for 
a woman to bleed to death into her own uterus, when it is dis 
tensible. The mortality is about 50 per cent, for the women, 
and where there is concealed hemorrhage about 95 per cent, of 
the children are lost. A differential diagnosis is to be made to 
exclude placenta praevia, rupture of the uterus, extrauterine 
pregnancy, rupture of an appendical abscess, gall-stone colie, 
or intraabdominal injury. 

If the child is viable it must be delivered as quickly as 
possible. If it is dead and the head is developed, craniotomy 
should be done to hasten extraction. When the abruptio takes 
place before the seventh month of gestation the fetus will die 
in about ten minutes, whether in the uterus or outside it; no 
matter what method might be adopted to empty the uterus, the 
child would be dead before delivery. The diagnosis would have 
to be made and instruments prepared, and this would take up 
more than the ten minutes of life left to the fetus. It is neces 
sary to get the fetus out to stop the bleeding of the open sinuses 
by contraction of the uterus. 

The removal of the fetus here is not like an artificial abor 
tion. In abortion the abortionist separates the placenta from the 
uterine sinuses and so kills the fetus; the removal from the 
uterus is secondary to that separation which kills. The com 
mon notion of moralists that death is caused in abortion by 


taking the child out of the uterus is inexact tearing loose the 
placenta is the real cause. In a removal of the fetus after an 
abruptio placentae the death of the fetus is not caused by the 
physician at all, but by the force that effected the abruptio. 
As the child will be dead before sufficient dilatation of the cer 
vix to deliver it can be attained, there is no objection to begin 
ning the delivery as soon as the diagnosis is clear. 


TUMORS in or near the uterus may be obstacles to deliv 
ery or they may through malignancy endanger the wom 
an s life. The commonest tumors complicating pregnancy are 
fibroids, cancers, and ovarian tumors, especially cysts and der- 
moids, but tumors of other kinds are not frequently met. 
Schauta, in 111,112 pregnant women, found fibroids in 86, 
one in 1292 cases; Pinard, in 13,915, found 84, one in 165 
cases; Pozzi, in 12,050, had 83, one in 133 cases; in St. Peters 
burg, in 13,076 deliveries, there were only 4, one in 3269 
cases; and in the Charite in Berlin, 6 in 19,052 births, one in 
3175 cases. The ovarian cyst in pregnancy is rarer than the 
fibroid 5 in 17,832 births, one in 3566 cases, in the Berlin 
Frauenklinik. Cancer of the cervix also seldom appears 
once in about 2000 cases. Other very rare conditions, related 
to these, are polyps of the cervix, enlarged and prolapsed kid 
neys, extrauterine pregnancy combined with intrauterine, echi- 
nococcus cysts, parametric abscesses, cancers of the rectum, 
rectal strictures, tumors of the bladder, stones in the bladder, 
tumors of the pelvic bones or cartilages, and tumors of the 
vagina or vulva. 

Fibroids, called also fibromyomata, fibromata, and myo- 
mata, in the uterine muscle or adnexa commonly enlarge dur 
ing pregnancy, and if they are big enough and low in the pelvis 
may block the parturient canal. These tumors may suppurate, 
grow gangrenous, or take on red degeneration ; they may cause 
abortion, peritoneal adhesions, pain, or hemorrhage; simulate 
threatened abortion; bring on retroflexion of the uterus, pla 
centa praevia, abnormal presentations, sometimes weak pains 
or pains so strong as to rupture the uterus, and they may check 
contraction after delivery so as to start hemorrhage. They 



may so kink the uterus as to incarcerate the placenta and cause 
sepsis. The percentage of degeneration in fibroids taken gen 
erally is 22, according to William Mayo. 1 

Myomata often obscure the diagnosis in pregnancy. The 
tumor may be mistaken for a twin child, or vice versa. A large 
symmetrical interstitial myoma may be mistaken for pregnancy, 
or vice versa. Sometimes, even after the belly has been opened, 
it is difficult to be sure whether the condition is pregnancy or a 
tumor. As eminent a surgeon as Deaver says this diagnosis 
cannot always be made by any one no matter what his experi 

We cannot give a general mortality average for myomata 
in pregnancy because only bad cases are reported, but in bad 
cases the mortality is very high 50 per cent, for the mother 
and about 60 per cent, for the children, with almost 30 per 
cent, of abortions. The majority of women who have myo 
mata go on to delivery without trouble. In some there is much 
pain or hemorrhage, and these conditions may finally oblige 
the obstetrician to operate, but the operation should be deferred 
as long as possible. Where there are signs of necrosis of the 
tumor, operation is necessary at once to prevent sepsis. Re 
moval of a myoma during pregnancy does not always cause 
abortion. The statistics are that about 83 per cent, of those 
operated upon are removed without abortion. In the Mayo 
Clinic 2 fourteen cases of degenerating fibroids in pregnant 
wombs were removed and the majority went on to term. The 
removal is always a very bloody operation, and it requires great 
surgical skill. Where enucleation of the tumor alone was in 
tended it may finally become necessary to amputate the uterus 
to stop hemorrhage. 

When the case has gone on to labor at term the diagnosis 
as to position and size of the tumor is to be made, and what the 
effects will be as to blocking the canal or crushing the tumor 
so as to bring on sloughing. If a tumor blocking the canal 
cannot be pushed up out of the way of the child, a cesarean 
section should be done immediately. ,In such an outcome as 

1 Jour. Amcr. Med. Assoc., March 24, 1917. 


section the experience of the operator must decide whether the 
tumor is to be removed then or at a more favorable opportunity. 
It may be necessary to do cesarean section to liberate an in 
carcerated placenta. 

Sometimes the fetus is so involved with a gangrenous myoma 
that enucleation of the tumor will kill or hasten the death 
of the fetus. When, in such a complication, it is evident that 
the life of the woman depends on the immediate removal of 
the tumor, yet a second but evil effect follows from the opera 
tion, namely, the unavoidable death of the fetus, the removal 
is morally licit provided the operator has the proper intention. 
The death of the child as an effect in this case is only indirectly 
voluntary from the physical point of view, and only permis- 
sively voluntary from the moral aspect. 3 

Ovarian tumors in pregnancy are, as has been said, rarer 
than myomata. Such tumors are mostly cysts and dermoids. 
In 862 cases collected by MacKerron, 68 per cent, were cysts, 
23 per cent, dermoids, 5 per cent, malignant tumors, and a few 
were myomata. Cysts and dermoids do not, like the myomata, 
grow bigger during pregnancy, but they may hinder delivery 
or grow gangrenous and septic. When treated early the mor 
tality in pregnancy is from 2.1 to 5.9 per cent, for the women, 
but delay gives a maternal mortality of from 31 to 39 per 
cent. The fetal mortality in Heiberg s statistics of 271 cases 
was 66 per cent. 

Most obstetricians advise the removal of an ovarian tumor 
in pregnancy as soon as diagnosed, provided it is of a size to 
cause difficulty in parturition, but such a removal causes abor 
tion in over 20 per cent, of the cases. The expectant treat 
ment causes abortion in about 17 per cent. If the child is 
viable, Fehling, Martin, Norris, and Do Lee are in favor of 
the expectant treatment. Late operators leave weak scars at 
labor. When there are symptoms of torsion of the pedicle of the 
tumor, infection, incarceration in the pelvis, involvement of the 
uterine broad ligament, or overdistention of the belly, the tumor 

*Cf. Ferreres, Nouvelle Revue Theologique, September and Octo 
ber, 1912, and the appendix of his book De Vasectomia Duplici, 
Madrid, 1913. 


must be removed immediately. Whether vaginal puncture or 
laparotomy is the better method is to be decided particularly. 
Dermoid cysts are likely to bring on sepsis if they are broken in 
enucleation, and the diagnosis and operation must be carefully 
made. When it is necessary to save the life of the woman to 
remove an ovarian tumor, the risk of abortion may be taken 

Cancers of the cervix uteri are always malignant and cause 
death if they are not removed before they have gone on to me 
tastasis. As this tumor commonly appears after the child- 
bearing age, it is rare in pregnancy; the ordinary ratio is 
one in 2000 deliveries, but De Lee saw only one in Chicago 
in 16,000 consecutive labors. Abortion occurs in from 30 to 
40 per cent, of the cases. Spontaneous rupture of the uterus 
may happen, and placenta praevia is frequent relatively. 
Pregnancy hastens the growth and spread of cancer very much. 
Eight per cent, of the women die undelivered, and 43 per cent, 
die during labor or immediately afterward. Of all uterine can 
cers, 80 per cent, are cervical. 

The diagnosis should be as certain as possible. Karely 
nodules which are not cancerous appear in the cervix during 
pregnancy, and these are to be examined microscopically. 
Snipping out of a piece of the nodule for examination does not 
cause abortion. Vaughan of Michigan University, who is a 
skilful and careful observer, said 4 that in an investigation of 
200 cases of cancer, upon which more than 30,000 differential 
blood-counts were made, he discovered a method of diagnosing 
the operability of a cancer as follows: He makes a blood- 
count and then injects intraperitoneally one c.c. of placental 
residue. The next day he begins a series of blood-counts, and 
if the number of polymorphonuclear cells decreases the case 
is operable, no metastasis has occurred; if there is no change 
in the number of the polymorphonuclea v s, or an increase with 
a corresponding decrease of the large rnononuclears, the case is 
inoperable, metastasis has begun. 

In cancer of the cervix operability does not mean curability 
always. Inoperability signifies that the woman has no chance 

4 Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., December 8, 1917. 


at all for life and that it is useless to do anything; operability 
means that she has one chance in four and that it is worth 
while taking the chance. The following conditions may be met : 

1. The case may be operable and the child inviable. 

2. The case may be operable and the child viable. 

3. The case may inoperable and the child inviable. 

4. The case may be inoperable and the child viable. 

In the first case the supposition is that the case is operable 
but the child inviable. To save the woman the uterus, 
with its adnexa, must be removed, and this, of course, kills the 
fetus. The case differs from the enucleation of a gangrenous 
myoma which involves the death of an inviable fetus. In the 
myoma case the woman has practically every chance for her life 
through operation; in this cancer case the woman has only one 
chance in four, as 75 per cent, of such operations fail through 
recurrence of the cancer. 

The child has about one chance in two of going on to via 
bility, owing to the tendency to abortion, if no operation is 
done; but the mother loses her chance for life if the opera 
tion is not done at once, as the cancer will spread beyond cure. 
Zweifel has seen such a growth extend a finger s breadth in 
one week. The one chance in four in immediate operation 
gives the mother a solid ground for hope, and the probability 
is sufficient, in my opinion, to permit the operation with a 
permissive loss of the fetus. 

In the second case the cancer is operable and the child is 
viable. The child should at once be delivered by cesarean sec 
tion, and the uterus with its adnexa removed. 

The third case is that of an inoperable cancer and an in- 
viable child. There the operation should be deferred, if pos 
sible, until the child becomes viable. 

The fourth case supposes the cancer is inoperable but the 
child viable. In the interest of the child, immediate cesa 
rean section is the best thing to do ; it is much better than wait 
ing until term. At term this operation will have to be done 
anyhow, and the earlier it is done, the better the woman can 
stand the strain. There is a risk that she will die from the 


first operation done to deliver the viable child, but she may lic- 
itly take this risk, as she might licitly run into a burning house 
to save a child, even if not her own. She may also licitly re 
fuse the first operation. 


PRIMARY appendicitis in pregnancy is very rare; re 
current appendicitis is not so rare. When appendicitis 
goes on to suppuration and perforative peritonitis the condition 
is worse in pregnant women than in the non-pregnant. In 
pregnancy protective adhesions, walling off, are less likely to 
occur ; the inflammation is more intense owing to increased vas- 
cularity ; thrombosis and phlebitis are more frequent ; drainage 
may be obstructed and the burrowing of pus widespread ; tym- 
pany, too, causes dyspnoea earlier. About 75 per cent, of the 
cases occur after the third month, and the earlier the appen 
dicitis appears, the better the prognosis. During labor the 
contracting uterus sometimes tears open an adhesive appendix, 
or ruptures a pus sac and starts a general peritonitis. This 
condition may be mistaken for a general sepsis which is puer 
peral. Acute appendicitis is likely to be confused with an in 
flammation of a Fallopian tube. When the appendicitis is per 
forative abortion, infection of the uterine contents and death 
of the child happen in most cases. Labor is very painful 
when appendicitis is present, and the uterine contractions are 
often weak. After delivery many forms of infection of the 
uterus and its adnexa are possible. 

Operation is much less difficult in the first half of gesta 
tion than in the latter months. At the beginning of gesta 
tion the operation does not, as a rule, cause abortion. Late 
in pregnancy appendicitis rapidly goes on to suppuration and 
perforation, with a high mortality. Hirst says that where there 
is reason to suspect suppuration a median incision should be 
made and the pelvic cavity examined for possible areas of in 
fection. John Deaver says, "Always cut down on the sore 



spot and do not handle the uterus." An infected uterus after 
cesarean section complicated with appendicitis has to be am 

The diagnosis between appendicitis, ectopic gestation, 
twisted ovarian tumors, ureteritis, and ureteral stone is to be 
made. In a discussion of a paper by Finley on Appendicitis 
in Pregnancy, 1 Dr. John Murphy of Chicago, a great author 
ity, advised operation as soon as the diagnosis is made, and ho 
was of the opinion that this diagnosis is not difficult to make 
in pregnancy. Deaver said a diagnosis of catarrhal appendi 
citis is not seldom very difficult to make. This form is very 
rare in pregnancy. Deaver is not of the same opinion as Mur 
phy as to operating as soon as the diagnosis is made in all cases. 
Where there is a general peritonitis, operation commonly only 
makes matters worse by spreading infection. The mortality 
of cases of appendicitis in pregnancy left without operation 
is as high as 77 per cent. ; where the cases are operated upon 
within forty-eight hours after diagnosis the mortality is G.7 
per cent, and it would be better if the operation were done 
within twenty-four hours. Finley says that in the fifteen cases 
reviewed in his paper the operation did not cause abortion. 
Deaver tells us the muscular rigidity in the right groin char 
acteristic of appendicitis is often missing in pregnancy, and 
that sometimes the pain is on the left side of the belly. 
*Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., December 24, 1912. 



FROM 8 to 10 per cent, of all insanity in women develops 
during the puerperium the incidence is about one case 
to 400 births. Puerperal insanity in nearly 70 per cent, of 
the cases begins within the first two weeks after parturition. 
Next in frequency of occurrence is the period of lactation, es 
pecially in multiparae. Insanity during pregnancy itself ii 
relatively rare, and it begins usually after the fourth month. 

As in other forms of insanity, hereditary predisposition is 
found in from 25 to 30 per cent, of the cases. Alcoholism, 
sepsis, and neuroses like hysteria, chorea, and epilepsy, are the 
predisposing elements. The most common immediate exciting 
cause during pregnancy is toxemia from faulty metabolism 
and excretion. Other frequent direct excitants are mental 
worry from poverty, desertion, seduction, and the like troubles. 

Prolongation of the lactation period beyond the usual time 
for weaning, from the ninth to the twelfth month, is common 
among ignorant and lazy women. Some women prolong lac 
tation in the erroneous notion that it prevents renewed im 
pregnation. Such lactation is injurious to the child, as a rule. 
Ploss says hyperlactation is frequent in Spain, and that some 
Japanese, Chinese, and Armenian women may nurse their chil 
dren for years, but this practice is undoubtedly injurious, es 
pecially among European races. The women get tabes lactea 
with emaciation, asthenia, anemia, backache, pain in the 
breasts, neurasthenia, cramps, and blindness. The uterus atro 
phies in some cases and may be permanently injured. Insan 
ity is not unusual. 

The forms of mental disturbance commonest in puerperal 
insanity are mania with or without delirium, melancholia, and 



dementia. Dementia is the final stage in the cases that become 
chronic. Mania is the prevailing type in insanity after labor, 
and melancholia in insanity during gestation. The melan 
choly of insanity during gestation is often suicidal, and must 
always be watched. Religious and erotic symptoms are also 

The onset may be very sudden during labor. An outbreak 
after labor may be suicidal or homicidal. Maniacal puerperal 
women are dangerous. They have delusions and hallucinations, 
with very rapid and incessant changes that range from obscen 
ity to prayer. Melancholy in the puerperium is likely to be 

About 75 per cent, of puerperal insanity cases recover 
within five or six months. From 2 to 10 per cent, die from sep 
sis, exhaustion, or intercurrent diseases ; the remainder become 
permanently insane. The nearer the delivery the insanity ap 
pears, the better the prognosis. Menzies found that of cases 
which began during gestation 56.7 per cent, remained insane; 
of those that began during the puerperium 25 per cent, did 
not recover; of those that began during lactation 43.5 per cent, 
remained insane. Melancholia is more favorable than mania 
in pregnancy, but after labor mania gives the better prognosis. 
The maniacal patient is more likely to die, but the melancholic 
is more likely to remain insane. The older the woman, the 
greater the number of her pregnancies, the more the depres 
sion, and the higher the temperature, the worse the prognosis. 
Alcoholism is an added risk always. 

All puerperal insanities should be treated in sanatoria or 
asylums and not at home. When a woman with puerperal 
insanity is allowed to remain at home she cannot get proper 
treatment, and is a constant menace to her own life and the 
lives of her family. 

A woman who has had puerperal insanity and has recovered 
her mental health is likely to have a recurrence of her malady 
at subsequent pregnancies. The question has been asked me a 
few times, "Would it not be justifiable to sterilize such a woman 
to prevent this recurrence, with its dangers and terrors?" 

It would not be justifiable: 1. Because it is not licit to 

inflict a grave mutilation to avert a possible or probable future 
evil. 2. There are other means to escape the danger : a woman 
with this tendency is justified in denying the debitum. 3. Once 
crazy, always crazy, is an aphorism with much truth in it, 
and it is doubtful that sterilization in itself will prevent ul 
timate insanity. 4. The conjugal relation of a sterilized wom 
an would be no better than onanistic. 5. The sterilization would 
fall under the decrees and penalties described at the end of the 
chapter on Cesarean Section. 



IN pregnancy the kidneys always give evidence of a con 
stant congestion, and the chief symptom of this is the great 
quantity of renal epithelium shed with the urine. This en 
gorgement has given rise to the term "kidney of pregnancy." 
There has been much discussion of this condition, especially 
as to the possibility of differentiating it from beginning ne 
phritis. In 227 consecutive cases of pregnancy in which the 
urine was examined at short intervals by myself throughout 
the entire gestation, there was always an enormous quantity 
of epithelium, and this presence of epithelium is so constant 
that its absence is a proof that pregnancy does not exist. It is 
as physiological as any other somatic change in the puerperium. 
Von Leyden and other German observers look upon the degen 
erative alteration in the epithelium of the renal tubules as 
pathological, but apparently more definite symptoms are nec 
essary to make a diagnosis of significant nephritis. 

Williams l says that in the examination of 1000 pregnant 
women at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore traces of al 
bumin were found in 50 per cent, without subsequent serious 
disturbance, but where considerable albumin with casts other 
than hyaline was seen there were symptoms of toxemia later, 
and several of these went on into eclampsia. Fisher 2 held that 
red blood-corpuscles in these cases indicate acute nephritis; 
and granular and epithelial casts, chronic nephritis. Like the 
Johns Hopkins cases, he found albumin in 50 per cent, of his 
patients. Albumin in slight quantities is found to be extremely 
common toward the end of pregnancy. Meyer,? in an ex- 

1 Obstetrics, p. 456. 

* Praeger medizinische Wochenschrift, ISO? n. 17. 
* Zeitschrift fur Oeburishulfe, bd. 16, n. 2. 



tensive study of the kidney in pregnancy, made at Copenhagen, 
found albumin in 5.4 per cent, of the women. During the 
last month of gestation 71 per cent, of the women showed albu 
min. Premature births occurred in 8 per cent, of the patients 
who had had albuminuria, but in 21.5 per cent, of the women 
who had had casts. Delicate tests for albumin are used by men 
who find these high averages, as a few leucocytes from leucor- 
rhoea will give the reaction. Most of these cases have no clini 
cal significance. 

It is usually impossible to differentiate in pregnancy a 
lighting up of an old nephritis from a toxemia. Where there 
is a history of nephritis before the pregnancy, this often clears 
up the diagnosis. Nephritis is likely to manifest itself in 
pregnancy earlier than toxemia; albuminuric retinitis is com 
moner in nephritis, but these facts are no real help in differen 

The position of the uterus may be a cause of nephritis, ac 
cording to the American Text-Book of Obstetrics; but De Lee 
and others hold that the growing womb cannot possibly be a 
cause. Many other origins have been suggested, but without 
sufficient proof. 

The treatment of the nephritides of pregnancy is that de 
scribed in chap, xiii for eclamptic symptoms. When albuminuric 
retinitis occurs, the medical tendency is to empty the uterus. 
All text-books counsel this procedure, but they give no convinc 
ing reasons for the advice. If the child is viable the thera 
peutic abortion might be done when necessary; if the child is 
not viable the operation is, of course, not licit In the ne 
phritis of pregnancy it is not certain that emptying the uterus 
artificially, with the entailed shock, is the best method of treat 
ment; but, as a rule, nephritis is made worse by pregnancy, 
and the irritation lessens with the termination of gestation in 
some cases, but not in true chronic nephritis. Eclampsia is 
more toxic than nephritis, and the treatment may differ in im 
portant details: it certainly is doubtful that artificial abortion 
in eclampsia is the method of choice at present. I saw a case 
of albuminuric retinitis ten years ago, which could not have 
been worse. The woman was in the seventh month of gesta- 


tion; she was nearly blind and half comatose. The albumin 
in her urine always was so great that it would not fully precipi 
tate in a centrifuge tube, and every field under the microscope 
was covered with large casts in such enormous quantities that 
they were felted together. Yet the woman was carried on to 
term by Dr. Joseph O Malley and delivered of a fully developed 
child. She since has had two other children at term who are 
perfectly healthy, and she herself could pass a life insurance 
examination. This is, of course, only one case, and it is ex 
ceptional ; but it is impossible to say what will happen in any 
particular case whether it will go on to death or recovery. 

Both subacute and chronic parenchymatous nephritis show 
clinically much albumin, many casts, marked edema (except 
in very emaciated cases), absence of high blood-pressure, and 
the heart is not enlarged. This condition is caused commonly 
by chronic tuberculosis, syphilis, sepsis, and malignant tumors. 
With these clinical symptoms and the history, we may differ 
entiate the nephritis of pregnancy from Bright s disease. 
Again, acute intestinal nephritis or glomerulonephritis has 
urinary findings like the nephritides just described, and there 
may be edema. The heart and the blood-vessels are normal. 
The cause is usually a pus microorganism, and there may be 
anemia from the sepsis. In subacute glomerulonephritis, or in 
testinal nephritis, the urinary findings are marked (much al 
bumin and many casts), anemia is rather constant, the blood- 
pressure gradually goes up to 180 or 200, edema may be marked 
or absent. The cause is usually a pus microorganism. 
Chronic glomerulonephritis shows much epithelium and many 
casts (sometimes in showers), the blood-pressure is high, the 
heart is usually somewhat enlarged, there is polyuria and some 
blood, edema is common (but there are dry cases), albuminuric 
retinitis is rare, and anemia is marked and secondary. It may 
be difficult to find the cause of this chronic glomerulonephritis, 
but there is, as a rule, a history of tonsillitis, septic rheumatism, 
endocarditis, a true influenza, or the like infection. Primary 
arteriosclerotic contracted kidney shows hypertension and sec 
ondary circulatory disturbance. The urinary findings are 
comparatively slight and transient, and there is little or no 


anemia. The development is insidious, and the etiology is not 

There is evidence of late to find a septic cause for most 
of the nephritides, such as infectious fevers, pyorrhea of the 
teeth, and like bacterial intoxications; in pregnancy the ne 
phritis may be toxemic from sources that are not bacterial. 
It is extremely difficult, and not seldom impossible, to make 
any differentiation, as has been said. When the child is viable, 
whether the uterus should be emptied or not must be decided 
for the individual case; no general rule can be set down to 
cover all conditions. 

One of the kidneys may be dislocated during pregnancy 
usually the right kidney. If a floating kidney becomes twisted 
on its pedicle, abortion may be a con?equence. The torsion 
may compress the renal blood-vessels and bring on acute hydro- 
nephrosis with high fever, great abdominal tenderness, and a 
peritonic facial expression. 

Pyelitis of the renal pelvis is not seldom met in pregnancy. 
The gonococcus, colon bacillus, or some other pyogenic bacte 
rium gets a nidus after pressure and lowered power of resist 
ance. This condition is sometimes mistaken for appendicitis. 

Catalepsy is a rare complication of pregnancy, in which the 
woman lies in an unconscious condition. The disease is a neu 
rosis, but it might be mistaken for a toxic or uremic condition 
by a superficial observer. The infants of such women may be 
cataleptic, and may die as a consequence of the condition. 



THE term Eclampsia was first used to describe the sudden 
exaltation, flashing forth (eklampsis), of the vital fac 
ulties at puberty; later it was applied to convulsions, but now 
it is restricted to convulsions in pregnancy which sometimes 
begin suddenly, as in a flash. The disease is characterized by 
a series of violent convulsive movements, loss of consciousness, 
and coma, and is one of the most dangerous complications of ges 
tation. All convulsions and comas in pregnancy, not due to hys 
teria, epilepsy, cervical tuberculosis, apoplexy, pneumonia, phos 
phorus, strychnia and like poisons, uremia, and meningitis, 
are commonly classed as eclamptic. When the symptoms of 
eclampsia are present with the exception of the convulsions, a 
rare condition, this state also is said to be eclampsia. Reineke x 
reported a case like this. After death the heart, kidneys, and 
liver showed all the signs of eclampsia. 

The eclamptic attack may occur without warning, but al 
most always there are premonitory symptoms for from a few 
hours to some weeks. The preeclamptic symptoms are head 
ache (commonly frontal), nausea and vomiting, vertigo, nerv 
ous excitement or somnolence, muscle twitching, occasional 
delirium, cramps in the calves, disturbances of sight, tinnitus, 
and pain in the epigastrium. Epigastric pain, headache, and 
disturbances of the optic tract are important symptoms. If 
these last signs are present in a woman who has some edema 
and nephritis, the eclampsia will certainly occur, if proper 
means to relieve the condition are not promptly taken. When 
the prodromata appear there is nephritis, as a rule, but ex 
ceptions are observed. 

l Miinchener medizinische Wochenschrift, July 30, 1907. 



When the attack comes, if the patient is standing she falls 
unconscious. The pupils dilate, the eyes and head are turned 
to the side. She opens her mouth, and the jaw is pulled lat 
erally. The woman stiffens, her face is distorted, her arms 
bent, and the whole body curves sidewise in a tonic spasm. 
After a few seconds her jaws chop, and if her tongue is be 
tween the teeth it is lacerated; twitching runs down from the 
face and ends in a violent convulsion of the whole body, which 
may toss the patient from the bed, and she may even fracture 
her skull or long bones in the fall. The breathing stops, the 
bloodshot eyes stick out, the face swells and darkens, the lips 
become purple. Gradually the convulsions wane, and the 
woman appears to be dying; but after deep sighing she begins 
to breathe stertorously ; then she sinks into a coma, or, in favor 
able cases, revives. 

After a few minutes to an hour or more another convulsion 
may befall her, or she may have no more than one. In very 
grave cases consciousness may never return after the first fit. 
The convulsions may run up into extraordinary numbers a 
hundred or more. There is a pseudoeclampsia where the con 
vulsions have been as many as two hundred. If there* are 
many attacks in the first twenty-four hours with no clear evi 
dence of subsidence, the woman nearly always dies. Fever 
begins in such cases, and goes up to 103 or even 107 degrees. 
In an untreated case Black found a temperature of 110 degrees 
before death. The average number of attacks in these cases 
is from five to fifteen, and the convulsions are from a half min 
ute to two or three minutes apart. Olshausen had six patients 
who recovered after having had from twenty-two to thirty-six 
convulsions, but those who have above fifteen commonly die. 

If the convulsions are severe the woman as a rule aborts, 
and often rapidly. After the child is delivered the eclamptic 
symptoms may subside, or they may come on again, even a 
week after labor. Often the fetus dies during the attack; 
rarely it survives and is carried to term ; again, it may die and 
the eclampsia may subside, but the fetus remains in the uterus 
for some time. 

If the woman is to die the eclamptic attacks usually in- 


crease in frequency and violence; the temperature runs up 
very high, or it sinks; tho pulse becomes weak and running, 
edema of the lungs comes on, with rattling and cyanosis, and 
the urine ceases to flow. The woman may die in a convulsion 
from apoplexy or heart paralysis. At times the child is de 
livered, but the coma deepens and the woman dies. In other 
cases there are coma and death without convulsions. Rarely 
there is a condition akin to acute yellow atrophy of the liver, 
with delirium, twitchings, coma, and death. 

Women who have chronic nephritis seldom have convulsions 
in pregnancy unless there happens to be cerebral hemorrhage 
as an effect, but they suffer the other results of chronic Bright s 
disease dropsy, uremia, edema of the lungs, paralysis of the 
heart, and albuminuric retinitis; they also are inclined to pre 
mature labor, and to hemorrhages that loosen the placenta. 
When acute nephritis happens in pregnancy convulsions are 
quite common, and when there are convulsions as a result of 
either chronic or acute nephritis it is very difficult to differen 
tiate between these convulsions and genuine eclampsia. 

The real cause of eclampsia is unknown, but the most 
plausible explanation of this "disease of theories," as Zweifel 
of Leipsic called it, is that it is a toxemia which attacks the 
liver, and directly or indirectly the kidneys, and brings on 
convulsions by toxic action on the anterior cerebral cortex. 
The great difficulty is to explain how these toxins originate. 
One authority suggests that the poison comes from the liver; 
another, from the fetus; a third, from the placenta, the intes 
tines, the general metabolism, disturbed glandular balance, bac 
teria, and so on, but nothing is certain as to the etiology except 
that it is an intoxication. 

On an average, 20 per cent, of the women who have eclamp 
sia die, but statistics vary from 5.31 per cent, to 45.7 for the 
mother and from 30 to 42 per cent, for the child. Eclampsia 
occurring ante-partum has the worst mortality; intra-partum, 
less; post-partum, least. About half the children die from 
prematurity, toxemia, asphyxiation, narcotics administered to 
the mother, or injuries at birth. 

If the patient s pulse remains full and hard and below 120, 


there is no immediate danger of death; but if faster, weaker, 
and running, the prognosis is bad. High fever is not neces 
sarily fatal to the mother, but it is very dangerous to the fetus. 
Edema of the lungs is a very grave symptom, but recovery is 
possible. When the convulsions have gone beyond twenty the 
prognosis is bad, but there have been recoveries. Deep cya 
nosis, marked restlessness, anuria, and intense albuminuria are 
all bad symptoms. Apoplexy is nearly always fatal. After 
delivery the recovery of the woman is by no means certain. 
She may get pneumonia, sepsis, or another eclamptic attack. 
Hirst finds that if the diastolic pressure does not rise above a 
ratio of 1 to 3 times the pulse pressure (i. e., the difference 
between the systolic and diastolic pressures), the prognosis is 

Every pregnant woman should be watched to prevent 
eclampsia, if possible, because all are liable to this outcome. 
The hygienic methods mentioned in the chapter on Abortion 
are most important here. The family history is of weight 
if the women of the patient s family have been eclamptic, if 
her parents were alcoholic or insane, these facts increase her 
liability to the disease. If she has had eclampsia before, if 
her kidneys are acutely diseased, especially if injured by in 
fections, if she is inclined to digestive disturbance, she is 
disposed to eclampsia. Albuminuria, diminishing amounts in 
the daily excretion of urine, and decrease in the total solids of 
the urine, casts or blood in the urine, are serious symptoms. 
If albumin increases and urea decreases, this is a grave sign. 

The blood should be examined for the various anemias. If 
the thyroid gland is deficient or altered in activity, thyroid 
extract may be indicated this acts also as a diuretic. Uterine 
malpositions should be corrected. Treatment should be given 
where there is any evidence of toxemia, as headache, altered 
secretion and excretion, neuralgia, mental eccentricity, in 
creased vasomotor stimulation, high tension, disturbance in the 
sensory apparatus, obstinate constipation and jaundice. Tox 
emia is not necessarily renal in origin. 

In any of these conditions the proteids should be kept low 
in the diet, so that the kidneys may not be overtaxed. To throw 

off toxins, the emunctories should be stimulated by laxatives, 
water for diuresis, tepid bathing. If the symptoms grow 
threatening, and the kidneys are involved, the woman should 
be put to bed, on water alone. After three days an absolute 
milk diet should be begun. As she improves, starches are 
added, then the vegetables containing proteid, vegetable oils, 
and butter. As the improvement goes on, the diet may be 
vegetables, fruit easy of digestion, and one egg a day. Later 
fish and chicken are used, but never a full meat diet. Beef, 
mutton, veal, and similar heavy meats are not to be eaten. 
The drink is to be water, buttermilk, or koumiss. 

When the eclampsia is inevitable the question of inducing 
labor arises. If the child is not viable, abortion is out of the 
question, as has been proved in the chapter on Abortion and 
the general chapter on Homicide. If the child is viable, there 
are three opinions: one, that the premature delivery should be 
effected as soon as possible; a second, that this delivery should 
be delayed as long as possible; and a third, that it should not 
be attempted at all. Those who hold that the uterus should 
be emptied as soon as possible, induce labor at the first convul 
sion, rapidly and under deep narcosis. Chloroform is danger 
ous to the heart in such cases for full anesthesia ; ether is better. 
Braun first observed that the convulsions cease or are lessened 
after delivery. Diihrssen found these results in 93.72 per 
cent., Olshausen in 85 per cent., Zweifel in 66 per cent. 
Peterson said that in 615 cases of early delivery as soon as 
possible after the first convulsion the maternal mortality was 
15.9 per cent., but 28.9 per cent, in the same maternities under 
the expectant method. 

Olshausen was not in favor of forced delivery. Charpen- 
tier 2 held that forced delivery is dangerous and should be ab 
solutely proscribed. His statistics of mortality are: after 
spontaneous labor, 18.96; after artificial labor, 30.04; after 
forced delivery, 40.74. 

Lichtenstein 3 reported, from Zweifel s clinic in Leipsic, the 
results of 400 cases of eclampsia, and he found that the eclamp- 

* Nouvelle Archives d Obstetrique et de Gynecologic, 1893. 
Archiv fur Gyndkologie, 1911, xcv, 1. 


tic convulsions cease in only one-third of the cases after any 
form of delivery. He says the mortality of induced labor is 
no better than that after forced delivery, and that the mortality 
of both methods does not materially differ from the mortality 
of a long series of cases where there was no such intervention. 
The difference in the mortality between eclampsia without de 
livery or with delivery seems to depend on the relative loss 
of blood. In 40 per cent, of eclamptic cases operated upon, 
the loss of blood was 500 c.c. above the loss in cases of spon 
taneous delivery. The loss of blood tends to produce collapse 
when the blood comes from the uterus, although it may be 
beneficial if removed by venesection before delivery. Five 
hundred c.c. of blood is one-eighth to one-ninth of the entire 
blood supply of the body in a woman of average size. If 500 
c.c. of blood is withdrawn before the shock of forced delivery 
and replaced by an equal quantity of normal salt solution, the 
toxin is thus reduced by one-fourth or one-third and then di 
luted by the normal salt solution, so that it has less poisonous 

Lichtenstein 4 describes the expectant treatment by phleb 
otomy and narcotics to replace operative interference, and this 
method has revolutionized the mortality of the treatment of 
eclampsia. In ninety-four cases of eclampsia his mortality 
was only 5.3 per cent., and none of the deaths could be ascribed 
to the treatment. The infant mortality was 37.3 per cent., as 
against his 38.8 per cent, in active operative interference dur 
ing preceding years. Werner, in the Second Gynecological 
Clinic in the University of Vienna, 5 by this new method in 
thirty-eight cases of eclampsia had a maternal mortality of 5.2, 
as Lichtenstein had, but his infant mortality was only 1-1.65 
per cent., an enormous advance for the better. Formerly the 
mortality in the Viennese clinic was 15.8 for the women and 
44.3 for the children, in a series of 120 cases of eclampsia. A 
mortality of 50 per cent, in the children is common in the 
old method. In Lichtenstein s cases there were mental dis- 

4 Monatsschrift fur Geburtshulfe und Gynakologie, xxxviii, 2. 

* M iinchener medizinische Wochenschrift, November 23, 1915. 


turbances in 2.1 per cent, of the women, as against 6.75 per 
cent, in the old method. Eclamptics may go insane and kill 
the child after delivery. Lichtenstein treated 74 consecutive 
cases without a single death. In 54 per cent, of his cases the 
convulsions ceased after one venesection, and 42 per cent, of 
the women with ante-partum attacks recovered before labor 
came on. Engelmann 8 reported a case where a woman who 
had had 188 convulsions recovered after the third venesection. 

In this method the woman is put in a dark, quiet room ; 400 
to 600 c.c. of blood are withdrawn by venesection, and 0.002 
gin. morphine is injected; two hours later 3 gin. chloral is 
given in an enema. If the fetus presents in a position for 
prompt delivery it is removed with forceps, or by expression to 
spare the mother ; but expression is a dangerous process always. 

Zinke 7 of Cincinnati has a method which reduces the ma 
ternal mortality, but it has an enormous infantile mortality. 
He depresses the maternal pulse by veratrum viride, and this 
depression is probably the cause of the infantile mortality 
through asphyxia. Yeit introduced the use of morphine in 
eclampsia, and Winckel the use of chloral. It has been found 
that narcotics check the action of toxins on the nuclei of cells, 
and in eclampsia the action of narcotics may be of this nature. 
Baker of Alabama in 1859 first gave veratrum viride in 
eclampsia. The drug lowers arterial tension by depressing the 
vasomotor centres and the heart itself. In eclampsia it diverts 
blood from the brain and depresses the motor neurons of the 
spinal cord. Aconite has the same effect in acute cerebral con 
gestion without depressing the vasomotor centres or irritating 
the stomach as veratrum viride does. 

Cesarean delivery is used frequently of late in eclampsia. 
The mortality of the children is lowered somewhat by a cesa- 
rean section, but the mortality of the mothers is much worse 
than in the expectant method described by Lichtenstein. 
Eclamptic women usually have badly affected kidneys, and the 
anesthetic used in the section may be a cause of the raised 
mortality. Peterson reviewed 500 cases of cesarean section 

" Centralbl. f. Gynak. xxxi, 11. 

f New York State Journal of Medicine, xiii, 8. 


for eclampsia 8 done by 259 operators in various countries. 
Up to 1908 the maternal mortality was 47.97 per cent, in 198 
cases; from 1908 to 1913 it was 25.79 per cent, in 283 cases. 
Convulsions ceased in only 54.92 per cent, of the women after 
cesarean delivery, and in those cases in which the convulsions 
continued the mortality was 31.53 per cent. In 146 cases 
where the convulsions ceased the mortality was still 19.8 per 
cent, for the mothers. The fetal mortality was 10.69 per cent., 
counting all children who died within three days after delivery 
by section. The maternal mortality after cesarean section in 
creases with the age of the patient. The cesarean delivery, 
then, has a maternal mortality of late of 25.79, with a tendency 
to increase as unskilled men attempt it; the expectant method 
has a maternal mortality of only 5.3 per cent. The cesarean 
delivery has a fetal mortality of 10.69 per cent. ; the expectant, 
14.65 per cent. The expectant method is preferable. 

* Amer. Jour. Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children, 
Izix, 6. 



OVER 20,000 women die in childbirth each year in the 
United States, and about 100,000 infants, and more 
or less permanent injury from parturition is almost general in 
mothers. The mortality in the trenches during the present 
great war is 2 per cent. ; the mortality of infants during the 
first year is 14 per cent. Very much of this mortality and in- 
validism is attributable to lack of skill in the licensed unfit. 
We commonly deem parturition merely a physiological proc 
ess, and for that reason the state permits ignorant midwives 
and quacks to take upon themselves with impunity the respon 
sibility and the risks of delivery. 

It is difficult to draw the line between normal and abnormal 
parturition, but every labor, as women now are in civilized 
countries, should be regarded as a grave surgical operation, and 
the indications that must be met in a surgical operation are 
likely to occur in almost any parturition. The strength of the 
patient, the condition of the heart, lungs, kidneys, and blood, 
sepsis and antisepsis, the nature and technic of the various op 
erations that may be required, and the complications that may 
arise, are all to be understood and met conscientiously. ISTo 
physician who has any regard for morality and his own repu 
tation now will accept an obstetrical case unless he has had the 
woman under frequent observation for months before delivery. 
If the mother or child dies because of the bungling or surgical 
uncleanness of the physician or midwife, and unfortunately 
such deaths occur almost hourly, this physician or midwife 
is guilty of murder. There may be an abnormality of the 
uterine or abdominal muscles used in parturition, a dispro 
portion between the parturient canal and the child, or various 



accidents of labor; and these conditions are so frequent in oc 
currence and so grave that their removal requires great medical 
skill, fine discernment, quick and exact judgment, and often 
decidedly courageous purpose. 

New methods of treatment frequently appear, and the 
quack is likely to be among the first by which the new is tried. 
The use and abuse of pituitrin is an example of such a method. 
About 1909, pituitary extract as a uterine stimulant was first 
described and it was immediately taken up by competent men 
and more frequently, perhaps, by the quack. The extract is 
from the posterior lobe of the pituitary gland, and when in 
jected subcutaneously or into a muscle it is a very powerful 
oxytocic. In a few minutes the injection markedly increases 
the intensity and duration of the pains. The effect lasts for 
an hour or an hour and a half. Whitridge Williams 1 says a ju 
dicious administration of the drug will do away with the use 
of low forceps in from one-third to one-half of the cases, but its 
ignorant use places the life of the mother and child in jeopardy. 
Mundell 2 found twelve cases of rupture of the uterus, thirty- 
four cases of fetal death, and forty-one cases of fetal asphyxia 
pallida in which resuscitation was effected only after prolonged 
and vigorous efforts, sometimes for over an hour. 

If there is any serious obstacle at all to delivery in the par 
turient canal or in the fetal position, or the like, pituitrin is 
likely to cause rupture of the uterus and asphyxiation of the 
child. It should never be used when there is the slightest 
danger of rupture of the uterus ; or when the child is suffering ; 
or in a shoulder and most pelvic presentations; or in elderly 
primiparae with rigid muscles; or when the cervix is not fully 
dilated, lest the undilated cervix be torn off; or where there is 
inertia after prolonged effort to overcome an obstacle to deliv 
ery. It is never to be used in a normal delivery merely to 
hasten the birth. Obstetrical cases are tedious, and an impa 
tient physician with an atonic conscience is likely to use pitu 
itrin so that he can get back to his bed. 

Comparisons between the fetal mortality after the use of 

1 Obstetrics, 4th ed. New York, 1917. 
* Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., June 2, 1917. 


pituitrin or the forceps are erroneous. Quigley 3 contrasted 
the fetal mortality in these conditions. In 147 pituitrin cases 
it was 2.7 per cent., in about five or six times the number oi 
forceps cases it varied from 5.7 to 15.63 per cent.; but wher 
ever there is any real need at all for the forceps, pituitrin at 
once is contraindicated except in easy low forceps deliveries, 
where in the hands of a skilled man pituitrin may safely re 
place the forceps to avoid possible instrumental infection of the 
uterus. There are contractions of the uterus toward the end 
of gestation, before labor proper sets in, which cause what are 
called False Pains, and these must not be mistaken for the be 
ginning of labor, as unnecessary examinations and meddlesome 
interference may bring on great harm. Uterine atony, or 
weak pains, may affect the patient in the first stage of labor, in 
which the cervix of the uterus should be dilated ; or the second 
stage, in which the child is delivered; or the third stage, the 
post-partum period, when the placenta is thrown off. Con 
tractions of the uterine muscle cause pain, and these contrac 
tions themselves are called the Pains. In the first stage weak 
pains may prolong the dilatation of the cervix for days and 
expose the mother to sepsis or exhaustion, and the child to 
consequent danger. 

In the second stage the abdominal muscles, which push the 
child out of the uterus, fail to work if the pains are weak. 
Causes of unsuccessful pains in the second stage are : an infant 
ile uterus, fibroids or other tumors in or near the uterus, peri 
toneal adhesions, a full rectum or bladder, abnormal position 
of the uterus, a pendulous abdomen, diseases of the uterine 
wall, scars from past operations, chronic metritis or endome- 
tritis, primiparity in relatively advanced age, twins, distention 
of the bag of waters, gas in the uterus, abnormal position of 
the child, contracted pelvis, adhesions of the membranes about 
the os uteri, fatigue of the woman, and tetany or stricture of 
the uterus. The obstetrician must be able to diagnose the 
special cause and treat the indications. 

One of the causes of weak pains is a diseased heart. Systolic 
murmurs at the base of the heart and an accentuated second 

Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., April 10, 1915. 


aortic sound are quite common in pregnancy and may not be 
of grave importance. If there is a genuine cardiac lesion 
with good compensation, the labor is usually successful and 
without notable damage to the woman, although obstetricians 
like De Lee think that such patients appear to develop decom 
pensation sooner than do women who are not pregnant. If 
the heart disease is advanced and the heart is in unstable 
equilibrium, especially if there is myocarditis or fatty de 
generation, the heart is likely to break down in pregnancy or 
labor. In chronic cardiac lesions, pregnancy, through venous 
congestion, tends to renal and hepatic disturbance, or to 
dyspnoea and carbonic acid narcosis. The uplifting of the 
diaphragm by the enlarged uterus increases the respiratory 
difficulty. There may be edema of the lungs, hypostatic pneu 
monia, dropsy, insomnia, albuminuria, and other serious 

During labor a diseased heart may fail and cause sudden 
death, especially if the second stage is prolonged. At times 
there is collapse and death shortly after delivery. The mor 
tality of heart disease in pregnancy varies in the reports on 
various series from 4 to 85 per cent. Babcock 4 says that 
the mortality in mitral disease in pregnancy is 50 per cent. ; 
that in disease of the aortic valve is 23 per cent. These figures 
are far above those given by later obstetricians of skill. Fell- 
ner and Demelin, in ninety-four and forty-one cases respec 
tively, had a mortality of only 6.3 and 5 per cent. Hirst says 
he never lost a case. Jaschke 5 found a mortality of only 4 
per cent, in 1548 cases of pregnant cardiopaths. A great 
danger is in treating heart conditions by general rules, and in 
giving digitalis and other drugs without discrimination. In 
uncompensated heart conditions many of the children die from 
prematurity, abruptio placentae, diseases of the placenta, or 

Even those obstetricians who induce abortion at any stage 
of gestation when they deem the woman s life in danger say 
that heart disease in itself is not an indication for abortion 

* Diseases of the Heart. New York, 1905. 
Medizin. Klinik, February 25, 1912. 


unless there is chronic decompensation with myodegeneration 
and renal or hepatic insufficiency. Expectancy is the rule. 
Lusk advises abortion as soon as mitral stenosis is discovered. 

Surgeons of the Mayo Clinic, in a report 6 on Operative 
Risk in Cardiac Disease, hold that a valvular lesion is not a 
rational basis for judging a cardiopath so far as prognosis in 
a surgical operation is concerned, but this statement is not 
true for an obstetrical case. If we except angina pectoris and 
related diseases, the four disorders of the heart s mechanism 
that surgeons deem the worst risks in operation are auricular 
fibrillation, auricular flutter, impaired auriculoventricular con 
duction, and impaired intraventricular conduction. These 
conditions are usually accompanied by extensive lesions of the 
heart muscle. 

In auricular fibrillation there are rapid incoordinate con 
tractions, twitchings in individual muscle bundles of the auric 
ular wall. The auricle loses its power to pump the blood and 
dilates. The pulse is commonly arhythmic and rapid. A per 
manent fibrillation is worse than a paroxysmal state. The con 
dition is found especially in advanced cases of exophthalmic 
goitre. In the Mayo Clinic the operative mortality in seventy 
cases of exophthalmic goitre with auricular fibrillation was only 
2.8 per cent. 

In auricular flutter, or heart block, there are foci of irri 
tation in the auricular wall which cause rapid coordinate con 
tractions. The auricle may contract twice as often as the ven 
tricle, and the pulse may be regular or markedly irregular. 
The stimulus for heart contraction normally reaches the 
ventricle from the auricle by passing along the bridge of primi 
tive tissue which connects the auricle and ventricle. This 
bridge may be so affected that the stimulus is delayed, or pre 
vented at times from crossing over, or completely blocked. 
One patient with complete heart block was operated upon at the 
Mayo Clinic three times in eleven years for appendicitis, cancer 
of the breast, and the excision of recurring skin nodules, and is 
still alive and reasonably well. In intraventricular "block the risk 
of operation is worth taking, according to the opinion at the 

* Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., Lxix, 24. 


Mayo Clinic, where there is exophthalmic goitre or tonsillitis. 

In general, where there is question of surgical operation 
on a cardiopath, no such operation should be done unless there 
is definite ground to believe that the operation is essential to 
improve the heart condition or restore reasonable health. Ex 
tremely severe cardiac disease can be relieved or even com 
pletely cured by the surgical removal of infectious, mechanical, 
or toxic sources of heart degeneration, especially goitre. When 
the myocardial insufficiency is so marked that no medical treat 
ment reestablishes a reasonable compensation, no surgical op 
eration is permissible. The medical treatment is the only test 
to learn whether the heart can be put into a condition wherein 
it will withstand the anesthesia and the operation. Life de 
pends on ventricular action, not on auricular, and the ventric 
ular reserve is the standard for judgment in these cases. 

Fibrillation and heart block are grave conditions when 
found in pregnancy, but disease of the mitral valve because of 
frequency is more important, and when compensation is un 
stable mitral lesions are dangerous. In mitral stenosis the 
enlarged uterus in the last months of gestation, by crowding 
the intestines and diaphragm, embarrasses the heart. As the 
diaphragm cannot descend well, the flow of blood out of the 
right ventricle is not aided by respiration as in normal condi 
tions. Pressure on the abdominal veins increases the blood 
tension and throws greater work on the left ventricle. In the 
expulsive stage of labor there is danger of the right ventricle 
giving way under the added strain. 

In mitral regurgitation the left ventricle is dilated, and in 
pregnancy the regurgitation is increased by the peripheral re 
sistance or obstruction. If the dilated ventricle is also hyper- 
trophied it stands the strain much better. In the second stage 
of labor the danger is the same as in mitral stenosis. In dis 
ease of the aortic valve the strain of child-bearing is on the 
left ventricle, but patients in this condition undergo labor more 
successfully than do those with mitral disease. 

Labor in any cardiac disease requires close watching even 
when the compensation is good. There is always a possibility 
of collapse in the third stage or during the puerperium. The 


obstetrician must stay by the bedside, and he is to have every 
thing ready for a sudden emergency, which is likely to result 
in death if not instantly met. All the instruments for oper 
ative delivery are to be kept sterilized and ready for immediate 
use. When symptoms of imminent collapse appear, delivery 
is to be done at once. If a cardiopath collapses in the early 
stages of gestation, before the child is viable, the rule explained 
in the chapter on Abortion holds the child may not be killed 
by removal to save the woman s life. 

Jaschke, 7 in his consideration of 1548 pregnant cardiopaths, 
found that seven-eighths went to term, and that the women were 
prematurely delivered in only about 9 per cent, of the total 
number of cases. Therapeutic interruption of pregnancy was 
necessary in only about 1 per cent. The high mortality re 
ported by many good obstetricians is a proof that the treatment 
of cardiac conditions requires an experience in clinical medi 
cine and a skill lacking, as a rule, in specialists who are not 

A combined mitral and aortic disease with great enlarge 
ment of the heart, heaving of the chest wall, and some protru 
sion makes pregnancy very dangerous. Osier thinks mitral 
insufficiency in itself not very dangerous. He had one patient 
with such a condition, a loud apex systolic murmur, and some 
enlargement, who bore nine children and lived to past sixty 
years of age. Mitral stenosis is not so favorable, but even in 
extreme stenosis some women bear several children without 

f Loc. cit. 



iting of Pregnancy, is commonly classified among the 
toxemias; but as the etiology is not known definitely, this clas 
sification is one of convenience more than exactness. Nausea 
and vomiting occur so frequently in the early months of gesta 
tion that they are deemed almost physiological, but when these 
symptoms become very grave and persistent they are undoubt 
edly pathologic, and are said to be pernicious, as they may 
lead to abortion, or to the death of the woman. In 1813, Sim- 
mond first successfully employed artificial abortion to save the 
woman in this condition, and thus added a possible moral qual 
ity to the disease. Therapeutic abortion was used in 1608, 
and Soranus of Ephesus, in the second century, mentions it. 

The pernicious nausea commonly begins in the second 
month of pregnancy, less frequently in the fourth month, but it 
may be delayed until the sixth month; if it occurs after the 
sixth month it is, almost as a rule, an evidence of nephritis. 
It may last from about a month and a half to three months, but 
in toxemic cases it may result in death in two weeks. Some 
times remissions occur. 

In 1852, Paul Dubois described the disease, and his divi 
sion into three stages is still used in articles on pernicious vom 
iting, although these stages are not clearly marked clinically. In 
the early months of gestation the stomach may become unable 
to retain food, and there is notable loss of appetite; the con 
dition is then grave. There may be retching at the sight of 
food, at any change of position, or at the entrance of a person 
into the room. The emesis may recur so often at night as to 
cause exhaustion from insomnia. Hiccough, thirst, pain in the 



stomach, and soreness of the thoracic muscles are frequent and 
troublesome symptoms. In some cases there is salivation. 

The vomitus is food, mucus, and some bile at first; later 
mucus and bile ; finally it contains blood. The blood may come 
from the mouth, pharynx, or stomach, and it is serious if it is 
gastric. The urine is scanty, and shows nephritic irritation. 
At times it contains blood, bile, acetone, diacetic acid, indican, 
and rarely sugar. 

In the second stage of the disease all symptoms are aggra 
vated, and the stomach will not retain anything. There is ex 
treme thirst; the patient faints often, and loses weight rap 
idly. In chronic cases there is much emaciation. The mouth 
is like that in a case of typhoid. Sometimes there is a low 
fever; again, the temperature is subnormal, with a rise before 
death. The pulse is rapid and weak, and the post-mortem 
heart shows fatty degeneration as in a fatal sepsis. 

In the third stage the mind is affected, there is delirium, 
stupor, and coma; the vomiting ceases, the pulse grows more 
rapid and feebler, and the weakness becomes more and more 
overwhelming until the patient dies. This third stage is com 
monly short. In these conditions it is too late to empty the 
uterus, and any attempt to do so then only hastens death. 

In some cases the fetus is apparently not affected ; in toxic 
cases it is affected, and then there may be miscarriage. If 
the fetus dies the vomiting ceases, as a rule. 

The liver enlarges in the first stage and later diminishes. 
There may be a general hemorrhage hepatitis and acute yellow 
atrophy, or partial fatty degeneration around the central lobu- 
lar veins. Necrosis also occurs. Acute parenchymatous ne 
phritis and hemorrhages into the kidneys are often observed. 

Neurotic and hysteric women are more liable to this dis 
ease than the nervously stable. There is a direct communica 
tion by the sympathetic and vagus nerves between the stomach 
and the uterus and its adnexa, and thus reflex irritations read 
ily pass to the stomach. Through this path vomiting is caused 
by any unusual distention of the uterus, as when the fetus 
grows too rapidly ; or when the size of the ovum is larger than 
normal, as in twin pregnancies; or in irritations like hydram- 


nios, displacement of the uterus, acute anteversions, retrover- 
sions, or flexions which pinch and stretch the nerves. Inflam 
mations, as metritis, endrometritis, and cervicitis; tumors of 
the uterus; diseases of the adnexa or of the pelvic connective 
tissue or peritoneum are other sources of reflex vomiting. The 
proof that such are causes is that the vomit ceases when the 
conditions mentioned are cured. Such conditions exist, how 
ever, in women who are not pregnant without causing vomit; 
there is therefore some special disposition in the pregnant. 

Diseases which in themselves have vomiting as a symptom 
will in pregnancy make the vomit pernicious. Such are 
chronic gastritis, gastric ulcer, enteritis, cancer, helminthiasis, 
large fecal concretions, enteroptosis, tubercular peritonitis, and 
gall-stones. What is apparently pernicious vomiting in preg 
nancy may be the beginning of acute miliary tuberculosis. 
Diseases of the air passages hypertrophied turbinates, septal 
spurs, laryngeal and apical tuberculosis seem to cause the 
vomiting or to dispose to it. When vomit is associated with 
uremia, this occurs, as a rule, in the last months of pregnancy. 

The cause, again, may be in the nervous system, from either 
a demonstrable lesion or a functional imbalance paresis, lo- 
comotor ataxia, tumors or tubercle of the brain, meningitis, 
polyneuritis. Even when the nervous system is not directly 
the cause of the emesis, the remote irritant may work through 
the nervous system. A bad neurotic inheritance, as from al 
coholic, insane, or weak parents, disposes to neurotic hyper- 

Toxins from the fetal syncytium appear to be another cause 
of the vomit. The syncytium is a mass of protoplasm without 
cell demarkation but with nuclei scattered throughout the sub 
stance. Sometimes this embryological cellular material starts 
to grow after the manner of a cancer, and then it is very malig 
nant (syncytioma malignum], but its connection with the per 
nicious vomit of pregnancy is more theoretical than estab 
lished. In physiological conditions the toxins in the blood are 
neutralized by the secretions of the ductless glands of the body, 
and in pregnancy probably these same glands by intensified 
activity effect the same result. Injection of blood serum taken 

from healthy pregnant women has cured cases of toxemic per 
nicious vomit, and this makes the theory much more probable. 

To diagnose the etiology of pernicious vomiting is not al 
ways easy. We must decide first whether the emesis is really 
pernicious or not; secondly, we have to determine whether or 
not it is due to the presence of the fetus; thirdly, we are to 
differentiate the primary and adjuvant causes for intelligent 
treatment. The age of the fetus must be known to determine 
whether we may licitly interfere so as to remove the fetus from 
the uterus if necessary, in medical opinion, to do so. 

Trousseau emptied the uterus of a woman to stop her per 
nicious vomit, but she died, and at the autopsy he found a 
cancer of the stomach. Caseaux discovered tubercular peri 
tonitis in a woman who had died after a diagnosis of hyper- 
emesis gravidarum ; Beau, tubercular meningitis in a l ; ke case. 
Williams of Johns Hopkins University stopped a very grave 
case of pernicious vomiting in a neurotic woman merely by 
telling her of the dangers of artificial abortion. 

There is no settled mortality percentage in hyperemesis 
gravidarum because so much depends on diagnosis and treat 
ment. Braun, in 150,000 obstetrical cases, never had a death 
from pernicious vomit ; others have a mortality of 40 per cent. 

The treatment is technical, and is given in detail in books 
like De Lee s Principles and Practice of Obstetrics. 1 Sug 
gestion and the environment are important elements in the 
treatment. Local anesthetics, mechanical drugs like cerium 
oxalate and bismuth, depressomotors, external applications, 
and gastric lavage are indicated in the early stages of the dis 
ease, but are rather harmful than useful in later stages. Ad 
renalin, ten drops of a 1 :1000 solution by mouth, or three drops 
hypodermically as doses, often cures. Sergent and Lian re 
ported six such cases in one paper in 1913. Hypodermic in 
jection of the extract of corpus luteum in 1 c.c. doses has been 
effective in some cases. So has the injection of defibrinated 
serum from a healthy pregnant woman. Curtis describes the 
tcchnic in the Journal of the American Medical Association, 
February 28, 1914. The gynecologist must adjust uterine dis- 
1 Philadelphia, 1913. 


placements and heal cervical erosions. The oculist, laryngol- 
ogist, and otologist are to remedy refractive errors and remove 
irritants in the air passages and the ear. 

The treatment of last resort is to empty the uterus. This 
will cure all cases of neurotic and reflex origin if done early 
enough. In these cases, if the therapeutic abortion is deferred 
until very late, the patient will die of exhaustion. Toxemic 
cases do not react well after therapeutic abortion because of 
the damage previously done by the circulating poison, espe 
cially in the liver. A positive diagnosis of toxemia can 
not always be made, and many patients in whom the 
diagnosis has been made correctly recover without abortion. 
Apart from moral considerations, it is very difficult to deter 
mine the proper time to empty the uterus. A test is made of 
the glycolytic power of the liver by giving two ounces of levu- 
lose internally; and if sugar shows in the urine, this means 
that the liver is unable to act normally, that it has been at 
tacked and disabled by the toxin, and therefore the therapeutic 
abortion should be done. Again, a marked concentration of the 
blood, shown by erythrocytosis and leucocytosis, indicates star 
vation. Some obstetricians perform abortion when the pulse 
remains above 100, at the appearance of fever, blood from the 
stomach, jaundice, albuminuria, mellituria, acetonuria, indi- 
canuria, or marked loss of weight. Polyneuritis, with icterus 
and bile in the urine, is another indication for abortion ; a pa 
tient may die from polyneuritis alone after the hyperemesis has 
ceased. "Not one but all these facts must be considered, together 
with one s own clinical experience. 

In hyperemesis gravidarum, as elsewhere, therapeutic abor 
tion is never permissible, under any circumstances, if the child 
is not viable. If the mother cannot be saved without emptying 
the uterus, the mother must die; there is no way out of the 
difficulty. The proof that this doctrine is correct has been 
given in the introductory chapter on Homicide and when con 
sidering abortion in general. 


RECURRING, permanent, localized spasms of facial or 
other groups of muscles, which are often called chorea, 
are tics, convulsive tic, painful tic, accessorius spasm, and so 
on. Chorea is also characterized by various recurrent spas 
modic movements, but the origin of the disease is commonly 
an infectious endocarditis, rheumatism, tonsillitis, or the like 
disease. This is Chorea Minor, St. Vitus s Dance, or Infec 
tious Chorea. There is also a common chorea, which is not 
from an infection but from some nervous irritation, usually 
eye-strain, and disappears with the removal of the irritation. 
The chorea of pregnancy is often an infectious chorea, and then 
it is an extremely dangerous condition: the mortality in some 
collections of toxic cases is as high as 22 per cent. We meet, 
too, in pregnancy hysterical chorea, and a form which is partly 
hysterical and partly infectious in origin. 

Primigravidae are more susceptible to infectious chorea in 
pregnancy than multigravidae. If a woman has not had true 
rheumatism she very rarely gets chorea after the first gestation. 
Rheumatism in the patient or in her immediate ancestors, epi 
lepsy, fright and other emotions, and anemia are predisposing 
causes. The patients are all very neurotic; and if they had 
chorea in childhood, the condition is likely to recur in preg 

Mild cases may be cured without damage to the woman or 
fetus, but many cases go on to abortion and death in corra and 
fever. Some severe cases result in a mania which may last for 
months; again, there is paralysis and delirium. The earlier 
in pregnancy the attack, the greater the danger to the fetus. 

It is very important to differentiate infectious chorea from 



hysterical chorea the latter may or may not be dangerous; 
chorea always is dangerous. In hysterical chorea the move 
ments are sudden, isolated, and sometimes rhythmical, espe 
cially in the fingers ; there are zones of anesthesia, and the per 
versity of the hysteric soon manifests itself. The movements 
in hysteria are never so intense as to exhaust the patient. In 
true chorea the movements are irregular, spasmodic, and in 
creased hy motion and voluntary effort, especially if the effort 
is sustained; they exhaust the patient. 

Maniacal chorea differs from the mania of the puerperium 
from other causes: in maniacal chorea the woman is not so 
sullen, and is more garrulous than the patient with puerperal 
mania. The prognosis is better in maniacal chorea as to re 
covery of reason. Sometimes, however, the mania of puerperal 
chorea persists for months, or it may become even permanent. 

If the fetus is viable and the choreic woman, with a clear 
toxic chorea, shows signs of exhaustion from the spasms and 
insomnia, or if her mania is becoming fixed and her delusions 
are dangerous (such women are likely to kill the infant), or 
if she has endocarditis, the uterus should be emptied, as a rule. 
If, however, the symptoms show a recession on treatment, the 
uterus should not be emptied. Albrecht 1 reported a case of 
chorea cured by an injection of serum from a normal pregnant 
woman. Each case must be judged by its own characteristics. 
The last sacraments should be given as soon as the symptoms 
grow grave. 

Hysteria in a woman, even when mild, may grow serious in 
pregnancy when it takes the form of melancholia; but it is 
dangerous when it passes into maniacal excitement. In mania 
there may be exhaustion from a refusal to take food, and in 
labor maniacal hysteria may wreak grave injury on both mother 
and child. Hysterical women should be treated before preg 
nancy; indeed, the process of avoiding hysteria should have 
begun in the patient s grandparents. 

The term hysteria has been handed down from the days 
when physicians thought there was a connection between uterine 
disorders and the set of nervous symptoms grouped about the 
1 Zeitschr. f. Geburtshiilfe u. Gynak., Ixxvi, 3, p. 677. Stuttgart. 


title hysteria. It is now etymologically meaningless men also 
grow hysterical. Briquet found 11 male to 204 female hys 
terics, and later statistics increase the number of males. 

The disease is not readily definable. The patient is usually 
a young emotional woman, oftenest between fifteen and twenty 
years of age. She commonly has anesthetic spots on her body, 
concentric limitations of the fields of vision and reversals in the 
color fields, hysterogenetic zones, or tender points, which when 
pressed appear to inhibit the hysterical fit. The symptoms enu 
merated hero are not, however, found in every case of hysteria, 
and it is difficult at times to diagnose the case. There is a 
popular notion that hysteria is a disease of malingerers, but it 
is as real as typhoid fever or a broken leg, and a much greater 
affliction than either of these conditions. Malingering is only 
a symptom of the disease. 

The conditions that bring about hysteria are hysteria in a 
parent, or insanity, alcoholism, or some similar neurotic taint in 
an ancestor. Immediate causes are acute depressive emotions, 
shocks from danger, sudden grief, severe revulsions of feeling, 
as from disappointment in love or abandonment by a husband ; 
and, secondly, cumulative emotional disturbance, as from worry, 
poverty, ill treatment, unhappy marriage, or religious revivals. 
Certain diseased conditions, as anemia, chronic intoxications, 
pelvic trouble, start it into activity when it is latent. It is also 
communicated by imitation and it may become epidemic. 

After the great plague, the Black Death, in the fourteenth 
century, there were very remarkable epidemics of imitative 
hysteria in Germany and elsewhere. In 1374, at Aix-la- 
Chapelle, cro\vds of men and women danced together in the 
streets until they fell exhausted in a cataleptic state. These 
dances spread over Holland and Belgium and extended to 
Cologne and Metz. The "Dancing Plague" broke out again, 
in 1418, at Strasburg and in Belgium and along the lower 
Rhine. In 1237 there was a similar outbreak among children 
at Erfurt and many died from exhaustion. The tarantism in 
Italy from the fifteenth to the eighteenth century is another 
example of epidemic hysteria. There were epidemics of hys 
teria in Tennessee, Kentucky, and a part of Virginia, which 


began in 1800 and recurred for a number of years. These out 
breaks started in revivals and camp meetings. The majority 
of the cases were in youths from fifteen to twenty-five years of 
age, but the hysteria was observed in persons from six to sixty 
years old. The muscles affected were those of the neck, trunk, 
and arms, and the convulsions were so strong that the patients 
were thrown to the ground and often leaped about like a live 
fish tossed out of the water on a bank. 

Convulsions, tremors, paralyses of various forms and de 
grees are common in hysteria. In major hysteria the patient 
falls into a convulsion gently. There is checked breathing, up 
to apparent danger of suffocation. Then follows a furious con 
vulsion, even with a bloody froth at the mouth, but there is a 
trace of wilfulness or purpose in the movements. Next may 
come a stage of opisthotonos, in which the body is bent back 
in a rigid arch until the patient rests on her head and heels 
only, like a wrestler; and this is followed by relaxation and a 
recurrence of the contortions. An ecstatic phase succeeds this 
at times, the so-called crucifix position, with outbursts of vari 
ous emotions, and a final regaining of the normal state. Any 
of these stages, however, may constitute the entire fit. Some 
major hysterics can simulate demoniacal possession with ex 
traordinary ingenuity. In minor hysteria there is commonly 
a sensation of a rising ball in the throat the globus hystericus. 
There may be uncontrollable laughter or weeping, and muscular 
rigidity is frequent. The patient, especially if she is a child, 
may mimic dogs and other animals. The snarling, biting, and 
barking of false rabies are hysterical; such symptoms do not 
occur at all in real hydrophobia. 

There are innumerable physical symptoms of the disease, 
but the mental phases have most to do with the treatment. The 
hysterical person is characterized by an overmastering desire 
to be an object of sympathy, interest, admiration, rather than 
by a tendency to baser instincts. The will is weak, the emo 
tions explosive, the patient is impulsive and lacking in self- 
control. She readily goes from absurd laughter into floods of 
tears. She simulates pains and other symptoms of disease, and 


she is always a liar, no matter what her state in life, from 
nurse-girl to nun. 

Acquired hysteria may be cured, but the congenital form 
is virtually hopeless; yet even with this latter kind much can 
be done by patient training. Such a girl or boy must be reared 
carefully and with a firm hand. A marked congenital hysteric 
should not marry. Marriage makes them worse, and they 
beget other hysterics. When a hysterical girl gets one of her 
fits the chief obstacle to cure is sympathetic visits from rela 
tives and friends. If a patient in the vapors is taken from 
school and wept over, she will never come down to earth again. 
The girl who faints at the communion-rail regularly is always 
a hysteric, and the cure for her is a bucket of cold water in the 
sacristy, or a threat to turn her over to the police. You will 
find these fainters with a perfect pulse despite the faint. But 
there are other cases in which rough treatment is harmful, and 
the only method is patient tact. Such persons are objects of 
great pity and should be dealt with as one would deal with any 
deficient mind. 


A JUTE yellow atrophy of the liver in pregnancy was for 
merly called Icterus Gravis. The disease is not neces 
sarily connected with pregnancy, but half the cases are in preg 
nant women, and with them it may appear at any time in ges 
tation or shortly after delivery. Pernicious vomiting, eclamp 
sia, sepsis, chloroform poisoning, typhoid, osteomyelitis, diph 
theria, erysipelas, alcoholism, or phosphorus poisoning in preg 
nant women may end in this acute yellow atrophy. Bendig * 
reported two cases, both fatal, which were caused by syphilis. 

The liver lessens in size, is friable, yellow-streaked, mottled 
with red ; the heart degenerates, and all tissues are stained with 
bile, icteric. If the hepatic atrophy is a consequence of the 
diseases enumerated above, the symptoms of these diseases pre 
cede those of the atrophy. In chloroform poisoning the attack 
may end fatally within six hours, or it may last for five or six 
days before death. 

If a pregnant woman has had gastric catarrh with weak 
ness and headache, and then suddenly becomes delirious, begins 
to toss about the bed with rolling of the head from side to side, 
is jaundiced, shows epigastric tenderness, and a diminution of 
the liver dullness, the diagnosis is almost certain. The re 
flexes are exaggerated, there are minute petechiae on the trunk, 
arms, and legs, the tongue is dry and brown, the breath is foul, 
the pulse is fast and weak, the temperature is usually high 
(102-104 degrees), and the urine shows nephritis. 

The prognosis is always bad. The fetus nearly always dies. 
If the fetus is viable the uterus should be emptied at once even 
if the woman is so near death that the procedure appears use 
less : it may at least give a chance to baptize the infant. Sup- 

1 M unchener medizinische Wochenschrift, August, 1915. 


pose in a particular case a consultant or the physician in charge 
holds that the mother is so ill that therapeutic abortion will 
only hasten her death, yet the fetal heart-sounds can be heard 
through her abdominal wall. In that case I should be in favor 
of performing the abortion to baptize the infant, reluctantly 
permitting the chance of hastening the mother s death. But 
this hastening is by no means certain. 

When a diagnosis of acute yellow atrophy has been made 
the patient should receive the last sacraments as soon as possible. 


A^Y of the acute infections, as typhoid, typhus, smallpox, 
measles, scarlatina, and the others, attacks a pregnant 
woman as readily as one who is not pregnant. Pregnancy, as 
a rule, lessens the resistance to the infection, and the infection 
is likely to cause abortion. The toxin of the infection is added 
to the physiological toxins of pregnancy, the kidneys often are 
overwhelmed, and there is a tendency to hemorrhage. After 
the exhaustion from the disease, delivery, whether premature 
or at term, is liable to end in collapse, especially if the heart 
or lungs have been injured. Puerperal sepsis, either general 
or local, is a common effect of these bacterial diseases. In 
smallpox there is infection from the pustules and the virus 
itself; in typhoid the typhoid bacillus and the streptococci in 
Peyer s patches get into the blood; in influenza, pneumonia, 
erysipelas, and diphtheria the bacteria directly cause sepsis, 
and in scarlatina the pus organisms from the throat are found 
in the septic foci. 

In these infections the fetus may be killed by the high tem 
perature; it may die from asphyxia brought on by feeble ma 
ternal blood-pressure and consequent stagnation of the circula 
tion in the uterine sinuses ; it may be overwhelmed by maternal 
hemorrhage ; by deoxidation of the maternal blood, as in pneu 
monia ; by a hemorrhage in the placenta, and a consequent sep 
aration of the placenta itself from the uterine wall; by fatty 
degeneration of the fetal villi, which renders respiration of 
gases impossible. Again, the child may be infected by the 
disease of the mother, or it may be killed by the toxins in the 
maternal circulation. 

The communication between the fetal and the maternal 
blood systems is as indirect as that between the air in a man s 



lungs and his blood. The communication between mother and 
fetus is by osmosis, but certain toxins, drugs, and bacteria 
may also pass from the maternal to the fetal circulation through 
the placenta. Strychnia injected directly into the embryos of 
animals by Savory and Gussarow killed the mother after pass 
ing to her through the placenta. There is no direct communi 
cation (except by osmosis) between the fetal chorionic villi and 
the maternal intervillous blood spaces. In the first half of 
pregnancy fetal and maternal blood are separated by the syncy- 
tium, Langhan s layer of cells, the stroma of the villi, and the 
walls of the fetal capillaries; in the second half of gestation 
Langhan s layer gradually disappears. In the fetal blood-ves 
sels are found many nucleated red corpuscles, but these are 
lacking in the maternal intervillous spaces. Siinger also dis 
covered that in pernicious leucemia the leucocytes of the mother 
are not present in the fetal circulation. 

That gaseous substances pass through the fetal barrier of 
tissues was proved by Zweifel, Cohnstein, and Zuntz. Zweifel 
showed that chloroform administered to the mother rapidly 
reaches the fetus. As early as 1817, Mayer proved the passage 
of cyanide of potassium. Since then we have been made cer 
tain of the transmission of iodide and ferrocyanide of potas 
sium, salicylic acid, bichloride of mercury, methylene blue, and 
many other substances. Kronig and Futh, in 1901, determined 
that the maternal and the fetal blood freeze at the same tem 
perature, which indicates that they possess equal osmotic power, 
and that osmosis may occur in either direction. 

Some bacteria do not get through to the fetus, but a few 
do get in. Tubercle bacilli were found in the fetus by Birch- 
Hirschfeld l in 1891, and Schmorl 2 demonstrated them in 50 
per cent, of the placentas in one series of examinations. Bar 
and Renon 3 found them in the blood of the umbilical cord in 
two of five cases. Actual congenital tuberculosis is possible, 
though very exceptional: the bacteria either pass through the 
wall between mother and fetus, or destroy this wall and then 

1 Arbciten d. pathologisch. Instit. zu Leipsig. Jena, 1891. 
1 Miinchener medizinische Wochenschrift, 1904, vol. li, p. 1676. 
1 L Obstetrique, vol. i, p. 69. 


get in. Smallpox, measles, and scarlatina, the causes of which 
have not yet been demonstrated; typhoid, cholera Asiatica, 
pneumonia, bubonic plague, erysipelas, pus infection, anthrax, 
syphilis, febris recurrens, and malaria have already been dem 
onstrated in the fetus. Lynch of Johns Hopkins collected six 
teen cases of typhoid in the fetus. I found the typhoid bacillus 
in the liver and kidneys of a still-born fetus whose mother was 
ill with typhoid fever; this case was not among those collected 
by Lynch. 

The majority of writers give unfavorable prognoses for 
typhoid in pregnancy. Abortion or premature labor is ex 
tremely common, with great danger to the mother s life. When 
labor begins in these cases the last sacraments should be ad 
ministered early. Therapeutic abortion in typhoid is very 
likely to cause death, yet a number of women recover after 
abortion. As regards the woman s life, cases of premature 
labor have a worse prognosis than early abortion. The greatest 
danger is while the fever is high, and abortion is commoner in 
the first week of fever than in the second or third. In pro 
tracted typhoid abortion is likely to occur in the fourth week 
or later. After defervescence the prognosis is better, but there 
is always danger. Different physicians have markedly vary 
ing results. There is no medical condition where skill in the 
physician counts more than in typhoid; it is the supreme test 
of the therapeutist. Sacquin 4 collected from various sources 
the statistics of 233 cases of pregnancy during typhoid, and 
abortion or premature labor occurred in 150 of these, with 
death in 16 per cent. Many skilful men have a mortality as 
low as 3 per cent, in typhoid not complicated with pregnancy. 

The subject of typhoid is too vast for complete treatment 
here : the article on Typhoid in the American edition of Noth- 
nagel s Encyclopedia of Practical Medicine covers 472 large 
octavo pages. A very important point is not to mistake typhoid 
for a septicemia in its early stage. A Widal reaction should 
be made in apparently septic cases to exclude typhoid. Some 
times, however, a streptococcic infection will give a positive 

4 These. Nancy, 1885. 


Widal, and there may be a mixed typhoid and streptococcic in 

Smallpox in pregnancy causes abortion or premature 
labor in the majority of cases, and the child usually dies. The 
child may be born in the eruptive stage, or pockmarked. Frank 
lin reported a case where a vaccinated woman was delivered of 
a child while her husband was in the house ill with smallpox. 
The mother did not take the infection, but the child was born 
dead of smallpox : the contagion had passed to the child through 
the unaffected mother. Vaccinated women at times bear chil 
dren which are after birth immune to vaccinia and smallpox 
vaccinia, in the commonly held opinion at present, is an at 
tenuated smallpox. Pregnant women should be vaccinated, 
when there is smallpox in their neighborhood, to protect them 
selves and their children, unless they have been successfully 
vaccinated within four or five years. 

Vaccination prevents smallpox in more than 90 per cent, of 
the exposures to the disease. The death-rate was 58 per cent, in 
the unvaccinated cases and 16 per cent, in the vaccinated in a 
group of 5000 cases of smallpox studied by Welch in 1894. 
During the eighteenth century, according to Bernouilli s cal 
culation, one-twelfth of all the children born succumbed to this 
disease. In 1707, in Iceland, 18,000 of the entire population 
of 50,000 died of smallpox. As late as 1885, 3164 persons 
died of the disease in Montreal in one epidemic brought on at 
a time when vaccination had been neglected. In Prussia, from 
1851 to 1860, without compulsory vaccination for civilians, 
there were 36,577 deaths from smallpox; in the Prussian army 
during the same time, with compulsory vaccination, there were 
only fourteen deaths. During the war of 1870 the French 
armies, without vaccination, lost 23,469 men from smallpox; 
the German armies lost only 459 men and there was a great epi 
demic of the disease in Germany at the time. 

The efficiency and necessity of vaccination against small 
pox, which is as virulent now as it ever was, is so certainly 
established that a parent or guardian who neglects or refuses 
to have children vaccinated when exposed to the disease is 
guilty of homicide through neglect if an unvaccinated child 


under his care dies of smallpox. Revaccination is necessary 
every eighth year if smallpox reappears. Agitation against vac 
cination is not mere ignorance: it is a dangerous crime, ex 
actly like loosing a mad dog; and it is combined with the in 
solence of ignorance. Persons who have seen smallpox are 
very much afraid of it, because it is one of the most dreadful 
afflictions humanity is exposed to; those who have not seen it, 
yet say they are not afraid of it, are mere fools. 

A pregnant woman who is infected with smallpox should 
receive the last sacraments as soon as possible. If she aborts 
she may die very quickly in collapse. If she is evidently in 
articulo mortis and the fetal heart can be heard, her cervix 
should be forcibly dilated, the child turned, and delivered for 
baptism. If the physician waits for death, the child will be 
dead also, and sectional delivery will be too late for any good. 

Pneumonia in pregnancy is a rare but very dangerous dis 
ease. In one series of 13,611 pregnancies there were 120 cases 
of pneumonia eight-tenths of one per cent. ; in another series 
of 1842 pregnancies two and three-tenths had pneumonia. 
Wallich, 5 in a study of the mortality of this condition, found 
that pneumonia causes abortion in one-third of the cases that 
occur during the first six months of gestation, and in two-thirds 
of the cases that happen between the sixth month and term. 
On the third day of the pneumonia the abortions are most 
likely to occur. The maternal mortality varies between 50 and 
100 per cent, in the groups studied, and the fetal mortality is 
80 per cent, in general, but about 40 per cent, for viable fetuses. 
The large size of the uterus in the last months of pregnancy 
interferes with the descent of the diaphragm in respiration, and 
the heart is likely to fail. The more advanced the pregnancy, 
the greater the danger to both mother and child from pneu 
monia. Among the dangers to the child is the imperfect oxy- 
genation of its blood, and in a few cases the pneumococci reach 
the fetus. 

Randall, in a study of 190 pregnant women who had pneu 
monia, found a somewhat lower mortality than that observed 
by Wallich. In Randall s series 70 died (36.7 per cent.) ; of 

Annales de Gynecologic. June, 1889 


118 who did not abort, only 12 died (10.7 per cent.). In a 
second group of 352 cases abortion happened in 58.8 per cent 
Of 144 patients in the first six months of gestation, 22.08 per 
cent, died, but of those that aborted 52.08 per cent. died. 
Again, of 164 cases in the last three months, 30.49 per cent, 
died, but 70.12 per cent, died of those that aborted during these 
three months. Of 82 that aborted, 87.8 per cent. died. The 
mortality in women under 25 years of age was 13.33 per cent. ; 
in women from 25 to 35 years, 23.2 per cent.; over 35, 22 per 

Pneumonia in pregnancy is made worse by the mechanical 
interference with respiration brought about by the enlarge 
ment of the uterus, and the heart, which is overburdened in 
ordinary pneumonia, is still more exhausted by the additional 
strain of pregnancy in the pneumonia of gestation; moreover, 
the lungs, which are obliged to do enhanced labor in pregnancy 
in eliminating, are clogged by the pneumonia; it would seem, 
then, that, if the fetus is viable, the womb should be emptied 
to give the mother a better chance for recovery. Statistics, 
however, are against therapeutic abortion. The evacuation of 
the uterus determines blood to the inflamed lungs, which are 
already overburdened. The exhaustion of labor weakens the 
patient, and makes her liable to general septic infection. Mat- 
ton 6 found that in eighteen cases where pregnancy was arti 
ficially interrupted, nine women died (50 per cent.) ; while in 
twenty cases where no interference was attempted, only one 
woman died. This comparison is not exact, perhaps, because 
we do not know the gravity of the infection in each group, 
but in any consideration the difference is remarkable. In a 
group studied by Chatelain 7 the results in natural and arti 
ficial delivery were virtually the same. Inasmuch as thera 
peutic abortion at the best is no better than non-interference, 
there is no justification for therapeutic abortion, unless in un 
usual circumstances. 

Pneumonia is an infectious disease, and a pregnant woman 
should, for her own sake and the sake of the fetus, avoid ex- 

* Jour, de Med. de Bruxelles, 1872, p. 412. 

T Hid., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 430, 516, and vol. li, p. 11. 


posure to infection. When the disease is present the last sacra 
ments should not be deferred, as it may be impossible to make 
a confession when near death. 

Influenza in pregnancy is more severe than it is in the non- 
gravid state. By the laity, and sometimes even by physicians, 
influenza is confused with la grippe, but there is an influenza 
vera and an influenza nostras, or la grippe, and this latter is 
not nearly so serious a disease. The real influenza is caused 
by a specific bacillus; it appears in epidemics which have a 
tendency to become pandemic, and then the disease disappears 
for a generation. La grippe is a bronchitis or coryza with some 
fever and muscle-soreness. True influenza (the name is Ital 
ian, influenza di freddo) is very infectious. The pandemic of 
1889-90 started in Turkestan in June, 1889, and by October, 
1890, influenza had gone westward and encircled the earth 
along the trade routes. The preceding pandemic occurred in 

There is no clear proof that pregnant women are especially 
liable to infection by influenza, but there is always a notable 
fall in the birth-rate after marked epidemics of the disease. 
This has been observed in France, Germany, and Switzerland. 
When it does occur in pregnancy it is likely to cause abortion. 
Pasquier, as early as 1410, noticed this fact. The disease is 
likely to cause hemorrhage from the uterus in non-gravid 
women, especially in those who are past the climacteric, and 
menorrhagia in younger women who are not pregnant. Moel- 
ler 8 found abortion or premature labor in 28.3 per cent, of 
twenty-one severe cases. In severe influenza where there is 
diffuse capillary bronchitis, pleuropneuinoiiia, or spasmodic 
cough, abortion is most likely to occur, and such abortion is 
always dangerous. The hemorrhages in abortions from influ 
enza are often alarmingly profuse. 

In threatened respiratory or cardiac failure in influenza 
complicating pregnancy there may be question of therapeutic 
abortion, but in such an event great care must be taken to avoid 
exhaustion and shock. The child should be extracted; the 
woman should not be made to labor. One of the important 

* Dcutsch. med. Wochenscli., 1900, No. 28. 


moral considerations in this matter of influenza and preg 
nancy is that the woman commits grave sin if she needlessly 
exposes herself to infection, because of the danger to the child s 
life and the risk of its loss without baptism, and also because 
of the danger to her own life. 

Scarlatina (Italian scarlattina, Low Latin febris scarla 
tina), or Scarlet Fever, is very rare in pregnancy. Popularly, 
scarlatina is used for a light form of scarlet fever, as varioloid 
is used for a light attack of smallpox; but physicians do not 
make this distinction between scarlatina and scarlet fever: they 
use the terms synonymously. In Nothnagel s Encyclopedia of 
Practical Medicine Juergensen has an elaborate discussion off 
the differentiation between genuine scarlet fever in the puer- 
perium and the relatively frequent septic erythema found in 
that state, but the received opinion now is that real scarlet 
fever is very rare in pregnancy. Those who report large num 
bers of scarlet fever cases in pregnancy err in diagnosis. 

The mortality in the scarlatina of pregnancy may be very 
high 52 per cent, in some epidemics; and if the infection 
happens immediately after delivery, the mortality is still higher. 
A septic rash is sometimes mistaken for scarlatina, but where 
the genuine disease is present the pregnant woman is gravely 
obliged to avoid exposure to it, both for her own sake and for 
that of the fetus. In the early months of gestation scarlatina 
commonly causes abortion. 

Measles in pregnancy is also very rare, but when it does 
occur it is a serious disease. Gestation is interrupted in 55 
per cent, of the cases, and the mortality is 15 per cent, for the 
women. The same moral and related conditions that obtain 
in scarlatina are found in measles. There is a marked tend 
ency to hemorrhage and pneumonia. Of eleven cases re 
ported by Klotz, 9 nine aborted. 

In epidemics of Asiatic cholera the mortality among preg 
nant women is extremely high. In the Hamburg epidemic of 
1897, fifty-seven per cent, of the pregnant women affected died. 
Abortion is very frequent because of the hemorrhagic endome- 
tritis. The mortality for all patients in Asiatic cholera is very 
* Archiv. f. Gyn., vol. xxix, p. 448. 


great almost 50 per cent, at the beginning of the epidemic. 

Typhus fever is the ship or famine fever of 1847. It is very 
rare now. "When it does occur it is about three times as fatal 
as typhoid. It is a disease of poverty and war, and is spread 
largely by the body-louse, as happened in Serbia in 1915. 
Skilled hygiene, however, soon gains control of the epidemic. 

Erysipelas in pregnancy is rare, but not infrequent after 
delivery. In the puerperium it appears commonly as a septic 
infection in abrasions about the parturient canal. When it 
starts on the face, scalp, or breast the prognosis is relatively 
favorable, but even then it causes death ; when it starts on the 
genitalia it has a mortality of 43 per cent. Erysipelas causes 
abortion. As it begins from pus bacteria, it is not seen so fre 
quently now as formerly, owing to greater attention to asepsis. 
In the puerperium it is often an infection brought on by dirty 
midwives or physicians. 

Malaria, if severe, may interrupt gestation through fever 
or cachexia. During labor in such cases the uterine action is 
feeble, and hemorrhages are common after delivery. By proper 
treatment during pregnancy these evils can be averted. The 
infection is spread from one malaria patient to another by 
a mosquito (Anopheles), as yellow fever is spread by another 
mosquito (Stegomyia fasciata). 

Pulmonary tuberculosis in pregnancy is somewhat fre 
quent; the estimate is that about 32,000 tubercular women be 
come pregnant annually in the United States ; and obstetricians 
incline to the opinion that pregnancy commonly, though not 
always, makes the tuberculosis worse. Nearly all agree that 
the combined effect of pregnancy, the puerperium, and lacta 
tion is a grave burden on the consumptive and lowers the power 
of resistance. 

Trembley of the Saranac Lake Sanitarium reported that 
63 per cent, of 240 tubercular married women under his ob 
servation gave a history which showed that the disease was 
first recognized during pregnancy or the puerperium. Schauta s 
clinic found such origins in 29 per cent. Fisberg, Funk, 
Jacob, Panwitz, and other observers, in a series of 1100 cases. 


said 39 per cent, of these women thought the disease began 
during pregnancy or the puerperium. 

Some tubercular women during pregnancy give no clinical 
evidence of an aggravation of the pulmonary disease, but these 
cases are exceptional. Tubercular women who apparently im 
prove during pregnancy are likely to have a subsequent detri 
mental reaction. As tubercular cases, however, are prone to 
show exacerbations even if not pregnant, it is not possible to say 
that pregnancy is the sole cause of the progressive lesions in par 
ticular instances. Where there are no wide or deep areas of 
infection, there may be no recognizable damage from preg 
nancy, but advanced and active tuberculosis, with fever or cav 
ity formation, does badly, especially if the throat is involved. 
The pressure of the enlarged uterus causes dyspnoea ; the cough 
and fever may bring on miscarriage. Miscarriage, however, is 
rare in tuberculosis; it is more common in cardiac and renal 
diseases. Bernheim, in a series of 315 tubercular pregnancies, 
found that abortion occurred in 23 per cent. The later in ges 
tation the tuberculosis becomes florid, the more likely it is that 
abortion will happen. Conception may take place at any stage 
of the tuberculosis, although women in the final stage are com 
monly sterile. Sometimes a woman will give birth to a sound 
child and die herself of tuberculosis a few days after the parturi 

Pregnancy in consumptive women is not necessarily detri 
mental to each particular patient, nor is it, as a rule, a justi 
fication for emptying the uterus of even the viable fetus. Even 
when the tubercular condition grows worse during pregnancy 
it is not always possible to prove that the pregnancy itself is 
the cause of the deterioration. If the woman conceives in the 
final stage of pulmonary tuberculosis she will die, whether she 
goes on to term or not. Bonney 10 describes three cases of ad 
vanced pulmonary tuberculosis which were cured during preg 
nancy, by the bodily changes peculiar to that condition, but 
such results are altogether exceptional. 

Artificially induced premature labor sometimes causes more 
damage than normal parturition at term. Much depends upon 

"Pulmonary Tuberculosis, p. 550. Philadelphia, 1908. 


the methods used for the induction of the abortion. The in 
sertion of bougies, catheters, or sounds is always contraindi- 
cated in advanced tuberculosis. Hirst of the University of 
Pennsylvania n thinks the notion that tubercular women im 
prove in pregnancy is "a superstition," and that such women 
should neither marry nor have children. De Lee 12 holds that 
tubercular women should not marry because the woman is likely 
to infect her husband and children. He thinks the disease 
grows worse in pregnancy, and that hemorrhage is frequent ex 
cept in chronic ulcerative tuberculosis. In this last condition 
pregnancy does not ordinarily aggravate the condition. In tu 
bercular laryngitis complicating pregnancy, Kiittner found the 
mortality to be 90 per cent. Such laryngitis is usually fatal, 
whether pregnancy is present or not. When there is a miscar 
riage in tuberculosis, the infection often becomes florid and re 
sembles pneumonia. Advanced cases have a tedious and dan 
gerous labor, with dyspnoea and occasionally hemorrhage or 
cardiac exhaustion. Edema of the lungs is not infrequent. 

Williams of Johns Hopkins University, in the 1903 edition 
of his Obstetrics, tells of a woman who died of tuberculous peri 
tonitis a short time after parturition. The uterus was studded 
with tubercles and its interior was covered with tuberculous 
ulcers. The tubercle bacillus had been found in cultures taken 
from the interior of the uterus during life. Her child was 
born perfectly healthy and remained so. Williams says in the 
same place that the induction of premature labor because of 
tuberculosis is justifiable only in the interests of the child, and 
this only in those rare cases in which the woman is so ill that 
she probably will die before term. Norris 13 of Philadelphia 
agrees with Williams that induction of premature labor is use 
less, and he says all authorities unite in this opinion. 

A tubercular woman should not nurse her infant because 
she will infect it and exhaust herself. Infants are very sus 
ceptible to tuberculosis. Birch-Hi rschf eld, in 1891, first dem 
onstrated tuberculosis in the fetus, and Schmorl found it in 

11 A Text-look of Obstetrics, p. 427. Philadelphia, 1912. 
a The Principles and Practice of Obstetrics, p. 480. Philadelphia, 

11 Pennsylvania Medical Journal, February, 1916. 


the placenta in 50 per cent, of a series of cases that he ex 
amined. Infection of the child in uiero, however, is extremely 
rare even by the placental way. There is a high death-rate 
from tuberculosis among infants, but the infection is postnatal. 
Dietrich of Berlin found that the death-rate from tuberculosis 
among children in Prussia is higher during the first year of 
life than in any other year. 

The moral conclusion is that artificial abortion in preg 
nancy complicated with tuberculosis is never indicated except 
when the good of the child is at stake in the last stage of gesta 



SYPHILIS in pregnancy at times assumes peculiar malig 
nancy. The virulence depends on the patient s power of 
resistance, and whether or not there are septic microorganisms 
mixed with the syphilitic spirochetes. There are, moreover, 
varying strains of spirochetes which differ in virulence, or 
there are familial idiosyncrasies. Tropical syphilis is worse 
than northern infections, and syphilis of the nervous system 
is often incurable. Fournier was of the opinion that a syphi 
litic woman who becomes pregnant is more likely to abort than 
a pregnant woman who becomes syphilitic. The percentage of 
fetal deaths is also greater in the first class than in the second. 
The longer a woman has been syphilitic, provided she has not 
been treated for the disease, the worse the prognosis for the 
duration of the pregnancy and the life of the fetus. The ear 
lier in pregnancy the syphilis appears, the worse the prognosis 
for gestation. General fetal mortality in syphilis under the 
best circumstances is 75 per cent. Syphilis should be looked 
for in every case where the cause of an abortion is not evident. 
Huge holds that in 83 per cent, of repeated abortions syphilis 
is at fault ; late abortions are characteristic of this disease. 

Inoculation with syphilis before conception almost always 
results in abortion. In 130 women studied by Le Pileur there 
were 3.8 per cent, still-births before infection by syphilis, but 
78 per cent, after infection. In premature labor the child is, 
as a rule, born dead ; less frequently it is born syphilitic ; still 
less frequently it is born apparently sound, but the syphilis 
appears later; in a few cases, when the maternal syphilis is 
old, the child may be born normal. Interruption of gestation 
is the commonest symptom in syphilis complicating pregnancy. 



The labor itself is affected: the pains are weak and tardy. 
Abnormal presentations occur frequently when the fetus is 
dead. Chancres on the cervix may cause obstruction, and there 
may be indurations so dense as to necessitate cesarean delivery. 
The perineum may become so friable as to tear, as De Lee 
says, "like wet paper." 

When the mother is infected at the time of conception the 
child is always syphilitic. If the mother is infected early in 
pregnancy the child is almost always infected. If she is in 
fected late in pregnancy the child may escape infection. Men 
with tertiary syphilis have begotten children without, to all 
clinical appearance, inoculating the wife. In such a case the 
mother may nurse the child with safety to herself, but the 
child will infect a wet nurse other than its own mother, and 
in very rare instances mothers in this condition have been 
floridly infected. The condition here described is called Colles s 
Law. 1 The doctrine of Colles s Law has fallen into dis 
use because we can now demonstrate by the "Wassermann re 
action that almost all apparently healthy mothers of this class 
are in reality infected. The term now used is "Syphilis by 
Conception." 2 The virus passes through the fetal placenta to 
the mother, although immunizing substances are held back by 
the placenta. A fetus cannot make immunizing bodies before 
its eighth month, and on that account the earlier the fetus is 
infected, the more likely it is to die. Recently, however, some 
scanty testimony has been collected which sustains Colles s 
Law in a few cases. Ledermann reported three cases, and 
Nonne others, in which the wives of men with tabes or paralysis 
bore syphilitic children and yet never responded positively 
themselves to the Wassermann test, or showed any symptoms 
suggesting syphilis. To this list Kroon 3 adds a case corre 
sponding fully to the requirements of Colles s Law. A woman 
of twenty-eight years who had had eight abortions was de 
livered of a child with undoubted congenital, syphilis. The 
child s father had been infected with syphilis twelve years be- 

1 From Abraham Colles, Dublin, 1837. 

Wolff, 1879. 

1 Nederlandisch Tijdschrift voor OeneesJcunde, i, 9. 


fore. The woman showed no signs of syphilis, two Wasser- 
mann tests were negative, and she nursed the child without 
injury to herself. 

Should the husband have florid primary or secondary syph 
ilis, and infect his wife at impregnation, abortion is the rule. 
The commonest cases are those where the husband has been 
treated for syphilis more or less thoroughly before marriage. 
Even if at the time of impregnation the husband has no ap 
parent infective lesion, the child is usually syphilitic, or it may 
show signs of the disease later in life. Ibsen s Ghosts is 
founded on a case like this. If the syphilis is recent, or un- 
cured, the child dies, macerates, and is expelled. These con 
ditions recur in pregnancy after pregnancy, until the virus is 
removed by time or drugs. As the nucleus of the spermatozoon 
is too small to carry the spirochete of syphilis, the infection is 
through the semen in a manner not yet clear to us. 

Wolff * studied a group of nine syphilitic women and their 
children. There were sixty-six pregnancies, but only thirty- 
three viable children were born. Of these last fourteen died 
in childhood, three committed suicide at twelve, twenty, and 
twenty-eight years of age; and of the thirteen still living only 
two were normal. The others are all feeble-minded, epileptic, 
hysteric, or otherwise neurotic. Post 5 tabulated the mortality 
in thirty syphilitic families in which there were 168 preg 
nancies. Of these fifty-three ended in still-birth or miscar 
riage and there were forty-four early deaths a total loss of 
57 per cent. Of the children that were born alive 38 per cent, 
are now dead, and of the seventy-one that are alive only thirty- 
nine are apparently healthy. There are very many cases of 
diseased children and adults with serious lesions of obscure 
etiology, and in a great number of instances of anemia, mal 
nutrition, extreme nervousness, aortitis, bone diseases, vague 
pain, and similar conditions, the origin is congenital syphilis. 
Stoll, 8 in sixty-eight such cases, found a positive luetin syphi 
litic reaction, and a positive Wassermann in 17 per cent. 

4 Zeitschr. f. klinisch. Med., vol. Ixxvi. Berlin. 

* Boston Med. and Surg. Jour., vol. clvii, n. 4. 

* Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., October 31, 1914. 


Gottheil, 7 professor of dermatology and syphilography in 
Fordham University, holds that if a man has gone through a 
modern treatment for syphilis, given hy a competent physician 
and extended over three years, and if during the fourth year, 
without treatment, he repeatedly shows a negative Wasser- 
mann reaction, he may marry. That is the common opinion 
of physicians, hut it is decidedly erroneous. 

In one series of 562 cases of hereditary syphilis observed hy 
the great syphilographer Fournier, sixty children, or over 10 
per cent., were infected more than six years after the primary 
parental inoculation. He tells of one woman who had nineteen 
consecutive still-births from syphilis. Gowers 8 says: "There 
is no evidence that the disease ever is or ever has been cured, 
the word disease being hero used to designate that which 
causes the various manifestations of the malady." This state 
ment is too sweeping, but it is very near the truth. 

Brulms recently reported the outcome of the Wassermann 
test repeated about yearly from 1908 to 1915 in one hundred 
private cases infected with syphilis ten or more years before 
the time of the report. In forty-two the test was constantly 
negative; in thirty-two, positive at first but negative later; in 
seven, constantly positive notwithstanding repeated courses of 
treatment; in three, positive at first, then long negative, but 
finally changing to positive again; in eight, negative at first, 
then positive, and finally negative; and in eight, negative at 
first but finally positive. The last three groups are particularly 
significant. In some the long negative reaction, for five or six 
years, indicated cure, and physicians would pronounce such 
cases positively cured; but suddenly they changed to a positive 
reaction without any clinical manifestations showing at the 
time. After renewed courses of treatment in the following two 
years the reaction became negative. Among the cases with con 
stant negative reaction there were some who developed brain 
syphilis, or tabes, proving that they w r ere not cured despite the 
absence of clinical manifestations of the disease and the nega- 

T Forchheimer s Therapeusis of Internal Diseases, vol. ii, p. 421. 
New York, 1913. 

"Syphilis and the Nervous System, 1892. 


tive Wassermann reactions. Professor Blaschko of Berlin, at 
the seventeenth International Medical Congress in 1913, in the 
presence of Ehrlich, Wassermann and Hata, said no one could 
even talk of a cure of syphilis until an interval of ten years 
without symptoms had occurred. Where a blood Wassermann 
is negative a spinal fluid reaction may be positive. 

In from 60 to 75 per cent, of all cases of tabes or paresis 
members of the family other than the patient have shown in 
fection. The proportion of infections in the families of tabetics 
and paretics is far larger than that found in families in which 
the syphilis does not go on to these extremes. Tabes is also 
called locomotor ataxia. It is a degeneration of a part of the 
spinal cord, with unsteadiness and incoordination of motion, 
lightning pains, disorders of vision, and other symptoms. Par 
esis is softening of the brain, with insanity and death. 

These and other facts strongly indicate that the form of 
syphilis which ends in tabes or paresis remains infectious over 
a much longer time than ordinary syphilis does. No one has 
cured either tabes or paresis. Raven reported in 1914 an in 
vestigation of ninety families in each of which a case of 
metalues had developed. The interval between the date of in 
fection and the marriage was known in about half of these, and 
it was four years in two families, five years in one, and from 
six to twenty-one years in ten! Fournier, in 4400 cases of 
syphilis, saw three cases where the tertiary symptoms appeared 
fifty years after infection, and in one case fifty-five years after 
infection. Bonnet 9 reported such a case which came to him 
for treatment fifty-four years after infection. The man had no 

Syphilis that affects the nervous system as in tabes and 
paresis is an incurable syphilis, and there is no means whereby 
any physician, no matter how skilful he may be, can tell whether 
or not a given patient has such an infection. The physician, 
then, who tells a syphilitic that he or she is cured and lets such 
a person marry is responsible for all the evils that result from 
his rashness. Once a syphilitic, not necessarily always a syphi 
litic; but once a syphilitic, possibly and probably always a 

* Lyon Med., Novembe: 7, 1907. 

syphilitic, and that no matter what the treatment or the lack 
of clinical symptoms. Damaged goods of this kind are to be 
looked upon as damaged goods forever. 

Any man or woman, then, who has ever had a clear case 
of syphilis (and the diagnosis is easy, as a rule) is likely to 
be for the remainder of life a source of syphilitic infection. 
There is even question of late of spirochete-carriers, as there 
are typhoid-carriers and diphtheria-carriers, who may infect 
others while not suffering themselves. If one who has been a 
syphilitic marries without informing the other party to the con 
tract of the condition, the injustice is, without doubt, very 
grave. I should call such concealment a mortal sin, and a con 
dition exposing the sacrament to sacrilege. 

Suppose the second party is informed of the old infection 
and is then foolish enough to risk the marriage. No one but 
an experienced physician has any notion of the indescribable 
horror that may come of taking this risk, and no one has the 
right to expose his own body to infection by syphilis for the 
advantage of marriage. There is no approach to a juridic 
equilibrium between these two conditions. If in such a mar 
riage children are begotten and infected, (1) embryos will die 
without baptism; (2) later possible children will be born who 
will die of congenital syphilis; (3) possible children who will 
escape syphilis; (4) children who may have to pass through 
tabes or paresis to death, after begetting other degenerates. 

A syphilitic embryo which dies without baptism is better 
than no child at all. It will live in a state of natural happiness 
after abortion. A baptized child which has congenital syphilis 
is immeasurably better off than a sound child that lacks bap 
tism. Eugenics as a prudent investigation of conditions before 
marriage is a good thing; eugenics as the drivel of agitators, 
who cannot tell the difference between a gentleman and a corn- 
fed hog, is quite another thing. The marriage, therefore, of a 
person who has been syphilitic to one who knows or does not 
know of this condition gets its mortality chiefly from the damage 
to one of the contracting parties which is imminent. It is 
difficult to estimate the morality of the act as it refers to the 
children infected congenitally, and to society. 


The natural order, charity, justice, and related principles 
give every child the right to be born with bodily health, if such 
an event is possible. If it is not possible in particular circum 
stances, then melius esse quam non esse, and the decision in 
each case depends on its own qualities. 

If a physician knows that a person who has been infected 
with syphilis is about to marry, should the physician warn the 
innocent party? 

There are several conditions: (1) the infected person about 
to marry may be actively infectious; (2) the person may be 
probably infective, as any one is who has once had syphilis; 
(3) the physician may know the fact of the infection officially 
or unofficially; (4) the infective person may have gone to the 
physician for treatment for a condition not connected with the 
syphilis say, for a bronchitis or a broken bone and the phy 
sician in the examination discovers syphilis. 

Again, there are various kinds of secrets. St. Alphonsus 
Liguori 10 classifies secrets in three groups: (1) natural; (2) 
promised; (3) entrusted secrets. A natural secret is one which 
obliges us in justice to observe it if divulging it will gravely 
injure any one in reputation or possessions. We are not obliged 
to observe a secret of this kind at the risk of our lives unless 
the damage from the divulging would affect the community 
gravely. A promised secret obliges to silence either gravely or 
lightly, according to the intention of the promiser. Where 
reasonable doubt exists as to grave obligation, such obligation 
does not exist. A promise to secrecy made even under oath is 
not binding if one is obliged in justice to reveal the secret; 
therefore we must testify to the crime of another when a judge 
legitimately demands our testimony, even if we have promised 
not to tell anything. If a secret is entrusted to one, and divulg 
ing would cause grave damage, but justice, or similar circum 
stances, do not oblige us to reveal it, we are bound to observe 
it even when questioned by legitimate authority. Then we may 
answer we know nothing about it, at least for revelation. St. 
Alphonsus s text is : "Potes respondere te nihil scire, scilicet ad 
revelandum." His meaning seems to be: "You may say you 

" Theologia Moralis, iv, n. 970 et seq. 


know nothing about the matter inquired into." Any other 
signification would bo futile. To say literally, "I do not know 
anything I may tell," would only expose one to punishment 
for contempt. He seems to make the answer a conventional 
denial, like the "not guilty" of a criminal. A judge may not 
abrogate the natural right by which an entrusted secret is pro 
tected, unless the secret is already known in some other way, 
or there is a just cause for revealing it. 11 

When an entrusted secret, however, which is also called a 
strict or absolutely natural secret, is imparted expressly or 
tacitly, say, to physicians, lawyers, or priests, and becomes a 
professional secret, it obliges more strictly than any other. 
There are four conditions under which such an entrusted secret 
may be revealed, at least without mortal sin (except by a con 
fessor) : (1) If we have the presumed consent of the principal. 
(2) If the material of the secret is trivial, or if it is known 
from another source, or is already public. Is it a mortal sin 
to divulge a grave entrusted secret to a responsible person who 
is under the same bond ? St. Alphonsus, De Lugo, and others 
say probably it is not, provided the secret is not divulged to 
the particular person from whom the principal wished it to be 
concealed. The term probably here is technical and refers more 
to the absolute truth of an assertion than to its practical ap 
plication. (3) One might reveal such a secret without mortal 
sin, through inadvertence or thoughtlessness, or under the sup 
position that it is not a grave secret. Some moralists hold, 
however, that to excuse from mortal sin, the revealer must be 
certain that the matter of the secret is not grave. (4) Such a 
secret may be revealed if keeping it would cause public injury, 
or injury to an innocent person, or injury to the person to 
whom the secret has been entrusted; then the law of charity 
demands that it be revealed. Therefore, even if one has bound 
himself under oath, he may reveal the secret always excepting 
a priest or confessor. This is the common doctrine of moral 
theologians. It is for the common good of human society that 
entrusted secrets be absolutely kept unless so grave a damage 
befalls another from such observance that it becomes more con- 
" Cf. De Lugo, De Justitia et Jure, disp. 14, n. 141. 


ducive to the public good to reveal than to conceal. To let an 
infective syphilitic, for example, spread his contagion merely 
because an entrusted secret should be kept is a much greater 
damage to the public than a good. 

Barrett 12 says a physician may not divulge the diseases 
of a family to an insurance company unless the family as 
sents ; he may not tell the man before marriage that the woman 
had been operated upon, say, for ovariotomy, unless the woman 
gives permission ; nor may he let the woman know, before mar 
riage, of those diseases of the man which are not contagious. 
He says further that if a man has had syphilis and is now com 
pletely cured, the physician may not reveal this previous con 
dition to the woman. 

That doctrine about ovariotomy, if it includes double 
ovariotomy, is disputed by physicians because, they say, such a 
woman is sterile and she knowingly is going to deprive the 
man of his chances of having children ; secondly, a woman upon 
whom double ovariotomy has been performed is almost always 
a neurasthenic invalid with a marked tendency to insanity, and 
it is a grave injustice to any man to saddle such a degenerate 
upon him for life by treachery. The prospective injury to 
the man is so great that the physician should first try to induce 
the woman to divulge her condition, and if she does not, the 
physician at least may divulge it. 

Secondly, I deny most emphatically that any physician can 
tell that a man who once has had syphilis is completely cured 
and is not a source of infection. The facts I have cited in this 
chapter prove conclusively that once a syphilitic always prob 
ably a syphilitic, and the risk is always so great that the phy 
sician is obliged first to insist that the man does not marry, 
and if the man persists the physician may let the woman 
know. If preparations for the marriage have been made pub 
licly, the physician will, as a rule, for his pains from the woman 
and her family get only a rebuff and the woman will later get 
her syphilis more or less certainly. If the man is actively in 
fective the physician is bound to let the woman know, through 

u Sabetti-Barrett, Compend. Theol. Moral., n. 565. New York, 

her confessor if no other way presents, provided the man can 
not be frightened out of his scoundrel ism. If nothing else 
avails, the physician would be justified in reporting such a 
man to the Board of Health or the sanitary police. Barrett 
says the physician may be excused from divulging that the man 
has infective syphilis if such a revelation would cause the phy 
sician to lose the confidence of his patients. It never does have 
such an effect, although physicians constantly expose such cases 
in the interests of humanity. Because a man who is apparently 
cured of syphilis may or may not infect the woman, this doubt 
probably excuses the physician from the strict obligation of 
divulging the condition, although he may tell her if he wishes 
to do so, salvo meliore consilio, as far as the release from strict 
obligation to divulge is concerned. 

If a patient with syphilis goes to a physician for the treat 
ment of some other physical disability, and the physician dis 
covers the syphilis in the course of the examination, this knowl 
edge of the syphilis would be a tacitly entrusted secret. 
Whether, however, a secret that a man is actively infective 
or very probably infective is entrusted either tacitly or directly, 
it is not a privileged secret owing to the danger or certainty 
of extraordinary calamity to the innocent second party. 

The fact that in these cases of active or latent syphilis the 
disease has been acquired criminally does not in itself affect 
the state of the question one way or another a criminal syphi 
litic has a right to his reputation and goods despite his moral 
condition; but even where the disease has been acquired with 
out moral guilt the syphilitic is always a formally or mate 
rially unjust aggressor in a prospective marriage to an inno 
cent and uninfected woman, and is to be treated accordingly. 
If a woman may kill an unjust aggressor in defence of her 
chastity, and if quod liceat per se licet per alium, her natural 
protectors, kin, physician, and so on, may at least divulge the 
secret of the man s condition in defence of her from a fate 
which in many respects is worse than rape. 

In keeping with this matter of entrusted secrets it is worth 
noting that physicians should remember that the case histories 
they leave after them at death, or which they leave unguarded 


in their offices, are likely to be read by some third party who 
has no right to the secrets they contain. Case histories which 
the patients would not have divulged should be kept in cipher 
so far as proper names and addresses are concerned. 



GONORRHEA is caused by the gonococcus discovered 
by Neisser in 1879. The name was given to the dis 
ease in the second century by Galen, who supposed that the 
condition is a spermatorrhea. The infection begins as a sur 
face inflammation and gradually penetrates more or less deeply 
into the underlying tissues. In the male, gonorrhea may affect 
any part of the body; and when the disease is chronic it is a 
Bource of infection for years. If a man who has had gonorrhea 
wishes to marry after careful treatment, most physicians will 
permit him to do so if he passes the customary tests which 
indicate cure, but he is always dangerous. The tests are: (1) 
the microscopic and cultural examinations of the centrifugalized 
morning urine the washings from the urethra must be nega 
tive after repeated trials and over a space of months; (2) the 
microscopic and cultural examinations of urethral spontaneous 
and artificial discharges must be negative in the same man 
ner; (3) the microscopic and cultural findings of the secretion 
expressed from the prostate and seminal vesicles must be nega 
tive in the same manner; (4) urethroscopic examinations of the 
anterior and posterior urethra must show no unhealed lesions; 
(5) the complement fixation test is to be repeatedly negative. 
The complement fixation test is like a "Wassermann reaction, 
but the antigen should be polyvalent. This test does not give 
a positive reaction where no gonorrhea is present, but it is often 
negative where the gonococcus is present. Hence a positive re 
sult has value, but a negative result has little or no value. All 
these tests are to be tried repeatedly, and if negative for months, 
the physician may say the man is probably cured, but no phy 
sician can guarantee the cure so as to take the responsibility of 



the decision. Not one physician in five hundred can make 
these tests himself, because physicians in general lack the spe 
cial training and the means to make them. As the effects of 
gonorrheic infection in a woman are so appalling, any woman 
who wittingly marries a man who has had gonorrhea is very 
rash, and the man who takes the risk of infecting such a woman 
is a rascal. 

A physician is obliged to let a woman who innocently is 
about to marry a "cured" gonorrheic know of the man s con 
dition, as in a case of supposedly cured syphilis. Taber John 
son, Noble, and other authorities, say no one can tell when a 
gonorrheic is absolutely cured. 

In women infection of the cervix uteri occurs in about 80 
per cent, of the cases of acute gonorrhea, and in 95 per cent, 
of all chronic cases. The infection may extend up into the 
uterus at the menstrual period or just after parturition. In 
the cervix, owing to the histologic formation, the disease tends 
to chronicity, but the inflammation within the uterus is much 
more likely to subside naturally. Chronic gonorrhea of the en- 
dometrium is usually accompanied by tubular infection. The 
infection of the uterus may be superficial or it may extend 
down into the underlying myometrium. 

The inflammation extends from the endometrium to the 
Fallopian tubes and beyond, causing salpingitis, pyosalpinx, 
hydrosalpinx, tuboovarian abscess, tuboovarian cysts, and pelvic 
peritonitis. The most frequent form of tubal gonorrhea is 
pyosalpinx, or pus tube. 

In the acute stage of tubal infection the tubes become 
elongated and swollen, and the mucous surfaces within are cov 
ered with a seropurulent exudate. This condition is called sal- 
pinx or salpingitis. When the condition advances so far that 
the external abdominal ostium of the tube is closed, a pyosal 
pinx forms. The pyosalpinx may be quite large. A hydro 
salpinx is like a pyosalpinx, with both tubal ends sealed, ex 
cept that its content is a serous or watery fluid. When infected 
material escapes through the distal end of the tube, perioophori- 
tis develops, and the ovary becomes adherent to the tube and 
other adnexa. More commonly only the surface of the ovary 


is affected, but frequently the infection gets into the body of 
the ovary and causes oophoritis. The ovary then swells and 
there is a tendency to the formation of retention and other 
cysts, or an abscess of the ovary. A tuboovarian cyst is a hydro- 
salpinx in communication with an ovarian retention cyst, and 
a tuboovarian abscess is a like formation. 

Gonorrhea, especially in women, is likely to be very chronic. 
Emil Noeggerath, who in 1872 published a book 1 which 
changed the medical doctrine on the disease, said of women, 
"Once infected, always infected." Morris 2 reports a case where 
the gonococcus was latent in a man for twenty years, and he 
then infected his wife and wished to divorce her until he found 
that he himself was at fault. Sax 3 reported an infection after 
fourteen years; MacMunn, 4 one after fifteen years. These are 
exceptional durations in the male for virulence, though not for 
continuance of the diplococcus. 

Neisser, who discovered the cause of gonorrhea, holds that, 
with the exception of measles, gonorrhea is the most widespread 
of all maladies. By sterilizing men and women and by abor 
tion it holds down the birth-rate more than any other disease. 
The number of deaths from the consequences of gonorrhea 
(pelvic abscess, peritonitis, septicemia, endocarditis, and so on) 
is enormous. Morris thinks that 12,000 prostitutes die an 
nually from the effects of gonorrhea alone. Woodruff 5 holds 
that 60,000 is nearer the truth. The estimate, too, is that 50 
per cent, of all pelvic inflammatory diseases in women is gonor- 
rheic; and Neisser, Bumm, and Fiirbinger hold that from 
20 to 50 per cent, of childless marriages are due to gonorrhea. 
Probably more than 20 per cent, of all the blindness in the 
world is from the same cause. The Committee of Seven, 6 in 
1901, after examining most of the hospital records in New 
York and hearing from 4750 physicians, estimated that there 
were more than 220,000 venereal patients in New York City. 

1 Die latent? Gonorrhoea in weib. Geschlect. Bonn. 

Gonorrhea in Women, p. 123. Philadelphia, 1913. 

Trans. Amer. Urological Assoc., vol. iii. 

* Lancet, November 24, 1906. 

6 Expansion of Races. New York, 1909. 

9 Medical News, December 21, 1909. 


Bierhoff 7 reckoned that in 1910 there were about 800,000 
gonorrheics in that city. In 1906, in Baltimore, there were 
3310 cases of the infectious diseases like measles, diphtheria, 
scarlet fever, and tuberculosis combined, but 9450 cases of 
venereal diseases. In New York City, in round numbers, there 
are annually about 41,000 cases of infectious diseases, ex 
cluding the venereal group, but 243,000 cases of venereal dis 
eases over five times more cases of venereal diseases than of 
all the other infectious diseases together. Of 12,000,000 per 
sons insured in Germany, 750,000 annually are infected with 
venereal diseases. In the United States navy between 1904 
and 1908, with an average of 43,165 men in the navy and 
marine corps, there were 32,852 admissions to the hospitals for 
venereal diseases, and of these 11,526 were cases of gonorrhea. 
This report is far below the actual numbers, as only men in 
capacitated for work are included in the list. In the English 
navy in 1906 the daily number of men rendered inefficient by 
venereal diseases was 867. In the total relative number of 
venereal diseases the American army and navy, before the pres 
ent war, were the worst in the world, the Japanese navy next, 
the English army and navy next. 

Sullivan and Spaulding 8 reported on the prevalence and 
effects of gonorrhea in 522 women and girls in a Massachu 
setts reformatory for women. Of these women 75.7 per cent, 
had gonorrhea by positive diagnosis. The average length of 
time the infection had existed when diagnosed was four years 
and five months, but one woman had had the disease for twenty- 
six years, and seven had had it for over twenty years. In 
82.7 per cent, there had been no cessation of the clinical symp 
toms from the time of infection to the time of diagnosis. Of 
the total number 68 per cent, had pelvic inflammation on one 
side, and 27 per cent, had it on both sides. There were 41 
per cent, of the cases which had had surgical operations or 
which required such treatment. 

Of 63 women committed for alcoholism 52.4 per cent, had 
gonorrhea, 42.8 per cent, had syphilis, and 9.6 per cent, had 

New York Med. Jour., November 12, 1910. 
8 Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., January 8, 1916. 


doubtful syphilis; but of 400 women who had been at some 
time prostitutes 98.2 per cent, had gonorrhea, 65.5 per cent, 
had syphilis, and 9.5 per cent, had doubtful syphilis. Of 119 
mental defectives among these women, 90.8 per cent, had gonor 
rhea, 61.3 per cent, had syphilis, and 6.7 per cent, had doubt 
ful syphilis. 

Dr. Thomas Haines 9 reported on 365 cases of boys and 
girls under eighteen years of age committed to an Ohio re 
formatory, and of these 20.8 per cent, had syphilis, and it was 
mostly acquired syphilis, not congenital over one-fourth of the 
boys were so affected. McNeil 10 examined 1200 adult negroes 
in Galveston, Texas, for syphilis and found the disease in 30 per 
cent, of the 1200. 

Howard Kelly n estimated that venereal diseases cost the 
United States three billion dollars annually, and Norris thinks 
this estimate too low. The ravages of the disease are so fright 
ful, physically and morally, that any one who spreads it by in 
fection, especially of an innocent woman, is guilty of the gravest 
moral injustice. Morrow 12 thinks that 250,000 married women 
in the United States are suffering from gonorrhea. As most 
of these unfortunate women are infected by immoral husbands, 
and as the invalidism and suffering they undergo are indescrib 
able and cure is often impossible, the physician who permits a 
gonorrheic to marry without a protest is responsible for the evil 
as an accomplice; and, as has been said, once a gonorrheic, 
probably always a gonorrheic. 

Pelvic inflammatory disease includes in the uterus and its 
adnexa alone metritis, salpingitis, oophoritis, pelvic peritonitis, 
cellulitis, lymphangitis, and perimetritis. Pus may rupture 
into the pelvic cavity and set up local or general peritonitis or 
septicemia. It may burrow through from behind the uterus 
into the vagina, rectum, or other parts of the intestines, or into 
the bladder, and leave fistulas. Pus has been known to get 
through the abdominal wall itself. When the disease advances 
beyond the tubes there is, as a rule, invalidism until after the 

Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., January 8, 1916. 
10 Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., September 30, 1916. 
u Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., October 6, 1912. 
" Social Diseases and Marriage, 1904. 


menopause, although the woman may be cured by surgery. 
Even skilled surgery does not always cure, because it is prac 
tically impossible to get rid of the gonococcus once it has been 
fixed in the tissues. 

In cases where the gonorrheic or other bacterial infection 
has been chronic in the uterine adnexa, palliative treatment will 
in a certain percentage of cases make surgical intervention un 
necessary, and when such treatment does not avail we must de 
cide between the total removal of organs and the partial removal. 
Partial removal is called conservative surgery, and the term 
conservative is used as a synonym of preservative. Prochow- 
nick 13 reported 420 cases where pus in the tubes or ovaries was 
let out extraperitoneally, and no organs were removed. Of 
these cases, one hundred and sixty, or 38 per cent., were per 
manently cured. Fourteen of the one hundred and sixty who 
had received only one treatment subsequently gave birth to chil 
dren, and three aborted. After a second treatment twenty- 
seven remained well and three became pregnant, of whom one 
aborted. Olshausen, 14 a great authority in gynecology, used the 
palliative treatment, and he commonly waited for nine months 
after the infection and until the temperature was normal. 
Goth 15 reported excellent results in seven hundred cases of pel 
vic disease treated by the palliative method. The chief ob 
jections to this method are the time required to get the result, 
and the difficulty of controlling the patients and their chron 
ically diseased husbands, who reinfect them despite the med 
ical prohibition of marital intercourse. 

In cases of chronic pelvic peritonitis the question comes up 
frequently whether the womb and both tubes and ovaries should 
be removed wholly or in part. The text-books decide the question 
without any heed whatever to the notion of the morality of 
mutilation as such. They take into account the age of the pa 
tient, whether she has children or is desirous of maternity, 
whether or not she supports herself by manual labor, her tem- 

" Monatschrift f. Geburt. u. Gyna., 1909, n. 20. 
"Zeitschr. f. Geb. u. Gyn., 1907, vol. lix, n. 1. 
"Archiv. f. Qyn., vol. xcii, n. 2. 


perament and character, and the results attained by men who 
have tried various methods of operating. 

The conservative surgery of the uterus and its adnexa in 
gonococcal pelvic peritonitis was for many years looked upon 
with disfavor by surgeons. These conservative operations often 
failed or later required secondary intervention. Preliminary 
palliative treatment as now used greatly lessened the number of 
failures. Operations in peritonic conditions are dangerous be 
cause they may let loose encysted bacteria and start up a general 
septic peritonitis, which may be fatal. By delay and pallia 
tive treatment the virulence of the bacteria subsides, except 
where the woman is reinfected by her husband. In any case 
the blood-count should have been normal for at least a month 
and a half before any surgical interference is attempted. Ols- 
hausen waited nine months to let nature disinfect the pus. 

The removal of a part of a tube is called salpingotomy ; the 
taking out of the whole tube is salpingectomy ; the opening 
up of a shut tube is salpingostomy. The presence of pus in a 
tube is absolute indication for removal according to the gyn 
ecologists at present. Howard Kelly and others have succeeded 
at times in such cases with conservative surgery, yet such treat 
ment is now deemed obsolete the dangers and failures seem 
to overbalance the little good effected. The end of conserva 
tive surgery is to try to restore function without pain, to pre 
serve menstruation and ovulation, to put the organs in a condi 
tion to make pregnancy possible, and to preserve the internal 
secretion of the ovaries. The ovaries, so far as the woman s 
health is concerned, are the most important of her generative 
organs. If a woman is at the end of her child-bearing age 
there is no reason to preserve the tubes when they are affected, 
and conservation is likely to fail ; but the ovaries should always 
be preserved, wholly or in part, when possible. 

If one tube is infected from the uterus many gynecologists 
are inclined to remove both tubes. "When a single tube is af 
fected the cause is seldom the gonococcus, but some other bac 
teria which are not persistent. "When both tubes are affected 
the cause is commonly the gonococcus, and attempts at preser 
vation then fail, as a rule. Norris, who is a reliable authority, 


holds that "the only cases in which a salpingostomy is justifiable 
is on old, non-active hydrosalpinges, and in those cases of tu- 
bal occlusion or phimosis resulting from extratubal inflamma 
tion, such as sometimes result from appendicitis or ectopic 
pregnancies." 16 When a tube is shut, if it can be opened the 
opening tends to close again. A few cases of subsequent preg 
nancy have occurred after salpingostomy, but such a result is 
exceptional, because the origin is usually the gonococcus, which 
destroys tissue and is very persistent. 

The ovary corresponds to the testicle, and the Fallopian 
tube to the vas deferens. Removal of the ovaries, or removal 
or closure of the Fallopian tubes, renders the woman sterile, 
but removal of the ovaries has other profound effects beside 
sterility. Loss of the ovaries brings on suppression of ovula- 
tion, menstruation, pregnancy, and ovarian internal secretion r 
various neuroses, and a tendency to insanity in certain cases. 

The testicles and prostate gland produce an internal secretion 
containing spermin, and the ovaries a similar nitrogenous base 
called ovarin, which acts like spermin. The suprarenal glands 
secrete epinephrin; the thyroid gland and the pituitary body 
also make internal secretions, and these secretions sustain the 
tone of the blood-vessels and effect immunity against those tox 
ins that arise from metabolic waste substances while these are in 
the body before elimination. If there is a hypersecretion from 
one or more of these glands, the excess causes congestion of the 
cerebrum and cerebellum and of the nerve centres there, and 
one effect may then be a sexual erethism that leads to masturba 
tion and similar deordination. 

Castration in the male or ovariotomy in the female stops 
all production of spermin and ovarin. In man the prostate 
gland also ceases its function after castration, and vasectomy 
lessens the production of spermin. In castration or spaying, 
again, when we remove the power of producing spermin or 
ovarin, that function of the testes and ovaries whereby the body 
is immunized against poisoning by its own effete material is 
also inhibited, and evil effects arise from this waste material. 
These toxins act just as would an excess of spermin or ovarin 

" Gonorrhea in Women, p. 285. Philadelphia, 1913. 


they congest the cranial nerve centres, excite fever, neuroses, 
or temporary sexual erethism. This excitement may gradually 
subside as equilibrium is restored and neutralization effected, 
through a compensatory overproduction of the internal secre 
tions by the other glands remaining in the body. Cimoroni 17 
found after ovariotomy an increase in size of the pituitary 
body with dilatation of the blood-vessels. Goldstein 18 reported 
a case of gigantism from overactivity of the pituitary gland 
after castration. Acromegaly in cases where there was no 
castration has been accompanied by atrophy of testicles and 
ovaries. Cecca 19 found like effects in the thyroid, and sev 
eral have observed these effects in the adrenals. All these re 
sults have also been produced experimentally on animals. 

Women at the menopause frequently are observed who have 
become neurasthenic from the irritation of waste material in 
toxication which is not neutralized because the ovaries are ceas 
ing to function. Ovariotomy in younger women produces this 
menopause artificially and suddenly; and women from whom 
both ovaries have been removed, as a rule, become neurotic inva 
lids with a tendency to insanity if they are unstable in character 
or have a bad inheritance. If the whole thyroid gland is re 
moved, death results from intoxication. Extreme obesity is an 
effect of undersecretion by the glands and a consequent lack of 
oxidation. Fat children have deficient glands, as a rule, and 
eunuchs grow fat as capons do. Removal of the ovaries before 
puberty arrests or prevents the development of the uterus; re 
moval after puberty stops menstruation, the breasts atrophy, and 
there is an arrest of general physical growth. 

Gordon 20 reported on 112 cases of ob phorectomy. Of these 
thirty-four had had before operation various symptoms of neur 
asthenia, hysteria, or psychasthenia, and vague abdominal dis 
turbances. Surgeons in each of these thirty-four cases blamed 
the ovaries for the symptoms; and although these organs were 
not diseased in any degree, the surgeons removed them. In 
twenty-five of these cases there was no improvement whatever; 

" Policlinico, 1907, p. 16. 

18 Miinchener medizinischc Wochenschrift, April 8, 1913. 

"Soc. Med.-Chir. de Bologne, 1904. 

K Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., October 17, 1914. 


in the remaining nine there was improvement for a few weeks, 
but complete relapse later, and finally their symptoms grew 
worse. The obsessions became permanent and expanded. 
Those women in the group who had hysterical paroxysms began 
to have stronger and more frequent attacks. Several psychas- 
thenics had to be confined in asylums for the insane. Three 
of the women who had complained merely of vague nervous 
symptoms, as pain in the abdomen, head, or back, or of consti 
pation or diarrhea, after oophorectomy grew irritable, highly 
nervous, quarrelsome, fickle, restless, showed a tendency to 
travel about, to complain of others ; finally there was insomnia, 
and loss of appetite or voracity. In the remaining seventy-five 
cases one or both the ovaries were diseased, but both ovaries 
were completely removed. All these women developed symp 
toms like those described above, but several grew much worse 
in their mental condition than the psychasthenics among the 
first thirty-four women. The generally observed symptoms are : 
restlessness with a tendency to move from place to place; loss 
of self-control ; dissatisfaction with all persons and things ; want 
of interest in work; indolence; pessimism. Sometimes there 
are outbursts of anger, with a tendency to attack. The mental 
conditions do not, as a rule, become clearly developed melan 
cholias or manias, although a few do grow definitely insane. 
The morbid symptoms, however, persist obstinately. After 
ten years observation Gordon found no improvement in some 
of these psychasthenics. 

When the ovaries must be removed for diseases like cystic 
degeneration or abscess, the surgeon leaves, if possible, part of 
an ovary, or he engrafts part of an ovary in the abdominal 
wound, under the skin, or elsewhere. This grafting is bene 
ficial in many cases, but it has little or no effect in many others. 
The graft is absorbed and it disappears in a year or two, but 
before it is absorbed it makes the onset of the surgical meno 
pause gradual and thus prevents much suffering. In thirty- 
two cases reported by Chalfant 21 the graft gave evidence of 
functioning in five of seventeen women from whom the uterus 
and ovaries had been removed; in others it acted for months 

* Surgery, Gynecology, and Obstetrics, November, 1915. Chicago. 

and then failed; in others it lessened the unfavorable symp 
toms ; in others it had no effect at all. Stocker 22 reported two 
successful implantations of ovarian grafts and one testicular 

Giles 23 says that in his series of 157 cases of double ob phor- 
ectomy severe mental depression occurred in various groups in 
from 10 to 33 per cent., and two women became insane. Sex 
instinct was abolished in 16 per cent. Dickinson 24 found, in 
200 cases where one or both ovaries had been removed, that 
not more than 20 per cent, fell into the surgical menopause 
even when the uterus had been taken out; but Giles, in 50 re 
movals of one ovary, found irregularity, diminution, or cessa 
tion of the menses in 16 per cent. Carmichael, Valtorta, and 
Mcllroy 25 discovered in animals a compensatory hypertrophy 
of the remaining ovary after one ovary had been removed. The 
internal function and nutrition seem to depend upon the ova 
rian secretion, as atrophy occurs after bilateral oophorectomy. 
In all operations upon or near the ovaries there is likelihood 
of interference with the blood supply of the ovary, either by 
including ovarian arteries in the ligatures, or by tension of 
these vessels, which occludes them, or by malposition and pro 
lapse of the ovary, which kinks them: these accidents result in 
degeneration or retention cysts. In most cases of pelvic peri 
tonitis the uterus is retrodisplaced, and this position prevents 
cure until it is corrected. 

When there is pus in the ovary, resection, in the opinion 
of gynecologists at present, is not an advisable operation; the 
ovary should be removed. Watkins, 20 however, says he resects 
small ovarian abscesses in young women with good results. In 
resection the blood supply is, as has been said, usually disturbed, 
and the cause for the operation is, as a rule, the gonococcus, 
and both these circumstances make the prognosis bad. The 
stitches necessarily used in resection operations are an addi- 

" Correspondenz-Blatt f. Schweizer Aertze, February 12, 1916. 
"Jour. Obstet. and Gynecol. of Brit. Empire, March and April, 

" Trans. Amer. Gyn. Soc., vol. xxxvi, p. 324. 
15 Norris, Gonorrhea in Women, p. 289. 
*Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., January, 1913. 


tional source of irritation. Turetta 27 speaks in favor of re 
section in certain cases. A single retention cyst may be re 
sected, especially when pedunculated. Boldt 28 had only one 
bad result in forty-five resections where a part of the ovary 
was saved. If the blood supply after the resection is evidently 
to be poor, resection is useless. Skill in surgical technic has 
much to do with success in all these cases. When the uterus 
is removed because of tumors, even near the time of the meno 
pause, if one or both ovaries can be left in, this should be done. 
In such conservative operations Dickinson found 80 per cent, of 
the patients free from nervous disturbance at the time of the 

Polak 29 describes an operation for the preservation of the 
menstrual function in double suppurative disease of the tubes 
and chronic metritis. He maintains that even if only one tube 
is infected, both should be removed because this apparently 
sound second tube will later, almost as a rule, show infection 
probably by extension from the fundus of the uterus inside. 
Ordinarily inflammation of the tubes happens to be bilateral. 
0wing to the persistence of the gonococcus in the uterine muscle, 
surgeons are inclined to the removal of the whole uterus and 
both tubes. After such an operation menstruation ceases, and 
in the removal of the uterus the blood supply to the ovary is 
interfered with so that the ovaries degenerate. The consequent 
artificial menopause has a decidedly injurious effect on the 
woman s general physical and mental health. The parts of the 
uterus permanently infected by chronic gonorrhea are the cer 
vical region, the fundus and the partes interstitiales of the 
Fallopian tubes. Polak advises that in cases where surgeons 
usually remove the tubes and the whole uterus they should in 
stead cure the cervical infection by the cautery and take out 
the tubes, but in place of the removal of the whole uterus they 
should cut out a wedge including the fundus and the partes in 
terstitiales of the tubes. This leaves the body of the uterus 
and does not injure the circulation to the ovaries. In the last 

" Jl Policlinico, January 3, 1919. 

" Trans. Amer. Gynecol. Soc., vol. xxxiv, p. 327. Philadelphia, 

"Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., December 8, 1917. 


seventeen cases thus operated upon by him he had success. 

When it is necessary to remove both ovaries and tubes an 
opinion very common now is that it is better to take out the 
uterus also, because in such cases the uterus and vagina atrophy 
and this condition later causes trouble. Giles came upon such 
trouble in 11 per cent of sixty-two cases. As the uterus is 
useless after the removal of the ovaries and tubes, there is no 
reason why it should not be removed. The danger of atrophy 
is sufficient reason for the mutilation. In operations for pelvic 
peritonitis it is well to remove also the appendix, because it is 
nearly always diseased, or it will give trouble from adhesions 
later and cause a secondary operation. It has no function we 
know of at present. 

In conservative surgery of the uterus and adnexa for pelvic 
inflammatory diseases, the results attained by four skilled sur 
geons are: Giles cured 90 per cent, of 132 cases; Polak cured 
35 per cent, of 300 cases; Robins cured 100 per cent, of 20 
cases; Norris cured 73 per cent, of 191 cases. Polak s pa 
tients became pregnant after operation much oftener than those 
of the other operators. Seventeen per cent, of his patients, 
from whom he removed one ovary and resected the other, be 
came pregnant. Giles found that of his married patients un 
der fifty years of age at the time of the operation 25 per cent, 
became pregnant and went to term. They bore twenty-five chil 
dren. Five of these also miscarried. In sixty-eight of Nor- 
ris s cases seventeen were delivered of living children after the 
operation ; three had two children each, one had three children, 
and there were seven miscarriages. In one of his cases where 
he removed one ovary and both tubes, the woman bore a healthy 
full-term child two years after the operation. Dudley 30 found 
that about 10 per cent, of 2168 cases of resection became preg 
nant after operation. Ectopic gestation is likely to occur in a 
few cases after conservative operations. Giles had seven such 
cases in his series of 132 operations, Polak one, and Norris two. 

When it is necessary to remove the uterus, the choice be 
tween supravaginal hysterectomy, where the cervix is left in 
after the destruction of its mucosa, and panhysterectomy, 

"Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., vol. xli, n. 24. 


where the cervix and the body of the uterus are removed, of 
fers no moral problem except the necessity of deciding upon 
what will be best for the woman. Rupture of a pus tube is a 
very dangerous accident all the patients suffering from such a 
rupture die if not operated upon, and fifty per cent, die even 
after operation. A physician may do this damage by ignorant 
or careless examination, and he may be morally responsible for 
the death. The accident happens not unfrequently from mari 
tal congress, and if the husband has been warned by a physician 
but does not heed this warning, he is guilty of murder if the 
woman dies after rupture of the pus tube. 

Pregnant women are more liable to infection by the gono- 
coccus than non-gravid women, because of the increased blood 
supply to the generative organs in gestation, and the softening 
of these organs. For the same reason, latent gonorrhea is 
likely to become active and to spread during pregnancy. A like 
activity and extension of latent gonorrhea often occurs during 
menstruation. Women with gonorrhea are commonly sterile 
this is the chief reason why prostitutes are usually sterile. 
In married women gonorrhea may cause dyspareunia; it may 
bring on abortion through endometritis ; it may shut the tubes 
and prevent conception; it may destroy the ovaries. 

The disease is extremely frequent during pregnancy. 
Gurd 31 isolated the gonococcus in 52 of 113 pregnant women 
who came to his dispensary service because of pelvic rjain. 
Leopold, Stephenson, Fruhinholtz, and many others estimated 
that about 20 per cent, of all pregnant women have gonorrhea, 
but more recent observers think that from 5 to 10 per cent, is 
nearer the truth. 

When a pregnant woman has gonorrhea great care must be 
taken in treatment to prevent abortion. Powerful antiseptics 
in the cervix, or dilatation of the cervix, are not permissible, 
and operative interference is to be delayed as long as possible 
in each instance to avoid abortion. The vaginal douche as a 
routine treatment is not used now by obstetricians in these 
cases. When the gonorrhea is in the uterus douches of hot bi 
chloride solution, 1 to 10,000, are used twice daily during the 

n Montreal Med. Jour., vol. xxxvii. 


last few weeks of gestation, with the intention of saving the 
infant s eyes from infection during delivery. After delivery 
the cavity of the uterus should not be entered with instruments 
lest infection be carried in, unless absolute necessity requires 
this instrumental procedure. Post-partum gonorrheal sepsis is 
differentiated from other septic conditions chiefly by the his 
tory of gonorrhea in the husband, by bacteriological examina 
tions, and by the technical differentiation of symptoms. 

The moral guilt of a person who infects another with gon 
orrhea is affected by the extent of the physical injury done. 
Gonorrhea causes, besides the effects already described: (1) 
chronic cystitis, with all the suffering, loss of work, and danger 
of renal infection in such a condition; (2) lymphadenitis of the 
inguinal canal, and rarely of other places; (3) proctitis, or in 
flammation of the rectum, especially in women and young chil 
dren; (4) ophthalmia, vaginitis, and proctitis in infants and 
children, and metastatic conjunctivitis; (5) stomatitis or in 
flammation of the mouth in adults and children; (6) nasal gon 
orrhea (a doubtful condition) ; (7) gonorrheal septicemia, bac- 
teremia, or toxemia, which may affect any organ in the entire 
body; (8) bone and joint lesions: (a) gonorrheal arthritis in 
any joint in the body (this condition may be fatal, or it may 
leave permanent disability, or it may disappear) ; (&) tenosyn- 
ovitis, or pain, swelling, and edema along affected tendon 
sheaths; (e) gonorrheal periostitis, where the bone and peri 
osteum near a joint are affected; (d) perichondritis and chon- 
dritis, a rare condition, where cartilage is attacked; (9) endo 
carditis, or inflammation of the lining membrane of the heart 
(one of the most frequent secondary lesions of gonorrhea) ; 
(10) pericarditis, or inflammation of the sac which contains 
the heart; (11) myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart mus 
cle itself, usually as an extension of endocarditis; (12) aortitis, 
or inflammation of the aorta a rare condition; (13) phlebitis, 
an inflammation of the veins a very rare condition; (14) 
thrombosis, or blocking of a blood-vessel by exudate (this may 
be fatal) ; (15) skin lesions, as erythema, erythema nodosum, 
bullous and hemorrhagic eruptions, hyperceratosis, and ulcers; 
(16) gonorrhea of the lungs in septicemia; (17) gonorrheal 


pleurisy in septicemia; (18) gonorrheal nephritis, which is fre 
quent in gonorrheal septicemia the condition is often fatal; 
(19) perinephritis, a very rare condition; (20) gonorrhea of 
the nervous system, as neuritis or neuralgia, or neuroses, which 
vary from slight melancholia to severe mental disturbances; 
(21) parotiditis, a very rare condition; (22) otitis, or inflam 
mation of the middle ear, a very rare condition; (23) sup 
puration in muscles, or under the skin; (24) wound septicemia; 
(25) venereal warts; and (26) epididymitis, which often 
causes not only sterility but impotence. 

Campbell 32 reported a gonorrheal infection of a compound 
fracture at the ankle it required four months to get the wound 
free of the infection. Gonorrheal obliterating epididymitis is 
quite common. Delbet and Chevassu 33 found 114 cases of 
male sterility in 131 cases of epididymitis. More than half 
of such cases are left permanently sterile, and if the function 
of the testicle cannot be restored by the surgeon the patient 
is impotent, and any marriage he would make, 
is rendered void. These two surgeons have restored function 
in six such cases by uniting the vas with the epididymis by 
Martin s operation. It is much easier to restore function after 
vasectomy than after obliterating epididymitis. 

There are frequent cases of arthritic rheumatism in which 
the source of the infection is a chronic gonorrhea of the seminal 
vesicles. Fuller 34 has done 101 vesiculotomies for this con 
dition, and of these twenty-three were gonorrheal. In these 
twenty-three the excision of the infected vesicles cured the rheu 
matism. In vesiculotomy great care must be taken not to cut 
the vas def erens. If it is cut the man is impotent until the vas 
is restored, and it would be a very difficult operation to reunite 
the vas if cut near the vesicles. 

Of all the gonorrheal aifections of the body the most dan 
gerous and important are the cardiac inflammations and oph 
thalmia neonatorum. This ophthalmia is a purulent infection 
of the external parts of the eye in infants. It may be caused 

"New York Medical Journal, February 22, 1908. 

83 Canadian Presse Medic., July, 1908. 

"New York Medical Journal, May 30, 1908 


by many kinds of toxic bacteria, but the worst cases are from 
the diphtheria bacillus (a very rare condition) and the gon- 
ococcus (a very frequent condition). Before 1881, when Crede 
introduced prophylactic treatment for ophthalmia neonatorum, 
every maternity hospital had a department isolated for the care 
of babies suffering with this disease. At the present day, how 
ever, despite the precautions taken, this disease is quite com 
mon. Pennsylvania and New York alone spent $242,000 an 
nually for the support of asylums for the blind, and about 40 
per cent, of the children in these institutions were blinded by 
gonorrheal ophthalmia. The United States spends $1,800,- 
000 yearly on victims of ophthalmia neonatorum. Stephen- 
son 35 tells us that in the practice of forty-one oculists who re 
ported to him the gonococcus was found in 67.14 per cent, of 
their 1658 cases of ophthalmia. Mayou found the gonococcus in 
63.5 per cent, of 1483 cases. 

There is an infection of the child s eyes by gonococci pos 
sible even while the cHild is in the womb, but this is very ex 
ceptional ; the infection happens in the vagina during delivery, 
as a rule. When the child s head is born its lids and eyelashes 
should be cleansed with vaseline, or 1 to 5000 bichloride, or car- 
bolized oil, before the eyes are opened to put in the silver nitrate 
solution. This solution should be made from a pure drug or it 
will injure the eyes. A one per cent, solution is strong enough 
for routine work, but if the gonococcus is suspected, or if it is 
known that the mother has gonorrhea, then the lids of the in 
fant must be everted and touched everywhere with a five per 
cent, solution of silver nitrate. This is neutralized with a salt 
solution and washed out before the lids are turned back. It is 
rash to trust any of the albuminoid preparations of silver, like 
argyrol, silvol, or protargol, in gonorrhea or suspected gonorrhea 
of the eyes. 

If the child develops ophthalmia the treatment should be 
turned over to an oculist when possible. When a child can 
have a day and a night nurse, this method should be adopted, 
but ordinarily there is no nurse except some woman about the 
house or the mother. In such cases one eye, commonly the 

15 Ophthalmia Neonatorum. London. 1907. 


right, does better than the other because the first eye treated 
is opened readily, but after the infant has been irritated it 
shuts the eyes so strongly that it is difficult to open them at all. 
The first eye treated is habitually the same. The nurse should 
begin to treat the eyes alternately on this account, or wait to 
treat the second eye until after the baby has quieted down. 
Iced compresses should be used, but not so long as to chill the 
eye very much five to ten minutes at a time is enough. If 
the physician himself makes the applications of silver nitrate, 
the nurse should use some silver salt like argyrol. Three to 
eight grains of zinc sulphate to eight ounces of boric solution 
is a good regular eye-wash in these cases. Atropine must also 
be instilled to protect the iris. If only one eye is affected, the 
other eye should be protected under a watch glass sealed over 
it. All persons who have gonorrhea, or who treat gonorrhea, 
must be warned of the danger they are in of infecting their 
own eyes. 

A new treatment of gonorrhea is described by Weiss. 38 
The gonococci are killed by a temperature of 107.6 degrees 
Fahrenheit, and in eleven cases Weiss subjected men to a 
hot bath for forty to fifty-five minutes, with the temperature 
of the water gradually increased from 104 to 110 degrees 
Fahrenheit. In one instance the body temperature was raised 
to 108.5 degrees F. in a forty-minute bath and the gonococci 
disappeared at once. In the other cases the body temperature 
did not go up so high, but the vitality of the gonococcus was 
evidently reduced, and under a few local injections they all 

" M iinchener medizinische Wochenschrift, November 2, 1915. 


DIABETES MELLITUS is rare in pregnancy, but when 
it does occur the disease is fatal in three-fourths of the 
children, and it hastens the death of the woman, according to 
the common opinion of obstetricians, but this opinion is dis 
puted. In making the diagnosis we must exclude lactosuria and 
other pseudodiabetic conditions. A sugar reaction which is 
often mistaken for the glycosuria of true diabetes is from lactose 
in excessive milk secretion. This lactosuria is harmless. Again, 
when women are taking tonics or cough mixtures containing 
derivatives of wild cherry their urine may give a sugar reaction 
from the phloridzin of the wild cherry. The phloridzin so acts 
on the epithelium of the kidneys that it lets the blood-sugar es 
cape into the urine. Medical writers who report diabetes in 
large numbers of pregnant women mistake these reactions for 
the reaction of true glycosuria. 

In the genuine diabetes of pregnancy there is a high mor 
tality. Offergeld, 1 in sixty cases, found that the women died 
within two and a half years, and that 76 per cent, of the chil 
dren were lost. Diabetics commonly are sterile from atrophy 
of the uterus and ovaries: in a series of 114 diabetic married 
women, Lacorche found only seven pregnancies. In a third of 
such as do become pregnant abortion or premature labor occurs. 
Coma happens in 30 per cent, of these pregnancies, and it is 
almost always fatal. Delivery frequently causes collapse, coma, 
or sudden death. The liver in any gestation has more work than 
it has in the unimpregnated state, but a diabetic liver is unfit 
for almost any normal function. If albuminuria is found the 
prognosis becomes very bad. Diabetic women have poor re 
sistance against a tubercular infection. Half their children 

1 Archiv. f. Gyn., bd. 86, n. 1. 



are still-born, and 10 per cent, more die within a few days after 
birth (many of these children are diabetic). 

There is some evidence of heredity in diabetes it is likely 
"to run in a family." Heiberg 2 reported one family in which 
five of thirteen children had diabetes ; in another, four of eight 
children, the mother, two of the mother s brothers, and the 
maternal grandfather had diabetes. In another, two brothers, 
the father, and grandfather died of it. I know of a case where 
the only two sons and the father in a family died of it. Hei 
berg did not find any essential difference in the histology be 
tween the hereditary cases and those which were not hereditary. 

Joslin 3 reported seven cases of diabetes associated with 
pregnancy. Four of the seven are now dead, one by suicide, 
one from uremia, one from coma, one from tuberculosis. Of 
the three living one is in good conditoin, one is not well and 
she has lost two of three children, and one is very ill with dia 
betes. In persons beyond middle age diabetes with proper 
treatment may go on for from ten to fifteen years before it is 
fatal, but it quickly kills young patients. A young woman at 
the marriageable age who has diabetes will die anyhow in two 
or three years, and if she marries and becomes pregnant she will 
die very probably in her first pregnancy. 

When the child is viable, and the diabetic mother shows 
albuminuria, progressive weakness, or diacetic acid in marked 
quantity, it may be necessary to perform therapeutic abortion ; 
but if this is done no anesthetic may be used, and great pre 
cautions should be taken to avert physical and mental shock. 
Even ergot acts badly with these cases. The last sacraments 
should be given in good time, especially if coma threatens. 
When labor begins in a diabetic and everything appears to be 
normal the sacraments should be given, because there is always 
danger of sudden collapse and death. 

1 Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift, xlii, 9. 

1 Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, November 25, 1915. 


A METHOD of effecting painless childbirth through the 
use of scopolamine and morphine was first used in 1902 
by Steinbuechel, and in 1906 Gauss, of the University of Frei 
burg in Baden, reported a series of five hundred obstetrical cases 
in which scopolamine and morphine had been used. The wom 
an s condition was called in Freiburg a Dammerschlaf, a Twi 
light Sleep, because she is somnolent and forgetful of pain. 
In 1903 the chief obstetricians in several of the leading Amer 
ican and German universities tried the drugs, but they quickly 
abandoned the method because they found it dangerous and 
unscientific. The process was exploited here by McClure s 
Magazine, 1 The Ladies Home Journal, and other lay periodi 
cals. The articles in these magazines were written by 
persons who are not physicians, and their erroneous state 
ments are misleading. The Ladies Home Journal, however, 
while favoring the method, published letters from several lead 
ing obstetricians in the United States, all of whom are opposed 
to the use of these drugs during parturition because they had 
tried them and found them unscientific. The method is illicit 
morally, and it is unscientific. 

Obstetricians divide a parturition into three stages. In 
most primiparae and many multiparae there is a prodromal 
stage, in which false labor pains (dolor es praesagientes} are 
the most evident symptom. When the real labor sets in there 
are rhythmic uterine contractions about every fifteen min 
utes, which cause pain to the woman by the pressure of the 
fetus on the uterine nerves dolores praeparantes. From the 
time the pains become rhythmic, and are effective in dilating 

1 June, 1911. 



the neck and mouth of the womb, until the mouth of the womb 
is completely stretched and flush with the vaginal wall, thus 
completing the continuous parturient canal, is the first stage 
of labor. The fetal enveloping membranes (the "bag of 
waters") usually rupture at the end of this stage, but some 
times the bag bursts before the end, or as late as the second 
stage of labor. The first period is the stage of dilatation. 

The second stage extends from the end of the dilatation un 
til the expulsion of the child is completed. This is the stage 
of expulsion. 

The third stage lasts from the delivery of the child until 
after the expulsion of the placenta and membranes and the re 
traction of the uterus has ended the period of the afterbirth. 

Normal parturition is always painful to the woman. As 
the labor progresses the pains gradually grow more intense, 
and the interval between them shorter. After a few hours the 
pain is strong enough to cause the woman to cry out, but there 
is a great variety in the endurance of these pains, as the wom 
en s characters differ. Neurotic women begin to scream and act 
hysterically even in the early part of the first stage. When the 
pains are fully developed each lasts about half a minute. 

In most cases the infant comes out head first, but almost 
any part of its body may present. Before the advancing child 
part of the liquor amnii within the fetal enveloping membranes 
is forced down into the neck of the womb, and causes dilata 
tion. In primiparae especially the bag of waters may rupture 
prematurely and thus cause what is called a dry labor, which 
is commonly tedious and painful. Often operative interference 
is required in dry labors. 

In the second stage the pains are stronger, recur every two 
or three minutes, and are expulsive. The woman then strives 
to expel the child. She strains violently with the abdominal 
muscles literally labors; her pulse is high, the veins of her 
neck stand out, her face is turgid, and her body is covered with 
sweat. When at last the head of the child is driven out the 
woman feels as if she were being torn asunder in the dolores 
conquassantes. The pain is so great that the woman may faint 
from it, but that is not the rule. After a pause the shoulders 


are forced out, and then the trunk in one long convulsive ef 
fort. The umbilical cord is tied and cut, and the child is born. 

After from five to twenty minutes the womb begins to con 
tract again, but the pains (dolores ad secundum partum} are 
not nearly so intense as they were during labor. Then in from 
fifteen minutes to about three hours the placenta is expelled. 

The pains of labor are so evident that the expulsive con 
tractions of the uterus, of which the pains are symptoms, are 
themselves called "the pains." These pains in all scientific ex 
actness of statement are, as has been said, agonizing. "In do- 
lore paries filios" is a very literal text. The scopolamine-mor- 
phine method was devised with the intention of mitigating 
them, or mercifully rendering the woman unconscious of them 
during at least a part of the labor. If she is unconscious of pain 
she is thus saved also from shock and depression, which render 
her susceptible to infection. Such results certainly are im 
measurably valuable if attainable without taint of moral evil, 
but as the method stands just now, they are not free from that 

Scopolamine hydrobromide, one of the drugs used in this 
method, is an alkaloid obtained from the roots of Scopolia (or 
Scopola) carniolica, and it cannot be differentiated chemically 
from hyoscine hydrobromide, which is made from henbane and 
other plants of the Solanaceae group. Rusby was of the opin 
ion that scopolamine is really a mixture of hyoscine, hyoscya- 
mine, and atropine: one-tenth hyoscine and nine-tenths hyos- 
cyaniine and atropine. Cushny and others find different pro 
portions of these alkaloids. As the leaves of Scopolia are used 
to adulterate the belladonna leaves from which atropine is de 
rived, hyoscine and scopolamine are substituted for each other 
if, indeed, there is an any real difference between them. Some 
of the largest drug-houses in Germany before the war supplied 
hyoscine and scopolamine from the same stock bottle the name 
depended on the asker. Even in a pure state hyoscine and 
scopolamine have the same chemical formula (C 17 H 21 1S[04), 
and their physiological action is the same. Each can exist in 
three isomeric forms, and in one of these forms they turn polar 
ized light to the left, in another to the right, while in a third 


form they do not affect the light at all. The higher the rotatory 
power of the drugs, the more active they are physiologically. 
The levorotatory scopolamine has, according to Cushny, Peebles, 
and Hug, double the action of the inactive scopolamine on the 
cardiac inhibitory fibres of the vagus, but the levoactive and the 
inactive scopolamine produce the same effect on the central 
nervous system. The drug on the market is usually composed 
of a mixture of the levoactive and the inactive forms, and as 
one or the other predominates the results differ: the rotatory 
power of a given specimen should be known. Old solutions 
of scopolamine decompose and give rise to toxic substances. 
Gauss attributed post-partum hemorrhages in the women and as 
phyxia in infants to these decomposition products, but he 
avoided these untoward effects somewhat by cutting down the 
morphine dose. He had five infant deaths before he cut down 
the morphine, and 25 per cent, of the children were intoxicated. 
The chief action of scopolamine or hyoscine is upon the cere 
bral cortex, producing sleep, which is accompanied often by a 
low delirium. They depress the centre of respiration, and have 
a depressant effect also on that part of the spinal cord which 
governs the motions of the body. They intensify the action 
of morphine and other narcotics. 

Morphine, which is used to prevent pain, is the chief drug 
in the twilight sleep method, and it is greatly intensified in ac 
tion by the presence of scopolamine. When, however, morphine 
and scopolamine are given to a pregnant woman hypodermically, 
these drugs are at once carried by the blood to the fetus. Chil 
dren for years after birth all withstand the action of morphine 
badly, and a fetus in utero may be overwhelmed by it. Just 
in this fact lies the chief moral crux in the use of the twilight 
sleep method of obstetrical delivery. The woman may go on 
to the end more or less safely in competent hands, but if con 
stant watch is not kept at the bedside by a skilled observer the 
infant is liable to be killed, and the danger comes to it not solely 
from the drug directly it may be drowned in the amniotic 
fluid, its condition may be masked by the restlessness of the 
mother, which prevents proper observation: when a woman is 
plunging all over the bed, as is extremely common in twilight 

sleep, the pulse-rate of the baby cannot bo properly watched. 

If the mother happens to be particularly susceptible to scopo- 
lamine or morphine, the first will cause delirium and the sec 
ond coma; or the respirations may become arhythmic and be 
reduced to only five or six a minute. The kidneys may be af 
fected by the morphine so as to bring on total suppression of 
urine. Labor is prolonged, and it may be very much pro 
longed. In some women uterine atony is induced by the mor 
phine, with very dangerous consequent post-partum hemorrhage. 
Morphine relaxes all musculature, and it relaxes the muscle 
of the arterial walls and so disposes to hemorrhage. There is 
little or no premonitory symptom of these idiosyncrasies (except 
in the case of an injured kidney) to inform the physician that 
he should avoid the scopolamine-morphine treatment. 

Dr. Polak, professor of obstetrics at the Long Island College 
Hospital, reported 2 on 155 cases of the twilight sleep method, 
and he is in favor of it under several restrictions. He uses the 
drugs from ampules which contain one two-hundredth of a grain 
of scopolamine and half a grain of narcophin, which is a pro 
prietary drug said to be composed of the meconate of morphine 
with the meconate of narcotin in molecular proportion. Mor 
phine itself is a tribasic meconate, and narcotin, of course, 
another opium derivative. The American Council on Phar 
macy and Chemistry was unable to accept the claims made for 
narcophin. 3 Polak says he finds no difference between mor 
phine and narcophin. 

In the twilight sleep treatment the patient, especially if she 
is a primipara, should be definitely in labor before any injec 
tion is given. She should have pains occurring at regular in 
tervals, preferably every four or five minutes, before the first 
injection of scopolamine and morphine is administered; that 
is, the first stage of labor should be well advanced. Gauss 
gives one-sixth of a grain of morphine at the first injection, and 
Polak nearly three-fourths of a grain of narcophin, with one 
two-hundredth of a grain of scopolamine. If the woman is a 

" Long Island Medical Journal, December, 1914, and American 
Journal of Obstetrics, May, 1915. 

Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., November 21, 1914. 


multipara, Polak begins the treatment at the very beginning of 
the pains. The patient is kept in bed, in a darkened room, re 
moved from all noise and excitement. Some stop the ears and 
blindfold the patient, and, according to Baer of Chicago, the 
women are put into restraining sheets as a routine practice in 
certain clinics to keep them from infecting themselves. The 
ordinary practice is to give a half dose of scopolamine an hour 
after the first dose and about every two hours thereafter, ac 
cording to the indications. The morphine may be discontinued, 
or used approximately every six hours in a long labor. Smaller 
doses are required if the first is given early in the labor, and 
larger if the pains have been well developed. In these latter 
cases the danger to the child is, of course, greater. 

The condition of the patient s pulse, respiration, pupillary 
reaction, and the frequency and character of the uterine con 
tractions are constantly watched, to guard against poisoning. 
Fonyo 4 reported two fatal poisonings by the scopolamine-mor- 
phine method as used in surgery. Both were operations for the 
delivery of women by laparotomy, and in each case the centre of 
respiration was overwhelmed. In each of these operations only 
one-hundredth of a grain of scopolamine and one-third of a 
grain of morphine had been used, but chloroform was adminis 
tered later. Robinson recently reported the fatal poisoning of a 
negress by scopolamine, and Chandler of Philadelphia two more 
where one thirty-third of a grain of scopolamine had been used. 
One-ninetieth of a grain given hypodermically has caused severe 
toxic disturbance which lasted for twenty-eight hours, and Root 5 
reported a case where one three-hundredth of a grain given by 
mouth poisoned violently. 

In Freiburg, Gauss tests the consciousness of the women 
about every half hour by showing them some object, and if 
they remember having seen this object he gives an additional 
dose of scopolamine. Polak says this memory test is not nec 
essary: even if the patient gives outward evidence of pain by 
cries and motion, she is apparently but very dimly conscious 
in his opinion. 

* Zentralblatt f. Gyndkologie, September 19, 1914. Leipsic. 
Therapeutic Gazette, vol. ii. 


The progress of the delivery must be constantly watched by 
repeated extraabdominal or rectal examinations, following the 
fetal shoulder as it rotates and not by vaginal examinations 
to avoid sepsis. The fetal heart must be auscultated every 
half hour at most, between and during the pains. If the child s 
pulse grows arhythmic or slow between pains, these are bad 
prognostic signs. All use of the drugs is to be discontinued, 
and the child is to be delivered at once to save its life, by the 
most suitable method and route. 

Polak holds that the solutions of the drugs must be abso 
lutely pure, and that hyoscine cannot be substituted for scopo- 
lamine, but that narcophin is no better than morphine: the 
American preparations have produced delirium. As I have 
shown, no one can possibly tell the difference between hyoscine 
and scopolamine, even by chemical analysis. All we can do 
is to take the druggist s word that the drug at hand was made 
from Scopolia and not from Ilyoscyamus niger. It does not 
make any difference which is the source of the supply. 

Polak says the morphine shortens the first stage of labor 
by softening the cervix, but that the treatment lengthens the 
second stage. Other observers have not found that it shortens 
the first period. He tells us that if this second stage that is, 
the time from the full dilatation of the os until the delivery 
of the child lasts over an hour in multiparae, or over two 
hours in primiparae, delivery must be effected by the Kristeller 
expression or by low forceps. In the Kristeller expression the 
child is pushed out of the canal by the hands of the physician 
applied to the fundus uteri. It should be a method of last 
resort, because there is danger of rupturing the uterus, of tear 
ing the placenta loose, or of crushing an ovary. 

In his report Polak says he has had no failures; the pa 
tients had no recollection of the labor; in the first series of 
fifty-one the children showed no sign of asphyxiation or even 
cyanosis except in two cases. In this first series one patient 
had a long second stage and the child had to be resuscitated. 
There were, he said, no post-partum hemorrhages; no low for 
ceps; the placentas were delivered without difficulty; none of 
the women showed signs of tire or exhaustion the next day; in 


fact, they were better off than the women who have normal 
labor. This report is different from that made by other men 
just as competent, and in exactly the same circumstances; even 
Gauss confesses many failures. The lay journals say Gauss 
had no failures, but he himself should know. In April, 1915, 
I was told in New York City that there had been no failures 
tliere, yet in May, Dr. Broadhead, professor of obstetrics at 
the Postgraduate School of Medicine in that city, after ob 
serving seventy-two cases confessed 6 several failures where the 
child was concerned. One Catholic woman, a member of the 
executive committee in a Twilight Sleep League of married and 
unmarried women, was killed in Brooklyn by the method in 
the summer of 1915. 

Dr. Charles M. Green, professor of obstetrics in Harvard 
University, tells us: 7 "My own observations, published in 1903, 
led me at the time to favor this therapeutic means of producing 
the Twilight Sleep, and removing the consciousness of pain, or 
at least preventing all remembrance of it. I have long since 
abandoned this agent, however, for two reasons: First, because 
it has apparently been the cause, occasionally, of fetal asphyxia. 
Second, because the effect of the drug on the mother is often 
uncertain, and unless used with great care may cause unfavor 
able or dangerous results. Moreover, we have other and safer 
measures for the relief of pain in labor. So I have given up 
teaching the use of scopolamine in my lectures." 

Dr. Williams, professor of obstetrics in Johns Hopkins Uni 
versity, and the author of a book on obstetrics which is very 
valuable, says : 8 "We have used the scopolamine treatment of 
childbirth in two separate series of cases at the Johns Hopkins 
Hospital, but in neither series were the results satisfactory, nor 
did they in any way approach the claims made for the treatment. 
We expect to do more with it next year." In the fourth edi 
tion of his Obstetrics, published in 1917, he thinks that the 
twilight sleep method will fall into disuse, or at least that its 
use will be restricted to a small group of neurotic patients. 

The Postgraduate, May, 1915. 
* Ladies Home Journal. 
8 Ibid. 


From bis experience, he says, the method is not adapted for 
private practice. 

Dr. Hirst, professor of obstetrics in the University of 
Pennsylvania, tried the scopolamine treatment in the maternity 
hospital of the university in about 300 cases at three different 
times. He tried it first in 1903, but he found that if sufficient 
morphine is given to abolish pain there is danger of hemorrhage 
in the mother and of asphyxia in the child. At a meeting of 
the Obstetrical Society of Philadelphia 9 Hirst, commenting on 
a paper by Polak, said : "I am sorry to say I cannot agree with 
my friend Dr. Polak in his conclusions ... I had to dis 
continue morphia and scopolamine because there were too many 
cases of post-partum hemorrhage, too many cases in which for 
ceps had to be used, too many asphyxiated babies. So I am not 
an enthusiast for twilight sleep. 

Dr. Joseph B. De Lee, professor of obstetrics in the North 
western University Medical School, Chicago, and the author 
of a book on obstetrics which is now one of the best we have in 
English, tells us 10 that the impressions he received from study 
ing ten cases of childbirth in Professor Kronig s clinic at 
Freiburg were "decidedly unfavorable to the method of 
Twilight Sleep. In all the ten cases, he testifies, the 
birth pains were weakened, and labor prolonged in two 
instances for forty-eight hours. In three cases pituitrin, 
which is in itself a dangerous drug to use before the uterus has 
been almost emptied, had to be given to save the child from im 
minent asphyxia. In five of the cases forceps had to be used 
owing to the paralyzing effects of the drug, and all these forceps 
cases were extensively lacerated. Several of the women be 
came so delirious and violent that ether had to be used to 
quiet them, with the result that the infants were born "nar 
cotized and asphyxiated to a degree." One child had convul 
sions for several days. 

The complete failure in these ten cases is so obvious as to 
be a scandal, although De Lee does not say so. He aban- 

* Proceedings printed in American Journal of Obstetrics, May, 

10 Ladies Home Journal. 


doned the use of the method twelve years ago, and in 1913 
he visited the maternities at Berlin, Vienna, Munich, and 
Heidelberg, and found that all had tried the method and had 
rejected it. 

Several so-called detoxicated substitutes for morphine, like 
"tocanalgine" and "analgine," have been tried ; but these turned 
out to be morphine, and to be equal in strength to morphine 
as we ordinarily have it. These were the drugs that were ad 
vocated in the Cosmopolitan Magazine as "having nothing to 
do with the morphine-scopolamine treatment originating some 
years ago in Freiburg." They are morphine treacherously 
disguised, and the assertions in the Cosmopolitan were never 
retracted when attention was called to the untruth by the Jour 
nal of the American Medical Association. In the American 
Journal of Obstetrics for May, 1915, is a full description of 
these drugs (page 772). 

Dr. Joseph Baer reported n sixty cases of the morphine- 
scopolamine treatment at the Michael Reese Maternity Hos 
pital in Chicago, and his results were diametrically opposed 
to those Dr. Polak himself obtains. The rooms used were 
large, and had cork-lined sound-proof walls and doors; ob 
stetricians and specially trained nurses were present day and 
night. The circumstances, then, were the best that could be 

He used Merck s scopolamine at first, and later a solution 
made up after the formula of Straub of Freiburg, which is 
more stable. His doses of morphine were from one-eighth to 
one-fourth of a grain; Gauss uses one-eighth to one-sixth of a 
grain ; Polak, as much as three-fourths of a grain of narcophin 
for his first dose. 

Baer s series ended on February 5, 1915, and of his sixty 
cases only five were successful. Three of the successful cases 
received one-fiftieth of a grain of scopolamine in all, and some 
of the unsuccessful cases got as high as one-sixteenth of a 
grain, with only wild delirium as a result. 

The labor was lengthened by about seven hours over un 
treated cases. As to the amnesia, in twenty-six cases the mem- 
11 Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., May 22, 1915, Ixiv, 21, p. 1723. 


ory was not dulled at all, although they received more scopola- 
mine than thirty-nine cases in which the memory was cloudy. 

Thirty-two women had unbearable thirst throughout the 
labor, and nothing would slake this thirst. Their incessant 
cries for water were very distressing to the attendants. Head 
ache was present in twenty-seven cases and vertigo in thirty- 
one, and the headache, which was very intense in some women, 
lasted for several days after delivery. 

Pain was diminished in thirty-nine cases, absent in one, 
as severe as in the average untreated woman in nineteen, and 
increased in one. That is, only one woman in sixty did not 
suffer the pain for which the treatment was devised. The 
reason evidently is that his dose of morphine was too small, 
yet if he went above this dose he ran the risk of post-partum 
hemorrhage and of narcotizing the baby. As it was, he had 
seven post-partum hemorrhages, but in a series of sixty un- 
selected normal delivery cases he had only one hemorrhage. 

Restlessness was present in eighteen cases, and delirium in 
nine; six of these women had to be wrapped in restraining 
sheets, and one had to be shackled for four days after she had 
overpowered a nurse in an effort to jump out of a window. It 
took three attendants to get her into the strait-jacket. Chand 
ler of Philadelphia saw a woman in a like delirium who was 
shackled only after six attendants together had tackled her. 
Two physicians in the Chicago maternity were severely beaten 
by women in a twilight sleep delirium. 

Baer says the serious risk of self-infection during labor 
through the uncontrollable motion of these women is a source 
of constant anxiety. They sit cross-legged, and the heel infects 
them with coli communis from the expressed feces. The dazed 
women constantly try to get at the vague pain with their hands, 
and on this account, according to Baer, some clinics that prac 
tise the twilight sleep method keep all the women in strait- 
jackets, but they omit to publish this fact. 

One of Baer s patients died from a ruptured uterus, and 
ner dead baby was taken from her belly-cavity. The drug will 
mask symptoms in a case like this. Sudden cessation of puer 
peral pain as a symptom of rupture, and the peculiar pain of 


a premature loosening of the placenta, are both covered from 
observation by the drugs, the darkening of the room, and the 
tossing of the patient, which prevent proper examinations. 

One patient had a mitral insufficiency and myocarditis. 
This should be an ideal case for the treatment, according to 
the twilight sleep men. The woman, however, after three doses 
of the scopolamine developed pulmonary edema. Her child 
was delivered in asphyxia pallida and resuscitated with diffi 

Thirteen of the children did not breathe at delivery, six 
were asphyctic, and two cases relapsed into asphyxia. One 
child was killed, as we said, when the mother s uterus rup 
tured. Avarffy 12 had one fatal case in fifty, and Chrobak one 
in one hundred and seven. 

Eight of the women had blurred vision after delivery, 
which lasted for over twenty-four hours; two had marked 
delirium for from two to four days after childbirth. As to 
exhaustion after labor, Baer says he found no difference between 
the twilight sleep women and the normal cases. 

Some advocates of the twilight sleep method say that there 
is less use of the forceps in this method than in normal de 
livery. At Freiburg, for example, operative delivery has been 
"reduced" to six or seven per cent. Six per cent., as a mat 
ter of truth, is two per cent, above the normal average for 
forceps delivery in eighteen German maternities. In 95,025 
deliveries in these hospitals the average forceps delivery was 
4.5 per cent., and some were small teaching hospitals where 
the forceps were used on any provocation for class demonstra 
tion. The twilight sleep method has a much higher operative 
delivery, and this varies, of course, according to the skill and 
judgment of the operators. 

Holmes, one of the first in Chicago to try the newly re 
vived method, says 13 that in July, 1914, before the great war 
broke out, there were twenty-five malpractice suits pending in 
one German city as a result of the morphine-scopolamine fad. 
He quotes a noted obstetrician on this subject: "If you will 

" Gynakol. Rundschau, 1909, iii. 

u American Journal of Obstetrics, May, 1915. 


use the method, have the patient in the best hospital possible, 
with all the appurtenances requisite for the revival of the 
child ; if you do not know, learn at once the differences between 
asphyxia, oligoapneia, and narcotic poisoning, and the methods 
of treating them; get the best and the most reliable product 
called scopolamine; and then be sure you are in a position to 
be adequately defended by a lawyer versed in malpractice 

This is the state of the question. Two or three men in 
the best circumstances say they get one hundred perfect results ; 
other men, equally or far more skilled and in equally favorable 
circumstances, get one hundred results which are anything but 
successful, often a disgrace to science, and undoubtedly im 
moral. They are immoral because they risk human life in an 
attempt to ease a physiological pain, and this is not a sufficient 
reason; moreover, these attempts fail oftener than they suc 
ceed. The second group of practitioners have no motive except 
honesty to induce them to make their unfavorable reports of 
failure. The reports of the two groups are directly contra 
dictory, and the judgment is thus a matter of motives. Tes 
timony from women who have gone through the process is not 
to be taken into account. They were dazed, and in any case 
they are not competent to judge a matter which is wholly 

We know the limitation of morphine and scopolamine and 
we cannot improve their use. If enough is given to still pain, 
we take a criminal risk; if we do not give enough to remove 
the sense of pain, why not use the safer nitrous oxide, ether, 
and chloroform? If enough morphine and scopolamine are 
administered early in labor to a multipara, the labor is com 
monly stopped; if this dosage is given after the pains are 
developed, the baby is born, as a rule, before they take effect. 



THE State of Indiana in 1907 enacted a vasectomy law 
which obliges the superintendents of some prisons and 
asylums to appoint two surgeons whose office is to sterilize 
sexually criminals, idiots, imbeciles, and similar persons, if 
these surgeons, in consultation with the chief physician of the 
institution, deem the propagation of children by such so-called 
degenerates detrimental to society. The same law has been 
incorporated in the statutes by New York, New Jersey, Wash 
ington, Iowa, Nevada, Wisconsin, Connecticut, California, 
Utah, Kansas, Oregon, and Minnesota. The law has been 
proposed several times in the Legislature of Pennsylvania, but 
it was vetoed twice and held up once in the Assembly. 

In New Jersey there was question of sterilizing an epileptic 
girl, and the Supreme Court of that State J decided in 1913 
that the law is contrary to the State and Federal constitutions. 
In 1916 Probate Judge Lapeer of Michigan declared the law 
as passed in his State in 1913 unconstitutional, but the State 
appealed against this decision. The Supreme Court of Wash 
ington 2 decided in favor of the law in a case where a man 
convicted of rape was sentenced by the trial judge to life im 
prisonment and to vasectomy as a punishment. The constitu 
tionality of the Iowa law is on appeal to the United States 
Supreme Court after a Federal judge had declared it uncon 
stitutional. The law in Indiana was put into effect in hun 
dreds of cases, but Governor Marshall set the law in abey 
ance. Two Federal judges in Kansas said the law is uncon- 

1 Smith vs. Board of Examiners of the Feeble-minded, 88 alt. B, 

* State vs. Feilen, 126 Pac. R. 75. 



stitutional and granted an injunction against its application in 
a particular case. In 1808 the superintendent of a Kansan in 
stitution for the feeble-minded castrated forty-eight boys. Up 
to April, 1916, about twenty-five feeble-minded boys in the Wis 
consin institution at Chippewa Falls were sterilized, and the 
authorities then said they intended to sterilize the girls. The 
la T .v has been advocated by alienists in Switzerland, and French 
and English physicians have advocated it. 

The reason given by the advocates of this law is the alarm 
ing prevalence of feeble-mindedness with its tendency to crim 
inality; and as, they say, heredity accounts for 65 per cent, cf 
feeble-mindedness, the feeble-minded should be prevented from 
propagating their kind. Sweden, with 5,500,000 inhabitants, 
has 18,000 insane, 14,000 idiots, 20,000 imbeciles, and 7,000 
epileptics. Much of this degeneracy is due to the notorious 
alcoholism of the Swedes, which only lately has been brought 
under some control. Pennsylvania had about 17,000 feeble 
minded in 1913. In a single county almshouse in that State 
were 105 women who had given birth to 101 defective children. 
One feeble-minded couple in the same State had 19 defective 
children; two other families had 9 imbeciles and 7 idiots. In 
New Jersey the history of 480 individuals of the famous "Kal- 
likak" family (a pseudonym), descended from a feeble-minded 
woman who lived at the time of the Revolutionary War, has 
been traced out, and of these descendants only 40 were nor 
mal. New York State has 32,000 known feeble-minded per 
sons. One State school for the feeble-minded in Indiana in 
1908 had 1054 inmates. There are 6000 mentally defective 
children in the schools of Chicago. An investigation made in 
Illinois about 1907 brought out the conclusion that all the de 
fectives and delinquents in that State at the time could be 
traced to 150 families. Poehlmann of Bonn traced the de 
scendants of one female drunkard through six generations in 
800 individuals, and of these 107 were illegitimate, 102 were 
beggars, 181 were prostitutes, 76 were criminals in a grave 
degree, 7 were murderers, and they had cost the State 
$1,206,000. The Jukes sisters, two illegitimate prostitutes in 
New York State, in five generations bred 709 criminals. Fifty- 


two per cent, of the women were prostitutes, whereas the or 
dinary ratio of prostitutes to other women is 1.66 per cent. 
Alcoholics engender degenerates. In three generations of 215 
French alcoholic families, Legrand found that 60 per cent, of 
the children were degenerates. Bourneville found that 62 per 
cent, of 1000 idiotic, epileptic, and feeble-minded children in 
Paris had alcoholic parents. 

Hereditary transmission is certainly a cause also of many 
diseases of the nervous system. Friedrich s ataxia is heredi 
tary. It is an incurable progressive incoordination of the limbs, 
tongue, larynx, and eyes, which attacks commonly between the 
tenth and the twentieth year, and the patient dies from some 
intercurrent disease, usually an infection. Progressive mus 
cular dystrophy is also hereditary and incurable. The legs and 
trunk atrophy, and death comes from an intercurrent disease. 
Kelated to this malady are hereditary progressive neurotic 
muscular atrophy, progressive spinal muscular atrophy in in 
fants, and progressive spinal amyotrophy in adults. Amaurotic 
(amaurosis, blindness) family idiocy is hereditary, and the 
child dies at about two years of age. Huntington s chorea 
appears in every generation of an affected family. Its symp 
toms show between the ages of thirty and forty years, and it 
progresses from choreic and ataxic signs to dementia and death. 
The death is often by suicide. In eastern Long Island, south 
western Connecticut, and eastern Massachusetts 962 cases were 
all traced back to six persons, three of whom were probably 
brothers, who came to America in the seventeenth century. In 
the 3000 relatives of these choreics were 39 cases of epilepsy, 
51 cases of cerebral inflammation, 41 cases of hydrocephaly, 73 
feeble-minded children, and other evidences of neuroses. The 
heredity in this disease is apparently Mendelian. Besides 
the diseases enumerated here, there are several pathologic con 
ditions of the eyes which are hereditary presenile cataract, 
stationary night blindness, and retinitis pigmentosa. If the 
persons who have these diseases are sexually sterile, evidently 
the heredity so far as they are concerned will be cut across; 
hence the advocates of legal sterilization wish to have these 
patients sterilized to protect society. 


The surgical operation by which the man is sterilized ac 
cording to the State laws mentioned above is an interruption of 
the continuity of the vasa deferentia near the testicles. This 
interruption may be a severing of each vas, a cutting out of a 
part of each vas, or a ligation of the vasa. The term vasectomy 
is now used loosely to cover all these methods. The vas defer- 
ens, or seminal duct, passes from the testicle up along the 
groin on each side, in through the belly-wall by the inguinal 
canal, down along the pelvis and under the bladder, where it 
opens into the bottom of the urethra a short distance in front 
of the bladder exit. Each vas is about two feet in length, and 
it has a diameter of one-tenth of an inch throughout the greater 
part of its length, but its lumen is extremely narrow. 

There are two essential parts in the semen, the spermatozoa 
and the carrying liquid. The spermatozoa, which fructify the 
ovum, are formed in the testicle ; the liquid, which is the essen 
tial vehicle of the spermatozoa, and without which the sper 
matozoa are inert and sterile, is secreted, except a few drops 
from the testicles, at the distal end of the vasa deferentia under 
the base of the bladder, in the seminal vesicles, the prostate 
gland, and Cowper s and Littre s glands. The semen is made 
up of 90 per cent, water and 10 per cent, solids, and in these 
solids is the nitrogenous base called spermin, which is produced 
by the interstitial cells of the testicles and the prostate gland. 
Ovarin, secreted from the ovaries, corresponds in the woman 
to spermin in the man. The ductless glands, and some that 
have ducts, produce secretions which sustain the tone of the 
blood-vessels and neutralize the toxins from waste substances 
while these are in the body before excretion. An excess of 
spermin or ovarin causes congestion of the cerebrum and cere 
bellum and the nerve centres there, with consequent sexual 
erethism. When there is a pathologic sexual erethism from an 
excess of spermin or ovarin, vasectomy, castration, spaying, or 
the menopause cuts off this excess and the erethism disappears. 
Sometimes the waste product toxins excite the patient when the 
spermin or ovarin has been eliminated, just as the excess of 
spermin or ovarin excites, and the neurotic disturbance or 


sexual erethism continues until compensation by other glands 
neutralizes the irritating substance. 

The testicles in man are by no means the sole organ of 
generation. There are at least seventeen distinct organs in the 
male generative system. The seminal vesicles with the pros 
tate gland are as necessary in generation as the testicles, as 
their removal sterilizes the spermatozoa and prevents the for 
mation of the liquid vehicle. Castration effects an atrophy 
of several parts of the generative tract, and an irremediable 
degeneration ; vasectomy cuts off the spermatozoa but causes no 
atrophy or degeneration, and the condition is remediable. Dr. 
Edward Martin of Philadelphia found active living spermato 
zoa in a testicle that had been ligated off for twenty years. 

Running along the vasa deferentia, within the sheath of 
the two spermatic cords, are the spermatic arteries, the pam- 
piniform plexus of veins, and the deferential arteries. These 
vessels, with the vas deferens and the sheath enveloping the 
bundle, make up the spermatic cord. In vasectomy, under local 
anesthesia, a slit is made through the skin of the scrotum be 
hind, the sheath of the spermatic cord is opened, and the vas 
is isolated and tied or cut. The skin wound is left to heal. 
This operation is repeated on the second vas. If the blood 
vessels in the cord are ligated or cut with the vas, the testicle 
will atrophy; if the vas alone is operated upon, the testicle 
is not injured. The person upon whom vasectomy has been 
done is conscious of no change. The semen is discharged 
as before the operation, but in a slightly less quantity, and it 
is, of course, sterile from the lack of spermatozoa. 

Dr. Carrington of Virginia reported, in 1910, 3 twelve cases 
of vasectomy on convicts. He said ten of this dozen had been 
confirmed masturbators, and all were cured by vasectomy. One 
masturbating epileptic was cured of both conditions. Two dan 
gerous homicides were rendered harmless and peaceable. One 
of these two homicides was a negro under a long sentence for 
murder. He grew insane in prison, and while insane killed 
a second person. A confirmed masturbator and sodomist, and 
a dangerous savage, he became lucid and relapsed into insanity 

* Virginia Medical Semi-monthly, vols. xiv, xv. 

several times. A year after vasectomy he was "a sleek, fat, 
docile, intelligent fellow, a trusty about the yard." 

Dr. Sharp of Indianapolis, after ten years experience with 
the operation, during which time he did 456 vasectomies, says: 4 
"There is no atrophy of the testicle, no cystic degeneration, no 
disturbed mental or nervous condition following." He says, 
further, that 176 men in the Indiana Reformatory asked him 
to perform the operation on them. Vasectomy tends to check 
masturbation, and the minds of the masturbators frequently 
improve after the operation. 

If a man has been sterilized by vasectomy, restoration of 
function and removal of the sterility seems practically always 
possible. If a ligature has been used, releasing the ligature 
restores function. Dr. William T. Belfield of Chicago 5 re 
stored function fully by removing the ligature eight weeks 
after it had been applied. In a letter to me, Dr. Belfield said : 
"My observation accords with the general experimental and 
clinical experience that the restoration of the lumen after 
vasectomy or ligation, or both, is more certain than the lasting 
occlusion of the vasa by these measures. The perseverance of 
natural forces in restoring the lumen of the vas and the suc 
cess achieved over such obstacles as silk ligatures is surpris 
ing until one reflects upon the natural factors favoring such 
restoration. In one case I tied a waxed (to avoid cutting 
through) silk ligature tightly around the sheath of each vas; 
a specimen examined a month later was devoid of sperms; one 
six months later contained plenty of them. I cut down upon 
the ligatures, found them in place and neatly encysted, and re 
moved them. Evidently the pressure from behind had squeezed 
a passage on at least one side. The gynecologists have learned 
that ligatures around the Fallopian tubes are apt to cut through, 
whereupon the tubal lumen is restored, though pressure must 
be less than in the vas. Even when a piece of the vas has 
been excised cases of spontaneous restoration have been ob 
served in men and dogs." 8 

4 Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., December 4, 1909. 
*Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., October 19, 1912. 
* Belfield, loc. cit. 


When the ends of a cut vas are released from cicatricial 
tissue, these ends may be sutured together ; but as the lumen of 
the vas is extremely small, there is sometimes obliteration by 
occlusion at the juncture. Christian and Sanderson 7 de 
scribed a method of preventing this obliteration. A piece of 
No. O twenty-day catgut is inserted three-eighths of an inch 
into each end of the vas, and these ends are brought together 
by two catgut sutures, leaving the inserted catgut in the canal. 
The ends heal together and the catgut in the canal is absorbed. 
This method has been used successfully to join the cut end of 
a Fallopian tube. 

Gemelli 8 did vasectomy on eleven dogs and seven cats ; 
about six months later he reunited the cut ends, and on dis 
section found restoration perfect, anatomically and function 
ally, in the eighteen animals. The vas deferens in these ani 
mals is smaller than in man; and therefore offers greater dif 
ficulty in the suturing. He used no inserted catgut, but told 
me he employed the method Carrel applies in joining cut ar 
teries. In one case, where the dissection was broad, he suc 
cessfully inserted a piece of a vas taken from another animal. 
Whether there is occlusion or not after end-to-end suturing de 
pends largely on the skill of the surgeon. 

Dr. Edward Martin of the Pennsylvania University 9 and 
Delbet 10 have removed sterility by effecting a patulous anas 
tomosis between the vas and the epididymis, and this method is 
applicable after vasectomy by cutting, but it is not successful, 
as a rule. It has been done effectively where the vas had no 
stricture. McKenna, 11 in five attempts on men, succeeded once. 
Fiirbringer 12 said that in his experience with a thousand cases 
of double epididymis, the condition is incurable in 80 per cent, 
of the gonorrheal infections. 

Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., December 13, 1913. 
8 La Scuola Cattolica, November, 1911. 

* University of Pennsylvania Medical Bulletin, 1902, p. 388; 1903, 
xv, 2; Therapeutic Gazette, December 15, 1909. 

10 Revue de Therapeutique Medico-chirurgicale, January 15, 1912. 

11 Journal Amer. Med. Assoc., January 20, 1915. 
13 Deutsche med. Wochenschrift, xxxix, 29. 


Apart from the so-called vasectomy law, gynecologists quite 
frequently sterilize women who have chronic heart disease, 
tuberculosis, nephritis, diabetes, or hereditary mental taints. 
Some men, like Spinelli, Cramer, Polak, and others, would 
sterilize also in chronic anemia, persistent albuminuria, 
epilepsy, syphilis, contracted pelvis, diseases of metabolism, 
infections, and cirrhosis of the liver. There are several meth 
ods of sterilizing women removal of the ovaries, ligation of 
the Fallopian tubes, resection of portions of the tubes, resection 
of the whole tube on each side, cutting the tubes and burying 
the cut end in the tissues by various methods, and destruction 
of the lining of the uterus by vaporization or the thermocautery. 
De Tarnowsky 1S describes the various methods. Some liga- 
tions and short resections have failed to sterilize. When the 
ovaries or uterus are removed, or the major part of the tubes 
are resected, or the lining of the uterus has been destroyed, the 
sterilization is permanent. Almost certainly function could be 
restored where the resection of the tubes is not too destructive. 
Apart from the matter of mutilation, the effects of double 
oophorectomy are very grave, 14 and removal of the uterus or 
the ovaries merely for sterilization is not only immoral, but al 
together unjustifiable scientifically. 

A phase of this subject which is important and has occa 
sioned much discussion is whether vasectomy causes sexual 
impotence or not. From a medical point of view, there is no 
question of impotence; physicians would say it causes sterility 
only. Most canonists, however, hold that the condition after 
vasectomy is technically impotence in the canonical sense. Fer- 
reres of Tortosa, a leading Spanish canonist, in several articles 
in the Ecclesiastical Review, in Razon y Fe (xxviii, 376; xxxi, 
496), and in his book De Vasectomia Duplici (Madrid, 1913), 
opposed my opinion published in 1912 and 1913, which then 
was that vasectomy does not cause canonical impotence. De 
Smet of Bruges 15 holds that it causes impotence. So do 

"Jour. Amer. Med. Assoc., April 19, 1913. 

14 See the chapter on Gonorrhea. 

18 Ecclesiastical Review, September, 1912. 


Ojetti, 18 Rene Michaud, 17 Wouters, 18 Eschbach, 19 Capello, 20 
Stucchi, 21 De Becker, Vermeersch, De Villers, and Salsmans of 
the University of Louvain, and others. Gemelli of Milan 22 
agreed with me. The weight of authority is certainly in favor 
of the notion of impotence, but the arguments are by no means 
convincing, as virtually every canonist who has discussed the 
question has made gross misstatements of the physical facts in 
the case. 

If a man or woman is impotent, the disability is an impedi- 
mentum juris naiuralis, and as such it would nullify any mar 
riage, no matter what the dispensation. There are two opin 
ions among moralists as to the essence of canonical impotence. 

I. Some hold that any permanent obstruction to fecunda 
tion, no matter in what stage of the physiological process or in 
what part of the genital tract it occurs, constitutes impotence. 
They maintain that a woman whose ovaries or uterus have been 
removed is impotent. Roman Congregations have promulgated 
several decrees in peculiar cases permitting the marriage of 
spayed women; but, these moralists say, it is not clear that in 
those special cases the entire ovary on each side of the whole 
uterus was taken out; they hold there is doubt as to the fact. 
And, since there is disagreement of moralists, the Holy Office or 
other congregations would give the same decision because of the 
dubium juris. 

April 2, 1909, the Congregation on the Discipline of the 
Sacraments decreed that the marriage of a Spanish woman, 
from whom, according to the physician in charge of the case, 
the uterus and both ovaries had certainly been removed, should 
not be prevented. 

February 3, 1887, the Holy Office made the same decree in 
the case of a woman from whom the uterus and both ovaries had 
been removed. 

19 Synopsis Rerum Moralium et Juris Pontificii, 31st ed., n. 2425. 
" Nouvelle Revue Theologique. 

w Nederlandische Katholische Stemmen, January 15, 1911. 
" Analecta Ecclesiastica, September, 1911, and La Scuola Catto- 
lica, February, 1912. 

"La Scuola Cattolica, February, 1912. 
*Ilid., November, 1911. 
" Ibid., November, 1911. 


July 23, 1890, the Holy Office made the like decree under 
the same conditions. 

July 31, 1895, the Holy Office permitted the marriage of 
a woman from whom both ovaries had been removed. 

Another case, in 1902, in which the physician was not cer 
tain that the whole ovary on each side had been removed, was 
decided in the same manner. 

There have been, then, four decisions so far permitting the 
marriage of women who lacked both ovaries, and three of these 
women lacked the uterus also. The Congregation of the 
Council has made four decisions in recent time forbidding the 
marriage of women because of impotence; March 21, 1863, 
a case in which there was neither vagina nor uterus; January 
24, 1871, a case in which the vagina was only two inches in 
depth; September 7, 1895, a case in which the vagina was ob 
literated in greater part; December 16, 1899, a case in which 
the vagina was only five centimetres in depth. 

That a woman who certainly lacks both ovaries is canonic- 
ally impotent is the opinion of Antonelli, 23 Lehmkuhl, 24 Eos- 
set, 25 Alberti, 26 Bucceroni, 27 and others. These men meet the 
decisions of the congregations concerning the spayed women by 
saying it is not certain the whole ovarian tissue or the entire 
uterus was removed, although as a matter of fact the physician 
in one case testified explicitly that both ovaries and the whole 
uterus were undoubtedly removed. That a woman lacking 
both ovaries is not impotent is the opinion of Gasparri, D An- 
nibale, Genicot, Berardi, Aertnys, Tanquerey, Ojetti, De Smet, 
and others. 28 

II. The second opinion on impotence is that this condi 
tion is caused exclusively by those permanent disabilities which 
exist in the copula itself. If the sexual act contains in itself 
all that is essential to generation, if the copula is de se apta ad 

** Medicina Pastoralis, vol. ii, n. 43. 
** Theologia Moralis, 8th ed., ii, n. 744. 
15 De Matrimonio. 
" Theologia Pastoralis, p. iv, n. 88. 
" Theologia Moralis, ii, n. 994. 

K See Ferreres, De Vasectomia Duplici necnon de Matrimonio Mu- 
lieris Excisae, p. 110. Madrid, 1913. 


generationem, prescinding from all antecedent and subsequent, 
temporary or permanent, obstructions to generation, there is 
no impotence. In this opinion the woman without ovaries is 
not impotent, but the vasectomized man is ; in the first opinion 
both the mulier excisa and the vasectomized man are impotent. 
The second group says the vasectomized man is incapable of 
performing an act de se apta ad generationem because his semen 
lacks the essential spermatozoa. If one objects that the spayed 
woman, who is not impotent according to some moralists that 
so interpret the decisions of the congregations, lacks the essen 
tial ovum, so that she cannot perform an act de se apta ad 
generationem because she has nothing to generate with, they 
answer that her copula is per se apta, that there happens in it 
everything which takes place in a copula from which gen 
eration actually follows. The vasectomized man cannot go 
through the form of the act with all the elements which, so far 
as the act is concerned, are required and sufficient for genera 
tion because he lacks the spermatozoa, but the mulier excisa 
can. His inability is intrinsic to the act, it vitiates the very 
substance of the act; her inability to present ova is not in 
trinsic to the act, they say. All that is necessary in her 
case is that she be capable of receiving the semen. 

Marriage was instituted to beget children; that is the 
proper end of the contract, its basic justification. Whenever the 
debitum is used it must be with the intention of generating 
children. Even the use of marriage as a remedy of con 
cupiscence is so secondary an end that it alone is not enough 
to legitimize marriage. Because a woman does not always 
have ova present in the tubes, and there is no means of 
knowing just when the ova are present, it is justifiable to re 
peat the conjugal act until the woman is impregnated; sec 
ondarily and dcpendently, the repetition may be a remedy of 
concupiscence. The sexual act does not form either the sper 
matozoa or the ova; these pre-exist. The spermatozoa are 
always released in a normal sexual act; the ova are not always 
present when the spermatozoa are released. A copula which 
is perfectly de se apta ad generationem supposes not at the 
time the presence of both sperm and ovum, but it does sup- 

pose the possibility of the ovum, otherwise generation is ut 
terly impossible; and every copula becomes justifiable solely 
because there is a hope that it may be present. It is a mere 
quibble to say that an act is de se apta ad generationem if by 
no possibility generation ever can take place; nevertheless the 
congregations in four cases have apparently judged to the 
contrary. In these special decisions, however, Rosset, Antonelli, 
Bucceroni, and Palmieri hold there was a doubt in the minds 
of the members of the congregation as to the complete removal 
of the ovaries or uterus. Bucceroni expressly states 29 that the 
Cardinal Secretary of the Holy Office told him personally the 
members of the congregation supposed in the particular cases 
that generation could follow. Therefore these decisions do not 
say that the mulier excisa in general is not impotent or potent ; 
they merely gave the women of these cases the benefit of the 
doubt. The question is entirely open so far as these decisions 
are concerned. 

Those who hold that vasectomy causes canonical impotence 
say also the constitution of Sixtus V. forbidding the marriage 
of eunuchs is applicable necessarily to the vasectomized man, 
because the semen from the vasectomized man, inasmuch as it 
lacks spermatozoa, is not genuine semen, and Sixtus V. said 
eunuchs cannot produce true semen. The relevant passage in 
the constitution is: "Cum frequenter in istis regionibus 
eunuchi et spadones, qui utroque teste carent, et ideo certum 
ac manifestum est eos verum semen emittere non posse; quia 
impura carnis tentigine atque iminundis complexibus cum 
mulieribus se comiscent, et humorem forsan quemdam similem 
semini, licet ad generationem et ad matrimonii causam minime 
aptam, effundunt, matrimonium . . . contrahere praesumant 
. . . mandamus ut conjugia per dictos et alios quoscumque 
eunuchos . . . contrahi prohibeas." 

Sixtus V. says here: (1) that eunuchs "who lack both tes 
ticles certainly and evidently cannot emit true semen" ; (2) that 
"although eunuchs may perhaps produce a kind of liquid re 
sembling semen, this is by no means fit for generation or mar 
riage"; (3) therefore eunuchs are forbidden to marry. The 
" Theologia Noralis, 5th ed., vol. ii, p. 391, n. 994. 


effects of castration in the eunuch are: (a) that all spermato 
zoa are absent; (&) that, as a consequence of the absence of the 
testicles, the power of penetration is lost; (c) that, as another 
consequence, the liquor setmnis, which normally is formed in 
the seminal vesicles, the prostate and other glands, is no longer 
secreted. The eunuch, then, is completely impotent, in the full 
sense of the term. Ferreres is of the opinion, erroneously, that 
eunuchs, as a rule, have the power of penetration and of 
emitting a humor semini similis, and that amputation of the 
penis is requisite to cause impotence in eunuchs. There are 
only five authentic cases of temporary apparent potence in 
eunuchs in modern medical records, and these are explicable as 
cases of erethism from waste-product intoxication. 

The canonists who hold that the vasectomized man is im 
potent interpret the words of Sixtus V. to fit their opinion, 
although the vasectomized man has all the sexual potency of 
the normal man except that his spermatozoa are occluded. The 
potestas coeundi is not lost in any degree; neither he nor the 
woman is conscious of any change whatever. Only the micro 
scope can tell that the spermatozoa are absent if the fact that 
ho has been vasectomized is not told. Moreover, if vasectomy 
has been done by mere cutting without considerable resection, 
and especially if the vasa have been shut by ligation alone, no 
one can be certain that the occlusion is either certain or per 
manent. There is always doubt that the spermatozoa are pres 
ent if the microscope is not used, and these canonists all dis 
claim the use of the microscope in such circumstances. The 
argument Ferreres uses, to the effect that the absence of sper 
matozoa is seriously injurious to the woman, is a supposition 
of his own arising from an erroneous notion of potency in the 
vasectomized. This absence is not injurious to her, but it is 
probably injurious to the vasectomized man because of the 
partial ejaculation. Onanism, which is different, is decidedly 
injurious to both the man and the woman. 

Onanism, coitus interruptus, or withdrawal before ejacula 
tion, which takes place extra vas, is intended to prevent im 
pregnation. In the normal sexual act the male genital tract 
suddenly becomes congested with blood through nervous action 


of centres in the lumbar cord and the cerebrum. Cowper s and 
Littre s glands secret an alkaline fluid which neutralizes the 
acid urine in the urethra and thus prevents killing of the sper 
matozoa. Muscular peristaltic action presses out the sperma 
tozoa and the secretions of the seminal vesicles and the pros 
tate. When the act is normal there is a complete emptying of 
the tract of semen and of the blood engorgement; in coitus 
interruptus there is incomplete ejaculation and only partial 
deplethorization. The seminal vesicles remain distended, and 
this distention, with the congestion of the prostate, causes con 
tinual excitation of the sexual centres without relief. There is 
irritability and exhaustion of the centres, and this state brings 
on premature ejaculation and final impotentia coeuiidi. Other 
common effects arc tenesmus of the urinary bladder, incon 
tinence of urine, nocturnal pollutions, sexual neurasthenia, pain 
in the legs, over the eyes, and in almost any part of the body, 
general weakness, headache, vertigo, cardiac palpitation, neu 
rotic dyspepsia, and a train of psychic symptoms which not sel 
dom end in suicide. 

In the woman there is the like blood engorgement and a 
pouring out of the secretions of Bartholin s and the other glands, 
but deplethorization takes place later in the woman than in the 
man, and for this reason the woman suffers more from coitus 
interruptus than the man does. In onanism, as in masturba 
tion, after the diseased conditions have beeen established it is 
extremely difficult to induce the patient to resist the almost 
overwhelming irritation. 

The canonists have interpreted the text of Sixtus V. to the 
effect that the eunuch is impotent precisely and solely because 
he cannot produce semen "elaboratum in testibus." No man 
produces semen elaboratum in testibus more than 93 per cent, 
of the semen is produced entirely outside the testicle; nothing 
but the spermatozoa and two or three drops of a lubricating fluid 
are produced in the testicles. The eunuch really is impotent 
because the removal of the testicles and their nervous system 
so breaks the genital circuit, which consists of at least seven 
teen distinct parts, that erection is prevented, the formation of 
spermatozoa is impossible, the secretion of the essential vehicle 


of the sperm and of the fluids which render it fertile is cut 
off. The eunuch cannot penetrate and he cannot form any 
semen; he is impotent; the vasectomized man can penetrate, 
and he forms a semen which is sterile. 

I think now the vasectomized man is really impotent for the 
reason that I think the mulier excim is impotent, but he is not 
impotent because of the constitution of Sixtus V., which is not 
relevant at all to his case. 

If the vasectomized man is impotent, the following cases 
are also impotent: 

1. A man whose germ-cells have been destroyed by the 
action of the X-ray. 

2. A man with double permanent occluding epididymitis. 

3. A man whose vasa deferentia open into the ureters and 
not into the urethra. 

4. A man whose vasa are shut by surgical operations for 
stone, or cysts of the prostate, or seminal vesicles. 

5. A man whose seminal vesicles are shut by concretions, 
cysts, or tumors. 

6. A man with bilateral cryptorchidism. 

7. A man with a tuberculous condition of the testicles. 

8. A man with absolute neurotic aspermia. 

9. A man with congenital lack of development of the tes 
ticles or vasa. 

Sterility in the male would exist only in advanced diabetes, 
general tuberculosis, senility, or in cases of absent or diseased 
prostate gland or seminal vesicles. 

Here it is worth noting that since the copula must be nat 
ural, fit for generation in the natural manner, artificial im 
pregnation by the use of instruments is immoral, and forbid 
den by a decree of the Holy Office, promulgated March 24, 
1897. Artificial impregnation does not effect a copula which 
is by its nature proper to generation, but is an act contrary 
to nature, one from which generation does not follow in a 
natural manner, secundum communem speciem actus. It sup 
poses deliberate pollution and semination outside the vagina, 
both of which actions are intrinsically evil. 

In discussing tho morality of vasectomy the following points 
must be considered: 

1. In what degree of mutilation is vasectomy ? 

2. Vasectomy may be done either at the request or by 
the permission of the vasectomized person; or by order of the 

(a) If done by the request or permission of the vasectom 
ized person, it may be either (1) as a means to use 
the debitum without the inconvenience of having chil 
dren; or (2) as a therapeutic measure to cure some 

(&) If done by order of the State, it may be (1) a pun 
ishment; or (2) a prophylactic measure to avert 
physical or moral evil in society. 

If vasectomy causes canonical impotence, that fact adds a 
special moral quality. The weight of authority is on the side 
that it does cause canonical impotence, as has already been 

A slight mutilation, in the sense of the term as commonly 
used, can be any permanent effect of a wound, bruise, or sim 
ilar cause, from a mere scar to an amputation or other injury 
whereby any member of the body is rendered unfit for normal 
action. That the causal wound or injury is trivial in itself, 
apart from its effect, as in vasectomy, has little or no direct 
bearing on the morality of the mutilation. It is possible to 
have a very gross mutilation without extensive wounding. We 
can blind a man permanently by putting the point of a fine 
cambric needle one-twentieth of an inch within the pupil. 

Vasectomy is a grave mutilation because (1) it removes 
from the man the power of generation; (2) it inhibits the 
function of the testicle, which is an important organ of the 
body. Although they are not the entire organ of generation, 
the testicles are together a complete organ in themselves, the 
function of which is to produce the spermatozoa essential to 
the procreation of the human species. If by a wound one 
inhibits the function of the testicles, he gravely mutilates the 
human body, for a grave mutilation is nothing but an inhibi- 


tion of the function of a distinct organ through a wound. 

A mutilation of this kind, since it frustrates the production 
and action of the human generative semen and prevents gen 
eration, is what is technically called a mortal sin against na 
ture, unless there is sufficient cause to necessitate the frustra 
tion, such as to save life, to restore as a sole means the health 
of the whole body, to protect society, or a similar reason. What 
is said here of vasectomy is true for fallectomy or other methods 
of sterilizing the woman. Fallectomy, however, is in itself a 
dangerous operation, and oophorectomy is never justifiable as 
a mere method of sterilization because of its very injurious 
effects on the whole body and mind of the woman. 

Among the decretals of Gregory in Corpus Juris (lib. v, tit. 
xii, c. 5) is the following canon: "If any one, for the sake of 
indulging lust, or through revenge, does anything to a man or 
woman, or gives them anything to drink, whereby they cannot 
generate, or conceive, or bear children, he is to be treated as a 
homicide." Any one who sterilizes a man by vasectomy or a 
woman by fallectomy or oophorectomy, for an improper mo 
tive, ipso facto falls under this decree, and is before the canon 
law classed in the same category as a murderer; that is, the 
agent is deemed guilty of a grave crime against nature. 

If a man has vasectomy done upon himself, his intention 
may be (1) to use the debitum without the inconvenience of 
having children; or (2) to avert from a wife with a narrow 
pelvis the dangers of the cesarean section or other obstetrical 
operation to herself and the child ; or (3) to avoid the transmis 
sion to possible offspring of a hereditary disease like Hunting- 
ton s chorea or one of the others mentioned at the beginning of 
this chapter ; or (4) to cure himself of some malady. 

1. If vasectomy is done merely to be able to use the de 
bitum without the inconvenience of having children, it is evi 
dently illicit. It is in that condition the same as onanism; it 
is contrary to the basic justification of marriage; it is a frus 
tration of nature ; and so on. 

2. If it is done to safeguard a wife with a narrow pelvis 
it is a means, evil in itself, used directly to effect a good end ; 
and a good end, or any end or effect, never justifies a direct 

evil means or cause. There is in reality no such thing as a 
good effect from an evil means or cause; the evil means or 
cause essentially and substantially vitiates the effect. There is 
no question here of a double effect, one good and one evil, 
wherein the good effect is intended and the evil permitted, both 
coming with equal directness from the single causal act. On tho 
contrary, from the vasectomy here there is the single direct 
effect that the man is sterilized, and then directly from this 
sterility comes the desired effect, the protection of the wife. 
For exactly the same reason, vasectomy done to prevent the 
transmission of a hereditary disease is illicit; it is an evil 
means used directly to effect an end intended. In artificial 
abortion when the fetus is inviable the act done is to empty the 
uterus, and this act itself kills the fetus, which is not an unjust 
aggressor, and is murder. This murder may save the mother s 
life, but the end does not justify the means. The vasectomy to 
protect the mother s life or to avert an evil heredity is a parallel 
case. 30 

The fourth case supposes that the vasectomy was done to 
cure the man of some malady. If there were a malady that 
endangered the patient s life, or destroyed the health of the 
body and it could be cured by vasectomy, the operation would 
of course be licit for the reasons given in the chapter on Gen 
eral Principles concerning Mutilation. Dr. Carrington tells 
us 31 that he did vasectomy on an epileptic convict and cured 
him. Such a cure is doubtful as to permanence. He describes 
two dangerous insane negro homicides who were rendered harm 
less by vasectomy. In cases like those of the homicides any one 
responsible for them would probably be justified in having the 
operation done, although these two cases are the only direct 
ones on record. Epileptics sometimes show a homicidal tend 
ency, but it is doubtful that vasectomy would help them. The 
operation of vasectomy as a cure for bodily ill has a very limited 
field. There are very many conditions in women where it is 
necessary to remove the ovaries or the tubes to save life, or to 

10 See the chapter on General Principles concerning Mutilation 
for an explanation of the act with a double effect. 
31 Virginia Medical Semi-monthly, vols. xiv, xv. 


cure chronic invalidism of an unbearable nature. These con 
ditions are discussed in the chapter on Gonorrhea. There is 
no objection to the removal of a tube or an ovary when such 
removal is absolutely necessary, but the necessity must be 
clearly evident. There is a tendency in some surgeons to 
mutilate women in this manner without sufficient reason or to 
follow out a therapeutic theory. 

Men, like Sharp, who have done hundreds of vasectomies, 
say the operation commonly removes the inclination to mas 
turbation. Masturbation is, as a rule, a moral condition, but 
it can, like alcoholism, come to have a large physical element. 
Idiots almost unexceptionally have this vice, and in them there 
is no morality possible. If by vasectomy they can be cured of 
this vice, which injures their health and is a social indecency 
and a source of sin in observers, the operation would be licit in 
their case. When the patient is morally responsible vasectomy 
would not be licit, as there is no adequation between a physical 
evil like sterilization and a moral vice. There are cases of 
pathological sexual erethism which are so violent that the pa 
tients must be put into strait-jackets to prevent constant mas 
turbation. The semen of such patients is usually devoid of sper 
matozoa. If the patient is confined in a strait-jacket he will 
die, and vasectomy, according to Sharp, will quiet such a man. 
Vasectomy would be permissible in these circumstances. 

The question has arisen in the case of a sane masturbator 
who is neurotic, weak-willed, and a confirmed addict to his 
vice, whether or not his vasa might be tied off by ligatures, 
temporarily, with the intention of removing the ligature later 
and restoring function. I think not. Even temporary sterili 
zation is sterilization, a grave mutilation, while it lasts, and 
the condition is really moral fundamentally, and therefore not 
a fitting object for physical remedies. 

When vasectomy is done by the State, it is done either as a 
penal or as a prophylactic measure. As a general statement we 
can say the State in certain conditions has the right to kill or 
mutilate a criminal in defence of the social order; but even 
then any punishment, to be justifiable, must be effective and 
necessary, and it has to be either reformative, exemplary, or 


reparative in regard to the crime for which it is inflicted. 
Capital punishment and mutilation are effective usually, and 
are necessary for the preservation of society. The natural law 
permits the State to preserve itself against the unjust encroach 
ments of individuals by curtailing their rights in so far as 
that curtailment is effective and necessary: since the natural 
law requires the existence of civil society, it must allow what 
is necessary for the preservation of that society. There is no 
question here of a good end justifying evil means; the means 
which otherwise would be evil in these conditions become good. 
Homicide and mutilation are not mere killing or mere maiming, 
but unjust killing or unjust maiming. Killing or maiming is 
not intrinsically wrong under all circumstances, as lying, 
blasphemy, and some other crimes are; nevertheless, as a pun 
ishment by maiming, vasectomy is ordinarily wrong, and there 
fore a law making it an ordinary mode of punishment for cer 
tain whole classes of criminals, or all criminals, is unjust. 

It is wrong because as a punishment it is neither effective 
nor necessary nor reformatory nor exemplary nor reparative 
it lacks every quality of a justifiable punishment. In Dr. 
Sharp s list of vasectomies done in Indiana prisons, 176 opera 
tions were done on men who voluntarily asked for vasectomy. 
There is no pain, no inconvenience caused by the operation, no 
sexual change perceptible, but a fitting of the criminal to in 
dulge his lust without the various inconveniences of impreg 
nation. Instead of being reformatory, it is conducive to crime. 
I find only one man who objected to vasectomy. 32 In this man 
vasectomy was added to life imprisonment as a punishment for 

The legislators in the States which have passed the vasec 
tomy law all seem to have been influenced by the pseudoscien- 
tific notion that criminality is a hereditary condition, a physical 
disease, and not a matter of volition. This Lombrosan absurd 
ity is now held by no physical scientist, and from an ethical 
point of view it is nonsense. Moreover, if the State vasectom- 
ized all the criminals in the jails, this method would not ap 
preciably affect the supply of criminals, nor reach an appre- 

85 State of Washington vs. Feilen, 126 Pac. R. 75. 


ciable minority of the criminal class, as the most dangerous 
criminals are not in jails. 

The operation is not a punishment to the men upon whom 
it is done, but it is an unnecessary deprivation of an essential 
right of these men, an excessive, ill-ordered attack on a primary 
right of man, and an act of violence against human nature 
and its Author without adequate reason. The law is against 
the natural order because it directly deprives a man, and that 
against his will, of functions which are at times a moral neces 
sity to him, and puts him into the occasion of sin. Vasectomy 
does not remove his venereal desires, but gives opportunity to 
lust; it turns the conjugal relation into mere onanism and de 
grades marriage into a crime. Other conditions, like military 
service, in which necessity obliges the State to place its citi 
zens and thus prevent the conjugal relation, cause an indirect 
temporary prevention, reluctantly permitted, not directly in 
tended. Vasectomy is an evil directly intended. 

It is to the interest of the State to prevent the transmission 
of hereditary disease, and in doing so it may to a certain de 
gree curtail the natural liberty of its citizens. When the peril 
is great, as in a plague, the State may isolate infected individ 
uals, and thus indirectly, but temporarily, prevent a natural 
right namely, the conjugal relation. It may even perpetually 
isolate, as in leprosy. Vasectomy, however, is a direct pre 
vention without reason, and it is done as a direct evil means 
to effect a so-called end which it never attains. 

A man with Huntington s chorea, if married and if he has 
children, will surely transmit the disease to some of these chil 
dren, and they to their children. Vasectomy on him will pre 
vent a propagation of his kind but will cure no disease. More 
over, he is not a criminal and not amenable to punishment. 
The bad effect, sterilization, must be perpetual in his case or 
it is foolish, but the sterilization is not a punishment, nor a 
means of saving the health of the patient. Whatever good 
comes of the act comes out of an evil cause. If such a man 
persists in marrying, his marriage might be prevented, but that 
is different from mutilating him. 

The State has no direct dominion over the lives or members 


of its citizens, nor are citizens naturally mere instruments for 
the good of the government; on the contrary, the government 
exists solely for the good and utility of the citizen. The State 
may not take the life of an innocent person, nor mutilate him, 
unless these acts are necessary either (1) to protect the life 
or rights of individuals; or (2) to preserve the social life of 
the commonwealth. Now, neither of these two requisites is 
present when there is question of vasectomizing a man. 

The right or life of no individual is at stake. The rights 
of the possible children, yet unborn, are not injured, because, 
as these children are not in existence, they have no rights. 
Should they come into being, it is always better to be, even 
though diseased, than not to be. The methods of cattle-breed 
ers in dealing with human beings is not a virtue in the State, 
but an outrage and a degradation of human nature. 

The rights of the wife are not injured, because she per 
sonally receives no injury; and if her possible children have 
chorea, for example, she either voluntarily took that risk when 
she married, or if she did not, through ignorance, there are other 
means to avoid the trouble than the evil of sterilization, which 
in itself would render the use of marriage onanistic. If the 
husband has syphilis, gonorrhea, leprosy, tuberculosis, or any 
other infectious disease, vasectomy is no protection for the 

May a physician employed by the State in a prison, an insti 
tution for the feeble-minded, or a like place, do vasectomy 
at the command of the law? Certainly he may not, except in 
those rare cases where vasectomy is permissible as described 

The advocates of freakish legislation harp on the asser 
tion that insanity and imbecility are increasing alarmingly, and 
as a consequence the entire nation is degenerating. To cure this 
evil we are to mutilate certain criminals and the mentally de^ 
fective. It is not true that insanity and mental imbecility 
are increasing in a very marked degree in the TJnited States. 
The number of inhabitants in this country is increasing rapidly, 
and as there are more people here than there were a few years 
ago, the number of the insane and the mentally defective has 


increased purl passu, but the percentage does not increase to 
any degree that calls for immoral and ineffective legislation. 
Only of late years have the State governments begun to clas 
sify, diagnose, and gather up the insane and the imbecile, 
whom we always have had with us, and these processes have 
brought the defectives into the light. 

Our late immigrants are not equal in race, in mental and 
moral strength, to the old northern European immigrants. In 
Philadelphia the foreign-born population is 24.7 per cent of 
the whole, but that foreign-born population gives us 44 per cent, 
of the indigent insane. In New York State 27 per cent, of 
the registered insane are not American citizens. What we need 
here is not sterilization, but a better control of the immigrant, 
a keeping out of the unfit. Again, our insanity percentage is 
increased avoidably by the undoubted increase of insanity 
among negroes. We are accountable for this because we do not 
care for our helpless negroes. These people are prevented by 
trades-unions from learning and working at elevating trades, 
and they are thus forced unjustly into a poverty and degrada 
tion which lead to vice and mental deterioration. The cure is 
not a jail surgeon s scalpel, evidently. 

A system of education that ignores the will, upon which 
morality and virtue are based, and substitutes a sham intellec 
tuality as elaborated by ignorant boards of education and ad 
ministered by emotional, half-educated women, together with a 
lack of genuine religion, is a prolific source of mental and 
moral deterioration and consequent degeneracy in the physical 
and moral orders. 0ur American public-school system is such, 
and its deity is the unwashed and crassly depraved god Demos, 
whose bible is the evening newspaper. If we could civilize our 
schools, we should have no mention of legislation by vagary. 


Ecclesiastical Review, vols. xlii, xliii, xliv, xlvi, xlvii, xlviii, 

passim. Philadelphia. 

Gemelli. La Scuola Cattolica, November, 1911. Milan. 
Stucchi. Ibid. 


Eschbach. Ibid., February, 1912 ; Analecta Ecclesiastica, Sep 
tember and October, 1911. 

Capello. La Scuola Cattolica, February, 1912. 

Michaud. Nouvelle Revue Theologique. Paris, 1914. 

Schmidt. Zeitschrift fiir katholische Theologie, nn. 1 and 4, 

Ferreres. De Vasectomia Duplici necnon de Matrimonio 
Mulieris Excisae. Madrid, 1913. 

De Smet. Collationes Brugenses, December, 1910. 

Wouters. Nederlandische kathol. Stemmen, January 15, 

Waffelaert. De Virtutibus Cardinalibus, vol. ii. Bruges, 

Sharp. Journal of the American Medical Association, Decem 
ber 4, 1909. This is the article which started the entire 
vasectomy controversy. 

Barker. Maryland Medical Journal, April, 1910. 

Bell. Hereditary Criminality. Medico-Legal Journal, vol. 
xvii. New York. 

Desfosses. Presse Med., vol. xviii. 

Rentoul. St. Thomas Hospital Gazette, vol. xx. London. 

Swift. Maine Medical Association Journal, December, 1914. 

Lydston. Medical Record, November 8, 1913. New York. 


A COROLLARY of the doctrine which treats of the 
destruction in medical practice of existent human life, 
is a consideration of what is called Birth Control, or the crim 
inal prevention of possible human life by onanistic contracep 
tive methods. There has been an agitation for several years 
past in western and northwestern Europe and in the United 
States to bring about the repeal of laws which forbid the 
spreading of information on the methods of preventing con 
ception. The laws which the agitators wish to have abrogated 
declare that contraceptive information is indecent and should 
be classed with the circulation of obscene literature, porno 
graphic pictures, and instruction in abortion. The birth con 
trol advocates pay no attention to accusations like those 
expressed in the laws, or to those made by persons who have 
accurate notions of morality and common decency, but assert 
that the spread of contraceptive information tends to benefit 
the individual and human society. 

Birth control as advocated by its perpetrators is intrin 
sically contrary to the natural law, and therefore immoral; it 
mentally and physically debases those that are guilty of the 
practice; it does not benefit the poor as its advocates claim 
it does; the arguments urged by its supporters are foolish and 
frequently deliberate untruths ; and it is destructive of society 
and the state. Broadly speaking the natural law rests on the 
principle that order, reason, justice, what is congruous with 
the nature of a being or faculty and tends to its perfection in 
being or action, should prevail, and that disorder, unreason, 
injustice, the unnatural, must be avoided. The right order 
of nature as established by the Supreme Creator of nature is 
the standard of action; what is contrary to that order is evil, 



wrong, destructive, criminal, injurious, or the like, in different 
circumstances, but altogether these deordinate conditions must 
be removed, not accepted. Morality also depends on these 
facts. Morality is merely the observance of the natural law, 
and immorality is revolt against that law. 

Since the natural law evidently prescribes that man must 
live in society and that the human race which constitutes this 
society, is to be preserved by the generation of new human 
beings who will replace those that die, or are made useless by 
disease or other accident, whatever tends to this sustention of 
humanity according to the natural law, and in the proper con 
ditions, is good, and whatever tends to the destruction of 
humanity is evil and to be avoided. 

The generation of new replacing human beings must take 
place only in the state of marriage, because thus solely the 
wife and the child are protected, the children are educated 
physically, mentally and morally, and the degradation and 
bestiality of promiscuous sexual relationship are averted. The 
first and principal end of marriage is the procreation of chil 
dren. That end of marriage must be the end on which is 
founded primarily the natural necessity for this contract, but 
the natural necessity for the contract is the propagation of 
the human kind through lawful generation and education. Mar 
riage, too, in its very nature is fitted for that chief end, and 
for that end it was instituted by the Author of nature a 
stable, perpetual association of the sexes for the attainment of 
what is requisite for the propagation of mankind. There are 
secondary ends of marriage, such as a reciprocal love and help 
of the husband and wife, and also that aspect of marriage 
which makes it a restraint upon promiscuous lust. These last, 
however, are not enough to justify marriage in themselves with 
out the first or chief end, which is the procreation of children. 

Whatever is subversive of the end of marriage, and that is 
the propagation of mankind, is subversive of the very founda 
tion of human society, is contrary to the nature of man, frus 
trates the primal function of nature, and is therefore essentially 
and always evil, as bestiality, sodomy, or incest are evil. Such 
is birth control as ordinarily practised. Birth control if it is 


effective through a reciprocal consent of a wedded couple, for 
grave reason, and solely by mutual abstention from the debitum 
may be in certain conditions an indifferent act morally. If, 
however, birth control is effected by contraceptive drugs, or 
like methods, it is a crime against nature, and always a crime 
which no circumstance can excuse, no more than no circumstance 
can excuse bestiality, sodomy, or incest. Secondly, marriage, 
which was instituted primarily to perpetuate the creative act 
of God, when such practices prevail degenerates to mere con 
cubinage, a gratification of lust protected from the police. 
Such practices, moreover, lower man and woman below the 
brutes, because brutes do not frustrate the natural law except 
in the case of the male rat and a few other low grade rodents 
and boar pigs. Onan is the patron of Birth Control advocates. 
The Book of Genesis said Onan, the son of Judah, "did a 
detestable thing, therefore the Lord slew him." 

These are the fundamental reasons those of us recognize 
who do not wish that the ignorant and vicious should be taught 
to act contrary to the natural law. Furthermore, there is 
always another way out of the difficulties, mostly imaginary, 
the birth control advocates conjure up. Granting that all the 
difficulties from multiple births are real, no end justifies essen 
tially evil means, and a subversion of the natural law is always 
essentially evil. War, homicide, and like acts are not always 
evil ; under certain circumstances both war and homicide may 
be holy deeds; but to act contrary to nature is never justifiable 
in any condition. If I owe a man a large sum of money it 
may be to the advantage of myself or my children that this 
man be removed, but that good end does not justify murder; 
no more does any condition of poverty justify a contraceptive 
act against nature, especially when such an act is never the 
sole means of evasion. We must protect the married state, 
but in America we are destroying it. Human society had its 
origin in marriage, and it depends on marriage for its preserva 
tion, but our American divorce laws have made marriage a 
travesty. In New York alone in 1016 there were 74,893 
women divorced, nearly twenty-eight times as many as were 


divorced in England and Wales in that year, and over forty- 
nine per cent, of these women were childless, very significantly. 
Probably ninety-five per cent, of the childless women had used 
contraceptive methods, yet there are few forces better able to 
hold the marriage knot tied as it should be tied than a child s 
fingers. In England and Wales, too, in 1916, forty per cent, 
of the divorced couples were also birth controllers, at least they 
had no children. Pennsylvania is much more shameless than 
New York in granting divorces for no reason at all. 

Among the arguments used by those in favor of spreading 
contraceptive information is that large families keep the labor 
ing classes down to low living standards, and it would be bet 
ter for those families and the state that these children were 
not born. Large families as such do not keep the laboring 
classes down to low standards of living; bad legislation which 
allows profiteering, which criminally permits extortion in the 
prices of food, clothing, in taxes, rents, the cost of coal, and the 
like, which does not force employers to give laborers an honest 
price for labor, or check the extortions of monopolists, and a 
hundred similar economic deeds of injustice, together with a 
parental shiftlessness, unthrift, alcoholism, lack of education 
through neglect, and so on indefinitely, are the causes. Big 
families have more wages than small families, and as a rule 
they do better than the small families when the children are 
old enough to work. Society is at fault, not the size of the 
family; the active and the passive selfish are at fault, not the 
babies ; the liars, hypocrites, and the buttoned pockets are at 
fault, not the holy innocents ; the professional meddlers in the 
business of better folk are the nuisance, not the blessed children, 
who are the brightest things in this darkened world until we 
spoil them, and make them like ourselves instead of better. 
One decent mother is worth a hundred shirkers who raise noth 
ing but lap dogs. 

The children of large families, the birth controllers say, 
are more aiflicted by infectious diseases than those of small 
families. I was for years in charge of the infectious diseases 
Bureau of the Washington Health Department, and I have had 
ample opportunity here and in Europe to study this matter. 


Large families in proper economic positions are not different 
from small families as regards the infectious diseases. These 
diseases spread among the poor because the houses of the poor 
are commonly owned by land sharks and politicians who laugh 
at health regulations ; our health departments can not get enough 
money away from the political ringleaders in power to employ 
capable sanitary experts; our laws for the regulation of medi 
cal practice and education are a disgrace to our civilization, 
and every town is swarming with quacks who can not recognize 
even smallpox when they see it. The fault here is in our 
selves not in the large families. Control the professional poli 
ticians and quacks and there will be no occasion for foolish talk 
about birth control. 

Again, the children of poor but large families, we are told, 
have slight or no chance to rise in the social order. Benjamin 
Franklin, however, one of the greatest men America has pro 
duced, was the youngest of seventeen children in a poor family ; 
Lyman Beecher, a poor man, had eleven children, and every 
man and woman among them became famous; Theodore 
Schwann, the father of the cell doctrine and of all modern 
biology, was one of thirteen poor children; John Mueller, one 
of the greatest of modern scientists, and the Father of German 
medicine, was one of five children of a very poor family; 
Emerson was one of five sons, so was Farragut; John Wesley 
the founder of Methodism, was the eighteenth child of his 
parents; Ignatius Loyola was the eighth; Saint Catherine of 
Sienna, among the greatest women intellectually and morally 
that Europe ever produced, was the twenty-fourth child of her 
parents. This list can be extended indefinitely from the 
biographical dictionaries. Every enormous fortune made in 
America was built up originally by a man who arose from the 
depths Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Astor, Ryan, Have- 
meyer, Schwab, Ford, Gould, and so on. Poverty is a necessary 
foundation for a great fortune. The great soldiers of the world 
almost without exception rose from the ranks of poverty 
Napoleon, Washington, Sheridan, Grant, Sherman, Pershing, 
De Lacy in Russia, Prim in Spain, O Higgins in Chili, Stone 
wall Jackson, and others. The powerful Dukes of Tetuan in 


Spain came from an Irish adventurer, the fifth of eight sons 
of a poor man. Big families make for strength of character 
in the struggle for existence; the solitary child in a family is 
pampered, spoiled. 

Advocates of birth control say that Holland has had a 
Neornalthusian League openly operative since 1881, with fifty- 
two clinics where contraceptive information is publicly given. 
As a direct consequence, and solely from the work of this 
League, Holland has a dropping death rate and an increase 
in population, and even the stature of the Dutch has increased 
four inches since 1881. The main objection to these state 
ments about Holland is that they are absolutely false in every 
particular except that the population of Holland has increased 
from other causes. Before the great war every civilized 
nation had a dropping death rate and an increase in population 
except France where birth control worked against the increase 
made by the progress of preventive medicine and a diffusion of 
sanitary methods. The assertion about the fifty-two clinics in 
Holland w r as investigated. An army officer sent out by the 
committee searched fourteen days before he could find even 
one secret birth control propaganda station. The present prime 
minister of Holland, de Beerenbrouk, is an earnest Catholic 
man, and if anyone talks birth control in Holland during his 
administration he guarantees them a long term in jail. There 
was really a Neomalthusian League with 6,704 members, now 
greatly decreased in number, in the northern Protestant prov 
inces of Holland. As a matter of fact just where this league 
exists the birth rate decreased and the death rate increased 
and where it did not exist the direct opposite is true. As to 
the increase of four inches in stature since this is a physical 
impossibility the spinner of the original yarn was an ignorant 
romancer, lacking plausibility in his untruth. "Where there is 
birth control there are no children to increase or maintain the 
population, but the New York birth controller who invented the 
Dutch story says that in Holland where there are no children 
born through birth control the population increases through 
birth control. 

The birth control movement assumes that the world suffers 


from overpopulation. It does not; it suffers from incorrect 
distribution of populations, and no doctrine of birth control 
will ever affect this fact. All the authorities on the statistics 
of population tell us it requires an average of four children 
to each family to keep the population even stationary, not to 
talk of overcrowding. Two children reaching maturity replace 
their parents, and because of the high mortality in infancy, and 
the large number of the unmarried and the birth controllers 
and abortionists, four children are needed to a family to make 
a new generation as large as the old. An average of one, two, 
or even three children to a family means a loss in population, 
unless the loss is supplied, as in the United States, by immi 
gration. An average of five or six children means an increase 
in the population. Having none or two children to a family 
and relying on immigration to preserve the nations means 
political annihilation, as can be readily shown. In New York 
State in 1919 instead of the required four children to keep 
the population stationary, as far as the native Americans are 
concerned, there was one child to every ten families. 

The American nation was founded and built up wholly 
by Nordic races, immigrants from Great Britain and Ireland, 
Germany, and a few from France, Holland and Sweden. All 
our national traditions are from these Nordic immigrants, our 
notions of self government, our peculiar democracy, our con 
stitution, our language and literature. These Nordic peoples 
are dying out here in appalling numbers for two chief reasons, 
one of w T hich is birth control and the other is the American 
climate. The civilization which affects us has always existed 
along a geographical belt reaching from the British Isles to 
above Home, and covering Great Britain, Ireland, France, 
Spain, middle and western Germany, and Italy to below Flor 
ence. The Grecian civilization was not indigenous, but the 
result of a Nordic occupation, and it ceased centuries before 
Christ. Huntington of Yale and several others have shown, 
by studying the production of thousands of piece workers and 
students over a long time, that man does his best work physic 
ally and mentally under four climatic conditions : a mean tern- 


perature of about sixty-two degrees Fahrenheit for physical 
work and about forty degrees for mental work ; secondly, there 
must be a humidity of about seventy-five per cent. ; thirdly, the 
climate must be variable, be that of the belt of cyclonic storms ; 
fourthly, there must be a quantity of sunlight such as that 
found in the European racial habitat of the person considered. 
These conditions are found curiously in exactly these degrees 
in the civilized parts of Europe and not elsewhere. Above 
and below that area they are lacking and there has never been 
any civilization where they are wanting. The reason physical 
and mental productivity lessen annually with us in December, 
January, and February is because these climatic conditions are 
absent during these three months. 

Again, men are differentiated into races, thrive, develop, 
and reach and maintain mental and physical perfection w-ithin 
well defined climatic areas. Nature preserves the race that 
has acquired through countless ages acclimatization in a given 
environment, and kills off very quickly immigrants coming 
from far north or south of the given latitudes. The natural 
geographical position for the black man is from the equator 
to the thirtieth parallel of north or south latitude. The thirtieth 
parallel in America runs through upper Florida, southern Louis 
iana, and the lowest third of Texas. From the thirtieth to 
the thirty-fifth parallel is the zone of the brown man, like the 
Malay. The thirty-fifth parallel runs along the southern border 
of North Carolina and Tennessee, through the middle of 
Arkansas, New Mexico, Arizona, and the lowest third of Cali 
fornia. From the thirty-fifth to the forty-fifth parallel is the 
zone of the brune Mediterranean races. The forty-fifth paral 
lel passes near Halifax, Bangor in Maine, Ogdensburg, Ottawa, 
and St. Paul. In Europe it runs near Bordeaux, Turin, Bosnia, 
and the Crimea. New York is as far south as Naples, Phila 
delphia is sixty miles south of Naples, and has the sun of 
southern Italy. The Nordic races that we are interested in as 
our origins all live above the United States, and the summer 
temperatures they have been accustomed to are above the 
United States. An immigrant coming from northern Ireland to 
Philadelphia moves southward a thousand miles; a Norwegian 


going to Texas moves southward two thousand miles, and his 
family disappears as a rule in two generations. 

In historic times there have been sudden movements south 
ward of European races for about seven hundred miles and 
all ended disastrously. The Lombards went south from upper 
Prussia to middle Italy at the level of Boston and disappeared 
in two hundred years. The Teutonic Goths went from the 
Baltic to Italy and Spain. They lasted sixty-two years in 
Italy. Eighty thousand Vandals with their families went down 
from Brandenburg to North Africa at the level of Virginia. 
They were annihilated by the climate in one hundred and eight 
years. The Burgundians disappeared in sixty years from 
Greece, as the Celts who had carried the Homeric sagas to 
Greece also disappeared. Rome was great while the Nordic 
Cisalpine Celt ruled it, and died forever with the Celt. Italian 
art ended at Florence, the southern boundary of Cisalpine Gaul. 
The Slav disappeared the same way from southeastern Europe 
and left only language traces to the Turanian and Semite there. 
No European race of pure blood has ever had grandchildren 
in the tropics. 

The northern races of Europe die out with amazing rapidity 
in the northern United States. The Irish death rate at the 
level of New York is double the death rate in Ireland under 
much worse economic conditions ; the death rate of the southern 
Italian and the southern Russian is much better in New York 
than it is in their European racial habitats. 

In 1910 our English immigration was only six per cent, 
of the whole, and the Irish immigration is now negligible 
because there are no more people in Ireland to leave it, but we 
have seven million Slavs who came in during the ten years before 
the war. We have three million southern Italians, three mil 
lion Poles, and hundreds of thousands of nondescript folk from 
all the back alleys of the old world. At an army camp in 
Massachusetts during the late war there were thirty languages 
other than English spoken, and seven thousand men there 
never had heard the term Anglo-Saxon. The extreme southern, 
eastern, and southeastern European hordes are overwhelming us, 
and these hordes never knew a single political principle that 


even remotely resembles what we understand as American prin 
ciples. They come of races who were ruled, if they had any 
rule at all, by despots, but we shall make "Anglo-Saxons," 
Americans, or whatever you like to call the final metamorphosis 
we effect, out of these barbarians. Never ! Even in a millenium. 
Centuries from today the Slav here will be a Slav, the Sicilian a 
Sicilian, the Russian a Russian, all with a veneer of American 
slang on the tongue of an eternal racial character. Whole 
counties of Pennsylvania are filled with Germans who have 
been here since before the Revolution and they have not so much 
as learned English yet. The Nordic peoples die out here. Only 
the dark-skinned southern Germans last with us ; the sun kills 
out the red and blond in two or three generations. I recently 
went over fifty Irish families which I knew perfectly, and they 
have degenerated eighty-six per cent, numerically and otherwise 
in my own lifetime: killed off by the climate which keeps our 
southern states empty of white men. By two American censuses 
and one English we know that fifty per cent, of Washington s 
army was born in Ireland, but there are no Irish in the revolu 
tionary societies because the Revolutionary Irish have disap 

If there is any chance at all for our civilization, flimsy as 
it is, this world must be ruled by the Nordic European races, 
not by the southern, eastern and southeastern European bar 
barian Semite. We must rule for our own sake and for their 
sake ; they can not rule anything. If we do not rule them, then 
welcome the final curtain as soon as possible. How can we 
rule America, not to think of the rest of the world, unless we 
have Nordic children to take our place, and how can we have 
such children if we let sex-brained misfits run about spread 
ing contraceptive drivel ? The rascal that preaches such 
doctrine is a traitor to America, the worst enemy our country 
ever has had, more treacherous than any spy that sneaked in 
among us during the war just past. The French have had their 
lesson in birth control, and we should learn from their mis 
fortune. In the first six months of 1914 when Europe was 
still at peace the total number of births in France was 381,- 
398 ; a decrease of 4,000 on the year 1913. At the same time 


the deaths increased 20,845. Thus the population of France 
during the first six months of 1914 decreased 24,816. For the 
past thirty years the birth rate of that country has steadily 
decreased by contraceptive methods, while the death rate has 
increased proportionately to the number of inhabitants. Jan 
uary, 1916, found France with about seven hundred thousand 
less people than she had in January, 1914, and then came the 
horrible carnage of the great war. No matter what change of 
heart war may bring to France no increase in her population 
can be expected for many years yet to come. She is daily crying 
out to the world for treaties to protect her from Germany, de 
spite the prostration of Germany, because she knows Germany 
had a birth rate of two males for her one, and for twenty 
years to come Germany probably can put twice as many men 
into the field as France can. If France will give over her 
unclean birth control she will not need to whine for protection. 
The advocates of birth control assert that it lessens venereal 
diseases. It does not; it increases the spread of venereal 
disease. The more reasonable among the birth control propa 
gandists are anxious lest their public talks suggest temptation 
to the young. There is at present for youth the deterrent of 
the natural consequences of lust; with birth control knowledge 
spread broadcast that check is removed and promiscuity will 
become more general, because safer socially. Venereal dis 
eases will spread also as incontinence spreads. Nowhere in 
the world has the crime of birth control been practised as in 
France nor for a longer time, and in that country together 
with the lowest birth rate in the world there is the highest 
death rate from venereal diseases according to Dr. Dublin the 
statistician of the New York Metropolitan Life Insurance 
Company. Not long ago one of the leading medical writers 
of France, Doyen, said in the Academy of Medicine in Paris 
that syphilis is the chief cause of death in France. France 
now asserts she has given over birth control, but that is a hard 
disease to cure after it has been established. Unchastity is its 
own punishment, and if France goes the way of those nations 
that have died along the pathway of civilization, and great 


would be the pity, she has nothing to blame for it but this 
abominal moral leprosy, birth control. She is as striking an 
example of the insanity of birth control as Kussia is of the 
insanity of communism. 


Abnormal pelves, 133, 134 135 
Abortion, 91 

after fifth month, 102 

agents of, 117 

American law on, 119 

causes of, 92 

civil law on, 121 

Council of Lerida on, 115 

Council of Worms on, 115 

decretal of Gregory on, 115 

direct, 109 

excommunication for, 116, 117 

Gregory XIV on, 116 

habitual, 98 

Holy Office decrees on, 118 

homicide in, 110 

incomplete, 101 

inevitable, 101 

irregularity and, 117 

morality of, 109-114 

morphine in, 101 

paternal causes of, 95 

Pius IX on, 116 

precautions against, 105, 106 

prognosis after, 100 

sepsis after, 105 

SLxtus V on, 115 

statistics of, 97, 98 

symptoms of, 99 

syphilis and, 107 

tampon, use of, 103 

therapeutic, 107, 109 

threatened, 99 

treatment of, 102 

violence and, 94 
Abruptio placentae, 144 

causes of, 144 

effects of, 144 
Acute yellow atrophy of the liver, 


Aggressor, 17, 19 
Amnion, 52 
Amphiaster, 44 
Anaesthesia and the fetus, 93 
Analgine, 240 

Animal heat, 71 
Animal life, 48 
Animation, 33, 39 

Aristotle on, 39 

biologists on, 49 

Conklin on, 73 

Fienus on, 35 

Greek fathers on, 33 

Greek philosophers on, 33 

St. Alphonsus on, 39 

St. Anselm on, 35 

St. Augustine on, 34 

St. Gregory of Nyssa on, 35 

St. Thomas on, 35 

Zacchias on, 36 

Aortic stenosis in pregnancy, 175 
Apparent death, 82 
Appendicitis in pregnancy, 152 
Archenteron, 50 
Artificial impregnation, 258 
Attraction sphere, 40 

Baer on twilight sleep, 240 
Baptism of monsters, 80 
Beginning of life, 33 
Blameless defence, 18 
Blastocyst, 50 
Blastulas, 50 

Braxton-Hicks version, 143 
Bright s disease in pregnancy, 157 
Broad ligament, 124 

Cancers in pregnancy, 149 

morality of operation, 150 
Canonical irregularity, 23, 24, 25 
Capital punishment, 31 
Carrington s vasectomies, 248 
Catalepsy, 85 

in pregnancy, 160 
Cell, 40 

bridges, 60 

differentiation, 67, 68 

division, 41, 42 

heredity, 45 

life, 48 




Cell, motion, 70 

reduction, 45 

union, 65, 66 
Centrosome, 40 
Cesarean delivery, 132 

amputation of the uterus after, 

indications for, 132 

morality of, 136, 137 

repeated sections, 140 

sterilizations and, 139, 140, 141 
Chemico-vital changes, 70, 71 
Cholera in pregnancy, 195 
Chorea gravidarum, 181 
Chorion, 51 
Chromosome, 42 

numbers of, 43 
Chromatin, 41 
Circumstances, 3 

Citizen as member of the State, 31 
Coelom, 51 

Coition in gestation, 95, 96, 97 
Congenital tuberculosis, 189 
Conscience, 12 

Constitution Effraenatam, 115 
Contingent being, 1 
Contracted pelves, 133 
Craniotomy and excommunication, 

DammerscJilaf, 231 
Death, signs of, 89, 90 
De Lugo on the State, 31 
Development of the body, 56 
Diagnosis, percentage of correct, 


Diabetes in pregnancy, 229 
Differentiation by position, 68, 69 
Division, direct and indirect, 42 
Double effects, 18, 26 
Double monsters, 78, 79 
Dry labor, 109 

Eclampsia parturientium, 161 

abortion in, 165 

expectant treatment of, 166 

forced delivery in, 165 

mortality, 163, 168 

Lichtenstein s method in, 166 

precautions against, 164 

symptoms of, 161 

veratrum viride in, 167 
Ectoderm, 50 

derivatives of, 51 

Ectopic gestation, 123 

decrees of the Holy Office on, 
128, 129 

diagnosis of, 126, 127 

morality of operations, 129, 130 
Effects of an action, 6 
Egg shell, 47 
Embryo, 33 

growth of, 50 

stages of, 52 
End of an action, 4 
End of life, 82 
Endoderm, 50 
Endomclritis, 93 
Eutelechy, 60 

Erysipelas in pregnancy, 196 
Eunuchs, 255, 256 
Euthanasia, 1 

Fallopian tubes, 123 
Fecundation, 124 
Fetus, 33 

and the dead mother, 87 

at term, 54 

months, 53, 54, 55 

stages, 53 
Fibrillation, 174 
Fibroids, 146 
Fission theory, 77 
Form, 60 

Gemmule theory, 58 
Germ cells, 44 
God s existence, 2 
Gonorrhoea in marriage, 211 

abortion and, 224 

blindness and, 226 

conservative surgery for, 217 

effects, 212, 213, 215, 216, 225, 

operations for, 216 

professional secret and, 212 

tests of cure, 211 

treatment by heat, 228 
Good, 3 
Grippe, 194 

Happiness, 2 

Hastening of death, 111 

Hebosteotomy, 135 

Heart beat, 83 

Heart block, 173 

Heart diseases in labor, 172, 174 

Heart diseases in pregnancy, 169 


Heart diseases in pregnancy, 

Mayo clinic on, 173 
Heart, origin of, 52 
Homicide, 13 

accidental, 19 

arguments against, 14, 15, 16, 17 

bibliography of, 22 

direct and indirect, 13 

self-defence and, 17, 18, 19 
Human terata, 78 
Hyperemesis gravidarum, 176 

imitative, 183 

major and minor, 184 

marriage and, 185 

in pregnancy, 181, 182, 183 

Icterus gravis, 186 
Impotence, 258 

opinions on, 252 
Infectious diseases in pregnancy, 


Influenza in pregnancy, 194 

puerperal, 154 

spread of, 266 

Kant on morality, 29 
Karyokinesis, 41 

La grippe in pregnancy, 194 

Law, definition of, 28 

Life in separated tissues, 73, 74 

Malaria in pregnancy, 196 

Male generative system, 248 

Male pronucleus, 49 

Maniacal chorea, 182 

Marriage, end of, 254 

Mayhem, 23 

Means of an action, 5 

Measles in pregnancy, 195 

Mesoderm, 50 

Metabolism of the cell, 69, 70, 72 

Metaphases of mitosis, 44 

Midwives, 138 

Mignonette case, 113 

Mitosis, 41 

Miscarriage, 91 

Mitral regurgitation in pregnancy, 

Monsters, 75 

by displacement, 78 

multiple, 76 

Morality, 3 

determinants of, 3 

effects on fetus, 234 

effects in labor, 234, 235 
Morula, 50 
Mutilation, 23 

argument against, 26, 27 

argument for, 27 

civil law on, 23 

direct and indirect, 26 

Molina on, 24 

St. Alphonsus on, 25 

State and, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 

self-mutilation, 26 

Suarez on, 24 
Myomata in pregnancy, 146 

effects of, 147 

fetus and, 148 

mortality of, 147 

Natural law, 2, 12 
Necessary being, 1 
Nephritis in pregnancy, 157 

treatment of, 158 

varieties of, 158 
Nervous system, 51 
Nucleus, 40, 46 

Object of an action, 3 
Onanism, 256 

Operations during pregnancy, 94 
Operative risk in cardiopaths, 173 
Ophthalmia neonatorum, 226, 227, 

Organs, origin of, 51 

of the body, 64 

removal of, 218, 223 

resection of, 221 

Ovarian tumors in pregnancy, 148 
Ovarian, 247 

decrees of the Holy Office on, 
252, 253 

effects of, 219 

impotence and, 252, 254, 255 

psychoses after, 219, 220, 221 
Ovum, 33, 47 
Oxidation, 72 

Pangens, 68 
Paresis, 204 
Parturition, 169, 231, 232, 233 



Partus cesamis, 132 
Pathogenesis, 48, 49 
Pelvic diameters, 132 
Penal law, 31 

Pernicious vomit of pregnancy, 

abortion for, 180 

causes and symptoms, 177 

diagnosis of, 179 

treatment, 179 
Pituitrin, 170 
Placental infection, 188 
Placental osmosis, 189 
Placenta praevia, 142 
Plastid, 40 

Pneumonia in pregnancy, 192, 192 
Polak s operation on the tubes, 222 
Polar body, 46 
Porro s operation, 136 
Preformationists, 56 
Premature infants, 55 
Premature labor, 98, 108 
Probabilism, 6 
Prophases of mitosis, 44 
Protoplasmic bridges, 67 
Puerperal insanity, 154 

prognosis, 155 

sterilization and, 154 
Pyelitis in pregnancy, 160 

Quacks, 22 

Resuscitation, 83, 84 

methods of, 88 
Right and wrong, 3 
Rupture of Fallopian tube, 125 

Sacraments in apparent death, 82 
Salpingectomy, 217 
Salpingostomy, 217 
Salpingotomy, 217 
Scarlatina in pregnancy, 195 
Scopolamine, 233 
Secrets, 206, 207 
Segmentation cavity, 50 
Segmentation nucleus, 49 
Self-defence, 17, 18 
Semen, 247 
Sixtus V, bull of, 255 
Smallpox in pregnancy, 191 
Soul, 60 

Spaltungstheorie, 76 
Spermatozoon, 46, 47, 48 
Spermin, 247 

Spindle, 44 
Spireme, 43 

citizen and, 30 

dominion of, 28, 29 

end of, 29 

Sterilization of women, 251 
Substantial form, 60, 62, 75 
Suicide, 7 

arguments against, 7-12 
Suspended animation, 85 
Syncytium, 52, 66 
Symphyseotomy, 135 

abortion in, 200 

curability of, 203 

fetal, 201 

incurability of, 204 

marriage and, 205 

nervous system affections, 204 

pregnancy in, 200, 202 

professional secret in, 206 

Tabes, 204 

Telophases in mitosis, 44 

Terata, 75 

Tetrads, 46 

Tocanalgine, 240 

Tonics, 48 

Traducianism, 34 

Trophoblast, 50 

Tubal abortion, 125 

Tuberculosis in pregnancy, 196, 
197, 198 

Tumors in pregnancy, 146 

Tumors and premature labor, 109 

Twilight sleep, 231 

authorities opposed to, 238, 239 
effects of, 240, 241, 242, 243 
methods used, 235, 236, 237 

Twins, 76 

Two-celled stage of the embryo, 65 

Typhoid in the fetus, 190 

Typhoid in pregnancy, 196 

Typhus in pregnancy, 196 

Unity of the soul, 65 
Uterine adnexa, 123 
Uterus, abnormalities of, 124 
anatomy of, 123 

Vaccination, 191 

Vas defercns, restoration of, 249, 



Vasectomy, 244 

arguments against, 260-265 

bibliography, 266, 267 

bull of Sixtus V and, 255, 


effects of, 248, 249 
grave mutilation, 259 
hereditary disease and, 264 
impotence and, 251 
morality of, 259 
not a punishment, 263, 264 
operation for, 247 
reasons for the operation, 245, 


Vasectomy, State and, 244 
State surgeon and, 265 

Venereal diseases, 

prevalence of, 213, 214, 215 

Verwachsungstheorie, 76 

Viability of the fetus, 54, 114 

Vital principle, 58, 61 

Vital processes, 69 

Weak pains, 171 
Weismann s theories, 49, 56 

Yellow atrophy of the liver, 186 
Yolk sac, 52 


"Thoughts are the Masters and the Thinkers 
are the Doers." Confucius. 

One of the most successful of teachers is a Montreal Prin 
cipal successful because she insistently teaches undergradu 
ates to THINK. Force of thought is better than force of 
will. A triphammer is all force, but unless guided by a 
THINKER strikes a pile or a cream-puff with equal power. 
Then there is the nagger with a tongue-will of poiseless per 
petual power but thought-proof. 

Do you as host, hostess or guest 
want a spur to cleverness of thought, 
wit and repartee? 

Do you fail in clearness of thought 
and expression especially in conver 
sation ? 

Do you teach, preach or lecture? 

Do you dictate at home(?) at office 
or both? 

Do you want to give straight-to- 
the-point advice to your children, 
your friends, your employees and 

If an employer you will commend 
your employees surely to the stenog 

If easily discouraged, a victim of 
worry, fear, the blues, "Keystones" 
is your prescription. 

Is Christianity a Failure? Have 
you an active or passive grouch 
against the clergy (a now fashion 
able disease usually confined to the 
middle aisle) because of "what they 
say and do and because of the way 
they live"? 

Do you want something to "crib" for public dinners and 
other occasions? The "greatest after-dinner speaker in the 
world" is a New Yorker. Never lengthy, always aphoristic, 
he says more in five minutes than all the "wax-works" on the 
dais drone or spout in hours. 




The only book of original and genuine aphorisms in English. 

Written by "the World s master of aphoristic thought 

and expression." 

"The successful ophorist is about ten thousand times scarcer than the 
successful essayist, or st>.ry teller, or Assyriologist. Humor without 
effort, wit without bitterness, philosophy unthout pretension! Dr. O Malley 
has written a book that is worth possessing." From a review of the book 
written by the editor of the N. Y. Sun himself. 

Special gift book edition, suf-do. gold edges, In box a very useful 

ornament for Den, Desk, or Drawing Room, $4.00 net, Postpaid. 

Cloth, gold letters and design, $2.00 net, Postpaid. 

NOTE: Whether young or old, Sage or Seer, Poet, Philos 
opher, or what-not, if you think YOU can match KEY 
STONES pF THOUGHT in aphoristic originality, in depth, 
deftness, wit, wisdom and humor in tonic-cheer for all of life s 
worries, troubles and adversities, you are welcome to try. If 
successful The Devin-Adair Company will send you a check 
for an acceptable but well-earned sum, and your work will 
be promptly published.